SGT Report contributor and firearms expert Mark S. Mann joins us to analyze the alleged shooting of a police officer in Paris during the Charlie Hebdo massacre. The image from the moment before the head shot was distributed and used by the mockingbird mainstream media worldwide the day after the massacre. And now the full video showing the shooting of the officer is being scrubbed from You Tube and edited elsewhere. We wonder, why?
Mark Mann said "whether or not this event was a false flag, the fact of the matter is they are certainly using it to their full politcal advantage to use it as a justification for wider war or in an expansion of war in the Middle East with Syria, Iran, Al Qaeda, ISIS, whatever you want to call it. So regardless of what has happened here, it is being used as a justification to expand wider war. We're going to see more bombing. We're going to see more boots on the ground. We're going to see the American taxpayer to pony up for more weapons."
The mainstream media continues to push the story that this officer was killed by a head wound. One report by UK-based Sky News seems to admit having placed fake blood at the scene.
Sky News presenter suffers Freudian Slip: "You can see the blood on the ground, which has been put there to..."
He then catches himself and clarifies, "because of the blood that was shed on this spot yesterday."
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
So, the cop isn't dead? How come these internet sleuths haven't gone to his home and interviewed him?? Can't have an open-ended "conspiracy" without a solid, irrefutable living casualty. Internet: bring me that cop!! :p
With the exception of Whites, the rule among the peoples of the world, whether residing in their homelands or settled in Western democracies, is ethnocentrism and moral particularism: they stick together and good means what is good for their ethnic group." -Alex Kurtagic
Engineer Jordi Mir told The Associated Press he posted the video out of fear and a stupid reflex fostered by years on social media.
I was completely panicked, he said in an exclusive interview across from the Parisian boulevard where the officer was shot to death by terrorists Wednesday morning.
If he'd hit the officer in the upper back, the officer's clothing and body would have absorbed the very visible muzzle blast that is plainly centered forward of and to the left of the officer's head.
I would have no problem with that either if the MSM hadn't reported that he was shot in the head. If they had reported that he was shot in the back, then it would be possible that his bullet proof vest kept all the blood and flesh inside it.
I've watched and re-watched; between 12 and 13 seconds it appears to me the gunman aims first for the head, then lowers his shot slightly for the upper back.
I assume he was wearing a vest so his clothing, post shot, doesn't offer me any indication it's a fabricated hoax.
Just goes to show you how two people can look at the same record and see two different events.
To me, the muzzle blast indicated that the axis of the barrel is plainly to the shooter's left of the officer's head.
Viewing from the shooter's right, the rifle does appear to pointed at the supposed victim vertically.
Perspective makes it more difficult to determine the aim horizontally however. Just a few degrees to the left or right make the difference between a miss or a kill shot. It's very hard to tell from the camera lens point of view just where that muzzle is directed. The muzzle blast is determinative here, IMHO.
The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable. ~ H. L. Mencken
Some observer noted that a "real" AK round fired into the sidewalk would have done much more damage than raise of puff of dust.
I agree with that.
The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable. ~ H. L. Mencken
I'm glad Watson is taking this position, and I can't see any argument regarding how this shooting will be used, the disagreement is between Watson's take and those who see a hoax fueled by crisis actors.
Besides being dreadfully dopey, I can't tell if there is a shooting lane for this dunce or not. Even if there was, he/she needs to find a new job. But fake bullets? This announcer hasn't a clue.
Some observer noted that a "real" AK round fired into the sidewalk would have done much more damage
That's a good point. I've shot maybe 1000 rounds of 7.62 at various surfaces, and there's something about the appearance of this shot that doesn't look right to me.
there is a change in the report of the shots being fired by the black-clad crazies. Just before that (at ca. 55 sec's) the cameraman says, "C'est faux balles." IOW, they're false bullets. (Blanks.)
Lod: Some observer noted that a "real" AK round fired into the sidewalk would have done much more damage
randge: That's a good point. I've shot maybe 1000 rounds of 7.62 at various surfaces, and there's something about the appearance of this shot that doesn't look right to me.
If the sidewalk wasn't damaged because the gun was out of bullets at the time of the shot to it, in your opinion, would an empty AK then fire a blast of air at high enough velocity to raise a cloud of dust?
What is the likelihood of someone being shot in the back by an AK and not visibly being moved from the impact, even if they were wearing a protective vest?
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
If the sidewalk wasn't damaged because the gun was out of bullets at the time of the shot to it, in your opinion, would an empty AK then fire a blast of air at high enough velocity to raise a cloud of dust?
If the shooter had been out of ammo, nothing would exit the muzzle if the trigger had been pulled. We'd have seen zero, zip, nada. However a blank - a cartridge case loaded with powder but without a bullet - would raise some detritus if fired directly at a dusty sidewalk. Now a live round, one containing both powder and a projectile, might have a much more dramatic impact.
What is the likelihood of someone being shot in the back by an AK and not visibly being moved from the impact, even if they were wearing a protective vest?
A vid is worth a million words. Here is a video of the ammo used in an AK, (7.62x39) fired from a similar commie rifle.
disagreement is between Watson's take and those who see a hoax fueled by crisis actors.
You keep insinuating that crisis actors are just fiction, as if Intel and LEOs could never be cast in such roles and 4um should auto-shift into mainstream media format whenever alleged terrorism by Muslim/Arabs is presented as news, despite any past evidence of false flag framings so; such as the King David Hotel attack misdirectionally attributed to them during the British Mandate of Palestine.
Flashback - reported in 2008 as a good program for America; France, too, probably:
JINSA's Law Enforcement Exchange Program (LEEP) program is designed to establish cooperation between American and Israeli law enforcement personnel and to give the American law enforcement community access to the hard "lessons learned" by the Israelis in the interdiction of and response to all forms of terrorism.
US Generals, Admirals Are On JINSA Board Of Advisors! http://www.jinsa.org/board-advisors/all
French .mils also, most likely.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Great demonstration of why the Paris' sidewalk shooting was such a hoax, thanks.
That's one reason, why in Vietnam, if our guys could procure an AK, they'd throw away their ARs.
As you know, the AK is the most produced weapon of its type in the world.
Don't leave home without one.
The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable. ~ H. L. Mencken
Thanks for your input, randge. It think it definitively indicates that there was no realistic bullet-impact to the policeman on the ground or to the sidewalk either and that the dust cloud seen was most probably from blank gunfire.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
I haven't researched this event in great detail but my superficial perusal suggests that:
a. this event was real - it happened - no actors
b. as to the perps - could have been Sunni extremists actually
c. "assets"gone rogue trained by one of our alphabet agencies to overthrow somebody somewhere
d. I smell Mossad in the mix - Izzy benefits' from the attack - French educated Jews want to emigrate to IsraHell tout de suite - what a coinkeydance
What's super ironic is that for all the bruhaha in Paris re: the support of free speech, it's a crime in Europe to speak freely about the Holocaust. Go figure.
#34. To: Lod, randge, Jethro Tull, shooters, christine, 4 (#23)
Some observer noted that a "real" AK round fired into the sidewalk would have done much more damage than raise of puff of dust.
Not if the round struck the sidewalk before ricocheting into the back/neck of the target. The puff would be just about what I saw in an earlier video produced.
d. I smell Mossad in the mix - Izzy benefits' from the attack - French educated Jews want to emigrate to IsraHell tout de suite - what a coinkeydance
Here's one clue that such could have happened: how did they know there would be a meeting at the time of the attack? Did this crew know enough to do weeks of pre-op surveillance to find out the patterns of these (probable) work from home creative types? It's not impossible though.
You should go to an outdoor range and learn about shooting a center-fire round.
It's nothing like in that video, at all.
The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable. ~ H. L. Mencken