Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

History
See other History Articles

Title: In the history of the world, who has killed the most innocent human beings?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 23, 2015
Author: Kabir Hussain to Global Truth Project
Post Date: 2015-11-23 20:01:19 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 624
Comments: 27

In the HISTORY of the world, who has KILLED the most INNOCENT human beings?

1) "Hitler": Do you know who he was? He was a Christian, but media will never call Christians terrorists.

2) "Joseph Stalin called as Uncle Joe": He has killed 20 million human beings including 14.5 million were starved to death. Was he a Muslim?

3) "Mao Tse Tsung (China)": He has killed 14 to 20 million human beings. Was he a Muslim?

4) "Benito Mussolini (Italy)": He has killed 400 thousand human beings. Was he a Muslim?

5) "Ashoka": In Kalinga Battle Ashoka has killed 100 thousand human beings. Was he a Muslim?

6) Embargo put by George Bush in Iraq: 1/2 million children has been killed in Iraq alone. Imagine these people are never called terrorists by the media. Why? Today the majority of the non-muslims are afraid by hearing the words "JIHAD".. Jihad is an Arabic word which comes from root Arabic word "JAHADA" which means "TO STRIVE" or "TO STRUGGLE" against evil and for justice. It does not mean killing innocents. The difference is we stand against evil, not with evil. You still think that ISLAM is the problem?

1. The First World War: 17 million dead (caused by non-Muslim).

2. The Second World War: 50-55 million dead (caused by non-Muslim).

3. Nagasaki: Atom bomb=200,000 dead (caused by non-Muslim).

4. The War in Vietnam: Over 5 million dead (caused by non-Muslim).

5. The War in Bosnia/Kosovo: Over 500,000 dead (caused by non-Muslim).

6. The War in Iraq: 12,000,000 deaths (so far) (caused by non-Muslim).

7. Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, Burma: Deaths occurring daily (caused by non-Muslim).

8. In Cambodia 1975-1979: Almost 3 million deaths (caused by non-Muslim).

9. Israel (countless times): Wages war (one sided) with the Palestinians and murders women, children, elderly and most horrendous of all BABIES in cold blood. Why aren't they labelled as "TERRORISTS"?

Please.. first remove double standards on Killings.


Poster Comment:

Does anyone challenge the veracity of this man's facts?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 21.

#12. To: christine (#0)

I think this is a question best answered by native americans.

titorite  posted on  2015-11-23   21:26:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: titorite (#12) (Edited)

You mean people like me, who've had family here this country for 400 years?

You couldn't be talking about the Indians,* but if you are, you could have a point. They were always wiping each other out (after they were through eradicating the Mound Builders, that is) and had ghastly forms of revenge and torture. Did you know that each tribe's name in its own language means "people" or "real people", with the implication that the others were mere animals?

Their names for other tribe always meant something horrible such as "cut- throats" based on what THEY did to outsiders. Tolerance and diversity were not their main reasons for living.

*Aztecs, Cherokees et al were native to Asia. Leading Indian figures today such as Vine Deloria accept the "Indian" designation.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-11-23   21:35:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: NeoconsNailed (#13)

ok, I've concluded that the majority of human beings suck. If I were God, I would have done it differently. ;)

christine  posted on  2015-11-23   22:20:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 21.

#23. To: christine (#21)

I've concluded that the majority of human beings suck.

I used to believe that only a small percentage of people were actually psychopaths. But in the last 3-5 years I have revised that estimate up considerably -- no, drastically. The number of people who will deliberately and maliciously ruin someone else's life for any reason or no reason at all is staggering, almost incredible. (Look at what cops and juries do every day in the service of the state satisfying their lust for blood and power over someone's fate.) Very few people can be trusted to tell the truth, even when they benefit only very little from lying. And the number of people who would literally kill you if they thought they could get away with it is much larger than I thought it was in the days of my youthful naïveté.

StraitGate  posted on  2015-11-23 23:11:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: christine (#21)

Oh, hallelujah -- somebody else sees it! When you reach the point of being a NIHILIST FATALIST ANTI-NATALIST like me, we'll give you a gold-plated membership card. :-)

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-11-23 23:55:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 21.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest