4um: disinformation

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles
Title: disinformation
Source: 4um
URL Source: http://freedom4um.com
Published: Jan 11, 2015
Author: Deasy
Post Date: 2015-01-11 22:16:42 by Deasy
Keywords: rt, xinhua, aljazzera
Views: 202
Comments: 6

I'll make this short. RT and Global Research are piping lots of news at us. So is Xinhua and Al Jazeera. These are well-funded news agencies with lots of staff. One thing I've noticed is that they're consistent only about one thing: breaking down consensus among Americans about any important issue for national survival. The reporting is truthful, objective, and fills in a huge gap left by our controlled media. But on any given issue, they'll take a side, any side, sometimes both sides, and pump out consensus-busting information to all takers.
Think about it. I'm thinking of the Yuri Bezmenov lecture presented by G. Edward Griffin back during the Cold War. He called a dishonest version of the techniques I'm accusing these agencies of using "demoralization."
A proper consensus would lead to massive reforms in our system from top to bottom. Lack of consensus translates to inflexibility and readily-influenced masses. Collapse or disintegration are possible outcomes of inflexibility.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Deasy (#0)
it's either info, or disinfo. either way, disecting information is a very interesting and fun proposition. im sort of addicted to it.

so, we can either wade thru all this, or whatever aspect interests each of us personally, or be like the dolts that sit in front of the tube and watch sports or nonsense all day. and then you have the folks who don't have time for any of it, and are just struggling to survive!

I just saw this study which says most americans don't have 500 bucks
http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2015/01/most- americans-dont-have-savings-to-pay.html

life is short, can be very short. so I suppose people will do how they feel best suits their time . to each their own.
"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28
Artisan posted on 2015-01-11 22:50:31 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#2. To: Deasy (#0) (Edited)
RT and Global Research are piping lots of news at us. So is Xinhua and Al Jazeera. These are well-funded news agencies with lots of staff. One thing I've noticed is that they're consistent only about one thing: breaking down consensus among Americans about any important issue for national survival. The reporting is truthful, objective, and fills in a huge gap left by our controlled media. But on any given issue, they'll take a side, any side, sometimes both sides, and pump out consensus-busting information to all takers.
Think about it. I'm thinking of the Yuri Bezmenov lecture presented by G. Edward Griffin back during the Cold War. He called a dishonest version of the techniques I'm accusing these agencies of using "demoralization."
A proper consensus would lead to massive reforms in our system from top to bottom. Lack of consensus translates to inflexibility and readily-influenced masses. Collapse or disintegration are possible outcomes of inflexibility.

Depends on what you'd like the consensus to be on what, doesn't it? Tell me the difference between you and them, Deasy. On the Paris issue, what you've advocated is that there shouldn't be a consensus yet about this alleged terror attack, which is one of the most blatantly obvious false flag stagings ever seen. And why not? If there shouldn't be a prompt agreement to resist that as clearly more than absurd and, instead, we ought to send a consensus message to the scripters that there's evidently nothing they call news for their Police State and War agendas that can be seen as a false flag action and called so in rapid enough formation to deter their processions, if not that, then I'm nearly convinced at this point that it's a complete waste of time to question anything else of their Psychological Warfare antics.
Reconstruction edits.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
GreyLmist posted on 2015-01-12 3:27:39 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#3. To: Artisan (#1)
it's either info, or disinfo.

I think it can be both. What's important here is that these sources aren't on our side. They each have an agenda, just like every other source.

Deasy posted on 2015-01-12 13:13:35 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#4. To: GreyLmist (#2)
On the Paris issue, what you've advocated is that there shouldn't be a consensus yet

For me that's rational at this point. I've already explained that my "reaction" isn't different in either situation: false-flag or otherwise.

Deasy posted on 2015-01-12 13:34:14 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#5. To: Deasy (#4) (Edited)
On the Paris issue, what you've advocated is that there shouldn't be a consensus yet about this alleged terror attack, which is one of the most blatantly obvious false flag stagings ever seen. And why not?

For me that's rational at this point.

Why do you think it's rational to not agree that alleged "news footage" linked above is a staged PsyOp?
Edited quote section.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
GreyLmist posted on 2015-01-12 14:13:40 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#6. To: GreyLmist (#5)
I haven't watched it.

Deasy posted on 2015-01-12 14:18:57 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um