Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

History
See other History Articles

Title: Did Stone Age man invent 'church bells' 15,000 years ago?
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet ... s-call-community-funerals.html
Published: Aug 22, 2015
Author: RICHARD GRAY FOR MAILONLINE
Post Date: 2015-08-22 08:02:15 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 146
Comments: 13

Ceremonial boulders were hit like 'gongs' to call the community to funerals Large stone mortars were found next to stone age grave sites in Israel Researchers believe these were pounded to summon people to ceremonies Noise from the 3 foot tall rocks would have been audible for miles around It suggests nearby communities were bound together with common beliefs

They were among the first Stone Age humans to abandon the nomadic hunter-gatherer lifestyle in favour of living in settled villages around 15,000 years ago. Now archaeologists have discovered the Natufian culture that lived in the Levant in modern-day Israel may also have pioneered the concept of church bells to summon the community together.

Researchers have discovered strangely shaped boulders they believe were used as ceremonial 'gongs' that were pounded during burial ceremonies.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3205788/Did-Stone-Age- man-invent-church-bells-15-000-years-ago-Ceremonial-boulders-hit-like-gongs-call- community-funerals.html#ixzz3jXoeslgI Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

#1. To: Ada (#0)

Of course. They were identical to us. Identical DNA so naturally they could invent.

DWornock  posted on  2015-08-22   10:13:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: DWornock (#1)

Because evolution is a farce. Via anu.org =

jaysanalysis.com/2015/08/...tion-and-scientism-fraud/

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-08-22   10:32:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: NeoconsNailed (#2)

Because evolution is a farce

Of course not. Evolution doesn't occur in the blink of an eye. Looking at the last 15,000 years in earth's evolutionary history is like looking at only the last two frames of a more than 4 hour movie with 30 frames per second. You will not see anything change by looking at 1/15th of a second of a 4 hour movie.

DWornock  posted on  2015-08-22   11:40:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: DWornock (#4)

DUH, I've heard of extreme long time evolutionism a few times too. It does pop up!

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-08-22   22:52:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: NeoconsNailed (#5)

Do the calculations. Divide 15,000 years into 3 or 4 billion years which is the the length of the earth's evolutionary history. Then divide that number in the the number of frames in a 4 hour movie at 30 frames a second and you get two frames. That is why it is impossible for you to see evolution. You expect to see it in your life time or at least in recorded human history. Therefore, you are just taking a snapshot and a snapshot does not show movement.

A butterfly that only lives a few days doesn't see the growth of a Red-oak tree but that doesn't mean the tree didn't grow from a tiny seed.

DWornock  posted on  2015-08-22   23:51:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 6.

#7. To: DWornock (#6)

You're the one that said 15,000 -- I didn't. Macro-evolution is total garbage because there are no transitional forms in the fossil record. There should be gajillions -- a birdoid with 1/8-formed wings, a birdoid with 3765/72897436- formed wings, a birdoid with 51/64-formed wings etc. -- to give just one example of the millions of species.

Does nature or doesn't nature tend to disorder? I've tried throwing 10 pennies into the air 100,000 times but they've never landed forming a straight line.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-08-23 00:30:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest