Title: Sally Abdelmageed, Witness, Contradicts Govt, Media About Bernardino Shootings Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Dec 8, 2015 Author:. Post Date:2015-12-08 10:08:50 by christine Keywords:None Views:1334 Comments:48
In a phone interview with CBS Abdelmageed explained:
“I heard shots fired and it was from you know an automatic weapon. […] very unusual. Why would we hear shots? As we looked out the window a second set of shots goes off […] and we saw a man fall to the floor. Then we just looked and we saw three men dressed in all black, military attire, with vests on they were holding assault rifles. As soon as they opened up the doors to building three […] one of them […] started to shoot into the room.”
When asked what the gunman that shot into the room looked like the eyewitness replied: “I couldn’t see a face, he had a black hat on […] black cargo pants, the kind with the big puffy pockets on the side […] long sleeve shirt […] gloves […huge assault riffle […] six magazines […] I just saw three dressed exactly the same”.
“You are certain you saw three men,” the newscaster asked Abdelmageed.
“Yes,” said Abdelmageed. https://www.intellihub.com/eyewitness...
xxx
Pelley – “One of the witnesses today is Sally Abdelmageed, who works at the Inland Regional Center, the building where the attack took place. She saw the attackers enter the building and we spoke to her by phone.”
Abdelmageed – “I heard, um, shots fired and, you know, it was from an automatic weapon. So, you know, it’s very unusual why, you know, why would we hear shots? As we look out the window, a second set of shots goes off and it’s just pop, pop, pop, pop, pop, pop. And we saw, a man fall to the floor. Then we just looked and we saw, three men dressed in all black, um, military attire with vests on and assault rifles. And they, then they opened up the doors to building 3, and one of them opened up the door to building 3, he starts to um, sprayed, shoot. You know, he just shoots all over into the room. The room that we typically have conferences in, I just, we just heard more gunshots go off. Like, I got my phone. I, I reached for my phone and I, I called 911. Um, and I just hid under my desk. I didn’t see anymore, I just heard more gunshots go off as I was talking to the to the dispatch. We went into my managers office, locked the door, barricaded it. We, heard running and and things happening upstairs. About 30 minutes later, someone came to the door and knocked on the door, but we didn’t obviously answer. And then, another 15 minutes later someone came and took us into a secure room.”
Pelley – “Miss Abdelmageed, can you describe to me, in as much detail as you can, what did the gunmen look like?”
Abdulmageed – “I couldn’t see his face. He had a black hat on and, um, from my view all I could see was just a black hat and black long sleeve shirt. Possibly gloves on. Um, he had black cargo pants on, with all kinds of zippers on the sides and the big puffy pockets. Uh, he, he had a huge assault rifle and he had extra ammo. He was coming ready for, he was probably ready for something, to reload, I don’t know. He had like magazines, um, I couldn’t see what else. I saw, it was, I just saw 3. Dressed exactly the same.”
Pelley – “You’re certain you saw 3 men?”
Abdulmageed – “Yes. It looked like there skin color was, yeah, was white. They looked like they were athletic build. And, um, they, they they appeared to be tall.”
Pelley – “And of course we have just learned one of the suspects was actually a woman.” http://dailyhaze.com/witness-to-the-s...
xxx
“I did not know Syed Farook very well. We worked in different departments. Once I was told it was him and his wife that did this, I couldn’t believe it. They have a new baby. He was very polite. Every time you walked by him he said hello. It is hard to believe that he did all of this. When the shooting was going on Farook never said a word and neither did his wife. It seemed like they had a mission that needed no words.” http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/1st-eyewit...
#19. To: Lod, christine, titorite, jethro tull, formerlurker (#18)
I'm not sure why you have such a hard-on against the one person who's done more to awaken the world about the late hour that we're all in.
I really don't get it.
I'll tell you why, my friend.
I don't like how he is now saying after almost 15 years that the Saudis did 9/11. that is complete B.S. i posted this following detail before, and i dont think it should be brushed aside, it should be addressed. about how he whitewashes stuff insisting that 'we've been vindicated,' the muslims were cheering, and claims for his proof that "it was in the washington post and reported by dan rather."
Lets stick with those two very specific examples.
they are both complete lies, an inverting of what the WP and DR said. The quote in bizpac which infowars ran, about the alleged cheering muzzies, the WP quote was the ONLY actual source that Bizpac quoted, other than endless anonymous twitter posts. Now the WP published an extremely detailed and lengthy rebuttal of that claim the very next day. i linked to it,. The WP quote, published on 9/18/01, stated nothing whatsoever about muslims, . it was referring specifically to the people dancing on a rooftop in nj, who were arrested. those were JEWS, ISREALIS. Not muslims. alex is lying, bearing false witness about the very specific Washington post story which he uses as one of his two 'proofs' of 'vindication.'
It's similar to the way alex dismissed and brushed over, falsely, Dr. David Duke's point that in Israel it's ILLEGAL for a jew to marry a non jew. Alex claimed that they only have a law 'to prevent fraud marriages.' (as in, phony marriages conducted for citizenship/ immigration purposes only, which are illegal in all countries.) That is a complete lie, . Dr Duke often points out to and even links to jewish lawmakers and the law in israel banning jews from marrying non jews. it has nothing to do with merely preventing immigraton fraud. That is the kind of dishonest shit alex pulls in his manic style in which he never calms down and honestly addresses any critics.
The second proof Alex gives re 9/11 muslims gives is dan rather,. Dan says nothing whatsoever about muslims. he is also referring to the jews who were arrested on 9/11/01.
people kept whining to me a week before the trump interview asking where alex said that the jews were muslims. it was very clear, because the bizpac article he re-posted on his site falsely portrayed the jews as muslims,
but in the trump interview he repeated it endlessly on his own, not even using the bizpac piece.
also, aside from that, he went along with trump's false 9/11 narrative and never batted an eye.
as you know, this 9/11 is the event which woke me to many if not most of all the evils this country faces. It changed my life forever, and I don't appreciate people, either jones, or ron paul, or whatever 'patriot' parroting the diabolical lies of the satanists who did it. life is way too short, there is no time for that,. i find it extremely revolting., especially when its coming from people who know better.
I also don't like how trump, purportedly the best candidate, is championing TORTURE, militarism, the patriot act, "closing up the internet" as he put it, and saying that people who whine about freedom of speech are foolish people.
if bush had said ANY of those things he'd have been rightly and quickly derided here but this jew-toady asswipe says it and it is somehow overlooked and romanticized,. It is bizarre and disgusting what i see going on with this sick, circus.
[Alex Jones] whitewashes stuff insisting that 'we've been vindicated,' the muslims were cheering, and claims for his proof that "it was in the washington post and reported by dan rather."
Lets stick with those two very specific examples.
they are both complete lies, an inverting of what the WP and DR said. The quote in bizpac which infowars ran, about the alleged cheering muzzies, the WP quote was the ONLY actual source that Bizpac quoted, other than endless anonymous twitter posts. Now the WP published an extremely detailed and lengthy rebuttal of that claim the very next day. i linked to it,. The WP quote, published on 9/18/01, stated nothing whatsoever about muslims, . it was referring specifically to the people dancing on a rooftop in nj, who were arrested. those were JEWS, ISREALIS. Not muslims. alex is lying, bearing false witness about the very specific Washington post story which he uses as one of his two 'proofs' of 'vindication.'
The media ramping up a fracas against Trump for being convinced by rigged footage and the celebratory-allegations baselessly attached to it, which the MSM intently hyped to jolt the public repeatedly, then and afterward -- with nary any retraction and correction of their Zio-propaganda complicit presentations ... seems to me like a nefarious sting-operation: Manipulate Americans at a time of trauma with more shockery and then punish them later for still presuming that the media spin was credible. Trump is probably not unlike numerous other Americans who haven't yet suspected that perception managers meant for them get inaccurate impressions about what they think they saw happening on the news of supposed 9/11 celebrants; and the duplicitous producers of that programming probably cheer whenever they see or hear it recycled periodically according to their plans.
"We are not your problem. The Palestinians are your problem," said a Dancing Israeli when their van was stopped by the police on 9/11 (or words to that effect). "The Palestinians" ... like they might have had some foreknowledge about a soon-to-be-released film of Palestinians appearing to cheer the attacking of America ... also rather like the Dancing Israelis were maybe even mission-dispatched to a reportedly Muslim-populous area of New Jersey for the purpose of Arab-villianization by being spotted there as some "Middle Eastern-looking" men happily celebrating attacks on the WTC.
Almost all Muslim political and religious leaders condemned the attacks. The leaders vehemently denouncing the attacks included the leaders of Egypt (Hosni Mubarak), the Palestinian Authority (Yasser Arafat), Libya (Muammar Gaddafi), Syria (Bashar al-Assad), Iran (Mohamed Khatami) and Pakistan (Pervez Musharraf). The sole exception was Iraq,
A group of Palestinians were filmed celebrating in the street ... Annette Krüger Spitta of the ARD's (German public broadcasting) TV magazine Panorama states that footage not aired shows that the street surrounding the celebration in Jerusalem is quiet. Furthermore, she states that a man in a white T-shirt incited the children and gathered people together for the shot. The Panorama report, dated September 20, 2001, quotes Communications Professor Martin Löffelholz explaining that in the images one sees jubilant Palestinian children and several adults but there is no indication that their pleasure is related to the attack. The woman seen cheering (Nawal Abdel Fatah) stated afterwards that she was offered cake if she celebrated on camera, and was frightened when she saw the pictures on television afterward.
Rest of the world
Israel: Completed in 2009 for $2 million, it sits on 5 acres of hillside, 20 miles from the center of Jerusalem. The memorial is a 30-foot, bronze American flag,that forms the shape of a flame to commemorate the flames of the Twin Towers. The base of the monument is made of melted steel from the wreckage of the World Trade Center, that includes an engraving in both English and Hebrew “This metal remnant was taken from the remains of the Twin Towers, that imploded on September 11th disaster. It was sent over to Israel by the City of New York to be incorperated in this memorial. This metal piece, like the entire monument, is a manifestation of the special relationship between New York and Jerusalem.” Surrounding the monument are plaques with the names of the victims of 9/11. It is the only memorial outside the U.S. that includes the names of all who perished in the terrorist attacks. The site solemnly overlooks Jerusalem’s largest cemetery, Har HaMenuchot. The monument is often used for memorial and commemoration services.
We’re now on day two of the latest media controversy to engulf Donald Trump, namely his insistence that he personally saw footage that featured “thousands” of American Muslims in New Jersey celebrating the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11. [...] For two days now, the media has been parsing Trump’s claim, which he now supports with an unsourced paragraph in an old Washington Post article that describes “law enforcement authorities” questioning people who were “allegedly seen celebrating the attacks and holding tailgate-style parties on rooftops.”
That old WaPo report, it has to be said, is pure bull[feathers]. The reporters who wrote it have since said that they were unable to verify the allegation, but no one has questioned them on where it came from in the first place. Based on the lack of attribution, the only possibilities are that it was from some law enforcement source who insisted on deep background attribution (not likely given the broad nature of the claim), or it was from residents and/or local political figures who claimed knowledge of the incidents.
In any case, in the weeks following the attacks, literally everyone I ran into in New Jersey had a story about how they had personally seen the FBI or the cops raid their local convenience store/gas station/other business that happened to be owned by brown people, and that they knew for a fact the people scooped up in the raid had been plotting against America. People were scared
For some reason, though, none of the coverage of Trump’s remarks has included the footage that Trump was probably talking about, footage that every American either saw or heard about that day and was deeply traumatized by. While still reeling from the tragedy, Fox News viewers got to see this footage of Palestinians allegedly celebrating the attacks: [dailymotion video]
It wasn’t just Fox News, though. Here’s how the scene was presented by CNN: [dailymotion video]
MSNBC also aired similar footage from the West Bank: [dailymotion video]
Appearing when it did, this footage gave many Americans a distorted view of Muslim reaction to the attacks, which was, in fact, widespread condemnation. [...] Trump’s conflation of this footage with that unsourced WaPo report will be seen as a forgivable transgression at worst, and at best, something that feels true.
thanks for that. it is double tiered propaganda because the WaPo piece (I would refer to that rather than mediate or whatever that sight was) debunked the myth that their article referred to muslims, because nowhere in the article did it mention muslims. it did mention police questioning people who were partying on the rooftop. those were the 5 jews arrested by NJ cop scott decarlo.
but alas, the WaPo, while denying the false myth that muslims cheered, also neglected to confirm the very easily proven dancing jews. the author of the wapo piece kept posting updates for several days including a statement from a NJ cop who claimed that the allegations were never verified. I emailed him with the official federal court records, case #, judges name, FBI declassifed reports, NJ police reports but he found fit not to make a peep of any of it, despite the fact that he kept posting 'updates'.
the fact that people at a forum like this are still so confused and beffuddled about these literal 2nd grade level facts makes me have real pity on them, people are more ^%$#ed up than i ever dreamed.