4um: Field McConnell - Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot Used On 9/11 Planes, Impossible To Hijack!

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
9/11
See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Field McConnell - Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot Used On 9/11 Planes, Impossible To Hijack!
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5NnBQJ5at4
Published: Jan 24, 2015
Author: staff
Post Date: 2015-01-24 14:13:06 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 11074
Comments: 402

Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 69.
#2. To: Horse (#0) (Edited)
Nothing is uninterruptible, expect maybe a nuclear reaction. They definitely were "hijacked" in a sense because they never reached their destinations and they most definitely didn't hit the towers due to not physically being able to stay together at the recorded speeds the planes were flying at when they hit the towers at basically sea level.

RickyJ posted on 2015-01-24 16:18:47 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#4. To: RickyJ (#2)
not physically being able to stay together at the recorded speeds the planes were flying at when they hit the towers at basically sea level.

X-15 posted on 2015-01-24 17:59:40 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#44. To: X-15 (#4)
What I stated was a fact that Boeing itself says about their planes. What you posted was some videos of planes flying at undetermined speeds that proves nothing. I am surprised there are still any people on this forum that believe the government's lies about 9/11.

RickyJ posted on 2015-01-31 19:56:16 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#47. To: RickyJ (#44)
I'm surprised that anybody thinks that missiles-disguised-as-airliners (cloaking devices right out of Star Trek!!!!!) hit buildings, that's just pot-smoking sci-fi bullshit.

X-15 posted on 2015-02-01 2:12:49 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#48. To: X-15 (#47)
I'm surprised that anybody thinks that missiles-disguised-as-airliners (cloaking devices right out of Star Trek!!!!!) hit buildings, that's just pot-smoking sci-fi bullshit.

Good heavens...
How dare you question "proven facts" that everyone knows to be true?
I have a mutual friend that worked in the Pentagon, was there that fateful day. She said it was a damned airplane that went in, was found there, was removed from there.
We all KNOW that those people that WERE THERE IN THE BUILDING were in on this whole thing, dont we?????????

Cynicom posted on 2015-02-01 3:54:04 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#51. To: Cynicom (#48) (Edited)
I have a mutual friend that worked in the Pentagon, was there that fateful day. She said it was a damned airplane that went in, was found there, was removed from there.
We all KNOW that those people that WERE THERE IN THE BUILDING were in on this whole thing, dont we?????????

Did she happen to say anything about the Pentagon not being in high alert mode enough to even point some of the many surveillance cameras there in the direction(s) of an alleged incoming plane claimed to have been wandering around long after the WTC was reportedly struck twice?
It would not have been necessary for many people in the building to have been in on a staged strike. It wasn't evacuated in that direction, which was burning and billowing with smoke. That section was sparsely populated due to the renovations there that had been ongoing since Clinton's administration, during which the Rumsfeld-spotlighted trillions of dollars in transactions had gone missing/unaccounted for -- some of it, perhaps, black-budgeted to pre-rig that section for inward exploding and imploding FX/effects.
Some interesting YouTube videos, imo:
911 Pentagon - 1 minute
911 Evacuation of Pentagon ordered [a few minutes before the strike and had barely started?], but [ordered] by whom?
911 Washington Monument - less than 1 minute
The Washington Monument blows up on live TV. Or does it?
C-Span; 9/11 Live Coverage - 10 minutes
At 8:48, a fire at the State Department is reported ... a fireball was reportedly witnessed at the Pentagon ... a helicopter explosion was reportedly witnessed at the Pentagon ...
Edited to add video time-data + bracketed insert notations.

GreyLmist posted on 2015-02-02 3:47:06 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#55. To: GreyLmist, Katniss (#51)
Did she happen to say anything about the Pentagon not being in high alert mode enough to even point some of the many surveillance cameras there in the direction(s) of an alleged incoming plane claimed to have been wandering around long after the WTC was reportedly struck twice?

Of course not.
Ask Katniss about that. He worked at the Pentagon.

christine posted on 2015-03-29 14:42:50 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#60. To: christine, Katniss (#55)
Me at #51: Did she [an alleged Pentagon employee and 9/11 plane claimant] happen to say anything about the Pentagon not being in high alert mode enough to even point some of the many surveillance cameras there in the direction(s) of an alleged incoming plane claimed to have been wandering around long after the WTC was reportedly struck twice?
christine at #55: Of course not. Ask Katniss about that. He worked at the Pentagon.

Ok. Am asking, Katniss, what your Pentagon-insights might be in assessment of the issues at #51.

GreyLmist posted on 2015-03-31 14:31:29 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#63. To: GreyLmist (#60)
Ok. Am asking, Katniss, what your Pentagon-insights might be in assessment of the issues at #51.

Several years prior to that date there were multiple cameras of the entrance and entrance areas, the views of which one could see at the guard desk upon entering. The same was true of all sides of the building and property. It's pure gullibility to believe the Fed's account of this and the people that have ever worked there know this.
There was also a VDOT camera that pans that entire skyline that time of day. One could access it online despite the internet having been in its infancy. VDOT has always kept footage for a certain amount of time.
There was also a gas station for military members only right in the flight path that I gassed up at numerous times that had video yet had it stolen along with 31 other known videos within 3 hours of the event. I have to believe that the VDOT footage was also taken or destroyed as a part of that.
There is an entrance/exit to the building on the helipad side, which is the side in question. It's pure assinitity for anyone to attempt to tell you that there were no cameras with 24/7 surveillance of any and all exits to that building.
Even once in, people could only access certain areas of the building pending their levels of access. Generally speaking the further in in the rings one went, with five "rings," the greater clearances one needed. Anyone without those clearances could not access nor be permitted entry into those areas. Areas were also segregated by military brand, dept., etc. with permissions only being given to those needing access.
Again, to think that the exterior doors were not well covered via cameras is nothing but pure gullibility.
In other words, don't believe for a second that the only available footage was that joke of three frames, or whatever it was, that the Feds finally released years after the actual occurrence. There was no national interest that could not have been removed from that film to have it released within days if not hours of that event. Frankly, I cannot imagine anything sensitive at all in it, never say never though.
Either way, the fact that footage from 32 private cameras in that immediate area were stolen, all within 3 hours, tells us all that we need to know. They wouldn't even have been able to figure out where all of those 32 were in three hours much less have them all confiscated during that time. Clearly the due diligence thereof was done well prior to that day.
The tours of the building more or less simply "feel good" tours. You really don't see much of any real value, it's mostly museum type stuff with a tremendously limited amount of access to the actual building. I'm not even sure that they run the tours anymore although I'd guess that they do.

Katniss posted on 2015-03-31 21:09:17 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#66. To: Katniss (#63) (Edited)
the really real stuff would be ubderground.
patagon pentalawn.., when one studies crash physics one can not help to.wonder. "how come a plane cane crash through.a.building like the pentacon(sarc) ... but fail to blow away.wooden spools."
from 7 to the lawn the epa failed to act upon, ive disected 911 completly and what i discovered is that even among those who care, we seem to discombulated to effect meaningful change... even when irrefutable proof is given before ones eyes... we are still left with a majority of ignorant docille IGNORANT sheeple.... and i hate the word sheeple. with a passion... yet what can be done when the majority think dual wielding gun slingers can target with accuracy.... sandy hook, ft hood, bosron etc etc.. the propaganda matrix.relies on. propaganda. to definded ones mi.d is to learn their tech.iques. and share with others that they might be equally well armed.

titorite posted on 2015-03-31 21:23:50 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#69. To: titorite (#66)
911 is a complete ruse, we're on the same sheet there.
That hole in the Pentagon wall quite clearly isn't big enough to have a medium sized commmercial airliner go into it. Then when we're expected to believe that the wings folded up and followed the fuselage into the hole, and as you say with no marks on the lawn, all the lamposts undisturbed, the spools fine, etc., people have to a trained monkey not to see through that.
Unfortunately we have a nation full of trained monkeys. Untrained monkeys are brighter.

Katniss posted on 2015-03-31 21:50:39 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 69.
There are no replies to Comment # 69.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 69.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um