Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

History
See other History Articles

Title: FANTASTIC Letter/Article (esp for those interested in relevant history)
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://theendofzion.com/2013/05/25/ ... -by-heinz-weichardt/#more-2408
Published: Mar 30, 2015
Author: -
Post Date: 2015-03-30 10:12:53 by Katniss
Keywords: None
Views: 167
Comments: 11

Under Two Flags

Introduction

After years of urging my dear friend Heinz Weichardt to make at least a partial memoir of the vicissitudes of his interesting life, he finally was persuaded by Louis Beam, whom he met last year, to do so. This article was originally in the form of a letter to Louis.

Heinz certainly has had an unusual perspective of the Twentieth Century. A supporter of Hitler who left Germany as an unwanted non-Aryan, he became an enemy alien in America. As the years passed, Heinz became successful in his field of physics (electron-optics), retiring from IBM as a manager in its research division. As his article reveals, he never wavered in his support for National Socialism, even if he had himself been rejected by it.

Lately there has appeared a peculiar contempt for Historical Revisionism. The latter has undeniably been slashing and chopping the roots of contemporary Jewish power, so Heinz was very unsettled by such criticism. He told me often that when the Holocaust was beginning to be promoted in the 1960s he could only recall his school days in Germany. “I went to school with those fellows in the SS. I knew that they were simply not capable of behavior which the Jews were ascribing to them.” He felt that Revisionism was crucial to the regeneration of his once-beloved Germany which has staggered under the libels of Jewish-American lies for fifty years. The same goes for this miserable country.

Heinz believed that our goal must be to disfranchise Jews, to dislodge them from government, medicine, law, education, the arts and, of course, from the media. He believes that to criticize those who have demonstrated the Holocaust to be a lie only helps to maintain the Jews as our overlords.

It doesn’t matter if one genius today says he knew the Holocaust was phony in 1958 and because of that Revisionism is a waste of time. I don’t notice any reduction of Holocaust poison in the media today; our children continue to receive it. They must be protected from deadly lies. We adults must grow up, too. The truth will make us mad. It may make us fight. The fighting may one day make us free.

J. B. Campbell

February 23, 1995

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

I'm only partially through this at the moment, but a couple of key excerpts;

>>In Europe, meanwhile, the political influence of the Jewish banking dynasties became so strong that a Mrs. Rothschild could state, “My sons can decide if there will be war or not.”

>>When the Germans committed the unspeakable crime of becoming financially nearly independent from the international banking system and began to build a high-seas fleet to assure access to their modest colonial possessions, this was the last straw and something had to be done to put them down for good.

This piece is well worth the long read, particularly for those interested in WWI/WWII history and the launching pad for modern Zionism.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0) (Edited)

At a much later time the similar afflictions of the warmongering criminals, Churchill and Roosevelt, were generally well accepted! After the Russians arranged the murder of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand through their Serbian dupes, the First World War was on. The American people wanted to stay out of the European mess, but since the country was, at the time, suffering from one of its strangely recurring recessions, the powers that were decided differently. The opportunity of reaping huge profits by supplying one of the fighting sides with liberal credits and massive infusions of war matériel was too tempting and could not be ignored.

Man, this letter is hitting all the relevant points!

Katniss  posted on  2015-03-30   10:16:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: All (#0)

At exactly this point the seeds were laid to the future growth of German “anti-Semitism” (a euphemism for anti-Judaism) because the majority of middle-eastern Semites were still backing Germany at that time. The Jewish bankers in London and New York had Britain over a barrel and found it easy to extract the Balfour Declaration, which promised them a Jewish homeland–but not a sovereign Jewish state–in Palestine, which in 1916 still belonged to Turkey. The British, being famous for their fairness and integrity in all their dealings, made a similar offer to middle-eastern Arabs and even dispatched T. E. Lawrence to found the Arab Legion. At a later time when Lawrence reminded his government of this promise he suddenly and conveniently died in a motorcycle accident.

Man, I can't praise this read enough!

Katniss  posted on  2015-03-30   10:18:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Katniss (#2)

That IS good. You can almost see checkerboard squares all over Palestine as the big powers are angling for control of it. No surprise they'd kill Lawrence -- they're gangsters.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-03-30   12:30:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: All (#0)

To survive economically Germany was forced to conduct most of her foreign trade on the basis of exchange and went off the gold standard. The last measure was probably the real beginning of World War II. The world’s banking system simply could not permit that this upstart free his nation from their shackles. If his bold try became a success their whole empire would begin to crumble because others might be emboldened to try the same gambit. Horrors over horrors, it did become a success. Germany’s economic recovery became meteoric, unemployment disappeared rapidly while the rest of the world was floundering in an ever-worsening depression. It would take a major volume to describe the details of changes which took place in the first year of the Third Reich and the enthusiasm with which the vast majority of the people greeted the new system.

Another great and educational excerpt.

Katniss  posted on  2015-03-31   22:34:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: All (#0)

That this destruction proceeds under the direction of a Jewish dictator (Ignaz Bubis, head of the thirty to forty thousand strong Jewish community among eighty million Germans), who rules Germany solely through the strength of American bayonets, bodes ill for the future of that nation, if he should succeed in his nefarious plans. It is high time that Americans realize that they have been reduced to the unbecoming status of executioners for the all-powerful state of Israel.

More prophetic words were never spoken.

Katniss  posted on  2015-03-31   22:47:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Katniss (#2) (Edited)

The Jewish bankers in London and New York had Britain over a barrel and found it easy to extract the Balfour Declaration, which promised them a Jewish homeland–but not a sovereign Jewish state–in Palestine, which in 1916 still belonged to Turkey. The British, being famous for their fairness and integrity in all their dealings, made a similar offer to middle-eastern Arabs

Just noting that the British agreement with the Arabs pre-dated the Balfour Declaration by almost 2 years and was not a gifted "similar offer". It was a Military alliance and treaty obligation with the Arabs regarding expressed territory to be the governing domain of the Arab allies when liberated from the Ottoman Empire in their War for Independence from it -- not to be divided up under the control of the British and French Mandate systems afterward, as renegingly happened that it was, even though the agreement with the Arabs was in effect before the secretive Sykes-Picot spheres-of-power arrangement between Britain and France.

4um Refs.

Edited spelling.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-04-02   15:01:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: GreyLmist (#6)

Noted.

Not sure that it's relevant to the general theme of the piece, do you think it is? Were you simply trying to add some further details?

As to the excerpted piece, the shylocks and their banks had London under control long before that and had the situation in New York well under control for years prior to that.

Remember, it was the Israeli operation as led by Begin about a year after the end of WWII that was the first major step in kicking the Brits out of the region. Ironically, there are some shared motives between that and 911. Naturally the Israelis responsible were dressed as Arabs, which seems to be a recurrent theme of our modern world.

Either way, Britain and her troops was about the only thing that kept the Israelis from doing what they've done over there to date.

Katniss  posted on  2015-04-02   15:51:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Katniss (#7) (Edited)

Not sure that it's relevant to the general theme of the piece, do you think it is? Were you simply trying to add some further details?

Yes and Yes. I do think it's relevant to the theme regarding historical accuracy and obscurations of it, inadvertently or not; also wanted to cross-reference the info elsewhere.

As to the excerpted piece, the shylocks and their banks had London under control long before that and had the situation in New York well under control for years prior to that.

Remember, it was the Israeli operation as led by Begin about a year after the end of WWII that was the first major step in kicking the Brits out of the region. Ironically, there are some shared motives between that and 911. Naturally the Israelis responsible were dressed as Arabs, which seems to be a recurrent theme of our modern world.

Either way, Britain and her troops was about the only thing that kept the Israelis from doing what they've done over there to date.

Agree on the first and last sentences there. Regarding the second section, I'd be interested in hearing more on the Jewish insurgency against the British during its Mandate of Palestine period in comparison motivationally to 9/11. The King David Hotel false-flag, the Night of the Bridges and other Ops were major maneuvers to drive out Britain. However, it was under attack even earlier than Post WWII (especially for trying to stop illegal Zionist immigration) while it was busy fighting against Hitler. More sources on the those issues at the 4um Refs. linked above at #6, particularly under the 4um Title headers of "New York/Moscow/Tel Aviv Triangle" and "Can a Gold Plated Military Counter ISIS?" (which has various links to the site, "Britain's Small Wars" on some of the attacks against the British during the Palestine Mandate). Because of the Jewish insurgency against the British even during WWII, undoubtedly America got some degree of lesser Military assistance from Britain than it might have otherwise, which may have caused us casualty losses.

Edited last and next to last sentences + strikethrough.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-04-02   16:49:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: GreyLmist (#8)

Well, like I said, it was the first major step. Again, I don't see how debating, and I realize this, how the "small" tactics of Israel during and prior to the FF KDH bombing alters the overall conclusions of the piece or of his points. It doesn't.

Read up on precisely why the KDH was chosen. Essentially for the same reason that 7 was dropped except with even more evidence against the Synagogue of Satan and the Shylocks.

Katniss  posted on  2015-04-02   22:55:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Katniss (#9) (Edited)

I didn't post the info to debate it with you. There's nothing debatable about it, imo, and it doesn't have to alter the overall article conclusions or pass an inquest with the opening post Registrar to be admissable here. Methinks thou doth protesteth too much over it unnecessarily. It's simply there informationally in case any readers might have been confused by the quoted passage that there was some sort of similarity, which there isn't, between the gifted Balfour Declaration and the earlier Military alliance-agreement territorially between the Arabs and the British in regard to their fight for independence and Palestine's liberation, as well as other regions in the area, from the Ottoman Empire. I don't agree about what you think was the first major step against the British but thanks for clarifying that you were comparing WTC 7 on 9/11 to the King David Hotel false-flag. Hopefully, all that's enough said in this thread disputationally.

Edited sentence 4 and the last

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-04-03   1:00:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: GreyLmist (#10) (Edited)

Methinks thou doth protesteth too much over it unnecessarily. It's simply there informationally in case any readers might have been confused

Just trying to make sense of and trying to fit into the thread what your points are. Frankly, IMO these types of exchanges are more confusing than anything in the piece. I could make the same claim about your points. Just sayin'.

Curious, what was the first "major" step against the Brits by Israel in your opinion?

Katniss  posted on  2015-04-03   8:32:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest