Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: Russian Military Forces Arrive In Syria, Set Forward Operating Base Near Damascus
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015- ... d-operating-base-near-damascus
Published: Sep 1, 2015
Author: Submitted by Tyler Durden on 08/31/2015
Post Date: 2015-09-01 02:24:34 by HAPPY2BME-4UM
Keywords: None
Views: 70
Comments: 16

While military direct intervention by US, Turkish, and Gulf forces over Syrian soil escalates with every passing day, even as Islamic State forces capture increasingly more sovereign territory, in the central part of the country, the Nusra Front dominant in the northwestern region province of Idlib and the official "rebel" forces in close proximity to Damascus, the biggest question on everyone's lips has been one: would Putin abandon his protege, Syria's president Assad, to western "liberators" in the process ceding control over Syrian territory which for years had been a Russian national interest as it prevented the passage of regional pipelines from Qatar and Saudi Arabia into Europe, in the process eliminating Gazprom's - and Russia's - influence over the continent.

As recently as a month ago, the surprising answer appeared to be an unexpected "yes", as we described in detail in "The End Draws Near For Syria's Assad As Putin's Patience "Wears Thin." Which would make no sense: why would Putin abdicate a carefully cultivated relationship, one which served both sides (Russia exported weapons, provides military support, and in exchange got a right of first and only refusal on any traversing pipelines through Syria) for years, just to take a gamble on an unknown future when the only aggressor was a jihadist spinoff which had been created as byproduct of US intervention in the region with the specific intention of achieving precisely this outcome: overthrowing Assad (see "Secret Pentagon Report Reveals US "Created" ISIS As A "Tool" To Overthrow Syria's President Assad").

As it turns out, it may all have been just a ruse. Because as Ynet reports, not only has Putin not turned his back on Assad, or Syria, but the Russian reinforcements are well on their way. Reinforcements for what? Why to fight the evil Islamic jihadists from ISIS of course, the same artificially created group of bogeyman that the US, Turkey, and Saudis are all all fighting. In fact, this may be the first world war in which everyone is "fighting" an opponent that everyone knows is a proxy for something else.

According to Ynet, Russian fighter pilots are expected to begin arriving in Syria in the coming days, and will fly their Russian air force fighter jets and attack helicopters against ISIS and rebel-aligned targets within the failing state.

And just like the US and Turkish air forces are supposedly in the region to "eradicate the ISIS threat", there can't be any possible complaints that Russia has also decided to take its fight to the jihadists - even if it is doing so from the territory of what the real goal of US and Turkish intervention is - Syria. After all, it is a free for all against ISIS, right?

From Ynet:

According to Western diplomats, a Russian expeditionary force has already arrived in Syria and set up camp in an Assad-controlled airbase. The base is said to be in area surrounding Damascus, and will serve, for all intents and purposes, as a Russian forward operating base.

 

In the coming weeks thousands of Russian military personnel are set to touch down in Syria, including advisors, instructors, logistics personnel, technical personnel, members of the aerial protection division, and the pilots who will operate the aircraft.

The Israeli outlet needless adds that while the current makeup of the Russian expeditionary force is still unknown, "there is no doubt that Russian pilots flying combat missions in Syrian skies will definitely change the existing dynamics in the Middle East."

Why certainly: because in one move Putin, who until this moment had been curiously non-commital over Syria's various internal and exteranl wars, just made the one move the puts everyone else in check: with Russian forces in Damascus implicitly supporting and guarding Assad, the western plan instantly falls apart.

It gets better: if what Ynet reports is accurate, Iran's brief tenure as Obama's BFF in the middle east is about to expire:

Western diplomatic sources recently reported that a series of negotiations had been held between the Russians and the Iranians, mainly focusing on ISIS and the threat it poses to the Assad regime. The infamous Iranian Quds Force commander Major General Qasem Soleimani recently visited Moscow in the framework of these talks. As a result the Russians and the Iranians reached a strategic decision: Make any effort necessary to preserve Assad's seat of power, so that Syria may act as a barrier, and prevent the spread of ISIS and Islamist backed militias into the former Soviet Islamic republics.

See: the red herring that is ISIS can be used just as effectively for defensive purposes as for offensive ones. And since the US can't possibly admit the whole situation is one made up farce, it is quite possible that the world will witness its first regional war when everyone is fighting a dummy, proxy enemy which doesn't really exist, when in reality everyone is fighting everyone else!

That said, we look forward to Obama explaining the American people how the US is collaborating with the one mid-east entity that is supporting not only Syria, but now is explicitly backing Putin as well.

It gets better: Ynet adds that "Western diplomatic sources have emphasized that the Obama administration is fully aware of the Russian intent to intervene directly in Syria, but has yet to issue any reaction... The Iranians and the Russians- with the US well aware- have begun the struggle to reequip the Syrian army, which has been left in tatters by the civil war. They intend not only to train Assad's army, but to also equip it. During the entire duration of the civil war, the Russians have consistently sent a weapons supply ship to the Russian held port of Tartus in Syria on a weekly basis. The ships would bring missiles, replacement parts, and different types of ammunition for the Syrian army."

Finally, it appears not only the US military-industrial complex is set to profit from the upcoming war: Russian dockbuilders will also be rewarded:

Arab media outlets have recently published reports that Syria and Russia were looking for an additional port on the Syrian coast, which will serve the Russians in their mission to hasten the pace of the Syrian rearmament.

If all of the above is correct, the situation in the middle-east is set to escalate very rapidly over the next few months, and is likely set to return to the face-off last seen in the summer of 2013 when the US and Russian navies were within earshot of each other, just off the coast of Syria, and only a last minute bungled intervention by Kerry avoided the escalation into all out war. Let's hope Kerry has it in him to make the same mistake twice.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)

Russia is in Syria for the long haul.

We see reports that Russia is now supplying Syria with satellite surveillance, delivering S-300 air defense components, building a new naval seaport in addition to its facilities in Tartus, and most recently we hear that Russia is committing boots on the ground.

All of these commitments stand as evidence that Russia intends to remain a major player in the ME. It also will shore up the Assad regime as a bulwark against the tide of Takfiri fanaticism supported by Gulf states, Turkey and -- US.

"If ignorance is truly bliss, then why do so many Americans need Prozac?" - Dave McGowan

randge  posted on  2015-09-01   7:42:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: randge (#1)

It also will shore up the Assad regime as a bulwark against the tide of Takfiri fanaticism supported by Gulf states, Turkey and -- US.

================================================================

I don't see Turkey as being hostile to Russia.

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2015-09-01   11:29:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#2)

Never-the-f'in-less, Russia sees the takfiri jihadi crazies that Turkey breeds and infiltrates across borders as being hostile to Russia and of a piece with the salafists that threaten it at home.

BTW, did I forget to mention that MIG-29s and YAK-130s are on their way to Syria?

"If ignorance is truly bliss, then why do so many Americans need Prozac?" - Dave McGowan

randge  posted on  2015-09-01   11:47:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: randge (#3)

BTW, did I forget to mention that MIG-29s and YAK-130s are on their way to Syria?

=====================================================

War is a racket, regardless of who does it.

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2015-09-01   11:53:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#4)

ISIS gwine ketch de daid lonesome.

Head-chopper fricassee! :)

"If ignorance is truly bliss, then why do so many Americans need Prozac?" - Dave McGowan

randge  posted on  2015-09-01   11:58:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: randge (#5)

ISIS gwine ketch de daid lonesome.

Head-chopper fricassee! :)

=================================================

Ping me when Russia starts arming the Kurds in Northern Iraq, where REAL progress against ISIS will be both verifiable and justified.

Other than that, any other real concrete evidence that Russia is playing the same game as the US is vaporwar.

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2015-09-01   12:06:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#6)

Ping me when Putin engages in stupid loser gambits.

"If ignorance is truly bliss, then why do so many Americans need Prozac?" - Dave McGowan

randge  posted on  2015-09-01   12:14:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)

And since the US can't possibly admit the whole situation is one made up farce, it is quite possible that the world will witness its first regional war when everyone is fighting a dummy, proxy enemy which doesn't really exist, when in reality everyone is fighting everyone else!

Great.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2015-09-01   12:22:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: randge (#7)

Ping me when Russia starts arming the Kurds in Northern Iraq, where REAL progress against ISIS will be both verifiable and justified.

Other than that, any other real concrete evidence that Russia is playing the same game as the US is vaporwar.

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2015-09-01   14:35:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Lod (#8)

And since the US can't possibly admit the whole situation is one made up farce, it is quite possible that the world will witness its first regional war when everyone is fighting a dummy, proxy enemy which doesn't really exist, when in reality everyone is fighting everyone else!

======================================================

War is a racket.

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2015-09-01   14:37:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#9)

Ping me when Russia starts arming the Kurds in Northern Iraq, where REAL progress against ISIS will be both verifiable and justified.

You are joking, HAPPY. Strategic megalomania.

That would be the kind of ham-handed interventionism that Washington excels at.

"If ignorance is truly bliss, then why do so many Americans need Prozac?" - Dave McGowan

randge  posted on  2015-09-01   15:23:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)

This would probably be on the side of Assad's forces. Russia has had a defense alliance with Syria and Iran for several years, and given that they successfully foiled or at least delayed Obama and Hillary's attempt to destroy Syria in 2012, the Russians probably aren't too happy about getting involved at last.

Those who want to go on to Iran should heed this. War with Iran will probably involve war with Russia as well. It is pathetic that virtually no one in the presidential race is against war with both Iran and Russia. Even Trump who is better on Russia than his GOP counterparts is still gung-ho for war with Iran as virtually all the Israel bootlickers.

John Howard says: There are 4 schools of economics:
Marxism: steal everything
Keynesianism: steal by counterfeiting whenever needed
Chicago school (Milton Friedman): steal by counterfeiting at a steady, predictable rate
Austrians: don't steal

Exodus to Europe: Who’s to Blame?
'Wiped off the Map' – The Rumor of the Century

PnbC  posted on  2015-09-01   16:09:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: randge (#11)

Ping me when Russia starts arming the Kurds in Northern Iraq, where REAL progress against ISIS will be both verifiable and justified.

You are joking, HAPPY. Strategic megalomania.

That would be the kind of ham-handed interventionism that Washington excels at.

===================================================

USA, Russia, China, etc. could care less if the Kurds disintegrated. The Kurds are the only group in that region that aren't savages and therefore worth saving their lives against muslim insanity.

The Kurd won't be getting any help because all the above don't want their real estate, and don't give a damn they are being slaughtered with weapons supplied by (all the above).

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2015-09-01   16:12:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#13)

HAPPY, you're a nice guy, but it's hard to take you seriously sometimes.

There is no group more famous for fighting among themselves as well as all those around them (with the possible exception of the Ay-rabs) as are the Kurds.

Kurds are currently of interest as they are being employed by Zionists in their quest to divide Mesopotamia into manageable pieces.

"If ignorance is truly bliss, then why do so many Americans need Prozac?" - Dave McGowan

randge  posted on  2015-09-01   16:52:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)

Western diplomatic sources recently reported that a series of negotiations had been held between the Russians and the Iranians, ... The infamous Iranian Quds Force commander Major General Qasem Soleimani recently visited Moscow in the framework of these talks.

Soleimani - I think that's an Arabic version of the Hebrew name, Solomon.

since the US can't possibly admit the whole situation is one made up farce, it is quite possible that the world will witness its first regional war when everyone is fighting a dummy, proxy [ISIS] enemy which doesn't really exist, when in reality everyone is fighting everyone else!

That said, we look forward to Obama explaining [to] the American people how the US is collaborating with the one mid-east entity [Iran] that is supporting not only Syria, but now is explicitly backing Putin as well.

the situation in the middle-east is set to escalate very rapidly over the next few months, and is likely set to return to the face-off last seen in the summer of 2013 when the US and Russian navies were within earshot of each other, just off the coast of Syria, and only a last minute bungled intervention by Kerry avoided the escalation into all out war. Let's hope Kerry has it in him to make the same mistake twice.

Cross-referencing 4um Title: Benjamin Netanyahu Endorses This Candidate For President

URL Source: http://conservativenewsroom.com/new ... -this-candidate-for-president/

Interesting comment at the article site from 12 days ago, if so:

Did all you out there know that Kerry has relatives in Iran. Yes, his daughter married an Iranian man, and they live over there.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-09-03   1:32:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: GreyLmist (#15)

Nets Cheer ‘Unstoppable’ Iran Deal Amid Public Opposition; ‘Done Deal'

On the heels of President Obama and Senate Democrats achieving the minimum threshold on Wednesday to preserve the Iran nuclear deal, the “big three” networks of ABC, CBS, and NBC applauded during their evening newscasts the “unstoppable” “done deal” that had Secretary of State John Kerry taking “a victory lap.”

Even though the American people remain largely opposed to the deal (along with a majority of their representatives in Congress), ABC’s World News Tonight anchor David Muir still hailed it as “[a] big victory for President Obama” despite it coming “under fire, of course, from Republicans threatening to defeat it” (having failed to mention how two Democratic Senators oppose it).

Muir added that the deal “is safe thanks to Senator Barbara Mikulski of Maryland, saying she will not support the deal, giving the President 34 votes – the magic number, enough to prevent the Senate from overriding President Obama.”

Shifting over to NBC Nightly News, anchor Lester Holt saluted “a major win for the Obama administration” for a deal that “now appears unstoppable” with the President having “locked down all the votes he needs for the controversial agreement to survive in the Republican-controlled Senate.” 

NBC News chief foreign affairs correspondent and MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell continued on that theme, touting how “Kerry took a victory lap today when Maryland Senator Barbara Mikulski became the 34th senator supporting the Iran deal and that’s enough to prevent Congress from killing it.”

However, Mitchell was the lone network report to even mention polling data on public opinion of the deal, but quickly brushed it aside in claiming that they “show Americans are sharply divided over the agreement but Republican [presidential] candidates sure aren’t.”

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2015-09-03   8:12:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest