Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

World News
See other World News Articles

Title: War With Russia to Defend ISIS? Gee, Okay...
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/11 ... -perry/war-russia-defend-isis/
Published: Nov 26, 2015
Author: Jack Perry
Post Date: 2015-11-26 05:24:13 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 64
Comments: 7

Hey, remember back in those “good ol’ days” we called the Cold War when we thought World War Three would begin over some penny-ante border skirmish in Europe? You know, a Soviet plane gets close to the border, we panic, it gets shot down. Then the Soviets decide to shoot down the next plane that tries that again. Then it escalates from there. Well, folks, have a look at this.

There. Putin just placed some long-range surface-to-air missiles in Syria. The next Turkish F-16 pilot to play Top Gun is going to get a hotfoot he’ll never forget. Ok, but let’s get back to the Cold War for a second. Can anyone imagine it being 1983 and Reagan giving the okey-dokey to shoot down a Soviet aircraft? Of course not. Not even Reagan was that bonkers. If Turkey had said they were going to do that, they’d have been told in no uncertain terms: Absolutely not. We’d have never allowed a NATO nation to threaten such a thing, much less carry out that threat. They’d have been told to follow the protocols which are to send up planes and escort the aircraft away. That’s what NATO has been doing since they provoked the Russians into resuming Bear bomber excursions close to NATO airspace. They escort the planes away. They don’t shoot them down, no matter how many bloodthirsty whack-jobs were calling for it.

Also, the surviving crewman of the shot-down Russian plane has been recovered. Guess where? Syria! Gee, how’d that happen? If the Russian plane was in Turkey, how comes the Turks didn’t capture the guy? And since the pilot was killed by ground fire coming from al-Qaida, there are only two possibilities there. One, the plane was in Syria, which we can pretty much say is a given. Or, two, the plane was in Turkey and al-Qaida is getting safe haven in Turkey. So, ok, Turkey, which one was it? Was the plane in Syria when your F-16s ambushed it? Or are you harboring al-Qaida?

I bet NATO nations that want to stay out of this are crapping enough bricks to build a pyramid at this point. I hear tell that Turkish F-16s cross into Syria with some regularity. Sooner or later, one will get bagged by a Russian SAM crew. Or the next F-16 to shadow a Russian plane is going to get a supersonic parting gift. “Vanna, tell our contestant what he’s won!” “He’s won a surface-to-air missile and a free trip by parachute into the arms of his air rescue crew!” Turkey goes whining to NATO and demands assistance. There, we’re in World War Three. I tend to think this entire thing has been staged and Turkey was coached in it by those who want to get us into a war by any means necessary. I tend to think that actor is the Pentagon. They probably think the President and Congress aren’t getting us into a war fast enough.

Here’s what’s obviously going down over there. Turkey is, and always has been, supporting al-Qaida and ISIS. Both of them are covertly supported by the United States which is why a year-plus-change-you-can-believe-in’s worth of airstrikes haven’t even cost ISIS a magazine subscription. ISIS and al-Qaida have been using Turkey as a safe haven and that’s the starting point of the ISIS version of the Ho Chi Minh Trail. How come ISIS keeps getting resupply? Because Turkey is where the supply depot is. So, ok, ISIS ends up nuttier than a fruitcake but we still need them to get rid of Assad, so we just kick the can down the road, hoping an international coalition will get rid of ISIS later. But here came the Russians and no one thought that would happen. And it might not have if NATO and the U.S. had minded their own business in Ukraine. So Putin moved up his pieces on the board. But now here was the chance to get the war we wanted to start in Ukraine started in Syria and kill two birds with one stone. So to speak. Hence, Turkey was not challenged and warned off by the U.S. when they said they were going to shoot down Russian planes. In fact, that’s exactly what the Pentagon needed. And now it’s happened.

See, the Pentagon thinks it can win a war with Russia. Seriously. They do. Because even if it goes nuclear, as long as we wipe them out and we’ve got a handful of bureaucrats and generals alive in their fuehrerbunkers, we won! Hooray! Aren’t you all excited and proud to be an American right now? Gee, it’s swell to know we didn’t scrap all those nuclear weapons after the Cold War. We scrapped the air raid sirens so, hey, if you’re in the shower you might not even know the world is going to end before you’re done washing your hair. Don’t worry about drying it, the heat flash will do that for you.

Don’t you just love it? I can’t see any other conclusion that can be arrived at except that we’re about to risk a war with Russia over al-Qaida. Makes you wonder if al-Qaida ever was formally off the CIA payroll.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

#1. To: Ada (#0)

See, the Pentagon thinks it can win a war with Russia. Seriously. They do. Because even if it goes nuclear, as long as we wipe them out and we’ve got a handful of bureaucrats and generals alive in their fuehrerbunkers, we won!

Throughout history it's been the smart crazies and psychopaths that have power. They are always smart enough to fool 98% of average people that will follow their leaders regardless.

They are the ones in power in the USA now and so what if 300 million Americans die and perhaps 6 billion others. What difference does it make to them as long as they are in control and maintain control.

And in a way they are right. There would be plenty of people remaining so in two generations the world would be repopulated.

DWornock  posted on  2015-11-26   5:43:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: DWornock (#1) (Edited)

And in a way they are right. There would be plenty of people remaining so in two generations the world would be repopulated.

Do you live in a city with more than 3000 people? If so it is a nuclear target. You're not wrong. Their would be enough small towns left to repopulate(if they survive nuclear winter). But that's all they would be doing. And that's how many nukes both sides have. Enough to destroy every city center with a population above 3000

titorite  posted on  2015-11-26   6:22:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: titorite (#2)

We are not going to nuke our own cities so realistically there are enough nukes for cities above 10,000 (not 3,000). However, that is not the major problem as there would not be many areas in which the radiation wasn't high enough to kill most of the people. I believe more would die from radiation, sickness, and starvation than from the blasts.

With 2,000 to 4,000 nukes dropped on the USA, very few people in the USA would survive. However, after 2 weeks the radiation may be low enough for people to live. If not after 7 times that with radiation 10% of what it was after 2 weeks and certainly after 49 times that (2 years) with radiation 1% of what it was after 2 weeks people from other countries could safely move into and live in the area now know as the USA. No doubt millions would so in two or three generations the area would be repopulated. Especially since, with plenty of area (like in the past), women would be averaging 4 or more children.

DWornock  posted on  2015-11-30   14:51:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 6.

#7. To: DWornock (#6)

Look for DC to bomb these cities and blame Russia China and Hitler before they're through.

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2015-11-30 15:43:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest