Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Israel/Zionism
See other Israel/Zionism Articles

Title: More Evidence That Allowing Women to Vote is Childish and Destructive
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.dailystormer.com/more-ev ... e-is-childish-and-destructive/
Published: Jul 29, 2016
Author: Anglin
Post Date: 2016-07-29 01:28:25 by NeoconsNailed
Keywords: None
Views: 3811
Comments: 78

(Graphic wouldn't translate -- see it at source.)

It sure feels good to ignore all objective reality and embrace an insane fantasy that women are exactly the same as men in all ways. The problem is, denying clear realities in favor of feel-good fantasy often has disastrous consequences.

In the case of the childlike fantasy that women are capable of making logical assessments of political realities, those who embrace it end up with a vicious Marxist state, hellbent on destroying its own population for vague emotional reasons.

I still think we are going to be able to win this election, and we might even get some more women on board.

Nonetheless, these statistics are important, in that they show that we would never be in this position in the first place if we hadn’t gone along with Jew- feminism.

Women are different than men and should have a different role in society. Just as men don’t breastfeed babies, women don’t engage in politics.

Period.

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

Women generally vote by feel, and just looooove to have their feels manipulated by fake idealists and compassionaries. Women are generally Oprah in politics. My grandparents were great right-wing extremists but then I read grandmother's diary and she rhapsodized about FDR when the POS died. She thought he was good- looking!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-10) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#11. To: NeoconsNailed (#10)

Taxation without representation is tyranny! If a woman pays taxes, she should have a say in how that money is allocated.

Of course, if she doesn't pay taxes, she should have no vote. That goes for men too.

Ada  posted on  2016-07-29   7:25:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: NeoconsNailed (#0)

Immorality especially in government is really the problem.

Take for instance the taxing system that forces both parents to work in order to enjoy income sufficient to maintain the family unit. The children are deprived of the parental guidance necessary due to the requirements of the parents occupations. That's not true in every case but in the average family it is.

Then there's the divorce rate and illegitimate births .... that doesn't help either.

I agree that many women vote with their emotions more than men do, but in the end a moral society will find its way.

"Honest, April 15th is the real April Fool's Day".

"The almighty Dollar ain't worth a buck".

"White Lives Matter Most if you're white"

Doug Scheidt

noone222  posted on  2016-07-29   7:39:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: noone222 (#12)

No society with any brains allows women to pick its politicians -- or be them. By that point its morality is moot. My extremely independent-minded hating partner, 90yo woman, agreed last night -- said it's like womyn preachers.

"Sir, a woman's preaching is like a dog's walking on his hind legs. It is not done well; but you are surprised to find it done at all" -- Samuel Johnson.

Call me sexist, but call me sexist. Please? :-)

_____________________________________________________________

“We build but to tear down. Most of our work and resource is squandered. Our onward march is marked by devastation. Everywhere there is an appalling loss of time, effort and life. A cheerless view, but true.” - Tesla per FP

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2016-07-29   8:14:11 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: noone222 (#12)

but in the end a moral society will find its way.

no...

From a long life of observation, I would say we do NOT have a moral society.

Cynicom  posted on  2016-07-29   8:36:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: noone222 (#12)

the taxing system that forces both parents to work in order to enjoy income sufficient to maintain the family unit.

Don't know if the taxing system is to blame, but in the 1950s families could be supported on one income. Not so in the 1960s when the wife had to go out to work. Maybe the Mormons have the right idea and a second wife is necessary to stay home and educate the children :-)

Ada  posted on  2016-07-29   9:01:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Artisan, Ada, scrapper2, Lod (#6)

This is not meant to degrade or undermine their importance at all, though. That would be horrible and retarded.

The world was a better place when women weren't allowed to inherit their fathers' wealth (they were too stoopid to manage munny, run farms, hire help or pay duties to the sovereign) and when women couldn't vote (holding no property, of course) and when they died after multiple childbirths at an average age of 29.

Not only was the denial of control of their reproductive proclivities "good policy" (you know, before it was possible to "rape" one's wife) but in an alternate universe we could have kept some healthy surrogates permanently pregnant like dairy cows to provide milk for rich (and attractive) women who opted out of breast feeding the children of the elite. That way, wet nurse-nannies could rear the children while the wives tended to the more important duty of caring for fathers who were commanding generals, heads of industry and important politicians. (those who weren't prone to overvalue the true worth of of our simple minded and uneducated "heffas").

In other words, we couldn't discriminate against men of African descent because they're equal to Caucasians as a matter of law. But women of any race? Hell, our mothers, sisters and daughters deserve treatment no better than cattle, perhaps with nose rings to move them around (and shut them up) with battery powered cattle prods.

Who cares if they nurtured us, their sons, brothers and husbands with a tenderness and affection that apparently comes so easy for them that it's been overrated by romantic simpletons?

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2016-07-29   9:26:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: NeoconsNailed (#13)

No society with any brains allows women to pick its politicians -- or be them

I agree with your statement and am gladly amused that you're not afraid to say it. It just inherently rings true to me, regardless of the fact that that cow is out of the barn nd it's too late to change it. By the way, Richard Williamson, the clergyman who was arrested for holohoax denial in europe & who exposed 911, said similar things, although these comments from him surprisingly didn't get much play- regarding the traditional roles of women, that they shouldn't work outside the home or wear pants, etc.

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2016-07-29   9:50:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Ada (#15)

Don't know if the taxing system is to blame, but in the 1950s families could be supported on one income. Not so in the 1960s when the wife had to go out to work.

I thought this happened later. From what I saw growing up, most of the families I knew had the mom stay at home with the kids in through the 70s and even early 80s. That was my experience anyway.

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2016-07-29   10:31:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Cynicom (#14)

I would agree we are no longer a moral society.

"Honest, April 15th is the real April Fool's Day".

"The almighty Dollar ain't worth a buck".

"White Lives Matter Most if you're white"

Doug Scheidt

noone222  posted on  2016-07-29   11:27:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: scrapper2 (#1)

All women should not be allowed to vote.

"Have Brain, Will Travel

Turtle  posted on  2016-07-29   11:30:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: AdArtAall (#18)

Don't know if the taxing system is to blame, but in the 1950s families could be supported on one income. Not so in the 1960s when the wife had to go out to work.

I thought this happened later. From what I saw growing up, most of the families I knew had the mom stay at home with the kids in through the 70s and even early 80s. That was my experience anyway.

Mine too! The reason for this is obvious -- Jues. Jues in the Fed destroying the dollar, Jues in the edjucational system (AND MEDIA) turning all traditional standards and morals on their head, Jues fomenting "feminist" warfare expressly to destroy the "NUCLEAR" family. Jues in government doling out shekels to welfare queens.... need I continue?

Don'tell me anybody here actually disagrees.

It's the Jues' world -- we just live in it, if you can call this living.

_____________________________________________________________

“We build but to tear down. Most of our work and resource is squandered. Our onward march is marked by devastation. Everywhere there is an appalling loss of time, effort and life. A cheerless view, but true.” - Tesla per FP

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2016-07-29   11:51:07 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: noone222 (#12)

Women's Suffrage came to my mind today at our men's group Bible study. Ahaha


"Define yourself as one beloved by God. This is the true self. Every other identity is illusion."—Brennan Manning

Rotara  posted on  2016-07-29   12:20:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: noone222 (#19)

God has been sending Prophets to America to warn her for most of my life it seems.


"Define yourself as one beloved by God. This is the true self. Every other identity is illusion."—Brennan Manning

Rotara  posted on  2016-07-29   12:22:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: NeoconsNailed, hounddawg (#21)

Yep. I concluded long ago that it was a purposeful plot, a conspiracy. Break up the family through the so called sexual revolution- turn women into promiscuous, abortionist, contraceptive whores, and the men will gladly comply with that easy edict- broken individuals, broken families, broken society, then papa govt takes the men's place, as scrapper explained. If the family does manage to survive all of this diabolical garbage, then the federal reservists make it impossible to support the family with one man's income. Thus the kids go to government school and jew perverted tv to raise them

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2016-07-29   12:35:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Artisan (#24)

^^this


"Define yourself as one beloved by God. This is the true self. Every other identity is illusion."—Brennan Manning

Rotara  posted on  2016-07-29   12:38:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Rotara (#25)

Nice to see you posting regularly here again! :-)

I used to like Darryl Bradford Smith's website iamthewitness.com website. He provided much informative & educational data and interviews on all these matters. He closed his site this year after France passed new thought crime laws. He didn't want to risk dying in prison.

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2016-07-29   12:44:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Rotara (#25)

archive.is/UNAqf

Some nice chap made an archive of all Daryl files- wow.archive.is/U NAqf

"Even to the death fight for truth, and the LORD your God will battle for you". Sirach 4:28

Artisan  posted on  2016-07-29   12:49:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Artisan (#26)

Thanks, you too ! And thanks for the archive link !


"Define yourself as one beloved by God. This is the true self. Every other identity is illusion."—Brennan Manning

Rotara  posted on  2016-07-29   12:53:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: HOUNDDAWG, scrapper2 (#16)

Lot of misogynists around this joint :-)

Ada  posted on  2016-07-29   13:36:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: NeoconsNailed (#0)

In all my years of voting, I have heard most women say that they voted for him because he was good looking, he has nice hair, he dresses great PLUS I voted for her because she is a women, she wears nice hats, she dresses great. "We the People" are FRELLED

Darkwing  posted on  2016-07-29   14:01:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Darkwing (#30)

And EVERYBODY here knows that's EXACTLY how it works in general. Calling this misogyny is like saying somebody's anti-money for condemning the Fed -- or the FED as people numerously, constantly, dumbly insist on putting it.

It's not for nothing that communism demands getting women out of the kitchen and into the rat race -- or out on the streets chopping ice.

henrymakow.com/000180.html

_____________________________________________________________

“We build but to tear down. Most of our work and resource is squandered. Our onward march is marked by devastation. Everywhere there is an appalling loss of time, effort and life. A cheerless view, but true.” - Tesla per FP

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2016-07-29   16:11:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Ada (#11)

Taxation without representation is tyranny! If a woman pays taxes, she should have a say in how that money is allocated.

Of course, if she doesn't pay taxes, she should have no vote. That goes for men too.

Since men invented 99.99% of everything in the world, women should have no say in it. And also, by the way, since it was white men who did these things, only white men should be allowed to vote. No nigras, no wetbacks, no Jews, no women.

"Have Brain, Will Travel

Turtle  posted on  2016-07-29   16:25:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Turtle (#32) (Edited)

What does inventing have to do with government? You are trying to latch on to the merit of others.

Ada  posted on  2016-07-29   16:35:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Darkwing (#30)

In all my years of voting, I have heard most women say that they voted for him because he was good looking

No evidence that women ever elected a good-looking candidate, even JFK. However, women did defeat Adlai Stevenson, not on the basis of looks but because he was a divorced man. In that era in the Midwest that was a huge negative with the women.

Ada  posted on  2016-07-29   16:38:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Ada (#33)

What does inventing have to do with government? You are trying to latch on to the merit of others.

The average man maintains civilization. Women can't maintain it and instead destroy it. Hence women, blacks, Jews and beaners - all destroyers - should not be allowed to vote.

These things are obvious and simple.

Glad to help you out with the simple and obvious.

"Have Brain, Will Travel

Turtle  posted on  2016-07-29   16:55:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Ada (#34)

Girlz all went hog-wild for JFK. Few years ago Georgianne Geyer, one of the less flighty girl columnists, wrote a rapturous piece about how he just sent her and her kind as a handsome hunk 50 years ago. He's been called handsome and charismatic since he first hove into view.

Don'tell us you don'think girlz gave us Slick. Don't! And I'm sure if truth were known girlz gave us W -- both cover boys compared to the politicians before and around them. The girlz' Slick cult is one of the most damnably enduring features of our political lifetimes.

Don't look for anybody that looks old or even oldish to get elected ever again at these rates, which cuts out people with any experience.

Adlai Stevenson was a totally different era -- a different planet from this. But Lauren Bacall LOVED and WORSHIPED and WHORED for him because he was so liberal.

_____________________________________________________________

“We build but to tear down. Most of our work and resource is squandered. Our onward march is marked by devastation. Everywhere there is an appalling loss of time, effort and life. A cheerless view, but true.” - Tesla per FP

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2016-07-29   17:08:23 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: NeoconsNailed (#36)

Girlz all went hog-wild for JFK

Don't look for anybody that looks old or even oldish to get elected ever again at these rates

Didn't affect the election outcome. If you recall, it was a crooked vote count in Illinois that elected him president. In the 1960 election, JFK got 52% of the male vote but only 48% of the female The wimmins were not seduced by a nice haircut. True that they went 52%-48% for the rapist in 1996 but that was against pandering Bob Dole.

Its the old farts who vote, perhaps out of habit, but they are a force the candidates have to recon with.

Sure there were bi-coastal women who voted for Adlai. Not flyover country, though.

Ada  posted on  2016-07-29   18:02:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Turtle (#35)

The average man maintains civilization. Women can't maintain it and instead destroy it. Hence women, blacks, Jews and beaners - all destroyers - should not be allowed to vote.

The average man doesn't do nuthin. If a male invented the garbage truck, does that mean that only the males in the town get to vote whether they pay taxes to buy the truck and maintain it or not? Shouldn't those whose taxes pay for garbage collection have a say in who gets elected commissioner?

Ada  posted on  2016-07-29   18:08:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Ada (#37)

You're passing over Slick and conceding they went for baby-boom puerility over Greatest Generation banality. We seem to agree.

_____________________________________________________________

“We build but to tear down. Most of our work and resource is squandered. Our onward march is marked by devastation. Everywhere there is an appalling loss of time, effort and life. A cheerless view, but true.” - Tesla per FP

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2016-07-29   20:31:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: NeoconsNailed (#39)

You're passing over Slick and conceding they went for baby-boom puerility over Greatest Generation banality. We seem to agree.

Yes. In that election the Republicans fielded a weak candidate because it was his turn and he deserved it (perhaps for betraying the country by getting NAFTA passed?). He didn't win the male vote either but more men voted for Dole than women did.

Ada  posted on  2016-07-30   7:42:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Ada (#40)

We're not even talking about Obongo, whose hateful name was also made synonyumous with "handsome," "charismatic" AND "articulate" for the 1st 3 years so the girlz would go for him -- and go for him they did. Every single "mainstream" commentator applied these lying terms to the demon, even conservatives on the way to criticizing it!?!?!

Aside from the rare 70yo celebrity multi-billionaire like DT, look for every Pezident's hair to start dark and turn gray in office from now on..... because of GIRLZ! Dead and gone is the idea of needing a chief executive with some valuable age and experience on him.

You've made a valiant effort to speak up for your sex on this. I realize you may be feeling a bit cornered or lonely being one of the few women here, but we're all here to say exactly what we think, huh. It's good to know you're intellectually tough, too -- surely a basic requirement for all 4umizers!

_____________________________________________________________

“We build but to tear down. Most of our work and resource is squandered. Our onward march is marked by devastation. Everywhere there is an appalling loss of time, effort and life. A cheerless view, but true.” - Tesla per FP

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2016-07-30   8:40:10 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: NeoconsNailed (#0)

You may not know this but women are superior to men in almost every way. You give them groceries and they will make you a meal. You give them sperm and they will give you a child. You give them crap and you'll get a ton of shit.

Take away their right to vote and they'll probably bring back prohibition. Let the women vote

______________________________________

Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.

titorite  posted on  2016-07-30   8:45:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: Turtle (#35)

The average man maintains civilization. Women can't maintain it and instead destroy it. Hence women, blacks, Jews and beaners - all destroyers - should not be allowed to vote. These things are obvious and simple. Glad to help you out with the simple and obvious.

These sound like the words of man who has married his hand.

______________________________________

Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.

titorite  posted on  2016-07-30   8:58:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: Ada (#29)

Lot of misogynists around this joint :-)

Did you ever have any doubt?

______________________________________

Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.

titorite  posted on  2016-07-30   9:05:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: NeoconsNailed (#0)

My sister in Chicago told that she had voted Democrat her whole life. But she could not vote for Obama, so she voted for McCain. I told her, "You still voted for evil since BOTH are members of Council on Foreign Relations. They were BOTH internationalists." ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2016-07-30   9:05:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: Artisan, sneakypete, neoconsnailed (#24)

Yep. I concluded long ago that it was a purposeful plot, a conspiracy. Break up the family through the so called sexual revolution- turn women into promiscuous, abortionist, contraceptive whores, and the men will gladly comply with that easy edict- broken individuals, broken families, broken society, then papa govt takes the men's place, as scrapper explained. If the family does manage to survive all of this diabolical garbage, then the federal reservists make it impossible to support the family with one man's income. Thus the kids go to government school and jew perverted tv to raise them

If we don't break the Kosher petrobuck stranglehold monopoly we'll see walking skeletons in the US, just like on those "SAVE THE AFRICAN VILLAGERS" infomercials on Tee Vee.

The kids will be drawing water from a fracking overflow pipe....

And, sneakyYitzhak will blame the "spoiled, lazy, uninspired Americans" who refuse to work their way up the ladders leading out of their Kosher waste oil playpens....

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2016-07-30   9:06:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: Turtle (#35)

George Soros predicts civil war and riots for the U.S. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2016-07-30   9:08:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: BTP Holdings (#47)

eorge Soros predicts civil war and riots for the U.S. ;)

Aint he always makng that prediction?

______________________________________

Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.

titorite  posted on  2016-07-30   9:12:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: titorite, Turtle, Ada (#43)

"Turdle wrote" The average man maintains civilization. Women can't maintain it and instead destroy it. Hence women, blacks, Jews and beaners - all destroyers - should not be allowed to vote. These things are obvious and simple. Glad to help you out with the simple and obvious.

"titorite" These sound like the words of man who has married his hand.

THAT'S IT! SOMETHING'S WRONG WITH THE IDIOT! (it's so simple and obvious.)

I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT I KNEW IT.....

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2016-07-30   9:18:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: NeoconsNailed (#41) (Edited)

We're not even talking about Obongo, whose hateful name was also made synonyumous with "handsome," "charismatic" AND "articulate"

Were Obama white, I don't think many people would consider him handsome or charismatic. McCain might have had more sex appeal than Obama but he was too tied to Bush 43.

And I don't see any teeny boppers or their mothers going wild over Trump. Trump's biggest supporters are white males.

Ada  posted on  2016-07-30   9:27:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: titorite (#42)

Take away their right to vote and they'll probably bring back prohibition.

Actually, prohibition might rightly be blamed on women.

Ada  posted on  2016-07-30   9:29:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (52 - 78) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest