Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: Why Soldiers Lie
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/why-soldiers-lie/
Published: May 18, 2015
Author: WILLIAM S. LIND
Post Date: 2015-05-18 07:44:31 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 55
Comments: 7

Our generals are better at bureaucratic infighting than war fighting.

Since the year began I have had opportunities to visit several American military units and schools. What I found was encouraging. A growing number of officers and staff NCOs accept the painful fact that we have lost two wars. They know we need to change if we are not to lose more. Finally, they have come to understand that their services’ senior leaders, their top generals, do not much care about winning or losing. To them, military defeat is irrelevant because the money keeps flowing. The only war the generals care about is the budget war.

The senior military leadership is facing a crisis of legitimacy and does not know it. As one Marine officer put it to me, the generals seem divorced from reality, powerless, and risk-averse. The problem is less what they do than what they do not do, namely address the reasons for our defeats. The dissatisfaction with the senior leadership is coming not only from junior officers. I found it now goes up to the ranks of lieutenant colonel and even colonel.

Nor is the evidence merely anecdotal. The U.S. Army War College’s Strategic Studies Institute in February published a study by two of its faculty members, Leonard Wong and Stephen J. Gerras, Lying to Ourselves: Dishonesty in the Army Profession. Its conclusion, that many Army officers routinely lie to “the system,” is no surprise to anyone who knows our military. (The phenomenon runs across service lines.) What is more interesting is the study’s finding as to the cause of institutionalized lying: “the suffocating amount of mandatory requirements imposed upon units and commanders.”

Who imposes this burden? Mostly the generals, who appear neither to know nor to care that they are laying on more training and reporting requirements than there is time to meet. Their only concern is covering their own rears. Unable to do as ordered and unwilling to risk their careers by telling their superiors the truth, officers deal with the problem by lying.

The study’s authors do not mince words:

The Army as a profession speaks of values, integrity, and honor. The Army as an organization practices zero defects, pencil-whipping, and checking the box. Army leaders are situated between the two identities—parroting the talking points of the latest Army Profession Campaign while placating the Army bureaucracy or civilian overseers by telling them what they want to hear. As a result, Army leaders learn to talk of one world while living in another. A major described the current trend:

‘It’s getting to the point where you’re almost rewarded for being somebody you’re not. That’s a dangerous situation especially now as we downsize. We’re creating an environment where everything is too rosy because everyone is afraid to paint the true picture. You just wonder when it will break, when it will fall apart.’

The larger problem, again, is less what the generals do than what they do not do. They preside smugly over a cluster of institutional disasters, like so many Soviet industrial managers—which is what most of them are.

Angry officers demanding change provide one wing of a potential new military- reform movement, one that might succeed where that of the 1970s and ’80s failed. But success requires tying demands for reform to the services’ budgets, which is all the senior generals care about. The earlier reform movement got generals interested in Third Generation maneuver warfare because senators and congressmen who voted on the defense budget were talking about it on the House and Senate floors. Whence might come this second arm of a political pincer movement under today’s conditions?

Far more than was true 35 years ago, legislation is now for sale, for the legalized bribes we call “campaign contributions.” Business as usual in defense has vast amounts of money to give to members of Congress. Military reform can offer none. That usually means “end of story” on Capitol Hill. thisissueappears

But there is one possibility. The House now has a number of members who served in Iraq or Afghanistan. Having seen today’s military from the inside, some of them will know its weaknesses. They might put loyalty to their former comrades above payoffs. If they were to reach out to those still serving who are tired of losing, they could create the “inside/outside” nexus that made the earlier reform movement powerful for a time.

Money may still win in the end. If so, our problem will be larger than more lost cabinet wars. A republic whose government is for sale will not be a republic much longer. Or, perhaps, a state.

William S. Lind is author of the Maneuver Warfare Handbook and director of the American Conservative Center for Public Transportation.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

William S. Lind is author

William...

Little secret here, the military has ALWAYS been this way, it will never change.

Spending money, producing nothing, is a bad system but that is the nature of the beast.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-05-18   8:37:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Cynicom (#1)

Exactly why we were not to have a standing army.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2015-05-18   8:46:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Lod (#2)

It's nice to see somebody else say it here besides me, Lod. Cyni hasn't attempted to shoot you down yet (as I write) but the morning is still young.

Who imposes this burden? Mostly the generals, who appear neither to know nor to care that they are laying on more training and reporting requirements than there is time to meet. Their only concern is covering their own rears. Unable to do as ordered and unwilling to risk their careers by telling their superiors the truth, officers deal with the problem by lying.

In other words, the public fool system writ large across the globe wherever "TERRORISTS" are "THREATENING" amerika's "NATIONAL INTERESTS". And why? Because Jues are in power -- that's exactly why. As the military see's it's only there for make-work to keep dollars flowing, Jues take over everything and then keep piling on the "training and reporting" dictates to remind the dumb goyim what slaves they are and keep them so busy they can't stop to think about revolting.

"Why are Gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat. That is why Gentiles were created" -- Rabbi(d) Ovadia Yosef. HOw many instances of this can you find cleverly hidden in this picture? How about the IRS, OSHA, EPA in other pages?

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-05-18   9:09:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Lod (#2)

Even at the bottom of the military sludge pool, one can see, taste and smell the outright waste. The fraud is somewhat concealed, still evident to one that bothers to look.

A gravy train for the few, death knell for the many in wartime.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-05-18   9:09:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Cynicom (#4)

In other words, the amerikan military is nothing but a cancerous growth on the world, a racket, an impossibly evil "heart of darkness" business that we, nevertheless, are all but ordered to support with our deepest emotions, cash discounts, parades, programs, programs and programs. TV programs, therapy programs, card-writing programs.

Thank you for your service, young volunteers! You who are about to die, salute Caesar now, please. You who will spend 50 years in a state of living death maimed and deranged in VA homes, thanks for helping keep the government funds flowing there, too.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-05-18   9:23:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Cynicom, NN, Ada, 4 (#4)

Somewhere, Benito is applauding our slide into outright fascism.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2015-05-18   9:24:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Lod (#6)

America needs you, Benito Hitler, oh Harry, won't you please come home....

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-05-18   9:27:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest