Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Pious Perverts
See other Pious Perverts Articles

Title: It Is Time to Call Radio “Liberty” What It Is: Radio Gestapo Amerika
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/05 ... l-us-radio-liberty-what-it-is/
Published: May 8, 2015
Author: Paul Craig Roberts
Post Date: 2015-05-08 09:02:15 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 577
Comments: 22

Radio “Liberty” has always been a propaganda ministry. Formerly its propaganda was directed against the Soviet Union. Today it is directed against distinguished Americans who are known and respected for their allegiance to the truth.

Radio Liberty’s latest target is an American scholar who is far more widely respected than Radio Liberty. Like everything else in Washington the two-bit propaganda ministry is carried away by hubris and a mistaken opinion of its own importance.

A Radio Liberty non-entity named Carl Schreck, of whom no one has ever heard, has declared America’s most distinguished Russian scholar, Stephen Cohen, to be “a Putin apologist.”

Stephen Cohen, a professor of Russian studies at both Princeton University and New York University, was advisor to President George Herbert Walker Bush. Cohen was also respected by the Soviet government. Consequently, he was able to convince the Soviets to rehabilitate the widow of Nikolai Bukharin, a leading Bolshevik, one of Lenin’s favorites, who was murdered by Joseph Stalin. Mikhail Gorbachev also trusted Cohen, and little doubt that Cohen helped to bring about the end of the Cold War.

Like myself, Cohen comes from a time when academic reputations were based on discerning and telling the truth regardless of the government’s propaganda line. Those days have passed.

For propagandists like Carl Schreck, truth is whatever serves Washington’s agendas. Schreck is incapable of comprehending that truth is independent of Washington’s agendas. Therefore, when Cohen speaks the truth, Schreck brands it the Kremlin propaganda line.

Another non-entity of whom no one has ever heard and never will again, Lynn Lubamersky, declared Cohen to be “a mouthpiece for a mass murderer.” If the non- entity means Putin, who did Putin mass murder? The mass murderers of our time are George W. Bush and Obama, and clearly Cohen is not a mouthpiece for them.

So many academic careers today depend on federal and corporate money, that it remains to be seen if the academics in Cohen’s area of expertise can afford to stand up in his behalf.

Cohen’s position on Russia and Ukraine is the same as mine. The crisis began with the Washington organized coup in Kiev that overthrew the democratic government and replaced it with a puppet government answerable to Washington. In the official Radio Liberty propaganda this coup never occurred. Instead, there was a Russian invasion and annexation. No informed person can believe this abject nonsense. Yet, this nonsense is prevailing over the truth.

The Washington establishment is trying to silence Stephen Cohen, but I think he will give the liars the finger and continue to speak the truth.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

Like myself, Cohen comes from a time when academic reputations were based on discerning and telling the truth regardless of the government’s propaganda line.

Laff, laff, cough cough, snicker.

What horseshit.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-05-08   9:09:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Ada (#0)

With Jews we lose. Cohen teaches at PU and NYU and advised Bush-41? Somehow I can't muster any respect for him.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-05-08   9:25:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Cynicom (#1)

Why would anyone pay attention to anything written by PCR, a washed-up Reagan acolyte? He wasn't taken seriously 30 years ago when he was rubbing elbows with the elite, so why now?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2015-05-08   9:30:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Jethro TullPhant2000 (#3)

Why would anyone pay attention to anything written by PCR,

I tried to respond with something titillating if not profound, but, alas, the need for higher boots overcame my sense of propriety.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-05-08   9:40:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Cynicom (#4)

LOL

Katniss  posted on  2015-05-08   9:43:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Cynicom (#4)

horseshit

The word is all encompassing when it comes to swill.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2015-05-08   9:45:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Cynicom (#1)

Identifying yourself as "like" Cohen sure doesn't prove to me your "academic reputation" is "based on ... telling the truth". Contrary to truth, it reminds ME that joos in education are there specifically for the purpose of redefining the truth? Is that who Mr. Roberts is like?

I believe an assessment of "The Washington establishment ... trying ... to silence Stephen Cohen", would have resulted in an evaluation somewhat different than what the writer presents here. Notwithstanding that, giving "the liars the finger" would mean Cohen would be sending that signal to himself.

The fact that Roberts challenges Lynn Lubamersky's declaration that Cohen is “a mouthpiece" for a mass murderer (Putin), tells me Roberts nor Cohen pay attention to fact. For some reason or another they both ignore the fact that Putin bears the responsibility of the many recent deaths in the Ukraine.

Phant2000  posted on  2015-05-08   10:06:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Jethro Tull (#3) (Edited)

Because the rest of the time he's one of the best, most uncensored and properly fateful commentators out there. We don't throw the good Pat Buchanan out because of the bad one even though they mysteriously occupy the same space at all times.

Let me guess: you're going to do just that now for consistency's sake.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-05-08   10:11:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: NeoconsNailed (#8)

Point taken.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2015-05-08   10:19:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Jethro Tull, Phant2000, All (#6)

The word is all encompassing when it comes to swill.

When one wants to project total disdain, for personal pontification, the term used, leaves no room for doubt as to the writers intent.

A photo of Roberts, sitting on a manure pile would suffice, however, we have to be content with advising him to stop abusing himself, as his brain is withering.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-05-08   10:47:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Cynicom (#10)

So it's the guillotine the first time he's not 100% real? At least he's standing up for somebody pointing out that Victoria Juland, i.e. the Jewnighted States, started the whole Ukraine mess.

And unlike you, Cynicom, he regularly denounces the govt under his own name with a very high profile, inviting the Edgar Steele or William Cooper treatment on himself. I think you just revealed more about yourself than anything else with the filth you just belched up.

Who's William Cooper? If patriots and conservatives ever forget, we do all deserve what we're getting.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-05-08   11:11:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Jethro Tull (#9)

Pat's a great writer/commentator, but his last run for presidency was a total farce.

Obnoxicated  posted on  2015-05-08   11:31:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Obnoxicated (#12)

To my estimation, Pat is and has been the paid opposition for years.

The shills at Fox are likewise paid whores.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-05-08   11:35:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Cynicom (#13)

Pat was the first national columnist to stand up to Jew power by championing John Demjanjuk. Exactly what have you done that qualifies you to sit in judgment and totally trash people like him and PCR?

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-05-08   15:13:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: NeoconsNailed (#2)

Nevertheless, I find Cohen more credible than his critics.

Ada  posted on  2015-05-08   15:30:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Ada (#15)

You and PCR are probably right to do so. As you see, I agree with him on Ukraine.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-05-08   15:45:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Obnoxicated (#12)

Pat's a great writer/commentator, but his last run for presidency was a total farce.

I supported both his '96 primary & his 2000 Reform Party effort heavily. In '99 I was invited to his home around Christmas and had a great time. His defeat in 2000 became my exit from national politics. I haven't voted for a president since & I obviously haven't missed anything.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2015-05-08   15:53:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Jethro Tull (#17)

I don't understand "farce" re Buchanan's campaign. He won 2 primaries, much to the dismay of the party leaders, and was expected to win the next two when the leadership came down on him.

Ada  posted on  2015-05-11   8:27:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Cynicom (#10)

A photo of Roberts, sitting on a manure pile would suffice

When we throw the baby out with the bathwater, it's best to remember that he may grow up some day fully capable of bopping us on the nose.

"If ignorance is truly bliss, then why do so many Americans need Prozac?" - Dave McGowan

randge  posted on  2015-05-11   10:27:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Ada (#18)

I don't understand "farce" re Buchanan's campaign. He won 2 primaries, much to the dismay of the party leaders, and was expected to win the next two when the leadership came down on him.

And who, after these political accomplishments, did he support for president?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2015-05-12   9:20:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Jethro Tull (#20)

The party leaders' choice. Loyalty is a second class virtue.

Ada  posted on  2015-05-12   10:44:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Ada (#21)

The party leaders' choice.

In '96, after running against the establishment in the primary, he joined it when he endorsed Bob Dole. PJB didn't want to run 3rd party in '96 (he did in '00 but the momentum was lost) and be known as the person who fractured the Republican party. In the end, Buchanan achieved neither goal; the GOP establishment still hates him and the opportunity to create a viable 3rd party option was lost.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2015-05-12   11:19:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest