Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

National News
See other National News Articles

Title: ‘US NATIONAL GUARD’S DRILLS IN PUBLIC AIMED AT DEALING WITH DOMESTIC ‘DISSIDENTS’’
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/us-national ... ling-with-domestic-dissidents/
Published: Apr 27, 2015
Author: Paul Joseph Watson
Post Date: 2015-04-27 07:40:51 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 139
Comments: 22

US Army field manuals admit that public drills are aimed at dealing with political dissidents that need to be “reeducated to gain a new appreciation of US policies,” Paul Joseph Watson, Infowars Editor at Large told RT’s In the Now.

RT: The police in the US are accused more than ever now of militarization. A video has appeared online showing armed national guardsmen conducting exercises near a children’s playground in Virginia. We contacted the infantry brigade – here’s what they told us: coordination was made with the Staunton Police Department, these are freshers who are training on basic military subjects like drill and ceremonies, basic first aid, military courtesies and the guns they carry are replicas. What is wrong with it?

Paul Joseph Watson: What is wrong with that is the fact that they are doing it not on base but in public. And we have to put this in the context of a spate of videoswhich have emerged in the recent weeks with not only National Guard but US Army troops in some cases working with police conducting these public drills which in some cases, not in this case but others, are based around crowd control and civil unrest. And the line they always give us that it’s designed for overseas combat, foreign operations. But if you then read the US Army’s actual manuals that they release, it’s clear that it’s for dual purpose, it’s for “dissidents” on US soil. So the media regurgitate this claim that all these drills are just foreign operations. Yet they are doing it in public, in plain sight, while privately in their own field manuals admitting that it’s to take on “dissidents within the continental US.” That’s why people are concerned about it and a lot of our audience is National Guard or former or current US military. They are concerned about these public drills. They didn’t enlist to police the US people which is a lot of this seems to be geared towards.

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

Dissidents aren't going to be the problem for the PTBs. Controling packs of chimping, rampaging niggers is what they'll be dealing with. Whether in the big cities or the backwoods of america, They're going to have their hands full.

Obnoxicated  posted on  2015-04-27   9:17:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Ada (#0)

They didn’t enlist to police the US people which is a lot of this seems to be geared towards.

Yes they did.

Remember the oath, "ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC"????

Cynicom  posted on  2015-04-27   9:34:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Obnoxicated (#1)

Dissidents aren't going to be the problem for the PTBs. Controling packs of chimping, rampaging niggers is what they'll be dealing with. Whether in the big cities or the backwoods of america, They're going to have their hands full.

You got it Ob. When the welfare checks stop coming, the nogs will chimp.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2015-04-27   10:11:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Jethro Tull (#3)

The nubes don't think in abstract terms -- their hallmark. They'll attack the welfare offices but find there's no money there, kill the few emps luckless enough to be working at the moment the dollar bursts, and then come after US for our remaining groceries, guns, gas, females.... and lives.

The Deetroit types we're talking about are just the pet monkeys the "elites" have been breeding all this time, partly with such a moment in mind.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-04-27   11:40:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: NeoconsNailed (#4)

The Deetroit types we're talking about are just the pet monkeys the "elites" have been breeding all this time, partly with such a moment in mind.

Let the apes smack the gentrified Whites around, I could care less. But if anyone thinks they stand a chance outside of their ghettos, they are way off base.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2015-04-27   11:53:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Jethro Tull (#5)

Their ghettos all border white naberhoods, quite often nice ones. I hope you're right, really do, but savages always plunder the civilized when the chips are down in history.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-04-27   12:19:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: NeoconsNailed (#6)

If a White man doesn't have the means & training to scatter a horde of ghetto apes, he deserves his fate.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2015-04-27   12:24:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: NeoconsNailed (#6)

It seems like they always prefer to burn down their own hoods: I can't think of one elite, white hood that they've burned.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2015-04-27   12:25:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Cynicom (#2)

So much for Posse Comitatus.

Ada  posted on  2015-04-27   12:50:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Ada (#9)

This government, is the enemy, not the police, not the military.

When any mayor allows rioting and looting, it is a symptom of a fatal disease.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-04-27   12:56:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Ada (#9)

So much for Posse Comitatus.

I don't think Posse Comitatus applies to the National Guard.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-04-27   14:15:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: All (#11)

Posse Comitatus Act - Wikipedia

The Act only specifically applies to the Army and, as amended in 1956, the Air Force. While the Act does not explicitly mention the naval services, specifically the Navy and the Marine Corps, the Department of the Navy has prescribed regulations that are generally construed to give the Act force with respect to those services as well.

The Act does not apply to the National Guard under state authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within its home state or in an adjacent state if invited by that state's governor.

The United States Coast Guard, which operates under the Department of Homeland Security, is not covered by the Posse Comitatus Act either, primarily because although the Coast Guard is an armed service, it also has both a maritime law enforcement mission and a federal regulatory agency mission.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-04-27   14:24:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Lod (#8)

The welfare machine has never stopped (future scenario we're anticipating).

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-04-27   14:40:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Cynicom (#10)

+1

Obnoxicated  posted on  2015-04-27   15:49:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: GreyLmist (#11)

I don't think Posse Comitatus applies to the National Guard.

You are corrected. I was referring to the first sentence which referred to US Army field manuals.

"US Army field manuals admit that public drills are aimed at dealing with political dissidents that need to be “reeducated to gain a new appreciation of US policies,”

Ada  posted on  2015-04-27   16:58:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Ada. Cynicom, 4 (#15)

Paul Joseph Watson at infowars.com: They didn’t enlist to police the US people which is a lot of this seems to be geared towards.

Cynicom at #2: Yes they did. Remember the oath, "ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC"????

Ada at #9 to Cynicom at #2: So much for Posse Comitatus.

Me at #11 to Ada at #9: I don't think Posse Comitatus applies to the National Guard.

Me at #12 to All: Posse Comitatus Act - Wikipedia ... The Act does not apply to the National Guard under state authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within its home state or in an adjacent state if invited by that state's governor.

Ada at #15 to Me at #11: You are corrected. I was referring to the first sentence which referred to US Army field manuals. "US Army field manuals admit that public drills are aimed at dealing with political dissidents that need to be “reeducated to gain a new appreciation of US policies,”

All comments at The National Guard conduct exercises near a children's playground in Virginia - YouTube posted at the infowars article. Virginia National Guard, 116th Infantry unit interviewed about the exercise in the first 23 seconds. At 4:13-5:20, Watson mentions the alleged Military manuals and preparations for martial law.

First of all, the alleged field manuals (supposedly leaked to the public) aren't linked or even specified at either of those two sources, except among the discussion Comments at infowars where FM 3-39.40 "Internment and Resettlement Operations" (February 2010) is said to be the document at issue. Found another source (selfrely.com) that referenced a zerohedge.com article for info on that, in association with alleged Military doc ATP 3-39.33 "Civil Disturbances" (April 2014). Although there is a .mil site linked at zerohedge.com for the ATP doc, the linked site for the FM doc there is not an official .mil source. I searched for the word "dissident" in pdf files for both of the alleged docs at info.publicintelligence.net but that word wasn't found. Those publications are purportedly copies of Distribution Restriction/classified material, so I'm not certain, without viewing and comparing authentic docs, that the info is fully accurate. However, the pdf for the claimed ATP doc mentions Posse Comitatus and exceptions to it 5 times pertaining to Federal forces (in Chapter 2 and the References section). The pdf for the claimed FM doc mentions Posse Comitatus 4 times (in Chapter 10 and the References section). Scanning through it and especially Chapter 7 (Confinement of U.S. Military Prisoners), it seemed to be mainly focused on 1. Federal MPs/Military Police in foreign regions, 2. MPs and Martial Law conditions here where civil government is unable to function properly (due to disasters, rioting and such) and 3. MPs regarding detention of Military personnel in court martial offense situations.

My response-concern wasn't to dispute what you posted -- just that people, for their own best safety, shouldn't overestimate Posse Comitatus protections as applicable to State directed Guard forces or to the Coast Guard either (even though it acts Federally as a militarized revenue collector, etc.).

Like Cynicom noted, our Military does take an oath to guard against domestic enemies -- not just foreign enemies. With Law Enforcement/Police and State officials so often acting Unconstitutionally as rogues and also as enablers of situations that could escalate regionally into a disastrous crisis, in additioin to our State Militias being numerically low compared to what they should be according to law ... all of that increases the chances of Martial Law being enacted Congressionally for Federal forces to intervene someplace here. Surely most Americans wouldn't prefer that foreign forces like NATO's or the UN's were substituted for our own. If the alleged American "dissidents" in question of being rounded up were Constitution subverters, how much objection would there be then if our Military, State and Federal, were tasked with incarcerating them? How fast would the Communistic media, here in America and abroad, spin it as "killing their own people" if they were fired upon by subversives of the Constitution and had to return fire to defend themselves?

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-04-28   0:01:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Cynicom (#2)

Remember the oath, "ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC"????

"...all enemies, foreign and domestic", I believe refers to Communists and other subversive elements. Of course, if Obummer has his way, it will be U.N. troops that are posted in the streets. THEY have no loyalty or obedience to the U.S. Constitution. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2015-05-05   17:08:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Ada (#9)

So much for Posse Comitatus.

Posse Comitatus was for the protection of citizens in areas that had few, if any law enforcement officers, such as Town Marshalls or Sheriffs. That is long ago outmoded.

What we have today are closely intertwined police departments that are all linked by computers and other forms of advanced communications. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2015-05-05   17:10:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: BTP Holdings (#18)

Posse Comitatus is to limit the powers of the federal government in using its military personnel to act as domestic law enforcement personnel. IOW it was to protect the citizens from the US Army.

Ada  posted on  2015-05-05   20:32:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Ada (#19)

Posse Comitatus is to limit the powers of the federal government in using its military personnel to act as domestic law enforcement personnel. IOW it was to protect the citizens from the US Army.

Correct.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2015-05-05   20:52:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: All (#16) (Edited)

FM 3-39.40 "Internment and Resettlement Operations" (February 2010)

zerohedge.com article for info on that

The pdf for the claimed FM doc mentions Posse Comitatus 4 times (in Chapter 10 and the References section).

This is Google's cache of http://foreignpolicy.com/
2012/05/17/did-you-hear-the-one-about-u-s-internment-camps/

It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on May 27, 2015 01:52:46 GMT.

Archiving that demeaning foreignpolicy.com article: Did You Hear the One about U.S. Internment Camps? by J.M. Berger | May 17, 2012

Excerpt:

The manual has been around in one form or another since 1978, when it was first written to assimilate lessons learned from the resettlement of tens of thousands of Vietnamese and Cambodian refugees to the United States after the Vietnam War. It has been substantially rewritten since then, most recently to include scenarios encountered in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Notes that "only a handful of paragraphs from the 326-page manual address domestic operations of any kind." Goadingly gives some examples regarding "tasks performed in support of civil support operations" which "are similar to those during combat operations, but the techniques and procedures are modified based on the special [operating environment] associated with operating within U.S. territory and according to the categories of individuals (primarily DCs [dislocated civilians])". Neglects to mention any of the references to Posse Comitatus within the document, which makes the article itself an example of this assessment quoted there:

An Army spokesman, speaking on background, said the current spate of online postings had taken passages from the manual significantly out of context, conflating wartime operational guidance (such as psychological operations) with peacetime operations in which a limited number of the manual’s principals would be applied on U.S. soil, in exceptional cases such as during [disaster] relief efforts

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-05-28   10:15:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: All (#16)

people, for their own best safety, shouldn't overestimate Posse Comitatus protections as applicable to State directed Guard forces or to the Coast Guard either (even though it acts Federally as a militarized revenue collector, etc.).

Archiving Posse Comitatus info at politicalvelcraft.org: UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONAL MILITIAS. [scroll down to approximately 1/3 through 1/2 of the page]

OVERVIEW OF THE POSSE COMITATUS ACT

This appendix provides a broad overview of the Posse Comitatus Act, which restricts the participation of the military in domestic law enforcement activities under many circumstances.

KEY EXCEPTIONS TO THE POSSE COMITATUS ACT

A summary of key exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act

IMPLICATIONS FOR ARMY HOMELAND SECURITY ACTIVITIES


[My note: Recommending this link for a more easily readable Wayback Machine copy from 2005 of a 3-page rand.org pdf file with the above Posse Comitatus info: The Posse Comitatus Act 245. The link for it among the listings at the bottom of the politicalvelcraft article wasn't working.]

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-05-29   0:50:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest