Why is it hard for historians to accept that the sphinx is well over 50,000 years old? Jack Fraser, Undergrad Physicist at Oxford University Written Wed
From the details:
There's water erosion on the sphinx, rainfall hasn't occurred in Egypt for well over 10,000 years
This is an image of Cairo, from the 26th of January, 2016:
(Source: Cairo witnesses heavy rain, fog; unstable weather to last till end of week)
The Sphinx is 23km away from the dead centre of Cairo.
I would be willing to bet that the same shower which you see in this image, also gave the Sphinx a good smattering of precipitation.
Here is a graph of the rainfall in Cairo:
Note how distinctly not zero that graph is.
Cairo gets a fair amount of rain. Hence, due to proximity, so does the Sphinx.
It has rained on the Great Sphinx of Giza in the last 10,000 hours - let alone the last 10,000 years!
Your argument is invalid.
As an accused part of the global “Jewish Conspiracy” (despite not being Jewish), I hereby use my poorly defined “global influence” to revoke your internet license, until you learn to fact check better.
Poster Comment:
Graph at source.