Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Field McConnell - Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot Used On 9/11 Planes, Impossible To Hijack!
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5NnBQJ5at4
Published: Jan 24, 2015
Author: staff
Post Date: 2015-01-24 14:13:06 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 11338
Comments: 402

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-196) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#197. To: FormerLurker (#194)

FBI

2006 Flashback to: FBI says, it has “No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9 11” - informationclearinghouse.info

the question is asked, “Why doesn’t Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster make any direct connection with the events of September 11, 2001?” The FBI says on its Bin Laden web page that Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998 bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. According to the FBI, these attacks killed over 200 people. The FBI concludes its reason for “wanting” Bin Laden by saying, “In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorists attacks throughout the world.” ... Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection with 9/11. ... on June 5, 2006, FBI spokesman, Chief of Investigative Publicity Rex Tomb said, “The FBI has no hard evidence connecting Usama Bin Laden to 9/11.” ... should be headline news worldwide.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-04-03   10:33:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#198. To: FormerLurker (#194)

Then show us all the videos of a 757 flying straight into the ground floor of the Pentagon.

So because the FBI won't release the video of people dying it has to have been a missile...

Is that your logic?

Mickey Bell

Singleton Electric was the Wedge One electrical contractor and had just completed some punch-list work in wedge (one of five) when at 9:45 a.m. (EDT) American Airlines Flight 77 plowed into the western wall of Pentagon with 64 passengers and crew aboard. The jet, which had just taken off from Dulles Airport en route to Los Angles, set the world´s largest office building ablaze between the first and second wedges.

The jet came in from the south and banked left as it entered the building, narrowly missing the Singleton Electric trailer and the on-site foreman, Mickey Bell. Bell had just left the trailer when he heard a loud noise. The next thing he recalled was picking himself off the floor, where he had been thrown by the blast.

Bell, who had been less than 100 feet from the initial impact of the plane, was nearly struck by one of the plane´s wings as it sped by him. In shock, he got into his truck, which had been parked in the trailer compound, and sped away. He wandered around Arlington in his truck and tried to make wireless phone calls. He ended up back at Singleton´s headquarters in Gaithersburg two hours later, according to President Singleton, not remembering much. The full impact of the closeness of the crash wasn´t realized until coworkers noticed damage to Bell´s work vehicle. He had plastic and rivets from an airplane imbedded in its sheet metal, but Bell had no idea what had happened. National Electrical Contractors Association, September 13 2001

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-03   10:37:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#199. To: FormerLurker (#194)

Richard Benedetto

Richard Benedetto was in his car on his way to work, stuck in traffic just outside the Pentagon. He was listening -- in horror -- to an account of what had just happened at the World Trade Center in New York. "Then the plane flew right over my head. I said to myself, boy, that plane is going awfully fast," Benedetto said. "That plane is going to crash." The jet knocked over several light posts before it smashed into the Pentagon. Other observers said it seemed to come in full throttle with no attempt to slow down. "The noise was like an artillery shell, not an explosion like a bomb," Benedetto said. Then he saw a giant billow of smoke followed by a huge fireball, presumably the exploding fuel from the crashed plane. "You couldn't even see the building because there was so much smoke," said Benedetto. Hartford Courant, September 12, 2001

"I heard an airplane. A very loud airplane. ... I heard the airplane coming from behind me. ... So I looked up, and I saw this airplane coming, heading straight down toward the ground. It was an American Airlines airplane, I could see it very clearly. ... The plane went down and for a split second it was out of my line of vision because there was a bridge there and a hill. ... I didn't actually see the impact... I didn't see any flaps, it looked like the plane was just in a normal flying mode but heading straight down, sharply down. It was straight. No flopping. It was going pretty straight. ... The only thing we saw on the ground outside there was a piece of a - the tail of a lamp post."Quoted here

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-03   10:38:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#200. To: FormerLurker (#194)

Omar Campo

Omar Campo, a Salvadorean, was cutting the grass on the other side of the road when the plane flew over his head. "It was a passenger plane. I think an American Airways plane," Mr Campo said. "I was cutting the grass and it came in screaming over my head. I felt the impact. The whole ground shook and the whole area was full of fire. I could never imagine I would see anything like that here." The Guardian, September 12 2001

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-03   10:40:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#201. To: war (#200)

Why don't you look up quotes from Elmer Fudd while you're at it.

I don't care what some yokel has to say, I want you to find those videos of a 757 flying straight into the ground floor of the Pentagon. Now go find them.


"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination

FormerLurker  posted on  2015-04-03   10:44:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#202. To: FormerLurker (#201)

I don't care what some yokel has to say,

Right...why take the word of the hundreds who saw the plane when you can focus on something nonsensical.

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-03   10:49:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#203. To: war (#198)

So because the FBI won't release the video of people dying it has to have been a missile...

HUGE BS. The videos of the South Tower impact has been broadcast thousands upon thousands of times, AND are available on YouTube for anyone to watch over and over again.

ANYONE with at least half a brain cell knows that IF those VDOT and Pentagon surveillance videos actually DID show a 757 flying into the Pentagon, we would have seen them thousands upon thousands of times by now.

It's rather incredible that you try to use that lame excuse, the "FBI doesn't want to show people dying".

Your writers need better material.


"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination

FormerLurker  posted on  2015-04-03   10:49:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#204. To: FormerLurker (#203)

The videos of the South Tower impact has been broadcast thousands upon thousands of times, AND are available on YouTube for anyone to watch over and over again.

I'm just a-guessin' and a-ruminatin' here but maybe that is because every available TV and video camera in NYC was trained on the Towers?

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-03   10:52:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#205. To: war (#202)

Right...why take the word of the hundreds who saw the plane

Anyone can write or say anything they want, whether it's true or false. Additionally, there are NOT "hundreds" who "saw the plane", rather there are perhaps 20 or 30 who have made statements that they witnessed the alleged airliner.

In fact, there are strong indications that there were actually TWO aircraft, one which did in fact appear to be an airliner, and then there are reports of a smaller jet flying "like a missile". The reports indicate two different approach paths to the Pentagon, leading to the possibility that the airliner flew OVER the Pentagon while the smaller aircraft actually hit it.

There is actually one witness who claims to have seen the aircraft "cartwheel" on the Pentagon lawn, which I HOPE you know is both impossible and untrue.

So to eliminate any confusion, go ahead and ask the FBI for those videos so that we can see what did actually happen.


"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination

FormerLurker  posted on  2015-04-03   10:56:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#206. To: FormerLurker (#205)

Anyone can write or say anything they want, whether it's true or false.

A fact I am reminded of when I read your posts.

Additionally, there are NOT "hundreds" who "saw the plane", rather there are perhaps 20 or 30 who have made statements that they witnessed the alleged airliner.

Geezus...

911rese arch.wtc7.net/pent...dence/witnesses/bart.html

There is actually one witness who claims to have seen the aircraft "cartwheel" on the Pentagon lawn, which I HOPE you know is both impossible and untrue.

Here's his full statement:

David Marra, 23, an information-technology specialist, had turned his BMW off an I-395 exit to the highway just west of the Pentagon when he saw an American Airlines jet swooping in, its wings wobbly, looking like it was going to slam right into the Pentagon: "It was 50 ft. off the deck when he came in. It sounded like the pilot had the throttle completely floored. The plane rolled left and then rolled right. Then he caught an edge of his wing on the ground." There is a helicopter pad right in front of the side of the Pentagon. The wing touched there, then the plane cartwheeled into the building.

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-03   11:09:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#207. To: war (#206)

There is a helicopter pad right in front of the side of the Pentagon. The wing touched there, then the plane cartwheeled into the building.

Which is pure fantasy, since the lawn was untouched, the aircraft did not cartwheel, and if it did (which it couldn't do unless it were flying at a 90 degree angle and at a MUCH lower speed) it would have never entered the Pentagon as it would have been shredded to pieces BEFORE reaching it, AND there would have been jet fuel and debris spread all over the lawn and OVER the Pentagon.

Goes to show you can't trust tales coming from so-called "eyewitnesses" when there is a "national security" operation in progress.


"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination

FormerLurker  posted on  2015-04-03   11:18:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#208. To: FormerLurker (#207)

He didn't state that it hit the lawn.

Stick to what was said...not how you care to contort it...

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-03   11:35:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#209. To: FormerLurker (#207)

since the lawn was untouched, the aircraft did not cartwheel

So we got AA 77 cartwheeling across the Pentalawn now. Kool.

The Fantacists are smokin' some heavy shit these days.

"If ignorance is truly bliss, then why do so many Americans need Prozac?" - Dave McGowan

randge  posted on  2015-04-03   11:42:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#210. To: randge (#209)

So we got AA 77 cartwheeling across the Pentalawn now. Kool

Can you pint out where he stated that it cartwheeled across the lawn?

This is one in the mega-series of why you folks get laughed at by us normal people: You simply make stuff up.

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-03   11:59:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#211. To: war (#210)

Can you pint out where he stated that it cartwheeled across the lawn?

I'll "pint out" that some mothafuckahs do an honest day's work here. They get up at 7:00, hit it hard all day, and quit for dinner.

I wonder if it's a paid-by-the-hour sort of thing. If it is, somebody's due a raise.

"If ignorance is truly bliss, then why do so many Americans need Prozac?" - Dave McGowan

randge  posted on  2015-04-03   12:07:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#212. To: war (#208)

He didn't state that it hit the lawn.

Well how exactly do you claim it to have cartwheeled if it didn't hit the ground?


"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination

FormerLurker  posted on  2015-04-03   12:41:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#213. To: war, titorite (#193)

titorite at #91: how come the.tower that was hit second fell first?

You at #92: Greater weight of the upper floors...

Me at #98: Didn't you say elsewhere that the upper floors angularly toppled over rather than falling directly downward? -- which would be less weight on the floors below.

Your non-counterpoint at #102: No. As they fell they began to tilt....as is clearly indicated on the videos... [Pic link] ...In fact, it tilted for a number of reasons not the least of which was because the damage to the supporting columns was not uniformly horizontal...another annoying fact that the controlled demolition crowd cannot accept...

Me at #189: Tilted...toppled, either way it would be less weight on the floors below, as I said.

You at #193: ...and ignoring the direct effect of gravity as you did so...

You again at #193: Gravity affects all objects equally...the construction of WTC7 and WTC1 and 2 were not the same.

Me as quoted by you at #193: Shouldn't WTC 7 have fallen quicker than the Towers...

[Re-inserting the full context of my question regarding alleged burn-time duration to weaken the steel to the point of alleged structural failure -- not how long it took for WTC 7 to crumple to the ground in a heap when it started to fall, as compared to the time it took the Towers to crumble to the ground, somewhat, while largely floating away:

...smaller as it was with less steel to heat up -- or what's the difference between WTC 7 steel and the Towers?]

Your gravitational-sameness oversimplification that the Tower which was hit second fell first simply because of a higher upper-floors weight-differential there (even though much of the weight was in the process of tilting overward for some length of time and so lessening strain on the floors below while doing that) has ignored those factors and every other structural issue involved which would scientifically indicate that it shouldn't have fallen first. [Ref. floors data at #196]

For now, just try to address what you think the chemical difference would be between Tower steel and WTC 7 steel, since the more compact space at WTC 7 allegedly could withstand hours of supposedly "intense" fire but the Towers that had to be structurally sturdy enough for their size to meet rather intenser building codes didn't. Address any pre-planned demolition docs that likely had to be submitted for all 3 of the highest WTC buildings before any of them were approved to be built, too, please, if you're aware of such.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-04-03   15:35:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#214. To: war (#193) (Edited)

So, since you didn't have a counterpoint to speak of, how about you try to explain other things of gravitas for us like So, since you didn't have a counterpoint to speak of, how about you try to explain other things of gravitas for us like the lack of significantly visible smoke damage to the Towers from the blasts and sooty burnings.

Stipulating, for the moment, that is true...

So freakin' what if there were no stains on the aluminum?

Is it your claim that there was no visible smoke?

No, my claim wasn't about no visible smoke. It was about the lack of significantly visible smoke damages to the Towers.

Edited formatting.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-04-03   15:42:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#215. To: war, All (#187) (Edited)

As I said, you're both dishonest and stupid.

Seriously, which government agency do you work for?

Sorry, but this isn't a place whereby when things are told often enough people believe them.

Go back to whatever LP's pyscho tearoom replacement is. You don't belong here.

Interesting that you're at war with everyone on everything. That's always a tell-tale sign.

Katniss  posted on  2015-04-03   21:14:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#216. To: Katniss (#215)

I noticed that right away -- he does nothing but bitch at others and call them names in my limited experience here.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-04-03   22:04:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#217. To: Katniss (#215)

As I said, you're both dishonest and stupid.

But you still felt the need to repeat it, why?

Seriously, which government agency do you work for?

The Ministry of Inciting Paranoia...

I'm Deputy Secretary of The Internet Chatroom...

Sorry, but this isn't a place whereby when things are told often enough people believe them.

All evidence to the contrary...

Have you noticed that not one of you has put forth a viable argument that the broad outline of 9/11...hijacked planes...crashed into WTC and Pentagon...Towers and WTC7 collapsed due to structural damage...is untrue?

No...because you're too busy telling things - nonsensical at that, e.g. the planes weren't hijacked or the plane that hundreds saw crash in to the Pentagon wasn't a real plane or the plane that I stood underneath as it crashed into WTC2 wasn't a real plane or that there was very little damage to WTC7 even though every witness to the damage of WTC7 states otherwise - often enough that you hope people believe them. But when they are subject to minimal testing they are falsified...

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-06   6:51:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#218. To: NeoconsNailed (#216)

I noticed that right away -- he does nothing but bitch at others and call them names in my limited experience here.

You obviously don't read my posts.

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-06   6:52:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#219. To: GreyLmist (#213)

Your gravitational-sameness oversimplification...

I've put this challenge forth before...score a couple of 1x4s in several places and then support it on the ends and suspend the middle...put a 50'lb weight on one and a 100bln weight on the other and then bounce the boards slightly...which one breaks first.

This basic test underscores how what you folks try to promote stands at stark odds with reality...

For now, just try to address what you think the chemical difference would be between Tower steel and WTC 7 steel, since the more compact space at WTC7

Can you point out wherein I made this argument regarding the *chemical* differences in steel between the structures.

Thanks...

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-06   6:56:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#220. To: FormerLurker (#212)

Well how exactly do you claim it to have cartwheeled if it didn't hit the ground?

He stated exactly where he believed that it hit. He stated exactly what he thought the aircraft did.

You and someone else chose to misstate what he said...his words stand for what they are...

If you would have asked me @ 10 after 9 where I *thought* the second plane had hit I would have stated much lower than where it did hit. When I reached the Battery Park area around 9:20 and I saw the South Face of the South Tower I was a bit surprised that the entry point was as high as it was...

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-06   7:01:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#221. To: GreyLmist (#214)

No, my claim wasn't about no visible smoke. It was about the lack of significantly visible smoke damages to the Towers.

Tell me why I should care about smoke damage at all...

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-06   7:02:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#222. To: randge (#211)

In other words, you *can't*.

FWIW, I knew that.

They get up at 7:00...

I've done an hour's worth of work by then...slackers...

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-06   7:49:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#223. To: war, All (#218)

You obviously don't read my posts.

My nomination for the funniest post of the day so far.

One poster running around the room shitting on everything in sight, insisting that his shit doesn't stink while blaming everyone else for the stench.

Classic!

I'm sure he'll top himself, ... it's early yet.

Katniss  posted on  2015-04-06   12:28:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#224. To: Katniss (#223) (Edited)

...

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-06   13:44:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#225. To: Katniss (#223)

Can you point out any post in which I have attacked, for lack of a better word, you in a manner commensurate to how you have attacked me?

I'll wait...thanks...

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-06   13:44:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#226. To: Katniss (#223)

I'm sure he'll top himself, ... it's early yet.

I've been up for 9 hours...early?

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-06   13:46:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#227. To: war, All (#226)

You're a fool.

Katniss  posted on  2015-04-06   19:44:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#228. To: Katniss (#227)

Since I revived this thread not one mention of the title:

"Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot"

Neo TryingtoWarnYou  posted on  2015-04-06   19:48:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#229. To: Katniss (#227)

You're a fool.

Thanks...I couldn't have made my point about you any more eloquently than you have.

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-07   7:10:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#230. To: Neo TryingtoWarnYou (#228)

Since I revived this thread not one mention of the title:

I believe that nonsensical nature of the title was dispatched with relatively quickly...

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-07   7:11:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#231. To: war, All (#229)

Thanks...I couldn't have made my point about you any more eloquently than you have.

You're a fool.

Katniss  posted on  2015-04-07   7:26:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#232. To: Neo TryingtoWarnYou (#228)

Since I revived this thread not one mention of the title:

"Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot"

LOL

No doubt. Yeah, that's what happens when one single ignoramus fool hijacks the thread. It's common across message boards everywhere.

Seriously, I'd bet dollars to donuts that this clown's a government op.

Katniss  posted on  2015-04-07   7:28:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#233. To: Katniss (#231)

You're a fool.

You repeat yourself a lot.

FWIW, that comes from being ignored.

In other words, you should be *NICER* to me...

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-07   9:44:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#234. To: Katniss (#232)

Seriously, I'd bet dollars to donuts that this clown's a government op.

I have 10,000 donuts...

We have a bet?

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-07   9:45:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#235. To: Katniss (#232)

Yeah, that's what happens when one single ignoramus fool hijacks the thread.

This thread isn't about 9/11?

It's common across message boards everywhere...

How much time do you spend on the internet to make you such an *authority*?

--Are you a *Jew*?

war  posted on  2015-04-07   9:47:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#236. To: Neo TryingtoWarnYou (#228) (Edited)

Since I revived this thread not one mention of the title:

"Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot"

At 32:30 of the opening post video:

Richie Allen: "Question one. Are we to presume, then, that the people on Flight 77 and the people on the other airplanes that supposedly crashed into the Towers, that those people were taken away and summarily executed somewhere else?"

Field McConnell: "Yes, they were...they all died in Whiskey 3-8-6 Alpha Airspace, except United 93. That airplane was destroyed by technology over Shanksville, Pennsylvania."

Article excerpt from Abel Danger: Specific Companies in the World Trade Center Targeted on 9/11 - 2010

some of these passenger jets may have been flown electronically into Whiskey 386 military-training airspace [...] over the Atlantic Ocean, and detonated via preplaced, embedded incendiaries.

I'd disagree because that could have left trace evidence but Post #71 of 4um Title: "Airline whistleblower solves 9/11" has more info on Whiskey 386 [pilotsfor911truth audio file on the Langely jets and 2 more 4um refs. with additional linked sources].

Formatting edits.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-04-07   12:20:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#237. To: war (#193)

Me at #189: the first Tower that fell without significanly damaging the one next to it, as it did others farther away. How'd that happen?

You at #193: A) Where's your evidence for that?

News footage.

You at #193: B) The South Tower was closer to the Banker's Trust building which, was directly across Liberty Street, than it was to the North Tower...IIRC, the South Tower actually collapsed in the direction of the SW and took out the Banker's Trust Building and the Winter Garden of the WFC.

Ref. the film clip linked above in this thread at Post #73 for an example from the video at Post #53: first falling Tower impacting the other [at 2:09-2:31] without significantly damaging it.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-04-07   13:45:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (238 - 402) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest