Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Israel/Zionism
See other Israel/Zionism Articles

Title: More Evidence That Allowing Women to Vote is Childish and Destructive
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.dailystormer.com/more-ev ... e-is-childish-and-destructive/
Published: Jul 29, 2016
Author: Anglin
Post Date: 2016-07-29 01:28:25 by NeoconsNailed
Keywords: None
Views: 3896
Comments: 78

(Graphic wouldn't translate -- see it at source.)

It sure feels good to ignore all objective reality and embrace an insane fantasy that women are exactly the same as men in all ways. The problem is, denying clear realities in favor of feel-good fantasy often has disastrous consequences.

In the case of the childlike fantasy that women are capable of making logical assessments of political realities, those who embrace it end up with a vicious Marxist state, hellbent on destroying its own population for vague emotional reasons.

I still think we are going to be able to win this election, and we might even get some more women on board.

Nonetheless, these statistics are important, in that they show that we would never be in this position in the first place if we hadn’t gone along with Jew- feminism.

Women are different than men and should have a different role in society. Just as men don’t breastfeed babies, women don’t engage in politics.

Period.

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

Women generally vote by feel, and just looooove to have their feels manipulated by fake idealists and compassionaries. Women are generally Oprah in politics. My grandparents were great right-wing extremists but then I read grandmother's diary and she rhapsodized about FDR when the POS died. She thought he was good- looking!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 16.

#1. To: NeoconsNailed (#0)

Friendly head's up: your post has a public platform due to the grace and generosity of a female - christine - who pays "the rent" for this free speech discussion website.

scrapper2  posted on  2016-07-29   1:36:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: scrapper2, neoconsnailed (#1)

Christine is gone, no longer at 4um.

Artisan  posted on  2016-07-29   1:41:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Artisan (#2)

Wow! I didn't know that. Who pays the rent?

scrapper2  posted on  2016-07-29   1:45:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: scrapper2 (#3)

Perhaps I shouldn't have brought it up. Not to negate your point of valid female involvement in the political arena, such as Lovely female Christine who started this place. I do tend to agree with NN though, that the female vote as a whole, & their involvement in govt, was a net negative. This is not meant to degrade or undermine their importance at all, though. That would be horrible and retarded.

Artisan  posted on  2016-07-29   1:55:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Artisan, Ada, scrapper2, Lod (#6)

This is not meant to degrade or undermine their importance at all, though. That would be horrible and retarded.

The world was a better place when women weren't allowed to inherit their fathers' wealth (they were too stoopid to manage munny, run farms, hire help or pay duties to the sovereign) and when women couldn't vote (holding no property, of course) and when they died after multiple childbirths at an average age of 29.

Not only was the denial of control of their reproductive proclivities "good policy" (you know, before it was possible to "rape" one's wife) but in an alternate universe we could have kept some healthy surrogates permanently pregnant like dairy cows to provide milk for rich (and attractive) women who opted out of breast feeding the children of the elite. That way, wet nurse-nannies could rear the children while the wives tended to the more important duty of caring for fathers who were commanding generals, heads of industry and important politicians. (those who weren't prone to overvalue the true worth of of our simple minded and uneducated "heffas").

In other words, we couldn't discriminate against men of African descent because they're equal to Caucasians as a matter of law. But women of any race? Hell, our mothers, sisters and daughters deserve treatment no better than cattle, perhaps with nose rings to move them around (and shut them up) with battery powered cattle prods.

Who cares if they nurtured us, their sons, brothers and husbands with a tenderness and affection that apparently comes so easy for them that it's been overrated by romantic simpletons?

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2016-07-29   9:26:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 16.

#29. To: HOUNDDAWG, scrapper2 (#16)

Lot of misogynists around this joint :-)

Ada  posted on  2016-07-29 13:36:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 16.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest