4um: Follow Up On Orlando Pulse Club False Flag

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
National News
See other National News Articles
Title: Follow Up On Orlando Pulse Club False Flag
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://victuruslibertas.com/2016/06 ... orlando-pulse-club-false-flag/
Published: Jun 16, 2016
Author: Victurus Libertas
Post Date: 2016-06-16 10:07:20 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 2352
Comments: 100

We were among the first ones to spot all the clues that point to a false flag when the Orlando supposed mass shooting at the Pulse club happened early Sunday morning June 12, 2016. As more reports came out and more interviews took place, it was even more and more obvious this was indeed, a false flag. If you are not yet convinced, I encourage you to watch the short videos below.
We all saw this guy with the red tennis shoes being carried with an alleged gun shot wound to the leg. Watch this video closely. Watch the “rescuers” put down the “victim” when they think they are out of the shot of the camera:

Click for Full Text!
Poster Comment:
Several more videos at url(1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 31.
#2. To: christine (#0)
Mike Rivero had an article from someone who did an analysis using Google earth and maps. It claims the people were taking alleged victims to the Pulse and not away from it. This only means there could have been a drill going on. I believe real people died. But the cops admit they might have killed some of the people inside the nightclub.
If there were 4 or 5 shooters, Omar could have been the patsy.
This false flag was poorly thought out. If ISIS did this, they would have to have people working as informants inside the federal government which is credible. If the Feds did this, they have some extremely stupid people working for them.
I expect many more attacks like this in Europe and in the US. The US, the UK and Israel helped create and fund ISIS but they have lost operational control at the level of the cell.

Horse posted on 2016-06-16 10:19:48 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#12. To: Horse, All (#2)
Alas, regardless of the truth the masses of asses will go on sobbing, lighting candles and cursing the Moozlims...... OMG, I'm listening to this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxkSVh2aNww
and this is showing!

Wotta source -- ton of anti-statist grafix!

http://www.facebook.com/MuhFlag/

___________________________________________________

NeoconsNailed posted on 2016-06-16 11:38:01 ET (3 images) Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#27. To: NeoconsNailed (#12)
The tax on tea was "taxation without representation". But the tax on whiskey was a lawful excise tax and needed to be enforced. Washington lead the Army against the protesters of the excise. Know your history. ;)

BTP Holdings posted on 2016-06-18 20:10:39 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#31. To: BTP Holdings (#27)
Occasionally, government errs. One of the great lewrockwell (and Rothbard!) articles out there
www.lewrockwell.com/1970/01/murray-n-rothbard/when-the-feds-first-attacked-the-americans/
..........The main distortion of the Official View of the Whiskey Rebellion was its alleged confinement to four counties of western Pennsylvania. From recent research, we now know that no one paid the tax on whiskey throughout the American “back-country”: that is, the frontier areas of Maryland, Virginia, North and South Carolina, Georgia, and the entire state of Kentucky.
President Washington and Secretary Hamilton chose to make a fuss about Western Pennsylvania precisely because in that region there was a cadre of wealthy officials who were willing to collect taxes. Such a cadre did not even exist in the other areas of the American frontier; there was no fuss or violence against tax collectors in Kentucky and the rest of the back-country because there was no one willing to be a tax collector.
The whiskey tax was particularly hated in the back-country because whisky production and distilling were widespread; whiskey was not only a home product for most farmers, it was often used as a money, as a medium of exchange for transactions. Furthermore, in keeping with Hamilton’s program, the tax bore more heavily on the smaller distilleries. As a result, many large distilleries supported the tax as a means of crippling their smaller and more numerous competitors.
Western Pennsylvania, then, was only the tip of the iceberg. The point is that, in all the other back-country areas, the whiskey tax was never paid. Opposition to the federal excise tax program was one of the causes of the emerging Democrat-Republican Party, and of the Jeffersonian “Revolution” of 1800. Indeed, one of the accomplishments of the first Jefferson term as president was to repeal the entire Federalist excise tax program. In Kentucky, whiskey tax delinquents only paid up when it was clear that the tax itself was going to be repealed.
Rather than the whiskey tax rebellion being localized and swiftly put down, the true story turns out to be very different. The entire American back-country was gripped by a non-violent, civil disobedient refusal to pay the hated tax on whiskey. No local juries could be found to convict tax delinquents. The Whiskey Rebellion was actually widespread and successful, for it eventually forced the federal government to repeal the excise tax.
Except during the War of 1812, the federal government never again dared to impose an internal excise tax, until the North transformed the American Constitution by centralizing the nation during the War Between the States. One of the evil fruits of this war was the permanent federal “sin” tax on liquor and tobacco, to say nothing of the federal income tax, an abomination and a tyranny even more oppressive than an excise.
Why didn’t previous historians know about this widespread non-violent rebellion? Because both sides engaged in an “open conspiracy” to cover up the facts. Obviously, the rebels didn’t want to call a lot of attention to their being in a state of illegality.
Washington, Hamilton, and the Cabinet covered up the extent of the revolution because they didn’t want to advertise the extent of their failure. They knew very well that if they tried to enforce, or send an army into, the rest of the back-country, they would have failed. Kentucky and perhaps the other areas would have seceded from the Union then and there. Both contemporary sides were happy to cover up the truth, and historians fell for the deception.
The Whiskey Rebellion, then, considered properly, was a victory for liberty and property rather than for federal taxation. Perhaps this lesson will inspire a later generation of American taxpayers who are so harried and downtrodden as to make the whiskey or stamp taxes of old seem like Paradise...........
This all spells a monstrous Jueing. The Jues are the great epic chiselers in any society. Mfg is offshored ptly so the Jue middlemen can make out like bandits on the shipping.

(They tried to civilize the poor girl, but it was a miserable thing. The strangest thing is that wild children adapt to weather as if they had animal fur -- cold means nothing to them! If humans will kindly stop reproducing, no more wild children. No more politicians, no more Izrul, no more war.....)

NeoconsNailed posted on 2016-06-19 4:57:15 ET (1 image) Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 31.
There are no replies to Comment # 31.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 31.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um