4um: Field McConnell - Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot Used On 9/11 Planes, Impossible To Hijack!

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
9/11
See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Field McConnell - Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot Used On 9/11 Planes, Impossible To Hijack!
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5NnBQJ5at4
Published: Jan 24, 2015
Author: staff
Post Date: 2015-01-24 14:13:06 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 11354
Comments: 402

Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-218) not displayed.
.
.
.

#219. To: GreyLmist (#213)
Your gravitational-sameness oversimplification...

I've put this challenge forth before...score a couple of 1x4s in several places and then support it on the ends and suspend the middle...put a 50'lb weight on one and a 100bln weight on the other and then bounce the boards slightly...which one breaks first.
This basic test underscores how what you folks try to promote stands at stark odds with reality...
For now, just try to address what you think the chemical difference would be between Tower steel and WTC 7 steel, since the more compact space at WTC7
Can you point out wherein I made this argument regarding the *chemical* differences in steel between the structures.
Thanks...
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-06 6:56:59 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#220. To: FormerLurker (#212)
Well how exactly do you claim it to have cartwheeled if it didn't hit the ground?

He stated exactly where he believed that it hit. He stated exactly what he thought the aircraft did.
You and someone else chose to misstate what he said...his words stand for what they are...
If you would have asked me @ 10 after 9 where I *thought* the second plane had hit I would have stated much lower than where it did hit. When I reached the Battery Park area around 9:20 and I saw the South Face of the South Tower I was a bit surprised that the entry point was as high as it was...
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-06 7:01:32 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#221. To: GreyLmist (#214)
No, my claim wasn't about no visible smoke. It was about the lack of significantly visible smoke damages to the Towers.

Tell me why I should care about smoke damage at all...
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-06 7:02:14 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#222. To: randge (#211)
In other words, you *can't*.
FWIW, I knew that.
They get up at 7:00...
I've done an hour's worth of work by then...slackers...
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-06 7:49:23 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#223. To: war, All (#218)
You obviously don't read my posts.

My nomination for the funniest post of the day so far.
One poster running around the room shitting on everything in sight, insisting that his shit doesn't stink while blaming everyone else for the stench.
Classic!
I'm sure he'll top himself, ... it's early yet.

Katniss posted on 2015-04-06 12:28:50 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#224. To: Katniss (#223) (Edited)
...
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-06 13:44:02 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#225. To: Katniss (#223)
Can you point out any post in which I have attacked, for lack of a better word, you in a manner commensurate to how you have attacked me?
I'll wait...thanks...
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-06 13:44:41 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#226. To: Katniss (#223)
I'm sure he'll top himself, ... it's early yet.

I've been up for 9 hours...early?
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-06 13:46:49 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#227. To: war, All (#226)
You're a fool.

Katniss posted on 2015-04-06 19:44:17 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#228. To: Katniss (#227)
Since I revived this thread not one mention of the title:
"Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot"

Neo TryingtoWarnYou posted on 2015-04-06 19:48:07 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#229. To: Katniss (#227)
You're a fool.

Thanks...I couldn't have made my point about you any more eloquently than you have.
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-07 7:10:32 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#230. To: Neo TryingtoWarnYou (#228)
Since I revived this thread not one mention of the title:

I believe that nonsensical nature of the title was dispatched with relatively quickly...
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-07 7:11:30 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#231. To: war, All (#229)
Thanks...I couldn't have made my point about you any more eloquently than you have.

You're a fool.

Katniss posted on 2015-04-07 7:26:13 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#232. To: Neo TryingtoWarnYou (#228)
Since I revived this thread not one mention of the title:
"Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot"

LOL
No doubt. Yeah, that's what happens when one single ignoramus fool hijacks the thread. It's common across message boards everywhere.
Seriously, I'd bet dollars to donuts that this clown's a government op.

Katniss posted on 2015-04-07 7:28:02 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#233. To: Katniss (#231)
You're a fool.

You repeat yourself a lot.
FWIW, that comes from being ignored.
In other words, you should be *NICER* to me...
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-07 9:44:48 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#234. To: Katniss (#232)
Seriously, I'd bet dollars to donuts that this clown's a government op.

I have 10,000 donuts...
We have a bet?
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-07 9:45:37 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#235. To: Katniss (#232)
Yeah, that's what happens when one single ignoramus fool hijacks the thread.

This thread isn't about 9/11?
It's common across message boards everywhere...
How much time do you spend on the internet to make you such an *authority*?
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-07 9:47:26 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#236. To: Neo TryingtoWarnYou (#228) (Edited)
Since I revived this thread not one mention of the title:
"Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot"

At 32:30 of the opening post video:

Richie Allen: "Question one. Are we to presume, then, that the people on Flight 77 and the people on the other airplanes that supposedly crashed into the Towers, that those people were taken away and summarily executed somewhere else?"
Field McConnell: "Yes, they were...they all died in Whiskey 3-8-6 Alpha Airspace, except United 93. That airplane was destroyed by technology over Shanksville, Pennsylvania."

Article excerpt from Abel Danger: Specific Companies in the World Trade Center Targeted on 9/11 - 2010

some of these passenger jets may have been flown electronically into Whiskey 386 military-training airspace [...] over the Atlantic Ocean, and detonated via preplaced, embedded incendiaries.

I'd disagree because that could have left trace evidence but Post #71 of 4um Title: "Airline whistleblower solves 9/11" has more info on Whiskey 386 [pilotsfor911truth audio file on the Langely jets and 2 more 4um refs. with additional linked sources].
Formatting edits.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
GreyLmist posted on 2015-04-07 12:20:12 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#237. To: war (#193)
Me at #189: the first Tower that fell without significanly damaging the one next to it, as it did others farther away. How'd that happen?

You at #193: A) Where's your evidence for that?

News footage.

You at #193: B) The South Tower was closer to the Banker's Trust building which, was directly across Liberty Street, than it was to the North Tower...IIRC, the South Tower actually collapsed in the direction of the SW and took out the Banker's Trust Building and the Winter Garden of the WFC.

Ref. the film clip linked above in this thread at Post #73 for an example from the video at Post #53: first falling Tower impacting the other [at 2:09-2:31] without significantly damaging it.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
GreyLmist posted on 2015-04-07 13:45:31 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#238. To: GreyLmist (#237)
News footage.
Ref. the film clip linked above in this thread at Post #73 for an example from the video at Post #53: first falling Tower impacting the other [at 2:09-2:31] without significantly damaging it.

You mean that in the less than 10 seconds that you can actually see *some* of the Towers, you've concluded that?
Okay...the reason that there is no counter-point is because you have no point...
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-07 14:02:24 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#239. To: war (#234)
If you have 10,000 donuts, then surely you own a donut factory. Which makes you, my new favorite person.
Though I am trying desperately to cut back on my donut consumption... It's things like this that drive me insane. You try to quit eating donuts, be healthier, then someone shows up with 10,000 donuts, or owns a donut factory.
This is much like how Sisyphus must have felt. I am in hell.
"Call Me Ishmael" -Ishmael, A character from the book "Moby Dick" 1851. "Call Me Fishmeal" -Osama Bin Laden, A character created by the CIA, and the world's Hide And Seek Champion 2001-2011. -Tommythemadartist
TommyTheMadArtist posted on 2015-04-07 14:09:02 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#240. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#239)
Well...if Katniss walks the walk here, I'll have $10,000 and 10,000 donuts.
But I was actually making fun of his/her paranoia by channeling the *fat* side of Willard Romney...
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-07 14:18:00 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#241. To: war, FormerLurker (#193)
Me at #189: What of all that indestructible paper debris which didn't spontaneously combust in the high-temperatures you claim weakened the steel?

You at #193: When the North Tower was impacted and I looked out the window from my vantage point in the northwest corner of 1 Liberty, it was like a ticker tape parade and some of the papers that were fluttering were singed...I remember one piece of paper hitting the window right before my nose that had a FUJI BANK letterhead.
As for your question...unless you were in the tower in the very area of the fire, you have no way of telling me what was or wasn't on fire...

Autoignition temperature - Wikipedia

Paper: Autoignition Celsius 218–246 °C | Autoignition Fahrenheit 424–475 °F

You #129 above to FormerLurker at #121:
FormerLurker: The FEMA report states...
war: ...on 2-22 that the temps were as high as 1100c [My note: 2012 °F] at ceiling level and 400c [My note: 752 °F] to 800c [My note: 1472 °F] elsewhere...
Those temps are well capable of compromising the strength of steel...

...and spontaneously combusting paper. You're not presuming to tell me that all of the paper seen in the first two videos at 4um Title: NIST FOIA: William Cirone, Clips 01-49 (WTC Complex & WTC7 after 10:28am) would have fluttered out of the Towers before they fell, are you? -- because news footage doesn't support that.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
GreyLmist posted on 2015-04-07 14:29:57 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#242. To: Katniss (#240)
Forgot to PING you to above...sorry...
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-07 14:34:00 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#243. To: GreyLmist (#241)
Did I miss something somewhere? The part where the floors which were on fire were the only floors with paper, maybe?
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-07 14:36:21 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#244. To: war (#243)
Did I miss something somewhere? The part where the floors which were on fire were the only floors with paper, maybe?

What point are you trying to make? Only the floors with steel compromising fire had paper that somehow withstood those temps?
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
GreyLmist posted on 2015-04-07 14:40:15 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#245. To: GreyLmist (#244)
What point are you trying to make? Only the floors with steel compromising fire had paper that somehow withstood those temps?

Not all the floors were on fire...not all of the paper in the WTCs burned...
Is there a reason you're not *getting* this?
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-07 14:47:09 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#246. To: GreyLmist (#241)
BTW, anyone who has read Ray Bradbury knows at what temperature paper combusts...
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-07 14:48:24 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#247. To: war (#238) (Edited)
News footage.
Ref. the film clip linked above in this thread at Post #73 for an example from the video at Post #53: first falling Tower impacting the other [at 2:09-2:31] without significantly damaging it.

You mean that in the less than 10 seconds that you can actually see *some* of the Towers, you've concluded that?
Okay...the reason that there is no counter-point is because you have no point...

I wasn't in charge that day of how fast the Tower fell at near free-fall speed or not to suit your observatory preferences. You were provided a source right in this very thread and simply have no counterpoint about the impact to the other one with insignificant damage to it, even though there are numerous other news footage clips that you could reference.
Edited link formatting.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
GreyLmist posted on 2015-04-07 15:20:57 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#248. To: GreyLmist (#247)
I wasn't in charge that day of how fast the Tower fell at near free-fall speed or not to suit your observatory preferences.

Are you saying that if you were that they would have actually fallen at free fall speed instead of at the less than free fall speed at which they fell that day?
You were provided a source right in this very thread and simply have no counterpoint about the impact to the other one with insignificant damage to it, even though there are numerous other news footage clips that you could reference.
Feel free to provide them but, as I stated before, the collapsing South tower DID cause damage to the buildings around it and photos of that damage have been provided.
On the other hand, your statement about not causing any damage remains...unsupported...
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-07 15:27:06 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#249. To: war (#245)
Not all the floors were on fire...not all of the paper in the WTCs burned...
Is there a reason you're not *getting* this?

"the inferno swept through the building" [You at #443 of 4um Title: "Methodical Illusion: The 9/11 Con Begins to Crumble — Rebekah Roth (Flight Attendant)"]
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
GreyLmist posted on 2015-04-07 15:39:08 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#250. To: GreyLmist (#249)
Why did you leave this part out:
From the 91st floor upwards, it is believed no one got out alive, even though as many as 1,100 may have survived the initial crash.
Either they would have been burned or smothered by smoke as the inferno swept through the building, or they would have been forced by the unbearable heat to jump, or else perished as the tower collapsed.
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-07 15:47:00 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#251. To: war (#248)
You were provided a source right in this very thread and simply have no counterpoint about the impact to the other one with insignificant damage to it, even though there are numerous other news footage clips that you could reference.

Feel free to provide them but, as I stated before, the collapsing South tower DID cause damage to the buildings around it and photos of that damage have been provided.
On the other hand, your statement about not causing any damage remains...unsupported...

It's not my job to spoonfeed you more supporting evidence, let alone slow down the speed of the South Tower collapse for you to notice the lack of significant damage from it to the North Tower that others can readily see. Your assertion that the collapsing South Tower caused damages to buildings around it is irrelevant to that issue except that it reinforces the anomaly of it visibly only being as impactful as a huge powder puff on the North Tower.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
GreyLmist posted on 2015-04-07 16:00:27 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#252. To: GreyLmist (#251)
It's not my job to spoonfeed you more supporting evidence....

I was comfortable asking for that evidence because I know that it does not exist.
let alone slow down the speed of the South Tower collapse for you

--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-07 16:05:51 ET (1 image) Reply Trace Private Reply
#253. To: GreyLmist (#251)
Your assertion that the collapsing South Tower caused damages to buildings around it is irrelevant to that issue except that it reinforces the anomaly of it visibly only being as impactful as a huge powder puff on the North Tower.

If that is the *truth* then you should have no problem providing supporting evidence for it...
Your assertion that the collapsing South Tower caused damages to buildings around it is irrelevant...
Says you for no reason other than you felt like typing...
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-07 16:09:02 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#254. To: war (#250)
Why did you leave this part out:

From the 91st floor upwards, it is believed no one got out alive, even though as many as 1,100 may have survived the initial crash.

Either they would have been burned or smothered by smoke as the inferno swept through the building, or they would have been forced by the unbearable heat to jump, or else perished as the tower collapsed.

I left that part out because it has nothing to do with the paper combustion issue here of the "inferno", as you call it, sweeping "through the building" -- not upward only. It's already been addressed at #96 above that the alleged jumpers "weren't even demonstrably under threat of smoke inhalation, much less about to be incinerated" from fire or withering heat. You might want to explain, though, why no helicopters were dispatched to try and rescue them.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
GreyLmist posted on 2015-04-07 16:15:50 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#255. To: GreyLmist (#254)
I left that part out because it has nothing to do with the paper combustion issue here of the "inferno", as you call it, sweeping "through the building"

The inferno was sweeping through the building at the floors above 91. The context is quite clear to anyone who does not have an agenda. No one jumped from the 20th floor.
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-07 16:26:49 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#256. To: GreyLmist (#254)
You might want to explain, though, why no helicopters were dispatched to try and rescue them.

www.wsj.com/articles/SB 1003784754436648720
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-07 16:30:10 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#257. To: war (#253) (Edited)
Your assertion that the collapsing South Tower caused damages to buildings around it is irrelevant to that issue except that it reinforces the anomaly of it visibly only being as impactful as a huge powder puff on the North Tower.

If that is the *truth* then you should have no problem providing supporting evidence for it...

I've already done that here 3 times: at #73, #237 and #247. Your problem, not mine, if that example isn't good enough for you. Nobody else is complaining.

Your assertion that the collapsing South Tower caused damages to buildings around it is irrelevant...

Says you for no reason other than you felt like typing...

Says you and your assertion about damages from the collapsing South Tower to buildings around it still remains irrelevant except as reinforcement for the anomalous lack of significant damage from it to the North Tower.
Edited formatting and spelling.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
GreyLmist posted on 2015-04-07 16:32:05 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#258. To: GreyLmist (#257) (Edited)
I've already done that here 3 times: at #73, #237 and #247. Your problem, not mine, if that example isn't good enough for you.

Your video does not show the ground...the angle is such that a building in the foreground obscures half the view and the ensuing dust cloud obscures the rest. To claim that video *proves* anything other than a) the building collapsed and b) generated a HUGE dust cloud is, to be kind, problematic.
Nobody else is complaining.
I care about what others do or don't do why, again?
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-07 16:41:23 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#259. To: GreyLmist (#257)
...for the anonalous lack of significant damage from it to the North Tower.

An *anamoly* for which you've established no proof.
--Are you a *Jew*?
war posted on 2015-04-07 16:44:19 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

.
.
.
Comments (260 - 402) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um