4um: Field McConnell - Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot Used On 9/11 Planes, Impossible To Hijack!

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
9/11
See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Field McConnell - Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot Used On 9/11 Planes, Impossible To Hijack!
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5NnBQJ5at4
Published: Jan 24, 2015
Author: staff
Post Date: 2015-01-24 14:13:06 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 11240
Comments: 402

Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 185.
#2. To: Horse (#0) (Edited)
Nothing is uninterruptible, expect maybe a nuclear reaction. They definitely were "hijacked" in a sense because they never reached their destinations and they most definitely didn't hit the towers due to not physically being able to stay together at the recorded speeds the planes were flying at when they hit the towers at basically sea level.

RickyJ posted on 2015-01-24 16:18:47 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#4. To: RickyJ (#2)
not physically being able to stay together at the recorded speeds the planes were flying at when they hit the towers at basically sea level.

X-15 posted on 2015-01-24 17:59:40 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#44. To: X-15 (#4)
What I stated was a fact that Boeing itself says about their planes. What you posted was some videos of planes flying at undetermined speeds that proves nothing. I am surprised there are still any people on this forum that believe the government's lies about 9/11.

RickyJ posted on 2015-01-31 19:56:16 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#47. To: RickyJ (#44)
I'm surprised that anybody thinks that missiles-disguised-as-airliners (cloaking devices right out of Star Trek!!!!!) hit buildings, that's just pot-smoking sci-fi bullshit.

X-15 posted on 2015-02-01 2:12:49 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#48. To: X-15 (#47)
I'm surprised that anybody thinks that missiles-disguised-as-airliners (cloaking devices right out of Star Trek!!!!!) hit buildings, that's just pot-smoking sci-fi bullshit.

Good heavens...
How dare you question "proven facts" that everyone knows to be true?
I have a mutual friend that worked in the Pentagon, was there that fateful day. She said it was a damned airplane that went in, was found there, was removed from there.
We all KNOW that those people that WERE THERE IN THE BUILDING were in on this whole thing, dont we?????????

Cynicom posted on 2015-02-01 3:54:04 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#51. To: Cynicom (#48) (Edited)
I have a mutual friend that worked in the Pentagon, was there that fateful day. She said it was a damned airplane that went in, was found there, was removed from there.
We all KNOW that those people that WERE THERE IN THE BUILDING were in on this whole thing, dont we?????????

Did she happen to say anything about the Pentagon not being in high alert mode enough to even point some of the many surveillance cameras there in the direction(s) of an alleged incoming plane claimed to have been wandering around long after the WTC was reportedly struck twice?
It would not have been necessary for many people in the building to have been in on a staged strike. It wasn't evacuated in that direction, which was burning and billowing with smoke. That section was sparsely populated due to the renovations there that had been ongoing since Clinton's administration, during which the Rumsfeld-spotlighted trillions of dollars in transactions had gone missing/unaccounted for -- some of it, perhaps, black-budgeted to pre-rig that section for inward exploding and imploding FX/effects.
Some interesting YouTube videos, imo:
911 Pentagon - 1 minute
911 Evacuation of Pentagon ordered [a few minutes before the strike and had barely started?], but [ordered] by whom?
911 Washington Monument - less than 1 minute
The Washington Monument blows up on live TV. Or does it?
C-Span; 9/11 Live Coverage - 10 minutes
At 8:48, a fire at the State Department is reported ... a fireball was reportedly witnessed at the Pentagon ... a helicopter explosion was reportedly witnessed at the Pentagon ...
Edited to add video time-data + bracketed insert notations.

GreyLmist posted on 2015-02-02 3:47:06 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#55. To: GreyLmist, Katniss (#51)
Did she happen to say anything about the Pentagon not being in high alert mode enough to even point some of the many surveillance cameras there in the direction(s) of an alleged incoming plane claimed to have been wandering around long after the WTC was reportedly struck twice?

Of course not.
Ask Katniss about that. He worked at the Pentagon.

christine posted on 2015-03-29 14:42:50 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#60. To: christine, Katniss (#55)
Me at #51: Did she [an alleged Pentagon employee and 9/11 plane claimant] happen to say anything about the Pentagon not being in high alert mode enough to even point some of the many surveillance cameras there in the direction(s) of an alleged incoming plane claimed to have been wandering around long after the WTC was reportedly struck twice?
christine at #55: Of course not. Ask Katniss about that. He worked at the Pentagon.

Ok. Am asking, Katniss, what your Pentagon-insights might be in assessment of the issues at #51.

GreyLmist posted on 2015-03-31 14:31:29 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#64. To: GreyLmist, Christine (#60)
BTW, if you're ever in the area, let me know. I'll take you down there and show you where everything used to be, where that 'cab' was, the flight path, where I was run off by an abusive and brainless LEO for publicly taking pics in public a day later, where gas station used to be, which IMO is no a coincidence that it's no longer there, i.e., part of the ongoing coverup.
I can tell you how to find the camera view on the VDOT camera. If you look at it in the a.m., when this happened, in between 9 and 10 a.m., that camera is always pointed towards the northwestern skyline to capture the inbound commuting traffic, as it's a traffic camera, and from it you can see the highways as well as the entire skyline which easily would have captured no less than 10 seconds of the last part of that flight.

Katniss posted on 2015-03-31 21:13:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#80. To: Katniss (#64)
BTW, if you're ever in the area, let me know. I'll take you down there and show you where everything used to be, where that 'cab' was, the flight path, where I was run off by an abusive and brainless LEO for publicly taking pics in public a day later, where gas station used to be, which IMO is no a coincidence that it's no longer there, i.e., part of the ongoing coverup.
I can tell you how to find the camera view on the VDOT camera. If you look at it in the a.m., when this happened, in between 9 and 10 a.m., that camera is always pointed towards the northwestern skyline to capture the inbound commuting traffic, as it's a traffic camera, and from it you can see the highways as well as the entire skyline which easily would have captured no less than 10 seconds of the last part of that flight.

Thanks for the kindly invite. I'd like to be able to visit there but chances are slim to none.
I think you're the third person, afaik, to report having been prevented from taking pictures there soon after. Maybe Judicial Watch could file a Freedom of Information Act request for the Virginia Department of Transportation footage during the time period in question that day. It managed to get 2 additional films released by the Pentagon in 2006.

GreyLmist posted on 2015-04-01 6:44:03 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#104. To: Katniss, GreyLmist (#80)
I'll take you down there and show you where everything used to be, where that 'cab' was, the flight path, where I was run off by an abusive and brainless LEO for publicly taking pics in public a day later, where gas station used to be, which IMO is no a coincidence that it's no longer there, i.e., part of the ongoing coverup.

The Pentagon has a very wide *no photo* zone around it.
Very wide...

war posted on 2015-04-02 7:34:31 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#185. To: war (#104) (Edited)
The Pentagon has a very wide *no photo* zone around it.
Very wide...

...for peasants who can't afford a telephoto lens camera, I suppose so.

GreyLmist posted on 2015-04-03 8:15:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 185.
#188. To: GreyLmist (#185) (Edited)
...for peasants who can't afford a telephoto lens camera, I suppose so.

Wow...you are a *wily* one...
BTW, you do know that for that rigging to be effective that it would have to have separate pieces of equipment?

war posted on 2015-04-03 08:59:33 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
End Trace Mode for Comment # 185.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um