Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Illegitimate Show Trial Sentences Gaddafi's Son to Death
Source: by author
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jul 28, 2015
Author: Stephen Lendman
Post Date: 2015-07-28 15:05:30 by Stephen Lendman
Keywords: None
Views: 363
Comments: 12

Illegitimate Show Trial Sentences Gaddafi’s Son to Death

by Stephen Lendman

In 2007, candidate Obama said “(t)he president does not have the power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”

Straightaway after entering office, he expanded drone attacks against Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen. He increased troop strength in Afghanistan after pledging to end war by yearend 2009.

US-led NATO aggression on Libya followed. Obama lied claiming Gaddafi “attack(ed) his (own) people. (So) we took…swift steps…to answer his aggression.”

A litany of Big Lies followed. “Innocent people were targeted for killing,” Obama blustered. “Hospital and ambulances were attacked.”

“Journalists were arrested, sexually assaulted and killed…Water for hundreds of thousands of people…was shut off. Cities and towns were shelled. Mosques were destroyed.”

“Gaddafi declared he would show no mercy to his own people” - willful Obama deception. He tried justifying the unjustifiable, adding “I authorized military action to stop the killing and enforce UN Security Council Resolution 1973.”

International law is clear. Nations may not attack others except in self-defense - and only if UN Security Council authorized.

America wasn’t attacked, nor other NATO countries. Gaddafi threatened no one, including his own people. The longer war raged, the more popular he became. Libyans rallied around him for safety and security - hoping he’d be able to restore peace and stability.

At war’s end, he was brutally sodomized and murdered in cold blood. On November 19, 2011, his son Saif was arrested trying to flee Libya to safety, held captive by Zintan rebels, tortured, until tried in absentia in Tripoli and convicted by kangaroo tribunal proceedings affording him no chance for justice.

He was declared guilty by accusation - sentenced to death by firing squad along with eight other former Gaddafi officials, including former intelligence chief Abdullah Senussi, and two former prime ministers, al-Baghdadi and Abuzaid Dorda.

A total of 32 defendants were tried - 23 got lesser sentences and fines. Attorney John Jones represented Saif. “It was clearly a show trial” for all defendants, he said. “It was basically a trial by militia” lasting two days - conducted by an illegitimate Islamist regime controlling Tripoli after ousting the US-installed one operating from Tobruk.

“Lawyers were intimidated,” said Jones. “The judges were intimated. Lawyers had to leave the case.” Controlled proceedings excluded the right to a proper defense. Only two intimidated witnesses for Saif were allowed. No evidence against him was presented.

Prosecutors relied solely on torture extracted information - what no legitimate tribunal permits. Transitional Justice and Rule of Law Division of the UN Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL) human rights director Claudio Cordone said:

“Concerns over the trial include the fact that several defendants were absent for a number of sessions. The evidence of criminal conduct was largely attributed to the defendants in general, with little effort to establish individual criminal responsibility.”

“(I)t is particularly worrisome that the court handed down nine death sentences. International standards require that death sentences may only be imposed after proceedings that meet the highest level of respect for fair trial standards. The United Nations opposes the imposition of the death penalty as a matter of principle.”

Spokesperson for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Ravina Shamdasani, added:

“We had closely monitored the detention and trial and found that international fair trial standards had failed to be met. Among the key shortcomings is the failure to establish individual criminal responsibility in relation to specific crimes.”

Other serious issues included lack of access to lawyers, torture and other forms of ill treatment, as well as illegitimate trials conducted in absentia.

An UNSMIL press release said “(d)uring their pre-trial detention defendants were denied access to lawyers and family for prolonged periods, and some reported that they were beaten or otherwise ill- treated, but UNSMIL is not aware of any investigation into these allegations.”

“Many defendants were not represented by a lawyer during the pre-trial process, which deprived them of a crucial opportunity to establish their defence. Defence lawyers said they faced challenges in meeting their clients privately or accessing the full case file, and some said they received threats.”

“They were constrained by the court to two or three witnesses per defendant and some said that witnesses were reluctant to appear in court due to fears about their safety. The court did not respond to defence counsel requests to examine prosecution witnesses.”

US-led NATO turned Africa’s most developed country into a cauldron of endless violence, deprivation and despair.

Tens of thousands were murdered in cold blood. Multiples more were injured and/or displaced. Violence, instability, insecurity and chaos reflect daily life. No end in sight looms. Millions of Libyans live in constant fear.

Obama bears full responsibility for raping, ravaging, destroying, and plundering a nation threatening no others. Anarchical charnel house conditions replaced it.

Dystopian harshness persists. Libya is a failed state. Central authority is absent. Public services aren’t provided. Corruption and criminality are rampant. Conditions are in free fall. Human misery is extreme.

Libya is one of many high crimes on Obama’s rap sheet. Perhaps he plans Libya 2.0 for Syria, Iran, Lebanon and Yemen. Longstanding US/Israeli plans to redraw the Middle East map suggest it.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

His new book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III."

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.

It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Stephen Lendman (#0)

Gadaffi was raped with knives hours before he succumbed.

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2015-07-28   15:12:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Stephen Lendman, 4 (#0) (Edited)

Saif was arrested trying to flee Libya to safety, held captive by Zintan rebels, tortured, until tried in absentia in Tripoli and convicted by kangaroo tribunal proceedings affording him no chance for justice.

He was declared guilty by accusation - sentenced to death by firing squad along with eight other former Gaddafi officials,

A total of 32 defendants were tried - 23 got lesser sentences and fines. Attorney John Jones represented Saif. “It was clearly a show trial” for all defendants, he said. “It was basically a trial by militia” lasting two days - conducted by an illegitimate Islamist regime controlling Tripoli after ousting the US-installed one operating from Tobruk.

“Lawyers were intimidated,” said Jones. “The judges were intimated. Lawyers had to leave the case.” Controlled proceedings excluded the right to a proper defense.

Other serious issues included lack of access to lawyers, torture and other forms of ill treatment, as well as illegitimate trials conducted in absentia.

13 April 2014: Gaddafi sons' war crimes trial begins in Libya amid security fears - The Guardian

rights groups say violence against judges and lawyers, which have seen the rule of law suspended across much of the country, leave a question mark over the trial. "Militias and criminals have harassed, intimidated, threatened and in some cases assassinated judges, prosecutors, witnesses," said Hanan Salah, of Human Rights Watch.

"This case is going to be an example, not just for the old guys on trial, but for the new guys in power," said a Tripoli photographer Magdi el-Nakua. "The message for the new guys is that any abuses, no matter how you see yourselves, you will be made to account for them."

The message is that only the West and those backed by it can acceptably resist their country's government being overthrown.

July 28, 2015: Libya trial: Gaddafi son sentenced to death over war crimes - BBC News, with videos

A court in Libya has sentenced Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, son of deposed leader Col Muammar Gaddafi, and eight others to death over war crimes linked to the 2011 revolution.

other ex-officials received life sentences and seven were given jail terms of 12 years each, said chief investigator Sadiq al-Sur. Four were acquitted.

He is being held by a former rebel group from the town of Zintan that refuses to hand him over.

A Zintani source indicated to the BBC that they would not execute him or hand him over to the court.

In the years before the uprising, Saif al-Islam was known for trying to introduce political and economic reforms, says the BBC's North African correspondent Rana Jawad.

They have the right to appeal against their sentences within 60 days.

Video review:

EXCLUSIVE - Gaddafi [son, Saif,] to Sarkozy [of France]: "give us back our money" - YouTube

Uploaded on Mar 16, 2011 by euronews (in English) [2 minutes; Sarkozy issue at 1:28]

Gaddafi gold-for-oil, dollar-doom plans behind Libya 'mission'? - YouTube

Uploaded on May 5, 2011 by RT [3.25 minutes]

4um References for review:

2011-02-23: Rothschilds Stage Revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt To Kill Islamic Banks In Emerging North African Markets | From the abbreviated version at Post #1:

The prize is the rapidly-rising economies of North Africa. It coincides with the efforts of Ben Ali to make Tunisia the financial center of North Africa and to promote Islamic banking. The Rothschilds want North African Muslims to borrow from Rothschild banks and pay interest at rates the Rothschild central bank decides: they do not want them to be able to borrow from Islamic banks and not pay any interest.

April 13, 2011: Libya: All About Oil, or All About Banking? | Also posted 011-04-16 for discussion here.

The presumption of the rule against borrowing from the government’s own central bank is that this will be inflationary, while borrowing existing money from foreign banks or the IMF will not. But all banks actually create the money they lend on their books, whether publicly-owned or privately-owned. Most new money today comes from bank loans. Borrowing it from the government’s own central bank has the advantage that the loan is effectively interest-free. Eliminating interest has been shown to reduce the cost of public projects by an average of 50%.

And that appears to be how the Libyan system works. According to Wikipedia, the functions of the Central Bank of Libya include “issuing and regulating banknotes and coins in Libya” and “managing and issuing all state loans.” Libya’s wholly state-owned bank can and does issue the national currency and lend it for state purposes.

That would explain where Libya gets the money to provide free education and medical care, and to issue each young couple $50,000 in interest-free state loans. It would also explain where the country found the $33 billion to build the Great Man-Made River project. Libyans are worried that NATO-led air strikes are coming perilously close to this pipeline, threatening another humanitarian disaster.

So is this new war all about oil or all about banking? Maybe both – and water as well. With energy, water, and ample credit to develop the infrastructure to access them, a nation can be free of the grip of foreign creditors. And that may be the real threat of Libya: it could show the world what is possible.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-07-28   21:54:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: GreyLmist (#2)

"give us back our money"

This is how the stinking cesspool of amerika's treatment of the Mideast really took off, in a sense. In the heat of the "Iran hostage crisis," ABC news created the Nightline to give horrible Jue Ted Koppel a chance to parade his blockheadedness via interviews with Iranian spokesmen.

The Shah had been whisked to amerika for safety with a huge wad of Iran's cash. Seemingly 10 times, tube boob Koppel asked the top Iranians (Bani-Sadr, Ghotbzadeh etc) via live feed "what is it you want from amerika?" The answer was always the same -- "give us back our money." Koppel was literally incapable of hearing this since in conflicted with the Jue version of things and dumbly just kept asking the same thing again.

This is also a stock Jue dialectic trick, of course -- ask the same question till our target tries giving another answer. Cheap ruses like that work like magic on lots of goyim, alas.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-07-29   3:35:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: NeoconsNailed (#3) (Edited)

"give us back our money"

This is how the stinking cesspool of amerika's treatment of the Mideast really took off, in a sense. In the heat of the "Iran hostage crisis," ABC news created the Nightline to give horrible Jue Ted Koppel a chance to parade his blockheadedness via interviews with Iranian spokesmen.

The Shah had been whisked to amerika for safety with a huge wad of Iran's cash. Seemingly 10 times, tube boob Koppel asked the top Iranians (Bani-Sadr, Ghotbzadeh etc) via live feed "what is it you want from amerika?" The answer was always the same -- "give us back our money." Koppel was literally incapable of hearing this since in conflicted with the Jue version of things and dumbly just kept asking the same thing again.

This is also a stock Jue dialectic trick, of course -- ask the same question till [y]our target tries giving another answer. Cheap ruses like that work like magic on lots of goyim, alas.

During Ron Paul's 2012 Presidential campaign, Dana Bash and Gloria Borger of CNN seemed as deaf-programmed as you've described Koppel. This is a similar BBC example, relevant to Libya -- 14.25 minutes of mostly "journalistic hearing impairment improv"; repetitious indistinction between concerned geopolitical-diplomatic "responsibilities" and national "blame":

Adam Curtis: Rushes of BBC interview with Saif Gaddafi by Guy Smith - YouTube

In this 1.5 minute Press clip, Saif al-Islam said that Al Qaeda was backing the armed militant terrorizers warring against the country and asked for Europeans to send a Fact Finding Mission as soon as possible to assess the situation but, evidently, it's as if nearly every foreign reporter there must have translated it to mean something like, "Send NATO to bomb us.":

Gaddafi son gives presser, repeats claims about Al Qaeda - YouTube

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-07-31   9:39:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: GreyLmist (#4)

Right! BTW, I meant to say "ask the same question till your target tries giving another answer", of course -- not "our target".

The media are literally the propaganda arm of government, even when feigning independence. It's only a sick, SICK country like amerika that turns its entire existence over to what's happening in other countries far away UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. But thanks to the global Jue world order, the main politics and headlines and each day revolve around the Mideast. All this because of the lie of 9/11!

Thus you've got so-called reporters putting top priority on grilling the son of a national leader they murdered, trying and trying to get him to confess unequivocally the "crime" of giving the west a taste of its own medicine (Lockerbie) so they can hang him too. THE MEDIA ARE THE JUDGE, JURY AND EXECUTIONER in a pincer movement with the politicians. The presstitutes get it all done in the public consciousness so the prostiticians can actually do it with greatly reduced friction -- whatever gross crimes against decency "it" is on a given day.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-07-31   11:49:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: NeoconsNailed (#5) (Edited)

Right! BTW, I meant to say "ask the same question till your target tries giving another answer", of course -- not "our target".

I figured that and, since you said so there, I added a [y] in front of the word "our" in the quote-copy of my posting to read more precisely.

The media are literally the propaganda arm of government, even when feigning independence.

Yes, and he even says at 6:34-7:45 of an ABC interview with Christiane Amanpour on 2-27-11 that the same people who opposed implementation of his governmental reforms are the same people he sees in the media approving the militant insurgency group as their preferred "reformists".

It's only a sick, SICK country like amerika that turns its entire existence over to what's happening in other countries far away UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. But thanks to the global Jue world order, the main politics and headlines and each day revolve around the Mideast. All this because of the lie of 9/11!

Thus you've got so-called reporters putting top priority on grilling the son of a national leader they murdered, trying and trying to get him to confess unequivocally the "crime" of giving the west a taste of its own medicine (Lockerbie) so they can hang him too. THE MEDIA ARE THE JUDGE, JURY AND EXECUTIONER in a pincer movement with the politicians. The presstitutes get it all done in the public consciousness so the prostiticians can actually do it with greatly reduced friction -- whatever gross crimes against decency "it" is on a given day.

libyaherald.com reported protests there over the death sentence verdicts and this is an informative article from rt.com: ‘Libya is McDonalds for US’: How Gaddafi’s ‘pro-democracy’ son stood up against the West - with audio, videos and numerous good comments, too.

At 2:37 of the first article-video interview - with RT on 7-1-11, he states that he is not in the Army ... not in the government, so even the rebels know that he wasn't an authoritative commander of force and nobody had to order Libya's Military to defend itself. Wikipedia corroborates that he had publicly turned down his father's offer of the country's second highest post and held no official government position; not a member of the government or the military. Nevertheless, at 20:42 of an Al Jazeera interview on 3-4-11, he was told that he'd lost "diplomatic immunity". Prior to that, at 17:30 of an interview on 3-1-11 with the British Press, he'd already attempted to clarify twice that "I'm not working for the government" ... "I'm not an official."

Of the pernicious Westerly "Media", Christiane Amanpour seemed fairest. This is a poignant summation reported at the RT article linked above, from the RT-interview video of 7-1-11, also linked above -- at the start to 2:18, at 7:31 and at 11:53.

Our example means one should never trust the West and should always be on alert – for them it is fine to change their mind overnight and start bombing Libya,” Gaddafi’s son explained.

Saif also compared Libya to the McDonalds fast-food chain, arguing that the US and their allies were not after Colonel Gaddafi, but the country’s resources.

“NATO and rebels – both are in a hurry. They want to finish as soon as possible because they’re hungry. They’re tired. They want to share the cake. For them Libya is like fast-food, like McDonald’s. Fast because everything should be fast – fast war; fast airlines; fast bullets; fast victory. But we are very patient because it’s our country,” Saif told RT.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-07-31   15:38:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: All (#6) (Edited)

Archiving info on Gaddafi's third son, Saadi:

21stcenturywire.com August 4, 2015: NATO’s FREEDOM & DEMOCRACY: Gaddafi Son Tortured By New Libyan ‘Courts’

“It does appear to be Saadi Gaddafi,” Melinda Taylor, an international criminal court defense lawyer for Saadi Gaddafi told RT.

His lawyer says that ‘Saadi being in al-Hadba subjects him both to the maximum sentence and to the maximum mistreatment’ simply because he holds the Gaddafi family name. The lawyer said that a ‘collective punishment‘ is being enforced. Something that has long been outlawed in international law.

No legal team is present during the “questioning.”

These ‘courts’ recently sentenced Saadi’s brother Saif, Gaddafi’s [second] son, to death.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-08-15   8:27:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: GreyLmist (#7)

We are pre-medieval. Only in ancient societies (all through the Old Testament) did they kill off an enemy's family too for what he had supposedly done.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-08-15   12:00:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: NeoconsNailed (#8)

We are pre-medieval. Only in ancient societies (all through the Old Testament) did they kill off an enemy's family too for what he had supposedly done.

Cross-referencing 4um Title: Tom Cotton 'Corruption Of Blood' Bill Would Convict Family Members Of Iran Sanctions Violators

Published: May 23, 2013

WASHINGTON -- Rep. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) on Wednesday introduced legislation that would "automatically" punish family members of people who violate U.S. sanctions against Iran, levying sentences of up to 20 years in prison.

Cotton also seeks to punish any family member of those people, "to include a spouse and any relative to the third degree," including, "parents, children, aunts, uncles, nephews nieces, grandparents, great grandparents, grandkids, great grandkids," Cotton said.

"There would be no investigation," Cotton said during Wednesday's markup hearing before the House Foreign Affairs Committee. "If the prime malefactor of the family is identified as on the list for sanctions, then everyone within their family would automatically come within the sanctions regime as well. It'd be very hard to demonstrate and investigate to conclusive proof."

Article III of the Constitution explicitly bans Congress from punishing treason based on "corruption of blood" -- meaning that relatives of those convicted of treason cannot be punished based only on a familial tie.

"Iranian citizens do not have constitutional rights under the United States Constitution," Cotton said.

Additional info at Post #1.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-09-03   23:16:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: GreyLmist (#9) (Edited)

Boy, that is VILE. How low can they get?

Went to a Tea Party mtg in Greenville this eve. Things were fairly passable for a long while till I realized that everybody there but me was a mindless Ayrab hater. Had wanted to hear Dr. Christian Jeffrey

faculty.ung.edu/bfr iedman/bfried/cjeff.htm

and while she brought some good info she rivaled this jerk in the above respect -- he also orated:

en.wikipedia.or g/wiki/Jeff_Duncan_(politician)

There were about 50 people there, and if 5 of them were under 60yo, it's a miracle.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-09-04   2:58:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: GreyLmist, NeoconsNailed (#9)

"Iranian citizens do not have constitutional rights under the United States Constitution," Cotton said.

Hmmm. A Feral Judge just ruled that Mexicans (non-citizens) have a 2nd Amendment right. Seems like a big conflict right there.

 photo 001g.gif
“With the exception of Whites, the rule among the peoples of the world, whether residing in their homelands or settled in Western democracies, is ethnocentrism and moral particularism: they stick together and good means what is good for their ethnic group."
-Alex Kurtagic

X-15  posted on  2015-09-04   7:26:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: GreyLmist (#9)

"Iranian citizens do not have constitutional rights under the United States Constitution," Cotton said.

That could be the positively maddest thing these ferals have said yet! So, every country on earth is part of the Juebenighted States, Obozo's "59 states" expanded to cover the globe, but they get to decree who has rights and who doesn't wholesale.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-09-04   10:58:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest