4um: Field McConnell - Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot Used On 9/11 Planes, Impossible To Hijack!

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
9/11
See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Field McConnell - Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot Used On 9/11 Planes, Impossible To Hijack!
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5NnBQJ5at4
Published: Jan 24, 2015
Author: staff
Post Date: 2015-01-24 14:13:06 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 11385
Comments: 402

Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 126.
#2. To: Horse (#0) (Edited)
Nothing is uninterruptible, expect maybe a nuclear reaction. They definitely were "hijacked" in a sense because they never reached their destinations and they most definitely didn't hit the towers due to not physically being able to stay together at the recorded speeds the planes were flying at when they hit the towers at basically sea level.

RickyJ posted on 2015-01-24 16:18:47 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#81. To: RickyJ (#2)
They definitely were "hijacked" in a sense because they never reached their destinations...

CTers usually prefer to state that the planes were *diverted* to a place or places *unknown*...congrats...you may be on the road to recovery...

war posted on 2015-04-01 9:20:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#83. To: war (#81) (Edited)
CTers

The official story is a ridiculous Conspiracy Theory, war, that admittedly would be unacceptable by court standards of integrity and is why the invasion of Afghanistan was launched instead -- which makes you and others arrogantly promoting it fanatic Conspiracy Theorists in denial.
Edited for capitalization and punctuation + word insert.

GreyLmist posted on 2015-04-01 14:39:49 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#84. To: GreyLmist (#83) (Edited)
The official story is a ridiculous conspiracy theory...

Yea...never have planes been hijacked...nor been used as missiles...a massive explosion and collision don't result in massive damage...10's of thousands of gallons of a volatile accelerant doesn't cause significant fires when introduced, ignited, in to a fuel rich environment doesn't result in fires of any significance and, my personal favorite, gravity doesn't *work* in a direct fashion but in a circuitous one...i.e. a falling object doesn't fall straight down...
PS: If we were going to bomb any nation over a pipeline in that region it would have been Russia...

war posted on 2015-04-01 15:03:46 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#85. To: war, GreyLmist (#84)
10's of thousands of gallons of a volatile accelerant doesn't cause significant fires when introduced,
MOST of which burnt up OUTSIDE the towers, and what was left burned for only several minutes before being spent.
ignited, in to a fuel rich environment doesn't result in fires of any significance
Sure there were OFFICE fires, but they burned for less than an hour, and as the towers acted as HUGE heatsinks, there's no possible way for temperatures to have reached anywhere close enough to weaken steel.
and, my personal favorite, gravity doesn't *work* in a direct fashion but in a circuitous one...i.e. a falling object doesn't fall straight down...
Gravity doesn't pull you through the floor you're standing on now does it? Are you travelling through the core of the earth as we speak, or is the floor you're standing on remaining in place?

FormerLurker posted on 2015-04-01 15:28:00 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#86. To: FormerLurker (#85)
MOST of which burnt up OUTSIDE the towers

You have no proof of that whatsoever...in fact, what analysis has been done puts the amount burned as ignited mist outside of the building @ around 15%...

war posted on 2015-04-01 15:38:50 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#93. To: war (#86) (Edited)
You have no proof of that whatsoever...in fact, what analysis has been done puts the amount burned as ignited mist outside of the building @ around 15%...

You are either chronically challenged in the intellectual department, or you are a HUGE liar.
Not only do videos of the South Tower impact depict huge fireballs created outside the tower, but even FEMA states in their report that a significant percentage of fuel was spent in those fireballs, and the remaining fuel was spent after the first few minutes.
Here's a link to the FEMA report if you wish to educate yourself (see pages 2- 21 and 2-22);
WTC1 and WTC2 (FEMA PDF)
Do you not read up on anything before you make such inane declarations?

FormerLurker posted on 2015-04-01 16:19:00 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#109. To: FormerLurker (#93)
FEMA states in their report that a significant percentage of fuel was spent in those fireballs...

In point of fact the very FEMA report you link to says no such thing...
The discussion of fuel dispersal and the fireball begins on 2-20...
Again, your bullshit has been *falsified*...

war posted on 2015-04-02 9:46:18 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#114. To: war (#109)
Tell me, what's it like being a poster-boy for the establishment?

Katniss posted on 2015-04-02 10:55:12 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#115. To: Katniss (#114)
Tell me, what's it like being a poster-boy for the establishment?

I'm anything but...
You have no idea how I wish that this bullshit was true...

war posted on 2015-04-02 10:56:26 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#117. To: war (#115)
You come across as a defender of establishment lies.

Katniss posted on 2015-04-02 10:59:50 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#119. To: Katniss (#117)
You come across as a defender of establishment lies.

For nearly 14 years no one has demonstrated that they are lies...
On the other hand, what has been presented to me over that same time period, and is on display on this very page, has been very easily falsified...
I am a big believer in Occam's Razor...

war posted on 2015-04-02 11:17:12 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#123. To: war (#119)
For nearly 14 years no one has demonstrated that they are lies...

That a whopper of a lie in and of itself....

FormerLurker posted on 2015-04-02 11:55:39 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#126. To: FormerLurker (#123)
That a whopper of a lie in and of itself....

Nothing that you have stated as fact - except for how long the fires in WTC 2 burned and you did that by accident - has withstood scrutiny...nothing...
I've heard all of this crap almost from the get go...in fact, the FEMA report that you are promoting here is what started all the CT bullshit...
Here's a helpful hint...planes that are deliberately commandeered and do not reach their destination are hijacked. Saying that the planes on 9/11 were NOT hijacked when they fully fit the above definition - regardless of who did it and why - is pretty freakin' *dumb*...

war posted on 2015-04-02 12:36:45 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 126.
#136. To: war (#126)
Nothing that you have stated as fact

By his sources they are.
Therein lies the problem.
I'm sure that despite the ever-growing preponderance of a consensus, he still believes that 7 fell from terrorist activity too.
Honestly, and we wonder why this stuff flies. Too many people simply want to believe it because it's politically expedient for them to do so.

Katniss posted on 2015-04-02 13:08:07 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#140. To: war (#126)
Here's a helpful hint...planes that are deliberately commandeered and do not reach their destination are hijacked. Saying that the planes on 9/11 were NOT hijacked when they fully fit the above definition - regardless of who did it and why - is pretty freakin' *dumb*...

Please point out any post I've made here where I've said the planes were NOT hijacked. Of course they were hijacked, the big question is by WHOM, and HOW.
We know they weren't hijacked by those claimed by the US government, since more than a few of them have publically appeared and stated they were obviously not the ones who hijacked those aircraft.
We also know that the cell phone calls were faked, since it was impossible for cell phone calls to be made from cruising altitude back in 2001.
So WHY were those calls faked, and WHO would have the ability to do such a thing?

FormerLurker posted on 2015-04-02 13:19:44 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
End Trace Mode for Comment # 126.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um