4um: The twin towers of the WTC, were constructed with caesium-137 contaminated steel.

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
9/11
See other 9/11 Articles
Title: The twin towers of the WTC, were constructed with caesium-137 contaminated steel.
Source: can.politics - Googlr Groups
URL Source: https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl ... topic/can.politics/ndkdowDYRy8
Published: Nov 28, 2015
Author: Ajunew
Post Date: 2015-11-28 07:57:47 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 220
Comments: 7

Tens of thousands of WTC occupants and visitors were exposed to 1,500 times the safe levels of caesium-137 on a daily basis for years.
The steel was deliberately contaminated by union steel workers on the payrolls of organized crime. Instead of properly disposing of radioactive waste, they tossed it into cement bridge pilings, sporting parks, and in this particular case, the mill cauldrons used to make the steel for the WTC.
There was no actual lethal intent. The steel workers on the take knew where the steel would be used. They thought melting the caesium-137 would "dilute" it sufficiently to be harmless, it was simply a convenient disposal issue. Or so they thought.
The radioactive contamination was discovered and kept secret by two separate insurance companies, who then conspired with the building management, owners, and the New York Attorney General to conceal it. One of those companies was AIG.
The radiation poisoning of thousands of innocent people had to be covered up for liability and legal purposes. A diabolical plan to destroy the buildings and remove the debris evidence was concocted.
AIG would shoulder the lion's share of the financial costs and cover all human associated liabilities, provided they were "reimbursed". The administration of William Jefferson Clinton became aware of the planning and demanded blackmail money to close their eyes. They then decided to participate in the crime. This drove up costs exponentially and delayed the plan execution for nearly a year while the money was covertly distributed and various witnesses silenced.
By this time, AIG was nearing financial insolvency and banks were beginning to ask questions. A federal promise of funding ended the concernes of the financial institutions involved.
The money to AIG had to be disguised. A hurricane wasn't enough. Some banks had to be sacrificed to misdirect the focus of the general public. A false financial crisis was constructed. There was much disagreement over which banks would fail and how much the total of the payout would be.
The Bush administration wanted those involved prosecuted and jailed for crimes against humanity. Wall Street convinced them that the resultant publicity could destroy the financial bedrock of the United States. The bickering continued for years. The Bush administration gave in during 2007 and demanded that loose ends be tied up and accounts settled.
Thus began the great fraud known as TARP. TARP, the fraud that Barack Obama picked up, saw that he could manipulate it to his advantage and did so. AIG got their money and escaped, so did all the others.
In the meantime, all the contaminated evidence went to Chinese steel smelters, who never once thought to check the material for radioactivity.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
Cesium 137 wasn't the only problem with the Twin Towers.
Asbestos Use in the Construction of the World Trade Center
ibasecretariat.org/lka_world_trade_center.php
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
BTP Holdings posted on 2015-11-28 9:01:30 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#2. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
Author: Ajunew

A Jew Knew ???
"Honest, April 15th is the real April Fool's Day".
"The almighty Dollar ain't worth a buck".
Doug Scheidt
noone222 posted on 2015-11-28 9:18:40 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#3. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
The Bush administration wanted those involved prosecuted and jailed for crimes against humanity.

As soon as I read that it smelled funny -- then I checked the source (basically none) and comments added at site. Funny them!

NeoconsNailed posted on 2015-11-28 11:49:11 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#4. To: NeoconsNailed (#3)
Might be then case of contaminated steel or a ruse by Sayan to detract from the likely controlled nuclear demolition of WTC:

Exposing the Nuclear Truth of 9/11 and other things I find interesting Rainbow in the Dark: Powerful Proof of 9/11 Nukes Posted on February 6, 2015 by Don
New research falsifies the nanothermite and DEW alternatives while confirming the mini-nuke hypothesis
by Don Fox (with Jim Fetzer)
In accounting for the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11, there are three contending factions within the 9/11 research community. While virtually everyone agrees that WTC-7 was brought down in a (classic) controlled demolition, they differ with respect to how the Twin Towers were destroyed, which was obviously not by means of any kind of collapse, which we know, given their design, would have been impossible, but which the government has told the American people was the case. These three factions advance different alternative hypotheses of how it was done:
(h1) the nanothermite hypothesis, supported by A&E911, Steve Jones and Christopher Bollyn;
(h2) the mini-nuke hypothesis, supported by Scholars for 9/11 Truth and others here at VT;
(h3) the Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) hypothesis, supported by Judy Wood and her associates.
A&E911 has received enormous support from the public, which has allowed its head, Richard Gage, to travel around the country and lead a comfortable life-style. His critics, however, are skeptical that A&E911 is on the up-and-up because its commitment to nanothernmite has been established to be inadequate as an explanation for the destruction of the Twin Towers, not least of all because in (its extant versions) nanothermite has an explosive force 1/13 as powerful as TNT. While A&E911 apologists maintain the organization does not deny other explosives may have been involved, it has made no effort to ascertain what those “other explosives” could possibly have been, which is inexcusable.
That is rather astonishing, all things considered, because (h1) has been based (virtually exclusively) upon dust samples that were gathered from an apartment in close proximity to “Ground Zero”, where the US Geological Survey has done overwhelmingly more through, detailed and extensive studies of dust samples take from a wide range of locations around Manhattan and subjected them to spectrographic analysis, which has revealed many elements whose presence in the quantities and correlations only appear to be explicable if 9/11 was nuclear event as (h2) asserts: Barium and Strontium: Neither of these elements should ever appear in building debris in these quantities. The levels never fall below 400ppm for Barium and they never drop below 700ppm for Strontium and reach over 3000ppm for both in the dust sample taken at Broadway and John Streets. Thorium and Uranium: These elements only exist in radioactive form. Thorium is a radioactive element formed from Uranium by decay. It’s very rare and should not be present in building rubble, ever. So once again we have verifiable evidence that a nuclear fission event has taken place. Lithium: With the presence of lithium we have compelling evidence that this fission pathway of Uranium to Thorium and Helium, with subsequent decay of the Helium into Lithium has taken place. Lanthanum: Lanthanum is the next element in the disintegration pathway of the element Barium. Yttrium: The next decay element after Strontium, which further confirms the presence of Barium. Chromium: The presence of Chromium is one more “tell tale” signature of a nuclear detonation. Tritium: A very rare element and should not be found at concentrations 55 times normal the basement of WTC-6 no less than 11 days after 9/11, which is another “tell tale” sign of nukes.
These findings expose the pseudo-scientific pretensions of the proponents of (h1) and of (h3) alike, neither of whom take the USGS data into account. That is especially ironic in the case of the “thermite sniffers”, since Steven Jones and A&E911 pride themselves on being “scientific” in their approach, when science requires that reasoning be based upon all the available evidence, yet they ignore more copious and detailed “dust sample” evidence than that upon which they base their own theory. And the “DEW huggers” display their incompetence in precisely the same way by failing to adjust their theory to new evidence and alternative hypotheses. Since I published my review on http://amazon.com in mid-2012, I have been assailed by an astounding 5,000 attacks by her fans:
Review of Judy's book

Donald Fox has done a brilliant job of exposing the role of Judy Wood as a “gatekeeper extraordinaire”, where the A&E911 (h1) group cannot be far behind. Unfortunately, a gullible public swoons over an organization composed of a thousand or more architects and engineers, even though they will not address WHO was responsible and WHY 9/11 took place and, like Judy Wood and her (h3) group, do not even provide an adequate explanation for HOW it was done. Here Don Fox advances a new line of argument confirming the use of nukes on 9/11 in support of (h2). This article has a more scientific and technical character than others, where we conclude with a glossary of terms related to the design, construction and detonation of nuclear weapons, the popularization of which Gordon Duff has pioneered, which, alas, must become part of the working knowledge of informed citizens today.
AveragerelativeThicknessofSteelanditsDistributioninaTwinTowe-640x479

Extensive studies by Charles Boldwyn have demonstrated that the Twin Towers could not have collapsed on 9/11
stock-footage-new-york-city-september-smoky-ground-zero-surrounded-by-skyscrapers-at-night
Rainbow in the Dark: Powerful Proof of 9/11 Nukes
by Don Fox
The destruction of the World Trade Center buildings was a high energy event. In the case of the Twin Towers two 110 story buildings were largely converted into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust in about 20 seconds. What was the source of energy that was responsible for the demise of these behemoths? Kerosene has no ability to produce the results observed at Ground Zero on 9/11.
The evidence collected at Ground Zero tells us 9/11 was a nuclear event. The Department of Energy water samples contained tritium which is a rare hydrogen isotope and a telltale sign of a thermonuclear explosion. The USGS dust samples contained barium, strontium, yttrium and cesium amongst other fission products. The earth and water tell us what happened on 9/11: the WTC was nuked.
Most 9/11 researchers (and the general public) lack a basic understanding of nuclear physics. This lack of physics knowledge has allowed people like Steve Jones and Judy Wood to obfuscate the true method of destruction of the WTC buildings with bogus claims of non-explosive nanothermite and amorphous DEWs. Once one gains an understanding of concepts such as nuclear fission and alpha and beta decay, the destruction of the Twin Towers and the aftermath makes perfect sense.
Nuclear Physics Basics
In order to understand what happened at Ground Zero one must first have a grasp on some basic nuclear physics concepts. Fortunately there is an abundance of nuclear physics knowledge readily available on the internet. From Universe http://Today.com:
There are three parts of an atom: protons, neutron, and electrons. Protons have a positive charge, electrons have a negative charge, and neutrons possess no net charge.
Electrons are the smallest parts of the atom. They are the most numerous of the three. It has no known components or substructure, so it is an elementary particle. Its mass is 1/1836 of a proton. It is also considered to be a fermion. It has an antiparticle called the positron. The positron is identical to the electron except that it carries opposite charge. When an electron collides with a positron, both particles will either scatter or be destroyed producing gamma ray photons. Electrons can collide with other particles and be diffracted like light. Two electrons cannot occupy the same quantum state based on the Pauli Exclusion Principle.
The proton is the part of an atom that helps to form the nucleus and has a positive charge. Protons must have an equal number of neutrons except in the hydrogen atom where a single proton exists on its own. A proton is composed of 2 up quarks and one down quark. They are considered to be fermions and baryons. They are held together by the strong nuclear force. The number of protons in the nucleus of an atom determines the atomic number.
A neutron is the part of an atom that holds no charge. Neutrons and protons occur in equal numbers in stable atoms except in hydrogen. Protons and neutrons are often referred to together as nucleons. If there are more neutrons than protons, then the atom is considered an isotope. If a neutron becomes free of its proton, then it becomes unstable, undergoes beta decay, and will disintegrate in an average of 15 minutes. The neutron is also important in nuclear chain reactions both natural and artificial.
From Chemistry http://Explained.com:
The nucleus is composed of protons (charge = +1; mass = 1.007 atomic mass units ([¼]) and neutrons. The number of protons in the nucleus is called the atomic number (Z) and defines which chemical element the nucleus represents. The number of neutrons in the nucleus is called the neutron number (N), whereas the total number of neutrons and protons in the nucleus is referred to as the mass number (A), where A = N + Z. The neutrons and protons are referred to collectively as nucleons. A nucleus with a given N and Z is referred to as a nuclide. Nuclides with the same atomic number are isotopes, such as 12 C and 14 C, whereas nuclides with the same N, such as 14 C and 16 O, are called isotones. Nuclei such as 14 N and 14 C, which have the same mass number, are isobars. Nuclides are designated by a shorthand notation in which one writes, that is, for a nucleus with 6 protons and 8 neutrons, one writes, or just 14 C. The size of a nucleus is approximately 1 to 10 × 10 -15m, with the nuclear radius being represented more precisely as 1.2 × A 1/3 × 10 -15m. We can roughly approximate the nucleus as a sphere and thus we can calculate its density where 1.66 × 10-27 kg is the mass of the nucleon. Thus the nuclear density is about 200,000 tons per cubic millimeter and is independent of A. Imagine a cube that is 1 mm on a side. If filled with nuclear matter, it would have a mass of about 200,000 tons. This calculation demonstrates the enormous matter/energy density of nuclei and gives some idea as to why nuclear phenomena lead to large energy releases. Of the 6,000 species of nuclei that can exist in the universe, about 2,700 are known, but only 270 of these are stable. The rest are radioactive, that is, they spontaneously decay. The driving force behind all radioactive decay is the ability to produce products of greater stability than one had initially. In other words, radioactive decay releases energy and because of the high energy density of nuclei, that energy release is substantial. Qualitatively we describe radioactive decay as occurring in three general ways: ± -, ² -, and ³ -decay. Alpha-decay occurs in the heavy elements, and consists of the emission of a 4 He nucleus. Beta-decay occurs in nuclei whose N/Z ratio is different from that of a stable nucleus and consists of a transformation of neutrons into protons or vice versa to make the nucleus more stable. Gamma-decay occurs when excited nuclei get rid of some or all of their excitation energy via the emission of electromagnetic radiation, or via the radiationless transfer of energy to orbital electrons.
Nuclear Fission
When uranium-235 undergoes fission, the average of the fragment mass is about 118, but very few fragments near that average are found. It is much more probable to break up into unequal fragments, and the most probable fragment masses are around mass 95 and 137. Most of these fission fragments are highly unstable (radioactive), and some of them such as cesium-137 and strontium-90 are extremely dangerous when released to the environment.
frag1

Cesium-137 and strontium-90 are the most dangerous radioisotopes to the environment in terms of their long-term effects. Their intermediate half-lives of about 30 years suggests that they are not only highly radioactive but that they have a long enough half-life to be around for hundreds of years. Iodine-131 may give a higher initial dose, but its short half-life of 8 days ensures that it will soon be gone. Besides its persistence and high activity, cesium-137 has the further insidious property of being mistaken for potassium by living organisms and taken up as part of the fluid electrolytes. This means that it is passed on up the food chain and re-concentrated from the environment by that process.
Cesium-137 decay has a half-life of 30.07 years and proceeds by both beta decay and gamma emission from an intermediate state. Both the electron and gamma emissions are highly ionizing radiation. The gamma radiation is very penetrating, and the beta radiation, though very short range, is very dangerous when ingested because it deposits all that energy in a very short distance in tissue.
cs137decay

Cesium’s danger as an environmental hazard, damaging when ingested, is made worse by its mimicking of potassium’s chemical properties. This ensures that cesium as a contaminant will be ingested, because potassium is needed by all living things.
Strontium-90 and cesium-137 are the radioisotopes which should be most closely guarded against release into the environment. They both have intermediate half-lives of around 30 years, which is the worst range for half-lives of radioactive contaminants. It ensures that they are not only highly radioactive but also have a long enough half-life to be around for hundreds of years. Strontium-90 mimics the properties of calcium and is taken up by living organisms and made a part of their electrolytes as well as deposited in bones. As a part of the bones, it is not subsequently excreted like cesium-137 would be. It has the potential for causing cancer or damaging the rapidly reproducing bone marrow cells.
Strontium-90 is not quite as likely as cesium-137 to be released as a part of a nuclear reactor accident because it is much less volatile, but is probably the most dangerous component of the radioactive fallout from a nuclear weapon.
Strontium-90 undergoes beta decay, emitting electrons with energy 0.546 MeV with a half-life of 28.8 years. The decay product is yttrium-90.
Beta Decay
Radiation and Radioactive Decay:
Image6
Image7
Beta particles are electrons or positrons (electrons with positive electric charge, or anti-electrons). Beta decay occurs when, in a nucleus with too many protons or too many neutrons, one of the protons or neutrons is transformed into the other. In beta minus decay, a neutron decays into a proton, an electron, and an anti-neutrino: n Æ p + e – +. In beta plus decay, a proton decays into a neutron, a positron, and a neutrino: p Æ n + e+ +n. Both reactions occur because in different regions of the Chart of the Nuclides, one or the other will move the product closer to the region of stability. These particular reactions take place because conservation laws are obeyed. Electric charge conservation requires that if an electrically neutral neutron becomes a positively charged proton, an electrically negative particle (in this case, an electron) must also be produced. Similarly, conservation of lepton number requires that if a neutron (lepton number = 0) decays into a proton (lepton number = 0) and an electron (lepton number = 1), a particle with a lepton number of -1 (in this case an antineutrino) must also be produced. The leptons emitted in beta decay did not exist in the nucleus before the decay–they are created at the instant of the decay.
To the best of our knowledge, an isolated proton, a hydrogen nucleus with or without an electron, does not decay. However within a nucleus, the beta decay process can change a proton to a neutron. An isolated neutron is unstable and will decay with a half-life of 10.5 minutes. A neutron in a nucleus will decay if a more stable nucleus results; the half-life of the decay depends on the isotope. If it leads to a more stable nucleus, a proton in a nucleus may capture an electron from the atom (electron capture), and change into a neutron and a neutrino.
Proton decay, neutron decay, and electron capture are three ways in which protons can be changed into neutrons or vice-versa; in each decay there is a change in the atomic number, so that the parent and daughter atoms are different elements. In all three processes, the number A of nucleons remains the same, while both proton number, Z, and neutron number, N, increase or decrease by 1.
In beta decay the change in binding energy appears as the mass energy and kinetic energy of the beta particle, the energy of the neutrino, and the kinetic energy of the recoiling daughter nucleus. The energy of an emitted beta particle from a particular decay can take on a range of values because the energy can be shared in many ways among the three particles while still obeying energy and momentum conservation.
Cherenkov Radiation
Is there an equivalent of the sonic boom for light?

When a charged particle does move through a medium at a speed higher than the speed of light in that medium, a faint radiation is produced by the medium. In water, for example, the charged particle excites the water molecules, which then return to their normal state by emitting photons of blue light. Because the particle is moving faster than the speed of light in water, it can trigger a cascade of photons that are in phase with each other and can interfere constructively to form a visible blue glow.

Hanford

Nuclear Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility, Cherenkov Radiation, Hanford Site, U.S. Department of Energy, Southeastern Washington State
Cesium-137 and Strontium-90 Capsules
In the early 1970s operators at the Hanford, Washington, site removed a large fraction of the Cs-137 and Sr-90 from the site’s high-level tank waste in order to reduce the requirements for cooling the tanks. The cesium and strontium were concentrated and sealed in stainless steel (SS) capsules for potential uses, for example, thermoelectric generators and sterilizers. The expected applications for the Hanford capsules did not materialize and ceased entirely in 1988 after one capsule being used in the commercial sector was found to be leaking (USNRC, 1989).
In the capsules, cesium is in the form of cesium chloride (CsCl) and strontium as strontium fluoride (SrF2). The chemical composition has been described as being relatively uniform (NRC, 1997b). Each cesium capsule contains on average approximately 35,000 Ci of Cs-137 plus an unspecified amount of Cs-135 estimated to be 0.7 Ci and produces approximately 190 W of heat. Each strontium capsule contains approximately 33,000 Ci of Sr-90 and produces approximately 260 W of heat.
The blue glow from the cesium-137 and strontium-90 capsules is due to Cherenkov radiation.
Cesium-137 Glows Blue
Majia Nadesan has a blog post that discusses the Goiânia accident where a scavenger punctured a radiotherapy device containing cesium-137 with a screwdriver. A deep blue light came out of the hole.
Ground.Zero7
Cesium and Strontium in the USGS Dust Samples
Both cesium and strontium were found in abundance in the USGS dust samples. Both cesium-137 and strontium-90 undergo ²− decay. Cesium-137 decays into barium-137m and strontium-90 decays into yttrium-90. Barium and yttrium were also found in abundance in the USGS dust samples. There can be little doubt that the ominous blue glow in the above picture of Ground Zero is from Cherenkov radiation.
Tribute in Light
911-legacy
The Tribute in Light was first presented on March 11, 2002, six months after 9/11. The light memorial was done to provide a cover story for the blue light in the sky.
Conclusions
There can be no doubt that nuclear fission chain reactions took place at Ground Zero on 9/11. Fission products cesium and strontium were found in the USGS dust samples. These radioactive elements underwent beta minus decay and released high energy electrons. This is what caused the blue glow (Cherenkov radiation) over Ground Zero. Jet fuel, nanothermite or a Tesla inspired DEW have no explanatory power for beta minus decay and Cherenkov radiation. https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/tag/ground-zero/

Tatarewicz posted on 2015-11-29 0:43:52 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#5. To: Tatarewicz (#4)
math.... ? :)

"Besides, I was anxious to take the wheel, the man in pink pyjamas showing himself a hopeless duffer at the business." - Marlow
Dakmar posted on 2015-11-29 1:00:07 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#6. To: Tatarewicz (#4)
There can be no doubt that nuclear fission chain reactions took place at Ground Zero on 9/11. Fission products cesium and strontium were found in the USGS dust samples.

That would make much more sense. BTW, gang -- "-im" and "-ot" is how they form plurals in Jue talk.
"the sayanim, volunteer non-Israeli Jews who provide logistical support around the world"

NeoconsNailed posted on 2015-11-29 3:33:57 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#7. To: Dakmar (#5)
Nice acoustics from the dead -- love mandolin anytime. Version I grew up with
www.youtube.com/watch? v=0UPaKMbGi04
My father used to play and sing it on the Stella guitar he bought new for $18 circa 1964. Ahh, that 1960s folk revival -- was thrown down backwards to learn that a fellow player and anti-Zionist 15 years younger than me had no knowledge the Hootenanny era ever existed!

NeoconsNailed posted on 2015-11-29 3:46:55 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um