Title: Field McConnell - Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot Used On 9/11 Planes, Impossible To Hijack! Source:
[None] URL Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5NnBQJ5at4 Published:Jan 24, 2015 Author:staff Post Date:2015-01-24 14:13:06 by Horse Keywords:None Views:11465 Comments:402
So well reasoned and I agree with everything you wrote. Think about all who were involved with the Kennedy assassination and how many had to have been silenced either forcibly or willingly. I liken 9/11 to the assassination as I believe that once that was accomplished, the controllers knew they could do whatever they wished. Both events were coups.
Truth is still truth even if no one believes it. A lie is still a lie even if everyone believes it.
WTC insurance fraud? Silverstein “trial” runs Monday through Wednesday
World Trade Center owner Larry Silverstein – who confessed on national television to “pulling” World Trade Center Building 7 – will appear in the courtroom of Judge Alvin Hellerstein at 500 Pearl St. in New York City. The non-jury trial,
Truer words were never spoken. The threat of murder is a huge factor. The Clinton body count is a long established presence online and there's an equivalent for each president as he emerges and racks up kills. The bodies strewn in the wake of the JFK hit are sobering to say the least, starting with Oswald and Ruby. Neither of them is particularly missed, but it's the principle of the thing.
Fantastic news -- I had no idea!! Alas, he's got the dough to buy any judge. Would love to know why it took them 14 years. Yeah, the insurance fraud and his "pull it" speech are among the painfully obvious smoking guns. The day the brass claimed to find one of the Ayrabs' passport in the WTC wreckage was surely the lowest point in public intelligence in history.
Interesting point that the various cameras in the immediate area were probably pinpointed sometime prior for quick film-confiscations (for security purposes or whatever). The Pentagon brass didn't seem to have a security issue with the grounds being filmed by those cameras on other days. Likely, the footage was seized because of what it wouldn't have recorded -- a plane strike. I'd expect there were more than door-cameras at the Pentagon that would have been pointed towards a long-derelict, incoming plane on a trajectory with it, if there had been one. The apparent lackadaisicalness about that is anomalous, imo, or even purposely appearing to be so off-guard for reasons unknown.
YouTube comment at Pentagon Attack Footage - 'Missile' and(or) 'Plane'?: "There are at least 5 nice closed circuit security cameras atop the pentagon roof's edge on this side of the building. The President was due to land on that helicopter pad in about 3 hours in which, the plane supposedly nearly flew over. This was a very 'High Security Area'" Another comment there: "the only thing hijacked on 9/11 was the US Government!"
Two film-analysis discussion points at truthandshadows.wordpress.com: "Does it not strike people as odd that we get to see footage of the WTC plane crashes over and over, but not for the pentagon?" ... "The government has no pride to wound. It has pushed the 'incompetence' theory from the beginning to distract us"
You: In other words, don't believe for a second that the only available footage was that joke of three frames, or whatever it was, that the Feds finally released years after the actual occurrence. There was no national interest that could not have been removed from that film to have it released within days if not hours of that event. Frankly, I cannot imagine anything sensitive at all in it, never say never though.
Uploaded on Jan 27, 2008 by History Commons Groups
Five frames of footage taken by a security camera at the Pentagon on 9/11. The frames were released on March 7, 2002. Relevant event in the History Commons database: March 7, 2002: Plane Crashing into Pentagon Is Shown in Photos. Link: http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/co... [2003 Wayback Machine archive copy -- pics show that the film was date stamped as Sep. 12, 2001]
These two short videos were released years later in 2006 after Judicial Watch made a FOIA/Freedom of Information Act request. They both show small "UFOs"/unidentified flying objects moving fast from the left side of the screen towards the strike zone. The [second first] video looks more Sci-Fi due to lens glare seeming to be something shiny on the ground until a vehicle passes by and, also, something that looks to be hovering in mid-air, probably from a lens smudge:
Uploaded on May 16, 2006 by Judicial Watch
This is previously unreleased footage of American Airlines Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon obtained by public interest group, Judicial Watch. For more info, visit JudicialWatch.org
BTW, if you're ever in the area, let me know. I'll take you down there and show you where everything used to be, where that 'cab' was, the flight path, where I was run off by an abusive and brainless LEO for publicly taking pics in public a day later, where gas station used to be, which IMO is no a coincidence that it's no longer there, i.e., part of the ongoing coverup.
I can tell you how to find the camera view on the VDOT camera. If you look at it in the a.m., when this happened, in between 9 and 10 a.m., that camera is always pointed towards the northwestern skyline to capture the inbound commuting traffic, as it's a traffic camera, and from it you can see the highways as well as the entire skyline which easily would have captured no less than 10 seconds of the last part of that flight.
Thanks for the kindly invite. I'd like to be able to visit there but chances are slim to none.
I think you're the third person, afaik, to report having been prevented from taking pictures there soon after. Maybe Judicial Watch could file a Freedom of Information Act request for the Virginia Department of Transportation footage during the time period in question that day. It managed to get 2 additional films released by the Pentagon in 2006.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
The official story is a ridiculous Conspiracy Theory, war, that admittedly would be unacceptable by court standards of integrity and is why the invasion of Afghanistan was launched instead -- which makes you and others arrogantly promoting it fanatic Conspiracy Theorists in denial.
Edited for capitalization and punctuation + word insert.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
The official story is a ridiculous conspiracy theory...
Yea...never have planes been hijacked...nor been used as missiles...a massive explosion and collision don't result in massive damage...10's of thousands of gallons of a volatile accelerant doesn't cause significant fires when introduced, ignited, in to a fuel rich environment doesn't result in fires of any significance and, my personal favorite, gravity doesn't *work* in a direct fashion but in a circuitous one...i.e. a falling object doesn't fall straight down...
PS: If we were going to bomb any nation over a pipeline in that region it would have been Russia...
10's of thousands of gallons of a volatile accelerant doesn't cause significant fires when introduced,
MOST of which burnt up OUTSIDE the towers, and what was left burned for only several minutes before being spent.
ignited, in to a fuel rich environment doesn't result in fires of any significance
Sure there were OFFICE fires, but they burned for less than an hour, and as the towers acted as HUGE heatsinks, there's no possible way for temperatures to have reached anywhere close enough to weaken steel.
and, my personal favorite, gravity doesn't *work* in a direct fashion but in a circuitous one...i.e. a falling object doesn't fall straight down...
Gravity doesn't pull you through the floor you're standing on now does it? Are you travelling through the core of the earth as we speak, or is the floor you're standing on remaining in place?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
You have no proof of that whatsoever...in fact, what analysis has been done puts the amount burned as ignited mist outside of the building @ around 15%...
Congrates, you FINALLY admit to something that is true.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
Unless the 17 floors above me are falling on me...
And why would they be falling on you? Even if they did, YOU'D be squished like a bug, but the floors below ALWAYS supported the weight above.
Now sure, if the floor you're standing on is damaged, IT might fail, but not the 70 or so floors below it. ESPECIALLY when the floors above you turned to dust as they collapsed and much of the mass of those floors went UP or OUTWARDS due to air pressure blowing them in those directions as they "fell".
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
You have no proof of that whatsoever...in fact, what analysis has been done puts the amount burned as ignited mist outside of the building @ around 15%...
You are either chronically challenged in the intellectual department, or you are a HUGE liar.
Not only do videos of the South Tower impact depict huge fireballs created outside the tower, but even FEMA states in their report that a significant percentage of fuel was spent in those fireballs, and the remaining fuel was spent after the first few minutes.
Here's a link to the FEMA report if you wish to educate yourself (see pages 2- 21 and 2-22);
Do you not read up on anything before you make such inane declarations?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
thats not a very good guess if you are.trying to argue fire as the cause. see when the second tower allegedly got hit the big fire ball we all saw was supposed to be all the fuel burning outside. see the first tower allegedly got a direct hit putting most of the.fuel into the.building BUT the.second tkwer was a corner hit distrubuting most of.the.fuel into the air .
so if you wanna say fire caused it and tbat it fell first because it had more weight on a fire weakened load... thats fine....
can you tell me what floor the impact was on in both buildings?
______________________________________
Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.
The official story is a ridiculous Conspiracy Theory...
Yea...never have planes been hijacked...nor been used as missiles...a massive explosion and collision don't result in massive damage...10's of thousands of gallons of a volatile accelerant doesn't cause significant fires when introduced, ignited, in to a fuel rich environment doesn't result in fires of any significance and, my personal favorite, gravity doesn't *work* in a direct fashion but in a circuitous one...i.e. a falling object doesn't fall straight down...
PS: If we were going to bomb any nation over a pipeline in that region it would have been Russia...
Don't be absurd. That planes have been hijacked before doesn't mean they were that day in the conventional sense of terrorist pilots aboard commandeering the aircraft. A condundrum for Official Story indoctrinees is explaining how, for instance, our Military jets could intercept the foreign-based and far distant Achille Lauro hijack for a safe landing but somehow missed doing so here 4 times in one day. There's nobody in this forum that I'm aware of who is under any impression that planes couldn't be used as missiles before then. Those who question the official version have continually been pointing out, lo these many years, that the Pentagon staff, too, were well aware of that as a possibile occurrence and defensively drilled for it. It's G. W. Bush and his civilian admins who claimed to be clueless about such; so taunt them about it, not us. The WTC was not engulfed in flames -- just localized fires that diminished, as news footage shows. The alleged strikezone jumpers at the windows weren't even demonstrably under threat of smoke inhalation, much less about to be incinerated. The alleged plane impact damage to the buildings is comparable to an axe blow on tree trunks that likewise wouldn't be much structurally destabilized so easily. Your pipeline assertion about Russia doesn't match the reported intimidations of Afghanistan in Pre-9/11 "negotiations". We can discuss "circuitous" demolishment of the Towers, perhaps by electrification of the steel framing (which could even reduce it selectively to the consistency of iron-sand, if need be) in conjunction with strategically placed welding "erasers"/arc gougers (at salvageable-steel points, which would sound explosive) and by sound waves directed through the concrete to alter its chemistry, powered by the Consolidated Edison plant underground there -- right about the time you get done explaining the gov-issued "cell phone calls" in-flight that the technology then doesn't.
Edited spelling, spacing + rewording at 5th, last and next to last sentences.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
PS: If we were going to bomb any nation over a pipeline in that region it would have been Russia...
Sure, if you don't mind mushroom clouds appearing everywhere on the horizon, or directly over your head.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
how come the.tower that was hit second fell first?
Greater weight of the upper floors...
Didn't you say elsewhere that the upper floors angularly toppled over rather than falling directly downward? -- which would be less weight on the floors below.
Comparing the Towers to steel box beams and the alleged impact zones as similar to the first deconstruction dismantling-step of material removal to make segments of a beam topple over, a welder could take out triangular parts on each side of that space, pointed towards the back like this: < > and it likely still wouldn't slant forward that far up and topple off until they stepped around to the back area and blowtorched it across from one triangular point to the other.
Edited for a word replacement.
-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
I would like that. Thanks. I'll be in Maryland mid May for my niece's wedding, but only for a weekend and won't have time for anything or anyone other than family. I was actually born and raised in the Silver Spring/Wheaton area.
Sure, just let me know.
I'm not sure you'd want to live in the SS/Wheaton area today. When's the last time you were up this way?
Likely, the footage was seized because of what it wouldn't have recorded -- a plane strike.
And what it would have, a missile strike.
I'm sure that there were cameras on the property covering the perimeter in the event of anything suspicious approaching, and as you say, the helipad would have been on video too, some if not most of which would have had a horizon shot.
I think you're the third person, afaik, to report having been prevented from taking pictures there soon after. Maybe Judicial Watch could file a Freedom of Information Act request for the Virginia Department of Transportation footage during the time period in question that day. It managed to get 2 additional films released by the Pentagon in 2006.
I took a bunch and was chased off by some stooge cop decided that he was the most important person on the planet that evening.
And frankly, what should have been to hide from pictures being taken several hundred yards away? It was public, If I had been elsewhere with a tele lense it would have been OK?
Good luck with that VDOT footage. I'm guessing that was part of the confiscated lot and that since then it's been erased. I can't imagine that they would keep them that long anyway. Under normal circumstances there wouldn't be any reason to.
Didn't you say elsewhere that the upper floors angularly toppled over rather than falling directly downward? -- which would be less weight on the floors below.
No. As they fell they began to tilt....as is clearly indicated on the videos...
Here's a pic from a CT site so it will have credibility in your *mind*:
In fact, it tilted for a number of reasons not the least of which was because the damage to the supporting columns was not uniformly horizontal...another annoying fact that the controlled demolition crowd cannot accept...
Note also the visible fire...which FormerLurker claims were *out*....
I'll take you down there and show you where everything used to be, where that 'cab' was, the flight path, where I was run off by an abusive and brainless LEO for publicly taking pics in public a day later, where gas station used to be, which IMO is no a coincidence that it's no longer there, i.e., part of the ongoing coverup.
The Pentagon has a very wide *no photo* zone around it.
Good thing that I'm not guessing then but merely stating fact which is ALWAYS good.
if you are.trying to argue fire as the cause. see when the second tower allegedly got hit the big fire ball we all saw was supposed to be all the fuel burning outside
Uh...no...about 15% of the fuel burned outside...
can you tell me what floor the impact was on in both buildings?
Anyone with working eyes will see on page 2-22 that FEMA states the jet fuel was spent within the first few minutes.
So that makes you a liar war, but I'm sure everyone on the net who's ever read your posts already knows that.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
the south tower was not a.direct impact not even according the the governments nist offical story. it was alleged to be an indirwct corner impact.
The plane hit the tower...that makes it a *direct* hit...for it to be an *indirect* hit it would have had to have hit something *else* first...where it directly hit is inconsequential...
You're trying to pick gnat shit out of pepper, outdoors, in the winter...
