Title: The Nanking Massacre - Why China Still Hates Japan Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Aug 14, 2015 Author:TestTube News Post Date:2015-08-14 00:25:57 by HAPPY2BME-4UM Keywords:japan, china, nanking, massacre Views:618 Comments:28
China and Japan have a long history of rivalry and conflict, marred by war and atrocities. Today, both nations’ economies are thriving, and they’re big trade partners, so why does China still resent Japan? TestTube Daily takes a look at the countries’ dark past and the effect it's had on their relationship today.
Lots of Asians hate the Japs, understandably. Had lunch with a Korean family last week, and the 19 year old daughter told me, "Many Koreans hate the Japanese, including me. I hate them."
"One can assess the level of racism against the Ainus when it is realized that the modern Chinese/Korean descended Japanese pretend that they are indigenous, rather than settlers; and they down-play the fact that there were original black muurish Japanese.
Perhaps it is because they stole the land from the indigenes. Perhaps they do not want to recall the true owners of the beautiful land which they stole, the land belonging to another Asiatic black people, the Ainus, the last Muurs of Japan.
Perhaps it is because they stole the land from the indigenes. Perhaps they do not want to recall the true owners of the beautiful land which they stole, the land belonging to another Asiatic black people, the Ainus, the last Muurs of Japan.
Perhaps it is because they stole the land from the indigenes. Perhaps they do not want to recall the true owners of the beautiful land which they stole, the land belonging to another Asiatic black people, the Ainus, the last Muurs of Japan.
There's been a whole lot of stealing going on.
What ever happened to the Mohicans, or many other of the East Coast tribes?
How about the Tasmanians? The Aussies literally hunted these people to extinction. They were completely wiped out.
There's Argentina too lest we forget. Perhaps the most European of the South American lands. The indigenous folks were hunted down and the remainder forced to the margins of civilization there.
We speak English (and so do the Scots and Irish) because the Anglo-Saxons ruthlessly drove the Celts north and west and conquered what became Anglalonde.
You can imagine the chagrin of the Jews "returning" to the "Holy Land" only to find the history had officially be declared to be OVER and conquest was no longer synonymous with possession. (In which lesson the losers of WWII were solemnly catechized.)
I don't know if this helps, but it's virtually impossible ever to tell who the real indigenes are in an area. Nobody but nobody (except gliberals-come-lately) questions that Europe is white people's continent, that France is rightly for the white French etc. This is probably just because we don't know who was there before them, whereas we do in some other places -- but records only go back so far.
The Americas make fools of everybody because it's hopelessly complex. The Indians are only indigenous if they came over a Bering isthmus, but, ah, it seems they killed off the noble Mound Builders when they got here -- and the above case would make whites indigenous here too.