Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

World News
See other World News Articles

Title: The Red Cross Sucks, Again - unbelievable
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016 ... o-pray-with-flood-victims.html
Published: Aug 26, 2016
Author: Fox News - LA
Post Date: 2016-08-26 21:02:40 by Lod
Keywords: None
Views: 105
Comments: 9

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Lod (#0)

Behind every RED CROSS bashing is a non-Christian still pissed off about the IRC's accurate reporting of camp deaths during the Holocau$t. (The org visited the camps regularly and delivered packages to inmates and dutifully inspected camp records. When they reported that dead Jews numbered in the thousands instead of millions, their endless problems began.)

If a "non-Christian from New York City" (wink wink) needed shelter after a disaster the first thing he or she would do is contact the ACLU about the rampant proselytizing by Christians in a tax exempt (non religious) aid organization.

So. the Red Cross gets it from all sides from the Kosher Kabal. After Katrina the Heebs complained because the Red Cross allegedly didn't use donations to "help people". Digging deeper I found that the org bought new trucks, tents, reefers and equipment to replace outdated stuff, which of course must come out of donations received. (This wasn't mentioned in the hit piece I read)

The equipment is crucial to disaster response and rendering aid. But according to their evil, agenda driven critics' logic if the org buys food with donations that's okay, but buying garbage bags or dish detergent for clean up isn't.

But there's never a word of criticism when people donate to the UJA, which only helps Jews. If you donate to the United Way it may be given to Marxists in San Francisco, but United Jewish Appeal donations are "earmarked" for ewe gno hoo. And needless to say there's no reason to question how the monies are spent.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2016-08-27   19:34:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: HOUNDDAWG (#1)

Let's just say that I have nothing good, at all, to report about the Red Cross, or their money-grubbing operation.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2016-08-27   19:51:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Lod (#2) (Edited)

Let's just say that I have nothing good, at all, to report about the Red Cross, or their money-grubbing operation.

And I won't dispute any reasons you may have for your views my dear friend.

But, this article clearly avoids the obvious rules governing 501(c)(3) public charities and the problems that could result if the org suddenly becomes an appendage of Christianity without having stated the goal in its mission statement-application for tax exemption.

Even though the article explains how religious counsellors may be accommodated, the implied tone and criticism is that anything but unfettered access to its shelters for lay preachers is somehow wrong. (Do you believe that?) The first amendment is very broad in its stated protection of religious freedom, but that has nothing to do with Title 26, the IRS Code.

The article is a cheap shot hit piece that bears the paw prints of the Red Cross' most vicious and vocal critics.

And if said access was in fact permissible then there would be no way to stop the harassment of unwanted sermons aimed at sheltered Catholics by certain fundies who believe that "Papists are evil". After all, it's a regular theme of many "Christian" sermons, and has been for years. (OUR HOMES ARE GONE BECAUSE OF YOU IDOL WORSHIPPING SINNERS!") "And we need to get this country back on its knees where it belongs!"

And how could you stop a a bunch of zealots who get a whiff of "heathen blood" from ganging up on a minority of Buddhists, Hindus, Jains or G_D forbid, "the Christ killing Jews"?

NEWS FLASH!

Jewish Victim In Georgia Lynched in Red Cross Shelter Because He Claimed That "Leo Frank was innocent!"

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2016-08-27   20:40:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: HOUNDDAWG (#3)

A man trying to comfort and offering to pray with those who've just had their world(s) turned upside down should not be turned out. This doesn't sound like he was forcing anything, on anyone. Christ doesn't force himself on us, he just stands at the door and knocks; we choose to open the door, or not.

Where were all the cults mentioned trying to help the flood victims? I have yet to hear of their relief work in LA, or anywhere else for that matter.

It's past time for Lyndon's 501(c)(3) mess to be flushed down the IRS toilet of suppression of free speech.

imo

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2016-08-27   21:01:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Lod (#4)

It's past time for Lyndon's 501(c)(3) mess to be flushed down the IRS toilet of suppression of free speech.

Hey, you're preachin' to the choir, Reverend!

You may remember that the IRS seized a church in Norfolk, VA several years ago because the pastor refused to stop endorsing a presidential candidate from the pulpit. He truly believed that the other guy was of Satan, but, the IRS decreed that the govt licensed church could not offer meaningful influence during the election.

If it was up to me I'd refuse tax exemption for my church. But, unfortunately, many parishioners simply will not tithe unless their gifts are deferred taxes that they'd otherwise pay to Uncle Schmeuly, So, a big part of the problem is that many collection plates brim with cash for reasons other than Christian charity, and "don't let the left hand know what the right one is doing" is a dead letter.

But, without the god cursed income tax swindle (and the rapidly approaching worthless Federal Reserve Note) people could support their churches without having to unduly sacrifice. I certainly can't fault folks for taking the donations off of their taxes. Especially since our standard of living has contracted so much since the '50s, while being forced into ever higher tax brackets with ever crumbling buying power.

People and their churches could end the income tax or at the very least remove the tax exemption (which replaced tax immunity and no govt control of churches) if they had the will. They don't.

To paraphrase Mr. "Gimme sum hot nigger luvin', Sally" Thomas Jefferson, "people are predisposed to suffer the ills as long as they're bearable. instead of throwing off the chains."

It's just in our nature.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2016-08-27   21:57:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: HOUNDDAWG (#5)

One thing that really gets me is how the black preachers can pimp whatever politician they want, even have them speak in their churches, with absolutely zero consequences. Unlike the white preachers and their churches.

And I'll admit to being highly deduction driven when making my donations.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2016-08-27   22:20:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Lod (#6)

One thing that really gets me is how the black preachers can pimp whatever politician they want, even have them speak in their churches, with absolutely zero consequences. Unlike the white preachers and their churches.

And I'll admit to being highly deduction driven when making my donations.

The pastor in Harlem who bashes President Obama for alleged "carnal knowledge of the Sodomistical type" may be immune to retaliation for two reasons: He's very public in his pronouncements including Ewe Toob vids, and, our beloved president may not want to leave blatant evidence of having hurt another black perthun.

The allegedly "light and lilty" member of Pastor Manning's flock who was murdered may have been a greater threat to Mr. "Put a kibble in the pipe before you go back down", but he was less well known and possibly a greater danger to the rumored-to-be down low jefe supremo in La Casa Blanca.

I don't know of any other fearless pastors or critics of color who are slipping the noose.

The Norfolk, VA pastor (who was white) was a severe irritant to G.W. Bush, and he was invisible to the public. The news story showed no pix with Earth shattering quotes and it read as if he had received fair warning but continued to defy rules that "everybody knows you ain't supposed to ignore." And, Bush was much more arrogant than the cautious, "Drop in a fatty Barack Mack Daddy".

Could it be more of a case by case process with the added slant of Senor Presidente's reluctance to crush blacks like bugs? I mean, millions act as if he's helping blacks but he never did doodly for his peeps as a senator, and if as president he's lifted all boats for any class of Americans (other than BIG PHARMA and BIG INSURANCE) I'm certainly not aware of it.

It's probably a lot harder to arrange a stray bullet outside a Harlem Bucket O' Blood for Pastor James, and other attacks/accidents/suicides by psycho military cutouts may be more difficult to execute in La Manzana Grande because of witnesses at places where he is likely to visit.

Of course there may be other examples of which I'm not aware. I don't follow political news stories anywhere but here, because my fellow 4nicators don't try to manipulate me.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2016-08-27   23:38:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: HOUNDDAWG (#7)

I'm sure that all black churches are political cells dedicated to advancing black powah and black-friendly candidates. Alas, most white ones are too!

All non-patriots (non-racialists, non-nationalists) are basically cloning Judaism now. The blax have copied the gew holohoax wholesale with endless coaching and sponsorship by the Chosen. How many ways can we think of in which white (or at least light-skinned) institutions do the same for the greater glory of PC..... aka gew power?

Mexicans and other "accredited victim groups" (the great Wilmot Robertson's fraze) do the holocaust dance too -- if they're not nonwhite, which is a ready-made via dolorosa sob-story, they simply claim oppression by the evil dominant white male -- this covers women, the handicapped etc.

The 1960s are where the gews finally got their hands around whitey's throat for real. Their persecution yarns were already waiting in the wing since WW2, it was the simplest thing in the world for the other ACGs to line up right behind them in the "poor persecuted us" benefits line.

_____________________________________________________________

USA! USA! USA! Bringing you democracy, or else! there were strains of VD that were incurable, and they were first found in the Philippines and then transmitted to the Korean working girls via US military. The 'incurables' we were told were first taken back to a military hospital in the Philippines to quietly die. – 4um

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2016-08-28   0:30:05 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Lod (#0) (Edited)

{wrong thread, post deleted}

"We need more H-1B visas, because source code is rotting in the fields." - Countenance Blog

Dakmar  posted on  2016-08-28   0:38:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest