Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Chris Bollyn: Israel behind the 9-11 attacks-- and Iraq wars
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Feb 5, 2015
Author: Christopher Bollyn
Post Date: 2015-02-05 20:28:40 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 893
Comments: 31


Poster Comment:

Chris will be in Austin tomorrow night as part of his Solving 9-11 tour. My husband and I will be attending.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 31.

#1. To: Lod, Buzzard, Austin peeps (#0) (Edited)

If you're interested in going, it will be at the IHOP on South Mopac 7-10 p.m.

1101 South Mo Pac Expressway, Austin, TX 78746

christine  posted on  2015-02-05   20:31:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: christine (#1)

If you're interested in going, it will be at the IHOP

LIHOPMIHOP...IHOP/International House of Pancakes/WTC, NY 9/11. Even the Towers looked designed with rows of forks.

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-02-05   21:11:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: GreyLmist (#2)

LIHOPMIHOP...IHOP

hahahaha. good one, Grey

christine  posted on  2015-02-05   23:53:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: christine (#5)

:) On a serious note:

Part 3 of 4: Did Plasmoid Gas and Infrared Beams Cause the WTC Destruction? By Barry Ball, Barbara Ellis, and Russ Hallberg WTC Research Legislative Alliance

That World Trade Center buildings 1, 2, and 7 were brought down by a combination of plasmoid gas and infrared beams is a theory first reported in early 2002 by ...

... "9/11 researcher/writer Christopher Bollyn [in] an article for the website American Free Press."

He should be reminded of that every time he starts his "Buck Rogers beam weapons" chutzpah-schtick about Judy Woods' research. More from the linked article:

Bollyn underpins stories about laser beams by bringing up what he knows about “infrared-radiation” weaponry being developed by researchers working under contract by the U.S. Department of Defense. He points out that the far-off infrared waves, like a microwave oven, produce heat and “cause increased molecular vibrational activity.” (6)

He describes the Soviet experiment, leaving readers to speculate about results if plasmoid gas and those laser beams were paired to vaporize buildings in general and the WTC Towers in particular:

“The physicist placed a slightly warmed plate on the floor of a kitchen in an apartment on the fifth floor, just below the roof. GRU headquarters in Weimar (DDR), where the infrared beam originated was less than one mile away on the other side of the valley and the second transmitter or reflector was 200 meters away, with no obstacles between. An infrared beam weapons requires two sources. “The TV and the oven were turned on and the TV’s remote control was put in the refrigerator. The physicist left the room and watched the TV screen, which went black for a few seconds. The physicist left the apartment for a half hour to allow AFESC personnel to examine the results.

“The plate had been reduced to dust that was difficult to pick up even with a vacuum cleaner, according to the physicist. ‘The plate was not “destroyed suddenly as if hit by a bullet. Rather, it disintegrated in a process taking about 15 minutes.’

“….If the WTC had been struck by a similar weapon, then it is very likely, according to the physicist, that one of the transmitters could have been placed in a high building nearby or on a moving platform such as a satellite, plane, or ship, and the reflector, or second source, on a ship or across the East River.” (7)

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-02-06   12:05:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: All (#8) (Edited)

Part 3 of 4: Did Plasmoid Gas and Infrared Beams Cause the WTC Destruction? By Barry Ball, Barbara Ellis, and Russ Hallberg WTC Research Legislative Alliance

That World Trade Center buildings 1, 2, and 7 were brought down by a combination of plasmoid gas and infrared beams is a theory first reported in early 2002 by ...

... "9/11 researcher/writer Christopher Bollyn [in] an article for the website American Free Press."

He should be reminded of that every time he starts his "Buck Rogers beam weapons" chutzpah-schtick about Judy Wood's research.

Reference for Bollyn's "Buck Rogers beam weapons" remark about that at 52:55-54:08 of the YouTube at the opening post, Chris Bollyn: Israel behind the 9-11 attacks-- and Iraq wars. On a sidenote, he also claims vaguely in that time-stamped section to have been a starter-link in the dubious thermitic "chain of evidence", bringing "scientific" documents about alleged iron-sphere findings to Steven Jones from California, sometime prior to any of the alleged WTC dust sample donations reportedly sent to Jones half a decade after 9/11. Reference the two 4um links at the end of Post #28 here for more info on that subject.

Cross-referencing 4um Title: Bollyn at the Silver Eagle Taphouse, McQueeney, Texas - video, 3 of 3 at new.livestream.com/ronavery/bollyn. At 2:16:05-2:18:50 of that video, Bollyn attempts to misrepresent his own article on Directed Energy Weapons to disassociate himself from any such research by basically claiming that he was only patronizing a female Mossad operative (former Stasi/East German Intelligence agent) when he wrote it soon after 9/11. Says she had told him a weird story about a Soviet/Weimar era DEW-Test that he insists was just disinfo but he added his own material to it so that it would sound more interesting. However, that's not how his article reads and it makes no mention of such a female. [Ref. Israel and US Develop Infrared Beam Weapon by Christopher Bollyn] There he cites a male, German Physicist and another plasma expert amid his other reporting on laser weapons developement since the early 1970s, while also linking the space-based weapons program known as “Brilliant Pebbles” to the 1990s Estonia disaster; the sinking of which he's mentioned in his book tour videos but no longer as connected to a secret space weapons cargo, as he'd postulated before. [Refs. "ILL-FATED ESTONIA FERRY USED FOR WEAPONS TRANSFERS" by Christopher Bollyn and other articles of his on the topic at ESTONIA WAS SUNK. Also, Was Baltic Ferry Sunk to Prevent Technology from Reaching West? by Christopher Bollyn]

Additional laser and directed energy weaponry sources:

Laser Weapon Destroys Artillery Fire - Reuters and NewScientist.com news service on Wednesday, November 6, 2002

Moving target [My note: which the WTC wasn't]

Tuesday's test -- the first time a laser had shot down an artillery shell -- was part of a new series to determine MTHEL requirements and demonstrate the system's capabilities against a wide range of airborne targets.

In earlier tests in 2000 and 2001 the testbed focused on the threat of artillery rockets and shot down 25 Katyushas fired singly and in salvos.

The U.S. military has shot down dummy intercontinental missile warheads in tests both inside and outside the atmosphere using projectile weapons and is also examining the possible use of long-range lasers to burn up such warheads in flight.

Tests conducted in August 2000 showed that another laser system, the Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL), could destroy short-range Russian-built Katyusha rockets in flight.

The US army is currently researching a variety of different combat laser systems. It has developed powerful ground- and air-based lasers for targeting long-range missiles, as well as smaller fighter plane systems capable of striking other aircraft or anti-aircraft batteries.

Long-range moving target:

Laser weapon passes biggest test - Technology & Science - Science - NBC News

msnbc.com news services updated 5/7/2004

JERUSALEM -- A laser weapon under joint Israeli-U.S. development destroyed a long-range rocket for the first time in a test in the skies over New Mexico, military spokesmen said Friday.

In earlier tests the Nautilus laser had successfully eliminated 28 short-range Katyusha rockets and five artillery shells in flight as well as several “hostile objects” on the ground.

Laser/Beam weapons - defenceforumindia.com, currently 17 pages of info

Edited a 4um video link, punctuation and to expand the MSNBC news section.

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-02-18   8:35:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: All (#30) (Edited)

9/11 Proof Of Used Laser Weapons Part 1 - 8 minute Youtube + All Comments. Recommending the first half through 4:42.

Cross-referencing 4um Title: Bollyn at the Silver Eagle Taphouse, McQueeney, Texas - video, 3 of 3 at new.livestream.com/ronavery/bollyn. At 32:50-34:00 of that video, Bollyn talks about ground-heat at the WTC where the Towers and Building 7 were destroyed. Above that area on the screen, he points out Building 6, aka the US Customs House, with a giant area at the center of it gone. See also: Six World Trade Center - Wikipedia for info on other tenants, etc., + Pics. Example link, photo-captioned "NOAA aerial image following the September 11, 2001 attacks. North is approximately upper right on the image."

While discussing structural locations at the WTC complex in the clip, Bollyn states that Building 6 was completely destroyed by a missile, an explosion or something before either Tower fell. The italicized timing was rather shaky-sounding news, I thought, but even he didn't try to make the claim that termites...er, thermite/thermate did it, nano or not. Just as we can be reasonably sure that the Tower tonnages weren't pulverized into so much fine dust simply by jet fuel and office fires in conjunction with pancaking gravity or conventional demolition charges either, we can also be reasonably sure that doesn't quite account very tidily at all for what could have caused the internal fortitudes of WTC 6 to downwardly dissipate into a sort of cold fusionish void with no techno-visible trace-evidence thermally. A dejecting mini/micro n-device of another sort likewise doesn't seem to wholly sum up the much missing materials but lesser dust levels in what appears to have been a strike of such precision that the rickety-looking outer walls were mostly still left with substantial standing, barricade encircling-like:

Win every 9/11 debate with this one fact ! - 3.5 minute YouTube + All Comments

Description excerpts:

incredible see inside of building 6 http://youtu.be/a4FkO5ry1uo
Links are under the video for inside pictures of World Trade Center 6 , the interior is missing ,its not crushed or explosives go to the link and see for yourself
the basement is intact , the walls are intact

Surreal Pictures Inside WTC 6 Destroys 9/11 Cover Story For Ever ! - 12.75 minutes + All Comments

Description excerpts:

the walls are intact the basement is intact

[what] stands out is cardboard and wires have little to no damage

like magic or science

media [not] talking about this or showing it , maybe they [don't] realize but they will have to at some point

promoting nano thermite and they refuse to consider another narrative , building six is something they never had to consider until now

[reconsidering] something else turned the towers and world trade center complex into dust is something that should be considered a priority now

Edited paragraphs 1 and 2 + spelling, formatting and to add a somewhat laserly-comparative 9/11 Pentagon Pic:

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-02-18   16:26:16 ET  (2 images) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 31.

        There are no replies to Comment # 31.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 31.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest