Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

ObamaNation
See other ObamaNation Articles

Title: White House appoints transgender Czar to transform US military
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOr5eLAQ8ac
Published: Sep 2, 2015
Author: staff
Post Date: 2015-09-02 11:52:36 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 112
Comments: 9

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Horse (#0)

China sees this. Russia sees this.

They BOTH see it as a major indicator the US military is ready for one thing, and that is DEFEAT.

Ripe for the pickings.

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2015-09-02   15:37:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Horse (#0)

From 'medically unqualified' to a 'civil right'

A military watchdog says there's no rational reason for the Pentagon to allow so-called "transgendered" people to serve in the U.S. military.

"If you make policies based on political situations, it will degrade the culture of the military, cultural values, core values and all the rest," observes Elaine Donnelly, president of the Center for Military Readiness.

Donnelly and the Center have been fighting the Pentagon's allowance of open homosexuals and its push to put women into front-line combat units.

The fight over transgendered is now the latest fight.

In July, Defense Secretary Ash Carter announced that the Department of Defense intended to lift the ban on transgender troops and create a working group to study the implications over six months.

According to a draft memo obtained by USA Today, the Pentagon will end the ban next May. 

In the meantime, troops can reportedly serve as openly transgender, and it will require high-level approval to discharge troops of that orientation.

A defense official told USA Today that U.S. Army and U.S. Air Force leaders know of about 20 transgender troops in both services. But the story says that number could be as high as 12,000, and it could cost more than $5 million annually to treat them.  

People who are transgender say they identify as the opposite of their gender at birth.

Army soldiers with weaponsThe American Psychological Association identified that as "gender identity disorder" until 2012, when the APA dropped "disorder" to "avoid stigma."

Despite the softer term, the diagnosis of "gender dysphoria" currently disqualfies transgenders from military service, the USA Today story reports.  

The Pentagon is also considering revisiting the discharge status of transgender troops who have been kicked out of the service.

Reacting to that announcement, Donnelly says the Pentagon is now considering giving "civil rights claims" to people who are considered medically unqualified for military service.

"The decision just announced is disturbing," says Donnelly, "because of the fact that there is no rationale for doing this."

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2015-09-02   16:41:37 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Horse (#0)

EVEN CHILDREN KNOW A PERVERT WHEN THEY SEE ONE - Over 150 Students Walk Out Of School To Protest Transgender Teen Using Girls’ Locker Room

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2015-09-02   16:51:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#2)

I suppose horny guys could declare themselves "transsexual", get a bed in a female barracks, then just say they're lesbians... LOL


"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination

FormerLurker  posted on  2015-09-02   17:36:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#2) (Edited)

In July, Defense Secretary Ash Carter announced that the Department of Defense intended to lift the ban on transgender troops and create a working group to study the implications over six months.

According to a draft memo obtained by USA Today, the Pentagon will end the ban next May.

Defense Secretary Ash Carter isn't authorized to lift that ban anymore than Defense Secretaries before him could proclaim a "PC Pentagon Policy" lifting the official ban against gays openly serving in the Military without the Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010 being passed into law first by Congress. Such risks to National Security aren't decisions that our Founders intended to be made based on the personal opinions and particular Party affiliation of Military admins -- just Congress assembled. [Constitution Reference at Article I, Section 8: The Congress shall have Power ... To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces]

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-09-02   22:47:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#1) (Edited)

China sees this. Russia sees this.

They BOTH see it as a major indicator the US military is ready for one thing, and that is DEFEAT.

Ripe for the pickings.

See also:

From an Amazon.com Book Review at: Deadly Consequences: How Cowards are Pushing Women into Combat by Robert L. Maginnis

As Maginnis declares, our success on the battlefields is much more important than "glass ceilings" as defeat is the irrevocable result of political correctness. This well-written and documented book explains simply and forcefully that the policy of placing women in combat maneuver units is bad for the military and our country.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-09-02   22:55:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: GreyLmist (#5)

Defense Secretary Ash Carter isn't authorized to lift that ban anymore than Defense Secretaries before him could procaim a "PC Pentagon Policy" lifting the official ban against gays openly serving in the Military without the Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010 being passed into law first by Congress. Such risks to National Security aren't decisions that our Founders intended to be made based on the personal opinions and particular Party affiliation of Military admins -- just Congress assembled. [Reference: Article I, Section 8]

===============================================

100% correct.

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2015-09-02   23:40:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Horse (#0)

When the hell is the problem, we already have a homosexual and a TRANNY IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

Darkwing  posted on  2015-09-03   10:03:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Horse (#0)

*Trans*form indeed.

When the US empire attacks they'll look like the Persian king in the fictionalized "300". Of course, the US deserves to lose, not because of transgender soldiers but because of the policymakers pushing America into an unnecessary and unjust war.

John Howard says: There are 4 schools of economics:
Marxism: steal everything
Keynesianism: steal by counterfeiting whenever needed
Chicago school (Milton Friedman): steal by counterfeiting at a steady, predictable rate
Austrians: don't steal

Exodus to Europe: Who’s to Blame?
'Wiped off the Map' – The Rumor of the Century

PnbC  posted on  2015-09-03   11:02:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest