Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Territorial Waters Off Iran's Coast Are Persian, Not American
Source: by author
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 25, 2016
Author: Stephen Lendman
Post Date: 2016-08-25 11:40:37 by Stephen Lendman
Keywords: None
Views: 156
Comments: 21

Territorial Waters off Iran’s Coast Are Persian, Not American

by Stephen Lendman

You’d never know it based on how Washington operates globally, seeking dominion over planet earth, its resources, populations and space - naked aggression its main strategy of choice.

On Wednesday, the USS Nitze and USS Mason guided missile destroyers provocatively entered Iranian waters in the Strait of Hormuz - admitted by US Central Command spokesman Commander Kyle Raines.

Four Iranian small vessels interdicted them, both US warships changing course to avoid confrontation. The US Navy called the incident “unsafe and unprofessional.”

What legal right have US warships to sail in Iranian waters or those of any other country like Beijing’s in the South China Sea or Russia’s in the Black Sea.

Iran’s Defense Minister Hossein Dehqan said “(i)f any foreign vessel enters our waters, we will given them a warning and it is an act of aggression, we will confront them.”

Iranian vessels monitor all movements in Persian Gulf waters. America maintains a strong naval presence there, including occasional provocative war games. Its Fifth Fleet based in Bahrain includes a formidable array of warships and support vessels - too close to Iranian waters and coastline for comfort.

Iran’s Defense Minister Dehqan earlier said “(t)he Iranian Armed Forces are an intertwined and coherent complex that can give a decisive response to any threat at any level and any place under the command of the Commander-in-Chief.”

“The enemy can never assess and think of the range of the response given by the powerful and mighty Armed Forces of the Islamic Iran.”

He vowed a strong response to counter any US provocations. America acts irresponsibly, then blames Iran for “unsafe and unprofessional actions (risking) escalation and miscalculation” - claiming US forces “have an inherent obligation for self-defense.”

Longtime US policy calls for regime change in Iran. Perhaps a provocative action instigated by Fifth Fleet warships one day will be a Gulf of Tonkin type incident used to declare war.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

His new book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III."

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Stephen Lendman (#0)

Our masters own the media that people in the USA believe to be a free press. Therefore, with few exceptions, most believe whatever spin or lies they get from mainstream media.

DWornock  posted on  2016-08-25   12:05:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Stephen Lendman (#0)

I will have to disagree, according to the US government that goes back to early 1900's, the US of A can claim anything and everything they want. They will prove their right at the point of a gun, drop of a bomb, the use of a missile.

Darkwing  posted on  2016-08-25   12:10:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Stephen Lendman (#0)

Those shipping lanes, like those in the south china sea, must remain ooen and accessible to everyone, for the sake of commerce. As a jew, you should know this, Stephen.

Obnoxicated  posted on  2016-08-25   12:20:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Darkwing (#2)

Yep and that is why the US is the most hated nation on earth. Enter WWWIII. I see this happening in the very near future.

purplerose  posted on  2016-08-25   13:37:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: purplerose (#4)

Enter WWIII. I see this happening in the very near future.

WWIII or another large land war, like Korea or Viet Nam?

Cynicom  posted on  2016-08-25   13:56:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Cynicom (#5)

WWIII will make the Vietnam and Korea look like nothing.

purplerose  posted on  2016-08-25   14:11:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: purplerose (#6)

WWIII will make the Vietnam and Korea look like nothing.

That is understood.

However, will it be WWIII at outset, or another Korea or Vietnam?

Cynicom  posted on  2016-08-25   14:14:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Cynicom (#7)

This will be something beyond those two.

purplerose  posted on  2016-08-25   14:27:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: purplerose, 4 (#8)

We've been at war in the ME for well over a decade now with nothing but massive death, destruction, and loss of treasure to show for it.

On July 26, 1956, the House of Representatives voted 373 to 9 to cite Pete Seeger and seven others (including playwright Arthur Miller) for contempt, as they failed to cooperate with House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) in their attempts to investigate alleged subversives and communists. Pete Seeger testified before the HUAC in 1955.

In one of Pete's darkest moments, when his personal freedom, his career, and his safety were in jeopardy, a flash of inspiration ignited this song. The song was stirred by a passage from Mikhail Sholokhov's novel "And Quie Flows the Don". Around the world the song traveled and in 1962 at a UNICEF concert in Germany, Marlene Dietrich, Academy Award-nominated German-born American actress, first performed the song in French, as "Qui peut dire ou vont les fleurs?" Shortly after she sang it in German. The song's impact in Germany just after WWII was shattering. It's universal message, "let there be peace in the world" did not get lost in its translation. To the contrary, the combination of the language, the setting, and the great lyrics has had a profound effect on people all around the world. May it have the same effect today and bring renewed awareness to all that hear it.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2016-08-25   15:41:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Cynicom (#7)

We're seeing the flashpoint in Syria. Remember what the bible says about Damascus?

Obnoxicated  posted on  2016-08-25   16:27:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: All, Cynicom, Lod (#8) (Edited)

Russia, China and even Turkey want to turn America into wasteland. Meanwhile, American intelligence and Pentagon have yet to come to grips with who their enemies are because they talk out of both sides of their necks putting the rest of Americans at high risk.

purplerose  posted on  2016-08-25   16:47:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: purplerose (#11)

The pump is primed for a big false flag.


"Define yourself as one beloved by God. This is the true self. Every other identity is illusion."—Brennan Manning

Rotara  posted on  2016-08-25   18:48:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Obnoxicated (#10)

We're seeing the flashpoint in Syria.

Major wars are by intent. Years in planning.

Major wars by accident are few and far between.

Regardless of this government meddling in the Middle East because of Jew persuasion, one has to keep their eyes on the entire globe.

For instance, Obama started shifting US military to Asia and the Western Pacific...FIVE YEARS AGO.. This shift continues to this day and is accelerating. Little noticed items often pique ones interest, to ask why.

For instance we are going to station thousands of Marine grunts in Northwest Australia...permanently. Why to begin with and why not Southeast Australia? Guam is so saturated, we have opened up island of Tinian for "training". First time since WWII.

Take a few minutes to read this if you have time and interest.

www.mei.edu/content/us-pivot-asia-pacific-and-us-middle-east-policy-towards-integrated-approach

Cynicom  posted on  2016-08-25   19:18:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Lod (#9)

Howsomever......

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pete_Seeger#Spanish_Civil_War_songs

:-/

_____________________________________________________________

USA! USA! USA! Bringing you democracy, or else! there were strains of VD that were incurable, and they were first found in the Philippines and then transmitted to the Korean working girls via US military. The 'incurables' we were told were first taken back to a military hospital in the Philippines to quietly die. – 4um

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2016-08-25   19:28:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Rotara (#12)

FFs are US.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2016-08-25   19:42:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Cynicom (#13)

Major wars are by intent. Years in planning.

Major wars by accident are few and far between.

Regardless of this government meddling in the Middle East because of Jew persuasion, one has to keep their eyes on the entire globe.

For instance, Obama started shifting US military to Asia and the Western Pacific...FIVE YEARS AGO.. This shift continues to this day and is accelerating. Little noticed items often pique ones interest, to ask why.

For instance we are going to station thousands of Marine grunts in Northwest Australia...permanently. Why to begin with and why not Southeast Australia? Guam is so saturated, we have opened up island of Tinian for "training". First time since WWII.

You are right about this, Cyni.

Recall that the Japs planned for WW II for at least five years in advance of the attacks of December 7. And they took out our bases in the Philippines simultaneously.

Why has Obummer been shifting military toward the South Pacific? Because he expects some sort of hostile activities to be engaged in by the Chinese. it really is that simple.

It all boils down to resources. The Germans called it Liebensraum, or living space. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2016-08-25   20:01:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Rotara (#12)

The pump is primed for a big false flag.

Yes, I fear it is coming, sooner than later.

Out here last year, they did an active shooter drill out at the hospital, but they did it on an alternate frequency so it would not be confused that it was a drill and not a live event.

This worries me also because we do these "lock down" drills where I work. Now there is no one there, just a bunch of disabled souls that van barely take care of themselves. I am one of the most capable there, and I am not in such prime condition either. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2016-08-25   20:11:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: BTP Holdings (#16)

It all boils down to resources. The Germans called it Liebensraum, or living space. ;)

You are getting to be expert in geo/politics, past and present.

From that viewpoint one can make their own assessment of the future.

Cynicom  posted on  2016-08-25   20:29:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Cynicom (#18)

You are getting to be expert in geo/politics, past and present.

From that viewpoint one can make their own assessment of the future.

Cyni, I AM an expert in geo-politics. This came with my study of history by reading the magazine "The Barnes Review" to which I was an initial subscriber.

And from the military resources that Obummer has been transferring to the South Pacific, I am betting that there is something afoot out there, and it could well be with the Chinese.

Don't forget one thing, the Chinese have nukes. Will they use them? It remains to be seen. The U.S. has tactical nukes at Guam. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2016-08-25   21:02:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: BTP Holdings (#19)

The U.S. has tactical nukes at Guam. ;)

No....they have both.

They have had the real thing since my day in 1950.

This is where experience comes in.

My first NSA briefing I attended as a flight crew member, back in 1952 on Guam was an eye opener. You see and hear things beyond your belief and imagination.

Guam now has aircraft carriers that are nuclear armed, submarines that are nuclear armed and various long range bombers that are nuclear armed. All this in the backyard of China and Russia.

The view from inside is enlightening. This what we had in Korean war..

www.atomicarchive.com/Photos/LBFM/image2.shtml It weighed 10,000 lbs.

Cynicom  posted on  2016-08-25   21:22:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Rotara (#12)

I don't what exactly that means but for the US to be provoking the Iranians at sea does not sound like friendly fire to me. It sounds like the foreign waters are hostile right now.

purplerose  posted on  2016-08-25   23:26:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest