4um: Gay Marriage OK

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
National News
See other National News Articles
Title: Gay Marriage OK - scotus
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news ... es-gay-marriage-all-50-states/
Published: Jun 26, 2015
Author: pervs
Post Date: 2015-06-26 10:36:01 by Lod
Keywords: None
Views: 533
Comments: 76

No surprise here.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 37.
#7. To: Lod (#0)

JOHN ROBERTS DISSENT ON GAY RULING:

'Celebrate availability of new benefits. But do not Celebrate Constitution. It had nothing to do with it'...

SCALIA: Written Like a 'Fortune Cookie'...

HAPPY2BME-4UM posted on 2015-06-26 10:57:09 ET (1 image) Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#9. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#7)
So Roberts dissented??? Sounds pretty weak even so. No doubt he's an enthusiastic Bohemian Grove ecdysiast with the rest of the GOP demigods.

NeoconsNailed posted on 2015-06-26 11:04:43 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#13. To: NeoconsNailed (#9)
So Roberts dissented??? Sounds pretty weak even so. No doubt he's an enthusiastic Bohemian Grove ecdysiast with the rest of the GOP demigods.

=====================================================
He will have much to answer for as he stands before God and explains his actions. Would not want to be in his shoes.

HAPPY2BME-4UM posted on 2015-06-26 11:18:48 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#19. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#13)
Roberts in his dissents asks, "Who do we think we are?"
Scalia, whose dissent is by far the most entertaining to read, calls this decision a "judicial Putsch."
More than you wanna know at:
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf

randge posted on 2015-06-26 11:37:47 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#21. To: randge (#19)
This redefines the meaning of 'clusterf*uck'
A new dictionary is now required.

HAPPY2BME-4UM posted on 2015-06-26 11:45:44 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#24. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#21)
I believe that the political 'clusterf*uck' over this has just begun.
I don't even want to imagine what measures state legislatures will be called on to pass that may embody all manner of relationships and which will appeal for federal protection.
This can of worms has barely been cracked as far as what it portends for private employers and churches.
Hold on to your hat.

randge posted on 2015-06-26 11:54:17 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#25. To: randge (#24)
OK got it right by just doing away with marriage licenses; if a "couple" wishes to register their "union" with the several counties, they are free to do so.

Lod posted on 2015-06-26 12:05:19 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#28. To: Lod (#25)
if a "couple" wishes to register their "union" with the several counties, they are free to do so.

I guess such a "union" might well include first cousins or relations that traditionally would be considered even more incestuous.
You might wonder if this might open up challenges to laws prohibiting bigamy.
The possibilities are not exactly endless, but I'm just not gonna go there. The mind reels.

randge posted on 2015-06-26 12:17:13 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#29. To: randge, 4 (#28)
freepers are pissed -

www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3304554/posts

Lod posted on 2015-06-26 12:29:58 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#30. To: Esso (#29)
It's another 5-4 ruling!!!!

Why is it that ppl don't see the charade???
Fedgov overrules states' rights. Yet again.

christine posted on 2015-06-26 12:47:31 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#37. To: christine (#30)
It's another 5-4 ruling!!!!

Only missed by one vote.
Better luck next time, suckers!

Esso posted on 2015-06-26 15:11:47 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 37.
There are no replies to Comment # 37.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 37.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um