4um: WARNING: It is a weapon that the Wall Street Journal warns could shatter America. …it will be years of suffering. …And we may never recover from it.

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
World News
See other World News Articles
Title: WARNING: It is a weapon that the Wall Street Journal warns could shatter America. …it will be years of suffering. …And we may never recover from it.
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://the-final-warning.com/
Published: Oct 22, 2016
Author: Buck
Post Date: 2016-10-22 21:42:07 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 104
Comments: 12

WARNING: It is a weapon that the Wall Street Journal warns could shatter America. …it will be years of suffering. …And we may never recover from it.

Hi, you can call me Buck,
In this presentation I’m going to reveal recent news events that will change life in America as we know it, making it absolutely vital that you know how to protect your family, so keep watching…
Obama’s deal is completely and utterly a LIE? Why …
You may have heard about Obama’s so-called “deal” with Iran – the one that’s supposed to protect us by “limiting” Iran’s ability to make nuclear bombs. But that is completely and utterly a LIE. Why? Because it doesn’t shut down their nuclear program, it doesn’t shut down their reactors, and it doesn’t break apart their centrifuges. All it does is lift their trade sanctions, in exchange for “an honest promise” that they won’t do anything bad. Can you believe Obama bought this?
He even said himself that “Iran is only 2 or 3 months away from acquiring the raw materials for a nuclear bomb.”
Worst of all, Iran’s nuclear program is more dangerous than Russia, China, and North Korea’s combined. Keep reading, and I’ll tell you exactly why.
150408_Tom_Iran_845-2
Iran is an Axis-of-Evil country.
They’ve already broken every political agreement they’ve made with anyone. They built their Fordow nuclear site illegally, breaking their last official agreement. What makes anyone believe they’ll keep their word now?
Oh, and they built that facility under a mountain, so that nobody could destroy it. It seems TOO important to them. Why hide and fortify the facility if it’s for peaceful research? You and I both know the answer: it’s not.
Obama’s new “deal” lets Iran keep that facility, even though it’s their prime “research” site for nuclear weapons. All we get in return is another empty promise that they’ll only use it for “peaceful” purposes. Yeah, right.
In previous agreements, we had more control and more safety measures. Our inspection teams could check on suspect assembly and storage sites, making sure they’re safe, and that they’re not being used for weapons research. But the new “deal” forbids surprise inspections. Instead, Iran can schedule whenever is convenient for them, so that they can hide any incriminating evidence before inspectors see it.
This new deal FORBIDS surprise inspections!
In March, Yukiya Amato, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) tried to inspect a number of suspect sites in Iran. He’s the Principal International Inspector for verification that countries are honoring the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. In a report he published on March 23rd, he blew the whistle on Iran’s real intentions: Iran REFUSED to let him inspect their nuclear facilities. If that’s not a BIG RED WARNING about Iran’s evil intentions, I don’t know what is.
2015-11-18_0948
It looks to me like the President has sold us out to our enemies, to his friends fighting to establish…
Islamic Sharia Law all over the world (it’s called the Islamic Republic of Iran for a reason!).
hqdefault
Soon, they’ll easily be able to attack us with nuclear weapons at their convenience, most likely fused to create a high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) because, then, they can take us out with one good hit. When that happens, it will be the biggest TSHTF of our modern times, putting our country back 100s of years, essentially destroying our civilization completely.
It’s personally important to me that this message gets out, so that we stop this threat in its beginnings. That’s why my story, which I’ll share with you over the next few minutes, becomes very relevant.
Click for Full Text!
Poster Comment:
They talk about the coming EMP that will wipe out everything electronic in the country except those in hardened military facilities. Do you have plans to make your own Faraday Cage to protect your electronics?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0) (Edited)
Of course they have a DVD to sell you for $37. If I had the money to put on a debit card, I would do it myself.
Think about it. Everything runs on electronics, cars, trucks and buses. Everything will crash if our enemies do an EMP to us and it will be the end of America as we know it.
If you go to X out of the page, they will offer you a $10 discount. ;)
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
BTP Holdings posted on 2016-10-22 21:50:00 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#2. To: BTP Holdings (#1)
Everything will crash if our enemies do an EMP

Doesn't have to be enemies. Sun X flare can do it as well.

Tatarewicz posted on 2016-10-22 23:45:05 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#3. To: BTP Holdings (#0)
Congress was briefed on the EMP threat at least ten years ago and warned to insulate the US electric grid against it.
The fact is that less than five EMPs would KILL 98% of all Americans in under a year, mostly due to mass populations no longer having electricity to sustain normal life because everything Americans use to produce, distribute, and maintain the food supply is dependent upon the electrical grid. Not to mention everything else.
U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
HAPPY2BME-4UM posted on 2016-10-23 0:27:38 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#4. To: BTP Holdings (#0)
Iran shipped thousands of pounds of enriched uranium to Russia on Monday, a key commitment in the nuclear deal that had to be fulfilled before international sanctions can be lifted.
www.washingtonpost.com/wo...1-1998289ffcea_story.html

bush_is_a_moonie posted on 2016-10-23 1:40:54 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#5. To: BTP Holdings (#0)
After Iran Deal: Israel Trying to Thwart Move to Monitor Its Nuclear Program
Non-binding resolution could cause Israel great diplomatic damage, focus international attention on Israel’s nuclear program and prompt further IAEA action. read more: www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.669287

bush_is_a_moonie posted on 2016-10-23 1:42:33 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#6. To: BTP Holdings (#0)
Suzanne Maloney drags Samuels and his Ben Rhodes profile over the coals one more time:
Samuels writes that the underlying intent of the Iran nuclear deal was to “create the space for America to disentangle itself from its established system of alliances with countries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Israel and Turkey” and “effectively begin the process of a large-scale disengagement from the Middle East.”
The problem with this assertion is that Rhodes never says any such thing. Nor do any of the other U.S. officials quoted in the story, or anyone else for that matter. And nowhere does the article assemble actual evidence to corroborate this provocative description of the Obama administration’s grand strategy in the Middle East [bold mine-DL]. This proposition was first and most fully articulated by my former colleague Michael Doran, now a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, in a 2015 article for an obscure internet magazine that went viral. Its thesis clearly animates many of the deal’s opponents. But absent evidence, the premise that Obama harbors a “secret plan” to jettison America’s deep security partnership with Israel and the Gulf states constitutes pure conjecture, not fact.
The profile’s serious errors are not surprising when we remember that the modus operandi of almost all Iran hawks in the debate over the nuclear deal was to misrepresent everything about the deal and the diplomacy related to it. If the deal blocked Iran’s ability to build a nuclear weapon, opponents of the deal said that it “paved the way” to an Iranian nuke. If it imposed restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program, opponents insisted that the deal “legitimized” Iranian nuclear ambitions. Deal opponents took each detail, turned it on its head, and deliberately spread falsehoods to undermine the deal’s chances of being accepted in the U.S. Similarly, opponents of the deal didn’t attack the agreement as a prelude to rapprochement with Iran because there was any proof that this was the administration’s ultimate goal, but because they knew that if they presented the deal this way it would make it a harder sell at home. “Obama abandons allies” is the story these people have been trying to push for years, and despite the fact that there is no evidence to back it up it persists because it is a useful line of attack.
The profile’s most controversial claim that the administration deceived the public on the nuclear deal is without merit, as Maloney shows once again, but it is consistent with the way that Iran hawks took unremarkable and even positive aspects of diplomacy with Iran and tried to turn them into proof of betrayal and appeasement. There has been a massive campaign of deception perpetrated by one side in this debate, and there has been an attempt to actively mislead the American public about the nuclear deal with Iran, but it wasn’t directed from the White House. It was the concerted effort of the deal’s opponents to sabotage and undermine it, to which this profile makes a belated addition.
www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/the-iran-hawks-campaign-of-deception/

bush_is_a_moonie posted on 2016-10-23 1:46:02 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#7. To: BTP Holdings (#0)
These Zionist satanists will do or say anything to get the US involved in a war with Iran.
Much has been said about President Obama’s proposed Iran deal. Some of the conversation has been framed as civilized debate, while other dialogue has deteriorated into an endless litany of ugliness. While strong words have been used by parties on both sides in reference to this deal, it seems that, particularly within the Jewish community, the situation has hit an all-time low, with supporters of the deal castigated, mocked and warned that their failure to oppose the deal may well cost them their jobs come the next election. Worse yet, Jewish supporters of the nuclear agreement have been stamped with a scarlet “T,” branded as traitors to their own people.
What I found most disturbing about the war of words that has been played out so publicly is that opponents of the Iran deal have turned the focus of the issue from a national issue to a Jewish one. Using tactics that are both polarizing and divisive all at once, they have made it clear that supporters of the nuclear agreement are, in fact, turning their backs on the Jewish nation, a sentiment explicitly spelled out in an August 31st headline in the Algemeiner Journal which read, “Supporters of the Iran Nuclear Deal Should and Will Be Called Traitors.” The article quotes Jeff Wiesenfeld who explains, “There must be sanctions against conduct which Black, Hispanic, Asian and other Americans would not tolerate against THEIR interests. We are the outlying fools.” Author Ron Torossian continues with a warning that any member of Congress who votes in favor of the Iran deal “will be hounded for the rest of their careers for supporting this treachery.”
Anti-Semitism has been rearing its ugly head for generations, but in this case, we are the ones who are fanning the flames. Allow me to explain.
By painting the Jewish people as citizens, not of our home countries, but rather as an independent political nation whose allegiance first and foremost is to itself, it defines us as Americans whose loyalty to the United States is suspect, because we subscribe to a nationalistic agenda that extends beyond our country of residence. That sense of commitment to the Jewish nation first portrays us as a security risk to the place in which we live, because when push comes to shove, we are expected, like loyal citizens of any nation , to throw our support to the Jewish nation, not our host nation, the United States of America. As individuals, each of us has numerous allegiances, including loyalties to our families, our communities, our religions and our nations, but to publicly brand Jews who support the Iran deal as “turncoats,” we run the risk of giving the impression that our national loyalty and our religious loyalty are one and the same, while in fact they are two separate and distinct entities.
This categorization was used successfully by Adolf Hitler in chapter 11 of Mein Kampf, where he wrote, “Thus the Jew lived at all times in the States of other peoples and there he formed his own State, which, though disguised by the name of ‘religious community’ generally sailed as long as external circumstances did not see fit to make a complete revelation of its nature. But once he believed himself strong enough to be able to dispense with the protecting cover, then he always dropped the veil.… The Jew’s life within other peoples can only exist in the long run if he succeeds in creating the impression as though he were not a people but only a ‘religious community,’ though a special one. But with this the first great lie starts.”
The logic is, of course, flawed. Jews are, in fact, a religious community and citizens of their host country first. I consider myself to be a Jew by religion, a Caucasian by race and an American by nationality. What is most frightening is seeing Hitler’s fallacious claims being resurrected by members of our own people.
Whether or not this deal will endanger the security of the United States or its allies remains to be seen. But it is clear that categorizing its Jewish supporters as traitors jeopardizes the physical safety of the Jewish people, by making us seem like a security risk. By singling out the threats to Jews, not the United States, opponents of the Iran deal are making it clear that the national agenda of the Jewish people and that of the United States are two separate entities, a distinction that can only foster greater anti-Semitism.
In his remarks in Washington this past spring, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that he is “the representative of the entire Jewish nation.” That single statement is extremely troubling, because it places the loyalty of Jews worldwide to their home countries in question and suggests that Jewish people all across the globe will support Netanyahu, not their own leaders. Those sentiments are echoed on the official website of the State of Israel which bears the words of Avigdor Lieberman, minister of foreign affairs, which explains that “Israel is to the Jewish people what France is to the French people, Ireland is to the Irish and Japan is to the Japanese.”
If Netanyahu is the true leader of the entire Jewish people, then we are indeed, a nation within a nation. That nation, of course, does not exist, despite what Hitler claimed decades ago. There is Israel and there is America. There are American Jews and Israeli gentiles. There is no Jewish political nation and all Jews are not governed by Netanyahu.
This is America, land of the free. We are all entitled to our opinions and it is our constitutional right to lobby either for or against the Iran deal. But to turn this agreement into an issue where all Jews must be of one opinion, especially because a self-anointed “representative” has deemed it to be so, and to say that those who differ are committing treason, is the equivalent of throwing the Jewish people under the bus. Using a religious identity to further a political agenda is an action that has potentially devastating repercussions against Jews worldwide and one that should be avoided at all costs.
Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro is Rabbi of Cong. Bais Medrash of Bayswater in Far Rockaway, New York, and a spokesperson for True Torah Jews (Truetorahjews.org) a non-profit organization founded in 2001 in Brooklyn, New York that does media outreach on issues pertaining to Zionism and Orthodox Judaism.
By Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro
www.truetorahjews.org/issues/irandeal3

bush_is_a_moonie posted on 2016-10-23 1:51:05 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#8. To: BTP Holdings (#0)
Iran is part of the Shiite minority of muslims which are about 10% to 15% world wide. They have been persecuted through time over and over my the sunnies, almost to the brink of extinction.
I highly doubt that they would attack the US if they had nukes, to do so would be suicide considering their position within Islam as being a minority. Shiites do not recognize the caliphate and never will, shiites will never back anything even remotely tied to Isis/Isil. Iran has never been a threat even when the US/UK backed the shah which was toppled and replaced by a republic. Iran was not a threat when Irak invasion backed by the US happened. Iran is only a threat on the state sponsored medias shit train. Iran would definitely go after Israel and other sunnies country in a heartbeat for being beaten down century after century but I seriously doubt that they would be insane enough to try to attempt something against the north american US.

Some people work hard at being offended
SilverStorm posted on 2016-10-23 2:36:43 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#9. To: Tatarewicz (#2)
Sun X flare can do it as well.

It can. And there was a flare on the opposite side of the sun some time ago. If it had been blown in the direction of Earth, it would have brought immediate catastrophe. ;)
"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
BTP Holdings posted on 2016-10-23 9:27:55 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#10. To: BTP Holdings (#0)
EMP means no EBT. Sounds good to me.
A rainbow coalition against Jews doesn't require Whites or Pro-Whites. It can be just as brown or anti-white as you like.
Prefrontal Vortex posted on 2016-10-23 14:48:55 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#11. To: bush_is_a_moonie (#7)
I consider myself to be a Jew by religion, a Caucasian by race

A Khazar.

Tatarewicz posted on 2016-10-24 0:57:21 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#12. To: BTP Holdings (#0)
Hi, you can call me Buck....

After that intro, I knew the rest would be utter horse shit. after reading this I reminded myself why I normally skip over any threads posted by BTP Holdings.....
"The government ruling us draws its authority not from the principles of the Declaration of Independence, or even from the delegate powers listed in the U.S. Constitution, but rather from the war to re-conquer the independent South. That conflict, usually referred to by the artfully misleading title “Civil War,” established the fact that the government in Washington is willing to kill Americans in whatever quantity it deems necessary in order to enforce its edicts, and then sanctify the slaughter in the name of some suitably “progressive” social objective.
Rube Goldberg posted on 2016-10-24 7:22:51 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um