Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: He'd Let Them Swarm In, Now He'd kick Them Out: Trump Does Drastic 180 on Syrian Immigrants In less Than A Month, His Desperate, Starry-Eyed Supporters Don't Even Notice
Source: .
URL Source: http://libertyfight.com/2015/trump_ ... ic_180_on_Syrian_refugees.html
Published: Oct 6, 2015
Author: .
Post Date: 2015-10-06 14:00:35 by Artisan
Keywords: None
Views: 2619
Comments: 87

"I hate the concept of it, but on a humanitarian basis, with what's happening, you have to." - Donald Trump on Syrian refugees into the United States, less than 30 days ago

Look, everyone knows we need a real game-changer in this country, someone who cares about America. But let's not be so naive, gullible and desperate as to so easily fall for yet another one of these shysters. Just like his sudden, drastic "about-faces" on gun rights and illegal immigration, Donald "I'm A Big Fan Of Israel" Trump said less than 25 days ago that we must let Syrian immigrants in because it's a "humanitarian disaster" and the poor migrants were "in a living hell." This was reported worldwide including on CNN, Breitbart, Politico, Fox news and everywhere else. This week he's saying the exact opposite, that he would send them back, (presumably send back the same ones he promised to let in?) Where I come from theres an old saying which applies in this case. Trump's "so full of shit his eyes are brown." Also, here are his quotes supporting the assault weapons ban, longer 'waiting lists' and as well as his promotion of amnesty for the "good" illegal aliens who have not "broken the law." Yes his lines are good, (depending on which way the wind is blowing) but savvy political observers who know about gun rights, immigration and pro-life issues know that this Clinton and Harry Reid donor is as trustworthy as a used car salesman.

This week, it was reported: Donald Trump says he'd send back Syrian refugees taken in by the US

But less than a month ago, he said what he would really do, the exact opposite! It was widely reported worldwide:

  • CNN: Trump: U.S. Should Accept Some Syrian Refugees September 8, 2015 Washington (CNN)—Donald Trump thinks the United States should accept some refugees from Syria due to the "unbelievable humanitarian problem." Trump has made anti-immigration rhetoric a cornerstone of his campaign, but the Republican presidential candidate said Tuesday evening that though the migrants could pose a security risk -- floating the idea that there may be individuals with ties to Islamic militants -- he supported allowing them into America. "I hate the concept of it, but on a humanitarian basis, with what's happening, you have to," Trump said to Fox News' Bill O'Reilly.

  • Politico: Trump Calls For Taking In Syrian Refugees

  • Breitbart: "You Have To": Trump Would Allow Syrian Refugees Into America

On guns, Trump has openly called for gun bans, and to this day supports longer waiting lists and 'background checks.' And in a recent interview with a gun rights group, he did not retract his position on assault weapons ban, but rather quibbled about the defintion of what's considered an assault weapon.

Here are some of the priceless comments from the gun rights forum from people who don't fall for Trump's b.s.:

  • Why is there a “no firearms” sign on the doors at Trump Towers?
  • Vanns40 says: Trump refuses to answer the question regarding expanding waiting periods and artfully sidestepped the assault weapons controversy. Be very careful in supporting someone who refuses to be explicit in their answers.
  • Judd Paynter says: I cannot believe you guys are being suckered by this man. WHO EVER VOTES FOR TRUMP…A FLAMING LIBERAL AT HEART, IS NOT A TRUE PATRIOT AMERICAN, BUT NOTHING MORE THAN RINOS WHO LIKE DUMOCRATS ARE THE RUINATION OF AMERICA. While Trump is not a prophet, this scripture fits those being deceived by him. Matthew 24:24 “For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect.” You Trump zombies are no different than the sheeple who voted for Obama, and you will get the same from Trump. You will pay for having even supported Trump, but by then it will be too late.
  • Read Trumps comments, he and Hillary hold the exact same position on gun control. The NRA should compromise and support background checks, longer waiting periods and a ban on assault rifles. On guns he and Hillary are the same. Why would any gun owner support this?

  • The Donald .I must pass on. He is clearly no fan of citizen ownership of AR-15’s and magazines holding more than 10 rounds. He is a 1% elitist .Those untouchable gated community people who think they know better. Than the yeoman, common folk ,of America. If he is not like Bill % Hitlery Clinton. Why did he donate $100,000 to Clinton’s Globalist Initiative Foundation? Globalist really ? We are 7% of the world’s population. But we are unique .We are the greatest nation on this planet. These globalists want us to forget about being citizens of America. They want us to be citizen’s of the world. Worse they want us to be a vassal state to the United Nations. I say birds of a feather flock together. Historically nich people and gangsters in N.Y.City can get a pistol permit sidestepping the Sullivan Law. The common yeoman folk ,not very often. Besides Hitlery has already been chosen by the Globalist -Bilderburg’s to be the next POTUS. Presidents are not elected they are selected by the multinationals, bankers and globalists. At least I know who is pissing down my back and why. And it is not rain. All smoke n mirrors. Most Americans are asleep at the wheel. A hamburger and television mentality. We have lost the republic, that we were given !!!

  • If Donald the Scofflaw Trump is so successful at running businesses, why the multiple bankruptcies? Or is “running businesses into the ground” what you meant?

Here is Trump's waffling on immigration, backing away from his support of amnesty now that he's pretending to be a 'conservative.'

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

#1. To: Artisan (#0)

As long as BOTH parties and FedGov hate and despise Donald Trump then he is still marginally better than any other candidate for POTUS in 2016. I don't see anybody better on the horizon, especially with Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren about to jump into it against Hitlery Clinton.

X-15  posted on  2015-10-06   14:39:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#3. To: X-15 (#1)

As long as BOTH parties and FedGov hate and despise Donald Trump then he is still marginally better than any other candidate for POTUS in 2016.

Have to agree. I'm still not sure I'm going to vote at all, but at least for now I'm rooting for him.

PnbC  posted on  2015-10-06   14:49:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#4. To: PnbC (#3)

If Trump's on your ballot, go for him.

Lod  posted on  2015-10-06   14:54:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#7. To: Lod (#4)

If Trump's on your ballot, go for him.

I presume he will be, although in CA the primaries are about 5 or 6 months away. I also have no faith in the honesty of electronic voting machines, so when I have voted in the last few years it has always been absentee since it preserves the paper document. But you can see my hesitancy to even participate. I've been disappointed too many times already with numerous reports of voter fraud and other non-prosecuted shenanigans.

I guess I could vote for Trump in the primary. In the general election it will probably come down to either a third-party candidate (as usual), not voting (or only local issues), or voting for whichever major candidate is less likely to get us into (or escalate) war with Russia.

PnbC  posted on  2015-10-06   15:20:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#8. To: PnbC (#7)

did you vote for scwarzenegger for ca governor?

Artisan  posted on  2015-10-06   15:21:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#9. To: Artisan (#8)

did you vote for scwarzenegger for ca governor?

Nope. I was never that desperate in my home state.

PnbC  posted on  2015-10-06   15:43:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#11. To: PnbC (#9)

Nope. I was never that desperate in my home state.

glad to hear it,. i was a big supporter of senator mcclintock at that time, he would ahve made a good governor,. as a congressman, however, he sucks, because is a zionist loon.

just like tom tancredo, a lot of these guys with otherwise good principles, bow when it comes to the jew.

by the way i didnt know there was anyone here from CA. if you ever geta traffic ticket check out my traffic ticket archive, we have had a great deal of success and i get emails regularly from people who have beaten their tickets and wanted to say thanks. its a lot of fun. libertyfight.com/traffic.html

Artisan  posted on  2015-10-06   15:48:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#12. To: Artisan (#11)

Since we have nothing/no one to pin our hope on, Trump, for me, is pure entertainment. I won't be voting for him or anyone. Matt Drudge fears that hillary is the chosen. I caught a little of his interview on AJ's show while driving.

christine  posted on  2015-10-06   17:01:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#13. To: christine (#12)

Matt Drudge fears that hillary is the chosen. I caught a little of his interview on AJ's show while driving.

I think Hilarity will only continue to go down in the polls in the months ahead. A year ago I would've said she is a shoo in, but things aren't that bright for her these days. The other day I read about how getting assigned to guard Hillary was considered punishment by the SS during Bill's presidency. And more news coming out about her awful personality in private. If the media is being run by the PTB, then I'm inclined to think that the bigwigs are already starting to jettison her as a bad bet.

Her best chance to win is if she is running against Carly Fiorina. Pray it doesn't come to that.

PnbC  posted on  2015-10-06   17:13:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#15. To: PnbC (#13)

Polls don't matter. Israel wants their woman in there. All these scandals will be ignored or swept under the rug. They won't matter. Barring some kind of divine intervention, you'll soon be calling Hillary "madame president".

Obnoxicated  posted on  2015-10-06   21:01:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#17. To: Obnoxicated, pnbc (#15)

Her best chance to win is if she is running against Carly Fiorina. Pray it doesn't come to that.

Ok, so I understand that trump wouldbe preferable to clinton, although I don't think that the general policy, practice or direction of the country would change either way.

Aside from that, I don't think a woman should ever be president. Or senator for that matter, or any elected office. Is that a rare stance nowadays?

Women should stick to their natural roles and not try to be men.

Artisan  posted on  2015-10-07   8:56:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#20. To: Artisan (#17)

Ok, so I understand that trump wouldbe preferable to clinton, although I don't think that the general policy, practice or direction of the country would change either way.

Supreme Court nominations and the Military are two reasons why Presidential elections aren't supposed to be popularity contests. A Democrat stacked both with Cultural Marxist idealogues, which resulted in the obliteration of Marriage and Freedom of Religion by SCOTUS and America's national security being jeopardized Militarily, too, by the Commie Culturati of "Political Correctness". If it really doesn't make much difference to you either way and you don't even intend to vote for anyone (as I read here somewhere recently), why are you once again (for the 2nd Presidential election in a row) campaigning so much against the very best option of the Republican candidates running? It's not like America is going to get perfect choices from any party but Democrats are the most Pro-Abortion party and to the point of denying Freedom of Religion to doctors and hospitals about it.

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-10-08   9:14:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#25. To: GreyLmist (#20)

which resulted in the obliteration of Marriage and Freedom of Religion by SCOTUS an

No court or devil wearing a black robed costume has any authority to destroy marriage. Marriage is a sacred indissoluble bond created by God & entered into by a man & woman. Anyone who believes that govt can end or change marriage is wrong. People who afvocate sodomy, promiscuity, adultery, fornication, or any mortal sin will learn the truth the moment they die, and if they don't repentt before that moment then they will be damned to hell for all eternity.

Artisan  posted on  2015-10-08   11:31:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Replies to Comment # 25.

#29. To: Artisan (#25)

People who advocate sodomy, promiscuity, adultery, fornication, or any mortal sin will learn the truth the moment they die, and if they don't repent before that moment then they will be damned to hell for all eternity.

Man, I do my best to refrain from arguments related to religion or other people's beliefs. And while I agree with much of what is included above, I must say some of it is not Biblical but pure Catholicism, a religious organization that transfers paedophilic homosexuals rather than administer justice.

I believe that you are as deluded religiously as GM is politically. You both want to believe in a mirage.

noone222  posted on  2015-10-08 11:38:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#32. To: Artisan (#25) (Edited)

Capitoline Hill, Rome, October 29, 2004 - Signing the new EU constitution in the Appartamento dei Conservatori, Sala degli Orazi e Curiazi, before the bronze statue of Pope Innocent X by Alessandro Algardi.

No court or devil wearing a black robed costume has any authority

Nor one wearing a white Robe !!!

noone222  posted on  2015-10-08 11:57:14 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#36. To: Artisan (#25) (Edited)

People who advocate sodomy, promiscuity, adultery, fornication, or any mortal sin will learn the truth the moment they die, and if they don't repent before that moment then they will be damned to hell for all eternity.

Matthew 12:31

Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men.

EDIT: Your statement above is catholic doctrine. Matthew 12:31 is Bible !

noone222  posted on  2015-10-08 12:25:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#63. To: Artisan (#25) (Edited)

Me at #20: which resulted in the obliteration of Marriage and Freedom of Religion by SCOTUS

You at #25: No court or devil wearing a black robed costume has any authority to destroy marriage. Marriage is a sacred indissoluble bond created by God & entered into by a man & woman. Anyone who believes that govt can end or change marriage is wrong. People who afvocate sodomy, promiscuity, adultery, fornication, or any mortal sin will learn the truth the moment they die, and if they don't repentt before that moment then they will be damned to hell for all eternity.

I should have been more clear about what I hurriedly stated in "shorthand", so to speak, as "the obliteration of Marriage and Freedom of Religion by SCOTUS". What I meant was more in the sense of tyrannical, Federal overreach and abuse of power by enforcibly obliterating those matters, as far their wrongful and harmful newfangled-actionings are Commie, socio-engineering policy threats and manglements of our Constitution; and even to the extent of jeopardizing the employability and electability of religious Christians (ref. the case of Kentucky's Kim Davis). To try and recap the abominable and foriegn-system transpirings decreed here by the wantonly wayward and unsensible "ship-of-State Reconstructionism" crews about such:

1. The Federal government itself did not legitimize same-sex partnership stylizations of "Marriage" for tax exemptions and Insurance Complex beneficary purposes and so on.

2. Instead of the Federal government being lawsuited by agendists over that, all of the States were denied their decisive rights, their State Constitution voting rights were presumptively deemed "invalidated" on the issue and the American "Commons" was collectively punished/condemned to be reconfigured in comportment with the Unconstitutional appeasement of special interest groups.

3. In the process of violating Constitutional law to that effect, the 14th Amendment was absurdly invoked as SCOTUS "justification" -- the very same one the Federales invoke for "Affirmative Action" privileges or not to render Unequal Protection of anyone unfortunate enough to be classified as a "non-minority", which amounts to an unlawful Bill of Attainder against them contrary to A1S9 and A1S10 of the Constitution, as well as A4S2, Clause 1.

GreyLmist  posted on  2015-10-09 14:14:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

End Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest