Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

ObamaNation
See other ObamaNation Articles

Title: Microagression Theory: University Report: A Room Full of White People Is a Microaggression
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.nationalreview.com/artic ... icroaggression-katherine-timpf
Published: May 17, 2015
Author: Katherine Timpf
Post Date: 2015-05-17 08:31:45 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 121
Comments: 20

Apparently, just being in certain rooms is a microaggression.

According to a new report released by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, just “walking into or sitting in” a classroom full of white people is a microaggression in itself.

“Students of color reported feeling uncomfortable and unwelcomed just walking into or sitting in the classroom, especially if they were the only person of color, or one of a few,” stated the report, which designated the experience a microaggression.

“People do not necessarily say I do not belong, but I feel as if I do not when I am in a classroom and I am the one non-White person,” said one student, identified as a Latina female, who is quoted in the report.

The report, titled “Racial Microaggressions,” was based on an online survey of more than 4,800 students of color during the 2011–12 academic year, and it found more than 800 examples of such microaggressions on campus. Now, that may seem like a lot — but it’s important to recognize that this high number could signify the prevalence of a tendency to assume that almost anything is racist rather than the prevalence of racism itself.

Don’t get me wrong — some of the examples are totally unacceptable and definitely racist. One Asian student reported having “been told to go back to running a Laundromat,” and a multiracial student reported that she once “overheard other White students discussing admissions and laughing about how the only reason stupid Mexicans could get into this school was due to affirmative action.”

Those things are definitely racist and offensive. There’s no doubt about that.

A lot of the report’s “most commonly described” racial microaggressions could also be interpreted as having nothing to do with racism at all.

But a lot of the report’s “most commonly described” racial microaggressions could also be interpreted as having nothing to do with racism at all. “Being the only student of color in the classroom” was on that list, as was “being discouraged during meetings with one’s academic advisor” (one student determined that her adviser had questioned her choice of major only because “she realized I was African American,” and therefore, “in her mind, I wasn’t able to successfully complete the major”); “being dismissed or ignored by the instructor before or after class” (an African-American male stated, “when I raise my hand, I am often not called upon”); “receiving hostile reactions to participation in the classroom discussion” (one student said she has “witnessed and felt that when a minority student tries to correct [a] comment . . . they are then viewed as angry or defensive when in reality they are simply trying to inform others of what is true”); and “being excluded from participating in a group project” (one student says he keeps quiet in these situations because “I feel as though what I have to say often doesn’t matter to the rest of the group members.”)

But don’t advisers question students’ major choices all the time? Isn’t that actually their entire job? Hasn’t every participation-eager student had a professor that he feels doesn’t call on him enough? Isn’t it possible that people who act annoyed or upset about being publicly corrected are just upset about being publicly corrected in general rather than because they were corrected by a minority student specifically? Doesn’t the group-project example sound more like the kind of general shyness/self-doubt/social anxiety that anyone can experience rather than a sign of institutional racism?

Despite the fact that so many of these “microaggressions” are designated as such based on questionable assumptions, the study still recommends that the school take drastic measures to stop them: requiring that all students complete a “General Education requirement about race, White privilege, and inequality in the United States” as well as “both a non-Western culture and a US people of color cultural course”; fundamentally altering the curriculum to ensure that a third of all college 101 classes “include diversity and inclusion”; providing workshops, trainings, campaigns, and brochures “to help students identify when racial microaggressions are occurring”; creating a “slogan or language” — such as the phrase “Racism Alert” — to use when they identify one; and developing a “mechanism for students to report perceived racial microaggressions.”

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Jethro Tull (#0) (Edited)

1st they whine about not being included and get FEDERALLY FORCED INTEGRATION and now when it appears they've been included (yet they continually fail), they feel uncomfortable ... fuck em.

EDIT: I'd be willing to bet that the black kids in a majority white school (feeling uncomfortable) do better than the kids in an all black school !

"Honest, April 15th is the real April Fool's Day".

Doug Scheidt

noone222  posted on  2015-05-17   8:35:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: noone222 (#1)

I'd be willing to bet that the black kids in a majority white school (feeling uncomfortable) do better than the kids in an all black school !

You'd have a winning bet.

A 'white school' would allow for the physical safety of the students while fostering an environment for learning, if one applied themselves. Black schools not so much, this since the signing of the 1964 Civil Rights legislation.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2015-05-17   8:48:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: neoconsnailed, purplerose (#0)

when I am in a classroom and I am the one non-White person,” said one student, identified as a Latina female

This relates to the discussion you two were having last week.

Its true that "latinos" & "hispanics" are classified as caucasions on most survey & government forms, but that's not often the way whites & browned skinned people view it in the real world.

And I can tell you that the cultures are VERY, very different in many ways.

Maybe someone from academia/ govt should tell this latina girl that she's white! Problem solved?

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2015-05-17   9:11:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Jethro Tull (#0)

the study still recommends that the school take drastic measures to stop them: requiring that all students complete a “General Education requirement about race, White privilege, and inequality in the United States”

I don't think white privilege exists, if anything its the opposite, special favors & opportunities is granted based on racial quotas, often leaving the straight white males on the outs. Jews are however not left out.

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2015-05-17   9:17:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Artisan (#3)

Thank you for that. Tempted as I am to expand on it (agreeing with you), I'll just underscore again that most of the confusion results from white-hating ideologues in government, education, and do-gooder services of various kinds trying to "disappear" [verb transitive] the white race by lumping hispanics in with it.

It is an extremely rare case outside of like Chile, Argentina or Spain that a "hispanic" person is actually caucasian, complete with fair integumentation and features which are reflected in their blood kin. Indeed this longtime nonpro raciologist can't think of a single non- import case at the moment, famous or otherwise.

Ted Cruz looks pretty pink but look what a far ethnographic cry he is from Michelle Bachelet, the lovely former president of Chile:

With the snake-word 'latino," of course, hispanics are playing a similar game to Jues and their "semitism" racket. (Wait a minute -- that's exactly where the pundits lumping whites and hispanics together got the idea, and went it one worser!!!!) The gimmick is to take a more inclusive or even opposite term and make like a much more restrictive one equals it. Latinos would logically include Italians if not all Romance language speakers, right? Italian is simply modern Latin (in a colloquial sense) and Italians are famous for their warm "Latin temperament".

Look what a mess this buzzword is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicano

I (probably like most people) thought it was synonymous with latino in the vulgar amerikan vernacular, but it only applies to Mexicans? What do they think they are, special?

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-05-17   22:04:09 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Jethro Tull (#2)

A 'white school' would allow for the physical safety of the students while fostering an environment for learning, if one applied themselves. Black schools not so much, this since the signing of the 1964 Civil Rights legislation.

It's true, blacks can learn at an an accelorated pace when whites are around. Like this, for instance:

corruptissima re publica plurimae leges - Tacitus

Dakmar  posted on  2015-05-18   9:54:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Dakmar (#6)

Nice take-down.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2015-05-18   10:00:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Dakmar (#6)

Are they yelling "Yay Obamacare"?

Hope that longsuffering white kid isn't clapped in chains for his uncrime. Blaccs will sue over absolutely anything.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-05-18   10:01:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: NeoconsNailed (#8)

Are they yelling "Yay Obamacare"?

The consensus in the web seems to be they are chanting "white boys can't dance", but no one seems to be able to translate from ebonics. FWIW, I think the kid in the grey sweatshirt is a girl.

corruptissima re publica plurimae leges - Tacitus

Dakmar  posted on  2015-05-18   10:07:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Lod (#7)

I could watch that 100 times and not get tired of it.

corruptissima re publica plurimae leges - Tacitus

Dakmar  posted on  2015-05-18   10:08:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Dakmar (#10)

But where's the "insane reaction"? I don't see any at all -- the niglet falls on her back shrieking, end of movie.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-05-18   10:17:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: NeoconsNailed (#11)

Agreed, my title would have been "Monkeyshines ended with impromptu physics lesson"

corruptissima re publica plurimae leges - Tacitus

Dakmar  posted on  2015-05-18   10:20:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Dakmar (#12)

Jethro Tull  posted on  2015-05-18   14:24:38 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Jethro Tull (#13)

I always get a kick out of their fondness for KFC..


"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination

FormerLurker  posted on  2015-05-18   15:08:53 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: FormerLurker (#14)

HAHAHAHAHAHA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!! Oho ho ho ho HOHOHO!!!!!!!!!! Where'd you get that???

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-05-18   15:10:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: FormerLurker (#14)

Classic! thanks.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2015-05-18   15:52:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: NeoconsNailed, Lod (#15)

Where'd you get that???

I think it was PSUSA2 that first posted it here years ago. I laughed so hard when I first saw it I just about spewed coffee all over my monitor.


"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination

FormerLurker  posted on  2015-05-18   16:48:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Lod, NeoconsNailed (#16)

Here's another one I just found by looking up "KFC football".. :)


"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination

FormerLurker  posted on  2015-05-18   16:57:42 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: FormerLurker (#18)

Da bomb, even better, thanks.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2015-05-18   17:10:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: FormerLurker (#18)

Nice product placement, colonel!

Just kidding, but that seems about the level of discourse I expect from most people, present company excepted.

corruptissima re publica plurimae leges - Tacitus

Dakmar  posted on  2015-05-18   19:51:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest