Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Religion
See other Religion Articles

Title: Francis Arrives Amid Moral Crisis
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.theamericanconservative. ... cis-arrives-amid-moral-crisis/
Published: Sep 22, 2015
Author: PATRICK J. BUCHANAN
Post Date: 2015-09-22 07:40:21 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 52
Comments: 4

During the 1950s, the twin pillars of worldwide anti-communism were Dwight Eisenhower’s America and the Roman Catholic Church of Pope Pius XII. During the 1980s, the last decade of the Cold War, Ronald Reagan and the Polish pope, John Paul II, were the pillars of resistance.

When Pope Francis arrives in Washington on Tuesday afternoon, the country he enters will be a very different one from Eisenhower’s America or Reagan’s America. And Catholics will be welcoming a new kind of pope.

In America 2015, homosexuality, abortion on demand and same-sex marriage—shameful crimes in Ike’s America, mortal sins in the catechism of Pius XII—have become constitutional rights. These represent the values that define Barack Obama’s America, the values our officials defend at the United Nations, the values we preach to the world.

What Ike’s America saw as decadence, Obama’s America calls progress. And among its noisiest celebrants are our Catholic vice president, Joe Biden, and the Catholic leader of the Democratic Party in the House, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Since Eisenhower’s time, Christianity, the faith that created the West, has been purged from American public life. The Bible, prayer, and all Christian art, books, and symbols have been expunged from the public schools as they were in Cuba when Fidel Castro took power. Our cradle faith cannot be taught in our public schools.

America is a different country today, a secular and post-Christian nation on its way to becoming anti-Christian. Some feel like strangers in their own land. And from the standpoint of traditional Catholicism, American culture is an open sewer. A vast volume of the traffic on the Internet is pornography.

Ironically, as all this unfolds in what was once “God’s country,” Vladimir Putin seeks to re-establish Eastern Orthodox Christianity as the basis of morality and law in Russia. And one reads in the Wall Street Journal on Monday that Xi Jinping is trying to reintroduce his Chinese Communist comrades to the teachings of Confucianism.

The world is turned upside down. Every civilization seems to recognize the necessity of faith except for the West, which has lost its faith and is shrinking and dying for lack of it. In a New York Times article this month—”Are Western Values Losing Their Sway?”—Steven Erlanger writes:

In its rejection of Western liberal values of sexual equality and choice, conservative Russia finds common cause with many in Africa and with the religious teachings of Islam, the Vatican, fundamentalist Protestants and Orthodox Jews.

Yet what Erlanger describes as “conservative Russia” does seem to share values with America, only it is the America of 1955, another country from the America of 2015.

Which raises a question: Does moral truth change?

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, “The best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market.” But is this true? A decade after his beer hall putsch failed in Munich, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi party won the largest number of Germans ever to vote in a democratic election. He had succeeded in the marketplace of ideas. Did that democratic ratification make Hitler’s ideas true?

Or does truth exist independent of the marketplace?

Secular America, which has purged Christianity, preaches a new gospel to the world: liberal democracy as the salvation of mankind. Yet did not Winston Churchill, icon of the democracy worshippers, tell us that “the best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter”?

The Catholic Church, too, faces a growing crisis of moral consistency and credibility.

The church of Pius XII and John Paul II taught that the truths of the Ten Commandments brought down from Sinai and the truths of the Sermon on the Mount are eternal. Those popes also taught that a valid marriage is indissoluble, that homosexuality is unnatural and immoral, that abortion is the killing of the innocent unborn, an abomination.

Yet one reads regularly of discussions inside the Vatican to alter what is infallible church teaching on these doctrines to make the church more appealing to those who have rejected them.

As the pope arrives in America, some Catholics are calling for an acceptance of contraception, the ordination of women and a new acceptance of homosexuality. Yet the Episcopalians, who have embraced all these “reforms” and more, appear to be going the way of James Fenimore Cooper’s Mohicans.

In Cuba, Pope Francis declined to address the repression of the Castro brothers. Will he also avoid America’s moral crisis to chatter on about income inequality and climate change and find common ground with Obama?

What has come out of the Vatican in the past two years is moral confusion. Yet as Philadelphia Archbishop Charles Chaput reminds us, “confusion is of the devil.” It is also trifling with schism.

Having emerged victorious in the 70-year ideological struggle against one of the greatest enemies that mankind has ever known, Marxism-Leninism, are the United States and the Catholic Church heading for the same desuetude and disintegration?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

Having emerged victorious in the 70-year ideological struggle against one of the greatest enemies that mankind has ever known, Marxism-Leninism, are the United States and the Catholic Church heading for the same desuetude and disintegration?

YES, Pat, YES! Go, Pat, go!!

“The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter” -- oh, what a quote. What a quote -- thanks! But what resistance to communism did JP2 ever offer? I listened and listened for some strong statement from him, and heard nothing. On the contrary, every time I leaf through one of his writings he's telling the rich countries to redistribute their wealth, preferably to the third world.

People deify their popes even more than their presidents -- if that's possible.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-09-22   11:44:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Ada (#0)

Having emerged victorious in the 70-year ideological struggle against one of the greatest enemies that mankind has ever known, Marxism-Leninism,

Utter nonsense.

Cynicom  posted on  2015-09-22   11:52:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: NeoconsNailed (#1)

People deify their popes even more than their presidents -- if that's possible.

The papacy is the symbolic continuation of the Roman emperor. Before Christianity became the official state religion of the Roman empire (and even sometime after) the emperor WAS the pope - the official agent of god or whatever deity was the popular or official religion of the time. And of course after the (pointless) assassination of Roman dictator Gaius Julius (Caesar), Roman emperors from Augustus onward were increasingly deified, first posthumously then later when still alive like the pharaohs of old Egypt.

One of the earlier emperors who was a brief breath of fresh air after the evil reigns of Caligula and Nero was Vespasian, who in a show of self-deprecating humor said on his deathbed "I think I am becoming a god".

John Howard says: There are 4 schools of economics:
Marxism: steal everything
Keynesianism: steal by counterfeiting whenever needed
Chicago school (Milton Friedman): steal by counterfeiting at a steady, predictable rate
Austrians: don't steal

How to End the Refugee Flood
'Wiped off the Map' – The Rumor of the Century

PnbC  posted on  2015-09-22   12:06:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: PnbC (#3)

Rich, truly rich. Two smashing quotations on one page! I "collect" and try to rank the few better rulers in history.

Am told on good authority that what you've said is the covert Vatican position -- the pope's skullcap is symbolic of the pad Roman generals wore under their helmets, etc. etc. I get the distinct impression that the RCC regards itself as the rightful temporal ruler of the world and the Protestant era merely a low period in its power.

Just as a denomination founded to allow an English king to divorce will never be that spiritual, a church founded by a Roman emperor will -- in my humble opinion -- always be imperial at heart. Catholics, at least, believe in their thing more than Episcos or Anglicans ever did.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-09-22   12:24:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest