Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Israel/Zionism
See other Israel/Zionism Articles

Title: Insanity Unbound: Infowars Characterizes "Dancing Israelis" Arrested in New Jersey on 9/11/01 as Arab MUSLIMS
Source: .
URL Source: http://libertyfight.com/2015/dancin ... elis_in_NJ_become_Muslims.html
Published: Nov 27, 2015
Author: .
Post Date: 2015-11-27 10:44:33 by Artisan
Keywords: None
Views: 210
Comments: 24

Insanity Unbound: Infowars Characterizes "Dancing Israelis" Arrested in New Jersey on 9/11/01 as Arab MUSLIMS By Martin Hill http://LibertyFight.com November 27, 2015

http://libertyfight.com/2015/dancing_israelis_in_NJ_become_Muslims.html

I've had about enough of this propaganda of Muslims cheering for 9/11. It has gotten to the level of insane propaganda. Not only that, it's even worse, violating God's solemn Commandment of "Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness". I'm Catholic and I actually take this stuff very seriously. As I've discussed many times with my friend, Muslim scholar Dr. Kevin Barrett, (who was fired from his job as a University professor for daring to tell the truth about 9/11,) I've always contended that the accusation that 'Muslims are responsible for the attacks of 9/11/2001' is actually a very serious sin. Because it falsely blames a group of people who actually had nothing to do with 9/11. Once I learned the truth, in October 2001, I felt a moral obligation to set the facts straight.

Donald Trump, Ben Carson, Glenn Greenwald, and countless other politicians, along with corporate news outlets are now writing, tweeting, and even broadcasting news reports about these alleged people, Muslims, who "danced and cheered in the streets as 9/11 occurred". According to Trump, Carson and the neocons, this really happened and the people were Muslims.

This actually serves as a good opportunity for us to set the record straight.

Infowars.com was giddy after Donald Trump tweeted one of their articles, which was not even original Infowars content, but rather a re-post from Bizpac Review titled 'I Live In Jersey And Trump Is Right: Muslims DID Celebrate On 9/11 In NJ - We Saw It!'

Infowars knows darn well all about the fact that the cheering guys were Jewish israelis, and notMmuslims. In years past they published many articles on it, including one of mine, entitled "DANCING ISRAELIS" ARRESTED ON 9/11 LATER SUED THE GOVT, BUT LOST THEIR CASE

The author of the latest BizPac propaganda piece uses a quote from a Sept. 18, 2001 Washington Post article to verify her claims. However, the interesting thing is that the Washington Post picked up on this and has posted their own extremely thorough and lengthy rebuttal of the author's claims. Since the Post's own story was used as alleged 'proof' of the Muslims cheering, they took quite a bit of time and detail to debunk the myth that "thousands of Muslims were cheering."

A most interesting point is that the Washington Post also focuses a lot of attention on the specific allegation of the men dancing on the rooftop in New Jersey. The most frustrating thing is that they claim these are also unsubstantiated rumors, even quoting a New Jersey police officer. We contacted the WP and set the record straight with the truth about the dancing Israelis. They appeared on ABC's 20/20. In 2004, four of the ISREALIS (not "Arab Muslims") filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against Attorney General John Ashcroft and wardens of the Federal Bureau of Prisons for civil rights violations. THEIR NAMES are Paul Kurzberg, Silvan Kurzberg, Israelis Yaron Shmuel, and Omer Gavriel Marmari. [Article continues here.]

Martin Hill is a Catholic paleoconservative and civil rights advocate. His work has been featured in the Los Angeles Daily News, LewRockwell.com, WhatReallyHappened.com, Infowars.com, PrisonPlanet.com, Economic Policy Journal, TargetLiberty.com, FreedomsPhoenix, Haaretz, TMZ, Veterans Today, Jonathan Turley blog, The Dr. Katherine Albrecht Show, National Motorists Association, AmericanFreePress.net, WorldNetDaily, HenryMakow.com, TexeMarrs.com, Dr. Kevin Barrett's Truth Jihad radio show, Strike-The-Root.com, IamtheWitness.com, The Michael Badnarik Show, The Wayne Madsen Report, Devvy.com, Rense.com, AntiWar.com, and many others. Archives can be found at LibertyFight.com and http://DontWakeMeUp.Org.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 17.

#4. To: Artisan (#0)

Carmine Sabia's article definitely suggests that "a number of people who were allegedly seen celebrating the attacks and holding tailgate-style parties on rooftops" whom "law enforcement authorities detained and questioned" were Muslims. But it does not state that only Muslims were detained and questioned.

Aside from the implication that the rooftop dancers -- whom we know to be jews -- were Muslim, I don't find the rest of the article to be a pack of lies necessarily. The main thrust of the article is that a great number of Muslims celebrated the attack. Do you dispute that?

If I tell you that I bought a 9 volt battery, it doesn't mean that I didn't buy some AA cells, too.

StraitGate  posted on  2015-11-27   12:17:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: StraitGate, christine, titorite, neoconsnailed, horse, *9-11* (#4)

Do you dispute that?

Its not my obligation to refute something which offers no credible proof whatsoever. The veracity of their claims is laughable. So the ones making those claims would, in a rational debate, be obligated to offer a shred of credible, documented evidence. Instead they offer hysterical zionist million-rated blogs (as opposed to third rate blogs) and anonymous twitter posts as evidence???

You're much better than that.

Myself, I don't offer mere evidence, I gave concrete proof: official police reports, dcelassified fbi reports and federal court records.

So yes, I absolutely refute the lying warmonger zionists outrageous fantasy claims!

Artisan  posted on  2015-11-27   15:46:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Artisan, Lod (#9)

My question was pretty simple: Do you dispute the assertion that a great number of Muslims celebrated the attack?

The video links Lod provided claim to show Muslims celebrating the attack. And according to one of the videos, at least one of the Muslims interviewed said that they (the Muslims) were celebrating the attack because the USA always supports Israel.

I have no doubt that the jews who control the media could have fabricated these news stories if they wanted to. Nevertheless, it seems very plausible to me that a great number of Muslims would hate the USA for its unquestioning support of Israel, even so much so that they would celebrate the attacks.

I'm curious as to why and how you are so sure that Muslims did not celebrate the attack.

StraitGate  posted on  2015-11-27   18:29:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: StraitGate (#10)

My question was pretty simple: Do you dispute the assertion that a great number of Muslims celebrated the attack?

My answer was even simpler. The claims you're parroting have no basis in realiity, its not my job to bicker about complete nonse. It'd be the same as if I asked you "CAN YOU PROVE THAT 30 Foot tall PURPLE GUMBY-MONSTERS DON'T RUN THE WHITE HOUSE??? HUH HUH HUH?? PROVE IT!"

Its just like the Paris attacks. Jew owned corporate news actually showed footage of muslims cheering and celebrating. But guuess what? It was exposeed as a complete fabrication. The footage was from a soccer match. It was on WRH.

This is the kind of stuff people fall for, and in 20 years they'll be parroting "yep they cheered for the paris attack".

Artisan  posted on  2015-11-28   16:02:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Artisan (#14)

A "yes" would have been a nice simple answer. Instead you insult me and accuse me of believing this lie or that lie, or supporting the establishment, etc.

Please read this carefully: I haven't parroted any claims, and I never said I believed this or that about any of the reports. I told you what the reports claimed, and asked you if you believed them.

If I asked you what you think about electric cars, it doesn't mean that I am in favor of everybody owning one, or that I support the government banning internal combustion engines, or anything else. It simply means that I want to know what you think of electric cars. Period.

I asked you if you disputed the assertion that a large number of Muslims celebrated the 9/11 attack BECAUSE I WANTED TO KNOW WHAT YOU BELIEVED. Period.

Why are you insulting me for asking you a simple question?

StraitGate  posted on  2015-11-28   18:15:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: StraitGate (#16)

In my #9 post I replied that its not my obligation to refute a claim of which has no evidence to back it up, . I also ended with an affirmative "so yes, I absolutely refute it."

An explanation in addition to the yes gets to the larger point which is, people shouldn't be obligated to disprove something as if it'd a given known, or fact, when it is far from it.

I did not mean to insult you personally and sorry if my reply was terse.

Artisan  posted on  2015-11-28   20:45:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 17.

        There are no replies to Comment # 17.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 17.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest