Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

National News
See other National News Articles

Title: US military has become so depleted under Obama it is now only 'marginally able' to defend nation, scathing report claims
Source: Daily Mail
URL Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art ... aneous-wars-report-claims.html
Published: Feb 26, 2015
Author: Lydia Willgress
Post Date: 2015-02-26 11:14:27 by abraxas
Keywords: None
Views: 164
Comments: 20

US military has become so depleted under Obama it is now only 'marginally able' to defend nation, scathing report claims

Report released by think tank The Heritage Foundation on Tuesday Claims US military can no longer achieve its objective of being able to fight two simultaneous wars Cuts to number of soldiers and naval ships leave US under-powered

By Lydia Willgress for MailOnline

Published: 04:33 EST, 26 February 2015 | Updated: 10:14 EST, 26 February 2015

The US military has become so depleted by cuts that it has been left only 'marginally able' to defend the nation.

Decreases in the number of soldiers and naval ships have led to armed forces falling short of President Obama's national security strategy, a report by The Heritage Foundation claimed.

Obama's aim was to ensure that the country could still fight two major conflicts at once.

But the Index of US Military Strength report, released by the think tank on Tuesday, said that with current funding this would be problematic.

The report said: 'The consistent decline in funding and the consequent shrinking of the US Army are putting it under significant pressure.

'The cumulative effect of such factors has resulted in a US military that is marginally able to meet the demands of defending America's vital national interests.'

The Quadrennial Defense Review announced last year that the Army would be cut from 570,000 soldiers to 440,000 - the fewest since World War II.

The Army historically commits 21 brigade combat teams to one war but would struggle to do this and leave reserves if there were two simultaneous conflicts, the report said.

It added that the Navy would need another 62 ships to be able to carry out two large campaigns.

However the Air Force’s fleet is judged 'strong'.

Dakota Wood, a Heritage analyst and former Marine Corps officer, said: 'The US military itself is ageing. It's shrinking in size.

'It's quickly becoming problematic in terms of being able to address more than one major conflict.'

Randy Forbes, member of the House Armed Services Committee, said the report's findings were stark.

He said: 'It paints a stark picture of shortfalls in capability, capacity and readiness across the force, and illustrates the damage done by years of irresponsible budget cuts.

'If you listen to the Army, they will give testimony that they can no longer guarantee. You talk about two wars - they testified they can't guarantee that we could win one war.

'The Navy will tell you if we get to 260 ships, we cease to be a superpower - we become a regional power.

'I encourage all policy-makers interested in the current state of our military, and how to improve it, to review this Index.'

Under Obama the Pentagon's base budget, minus overseas war costs, has decreased from $527 billion in 2010 to around $496 billion.

He is hoping the budget will increase to $534 billion in 2016.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

#20. To: abraxas (#0)

The Heritage Foundation seems to believe that it's always 1938.

Here's the link to the actual report referenced in this article:

http://index.heritage.org/militarystrength /

It's a real hoot to read. In this article, they quote Randy Forbes as hoping the budget will increase to $534B in 2016. Where's he been? The President's Budget already calls for more than that: from Table S-5 in the President's Budget request, $605B. That's also ignoring that Congress actually makes the budget, not the president. From the historical tables in the FY16 Budget Request document, same table, it says that FY 14 we spent $596B and in FY 15 $589B. So it'd be really nice to see where he got those numbers from.

www.whitehouse.gov/sites/.../fy2016/assets/tables.pdf http://">www.whitehouse.gov/sites/.../fy2016/assets/tables.pdf

Pretty much every year they release a report about the massive shortfalls in the defense budget, in past years it was called "4% for Freedom" where they believe that the floor for defense spending should be 4% of GDP. That's absurd because GDP has no relation to the strategic environment the US finds itself in. They say it's the "historic" average, and completely affordable. Using the same logic, no individual program ever proposed could be challenged on affordability. The Affordable Care Act's projections make it eminently affordable using the same calculation.

historian1944  posted on  2015-02-26   19:57:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 20.

        There are no replies to Comment # 20.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest