Title: JFK #17: Daniel Sheehan and Alternative Theories of the JFK Assassination Nov. 21, 2013 Source:
youtube URL Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnR ... YAa03WA8QKncGVNolcdAn&index=17 Published:Nov 29, 2015 Author:Dan Sheehan Post Date:2015-11-29 11:05:18 by noone222 Keywords:None Views:178 Comments:26
Poster Comment:
You won't believe the statements made in this video at approx 55 minutes and afterwards.
Wow. Thanks for this. It's sort of a "unified field theory" of the JFK assassination.
Sheehan's saying that the fascists and the communists (to aggregate them crudely) are both of them two sides of the same dialectical materialist coin.
And as we see today, operatives of BOTH camps are deeply interwoven in the matrix of power in the US and the West, and BOTH of them are tools of globalist mega-finance.
Both of them, as soon as they gained power, the first thing they did was to ban the private ownership of firearms. This is the hallmark of tyranny.
We here in the U.S. at least have the advantage of the 2nd Amendment, which they do not have in all the other places in the world. Hang onto your guns, and never give them up, unless they pry them from your cold, dead fingers. ;)
I hate to contradict you, but that's not true about Adolf.
Thank you Cyni for your above attempt to keep this subject from being as stupidized here as it is elsewhere. I don't personally think Hitler and the good Nazis (the many Jews among them included) deserve any opprobrium -- if they'd had their way, there never would have been a World War Jue, a Jue World Order, communist Eurasia and Cuba, divided Germany, and white countries would still be proudly white in defiance of all PC.
Anti-Nazi fervor is, to me, sick. Everything we're up against today -- the entire NWO headache -- exists because the world has listened to the Jues instead of Adolf. ALL the perpetrators LIVE to curse him and to convince us they're saving us from his supernatural, universe-gobbling malevolence.
What he did say, seven years later, was this: The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered Eastern peoples to have arms. History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so. So its fair to conclude that he believed gun control had its uses. But thats quite a different thing from claiming that gun control was instrumental in the Nazi rise to power.
And the truth is that no gun law was passed in Germany in 1935. There was no need for one, since a gun registration program was already in effect in Germany; it was enacted in 1928, five years before Hitlers ascendancy. But that law did not outlaw guns, it just restricted their possession to individuals who were considered law-abiding citizens, and who had a reason to own one. And theres no reason to consider that law particularly significant, either; the Nazis didnt seize control of their own country with gunpowder. They used a much more potent weapon: propaganda.
I do remember this from history at some point in time from reading The Barnes Review. Good history magazine. ;)