Title: Field McConnell - Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot Used On 9/11 Planes, Impossible To Hijack! Source:
[None] URL Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5NnBQJ5at4 Published:Jan 24, 2015 Author:staff Post Date:2015-01-24 14:13:06 by Horse Keywords:None Views:11179 Comments:402
Yea...the structure being what was ABOVE the impact zones, doof...the columns that were compromised didn't support what was below it...only above it...
So now you're changing your mind again. You're saying that the UPPER columns are what failed, and that is why the LOWER STRUCTURE suddenly behaved like THICK AIR?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
It's time for you to wake up, smell the coffee, and stop shilling for those who wish to suppress the truth..
WTC 7 DID fall at free fall speed, WTC 1 and 2 fell at NEAR free fall speed, and there was no reason for ANY of them to FALL, since they all had supporting structures holding them up.
ANYTHING will FALL (accelerate downwards) when there is LESS resistance below than the force being exerted downwards by gravity.
Thing is, those structures were built to safely resist that force, otherwise no tall buildings on earth would be safe to inhabit.
Just as mountains don't simply "fall down" because they're above ground, neither do man-made objects.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
Ok, I missed ONE of your numerous questions that I'm sure I've answered repeatedly over the last week or so of fun and games with you, but here goes..
Why don't we approach it this way...assume for one moment that there was no controlled demolition...how should the Towers have collapsed and, most importantly, why?
A) They should NOT have collapsed. The lower structures were still intact and should not have instanaeously failed.
B) IF there had been SOME structural failure at the upper levels of the towers, then the upper structures should have crumbled and slid off the UNDAMAGED sections below, or tumbled off them, depending on the angle of the collapse and whether they broke up as they were shifting weight.
C) There is no way possible for them to drop straight down into their own footprint UNLESS there was a complete and total loss of support below them. That would not happen UNLESS the supporting structure below was demolished through the use of explosives.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
BS. There is a video proof of WTC7 falling AT free fall speed during at least PART of its collapse. And unlike the other buildings, the main collapse WAS from the bottom, where the entire structure FELL into its own footprint as one piece.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
So were rocket engines attached to the top of WTC1 to make it accelerate FASTER than gravity?
You see, UNLESS there is some EXTRA acceleration involved, such as a pilot flying a jet aircraft pointing its nose straight down and pushing the throttle, an object can't fall FASTER than free fall speed.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
Avalanches occur when what was supporting the materials which are now falling can no longer support them...
Avalanches are simply snow rolling off those mountains, the mountains themselves are not collapsing.
Amazing that you had to be told that.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
A) They should NOT have collapsed. The lower structures were still intact and should not have instanaeously (sic) failed.
The lower structure did no such thing. It failed in stages as ever increasing weight compromised the support structure.
IF there had been SOME structural failure at the upper levels of the towers, then the upper structures should have crumbled and slid off the UNDAMAGED sections below...
Under what theory does gravity so affect a vertical structure? Your *belief* is contingent upon the very flawed premise that only a controlled demolition can cause supporting columns to fail.
There is no way possible for them to drop straight down into their own footprint
As has been previously pointed out to you in both video and photos, it's a good thing that they didn't then...
The lower structure did no such thing. It failed in stages as ever increasing weight compromised the support structure.
Oh, so the towers took hours to collapse, sections at a time?
No of course they didn't.
Ever increasing weight? Are you for real? Are you saying that the muzzies were shoveling lead out of helicopters or something to add that "extra weight"?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
You felt the need to repeat back to me what I stated to you why, exactly?
You're equating snow rolling off a mountain to a total collapse of that mountain.
Whatever it is you're being paid for this, it's too much.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
As has been previously pointed out to you in both video and photos, it's a good thing that they didn't then...
As all videos and photos show, neither the towers nor WTC7 broke up and slid off in chunks, nor did they tumble sideways in one direction. They FELL straight DOWN, no matter how many times you lie about it.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
I stated mountains don't fall down. You stated avalanches make my statement false, in so many words.
That makes you a liar.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
Under what theory does gravity so affect a vertical structure? Your *belief* is contingent upon the very flawed premise that only a controlled demolition can cause supporting columns to fail.
The law of physics which states than an object will always take the path of LEAST resistance. Look it up.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
Can you please point to where there might reside any working brain cells in the room you are currently in?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
Can you please simply point out the post...not your warped interpretations.
In case you're either too retarded or too lazy to look up your own words..
FL : Just as mountains don't simply "fall down" because they're above ground, neither do man-made objects.
war: Avalanches occur when what was supporting the materials which are now falling can no longer support them...
Amazing that you had to be told this...
So you're equating snow rolling off a mountain to a mountain collapse.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
As all videos and photos show, neither the towers nor WTC7 broke up and slid off in chunks
WTC7 did have a minor break up in that the penthouse structure collapsed along with some of the roof but, essentially, it remained intact...on that I concur but the failure was much lower...13th floor...
As for WTC 1 and 2 to claim that they fell straight down and did not spew huge chucks of debris all over nor did it break apart is simply insanity. The debris field for WTC 1 and 2 spanned blocks and damaged structures in a wide radius...
Avalanches occur when what was supporting the materials which are now falling can no longer support them...
That statement is 100% correct.
Nowhere in that statement do I state that anything has fallen other than the materials which comprise the avalanche. The word *mountain* appears nowhere. The word *collapse* appears nowhere.
I am beginning to wonder if English is your first language.
The law of physics which states than an object will always take the path of LEAST resistance. Look it up.
So, the top of the WTC, now detached from the bottom of WTC, looks down and says..."Gee, look at that building...I better tilt over the other way!!!"
The fact is, when one vertical structure becomes two vertical structures the path of least resistance for the one on top, when the only inertial force upon it is gravity, is downward and not sideways...
The fact is, when one vertical structure becomes two vertical structures the path of least resistance for the one on top, when the only inertial force upon it is gravity, is downward and not sideways...
Wrong. Unless the supporting structure is instantaneously destroyed across all quadrants, the path of least resistance is in the direction of the failed quadrant or section. Thus any collapse other than total failure of the supporting floors and central core would have caused the top structure to tilt, tumble, and/or slide off the undamaged section. A straight downwards path is not possible without the help of explosives, and the duration of the fall indicates there was practically NO resistance at all to the downwards motion of the upper section.
You are also wrong about the top of the WTC towers "detaching". They were still resting upon their supporting elements, it's not as if a UFO came down and PICKED UP the top of the towers then dropped them.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
The debris field for WTC 1 and 2 spanned blocks and damaged structures in a wide radius...
Debris was ejected horizontally, yet the structure itself collapsed into its own footprint, ie. it did not tumble over and drop sideways into the surrounding buildings or street. It was a symmetrical collapse, not asymmetrical.
Do you know what those words mean?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
You added the above phrase after you responded with your avalanche statement in regards to my statement that mountains don't collapse because they're above ground.
So sure, snow falls off mountains. Mountains don't collapse.
The two do not equate and are not related. Do you fail to understand that?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
You added the above phrase after you responded with your avalanche statement in regards to my statement that mountains don't collapse because they're above ground.
Uh...no...that appears in my #311...a post that has not been edited and which precedes you using the same phrase.
You've just been caught in a possible lie...what do you do?
So sure, snow falls off mountains. Mountains don't collapse.
Snow does not fall *off* mountains. Down...but not off...
The two do not equate and are not related. Do you fail to understand that?
I've given you absolutely no cause for you to *think* that I don't.
There is a video proof of WTC7 falling AT free fall speed
Free fall speed for those 18 or 19 stories that are visible from the North would be 3.9 seconds...it takes 5.4 seconds for those 18 floors to disappear... So no...debunked...again...
Uh...no...that appears in my #311...a post that has not been edited and which precedes you using the same phrase.
Amazing that you had to be told this...
In other words, you felt the need to add that snide remark even though what you had just said made no sense in regards to my original statement.
Snow does not fall *off* mountains. Down...but not off...,
Er, not quite. Snow does not FALL DOWN a mountain, in terms of an avalanche it ROLLS down AND off a mountain.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
He sure is. By trying to "prove" the government story, he's actually bringing the inconsistencies of it to the forefront.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
No matter how many times you repeat this fable it will not move it to the non- fiction section...
So all of those videos of the WTC tower collapses, you're saying are fake, since they obviously did NOT fall sideways in ANY of those videos.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
Once again, I have no idea what your reference or context is.
I know you don't despite my having stated it numerous times.
Unfortunately for you, I simply recognize bullshit when I see it...
Well I should hope so, it's the first thing you look at every morning and the last thing every night in the mirror when presumably you brush bullshit's teeth.