Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

World News
See other World News Articles

Title: WARNING: It is a weapon that the Wall Street Journal warns could shatter America. …it will be years of suffering. …And we may never recover from it.
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://the-final-warning.com/
Published: Oct 22, 2016
Author: Buck
Post Date: 2016-10-22 21:42:07 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 121
Comments: 12

WARNING: It is a weapon that the Wall Street Journal warns could shatter America. …it will be years of suffering. …And we may never recover from it.

Hi, you can call me Buck,

In this presentation I’m going to reveal recent news events that will change life in America as we know it, making it absolutely vital that you know how to protect your family, so keep watching…

Obama’s deal is completely and utterly a LIE? Why …

You may have heard about Obama’s so-called “deal” with Iran – the one that’s supposed to protect us by “limiting” Iran’s ability to make nuclear bombs. But that is completely and utterly a LIE. Why? Because it doesn’t shut down their nuclear program, it doesn’t shut down their reactors, and it doesn’t break apart their centrifuges. All it does is lift their trade sanctions, in exchange for “an honest promise” that they won’t do anything bad. Can you believe Obama bought this?

He even said himself that “Iran is only 2 or 3 months away from acquiring the raw materials for a nuclear bomb.”

Worst of all, Iran’s nuclear program is more dangerous than Russia, China, and North Korea’s combined. Keep reading, and I’ll tell you exactly why.

150408_Tom_Iran_845-2

Iran is an Axis-of-Evil country.

They’ve already broken every political agreement they’ve made with anyone. They built their Fordow nuclear site illegally, breaking their last official agreement. What makes anyone believe they’ll keep their word now?

Oh, and they built that facility under a mountain, so that nobody could destroy it. It seems TOO important to them. Why hide and fortify the facility if it’s for peaceful research? You and I both know the answer: it’s not.

Obama’s new “deal” lets Iran keep that facility, even though it’s their prime “research” site for nuclear weapons. All we get in return is another empty promise that they’ll only use it for “peaceful” purposes. Yeah, right.

In previous agreements, we had more control and more safety measures. Our inspection teams could check on suspect assembly and storage sites, making sure they’re safe, and that they’re not being used for weapons research. But the new “deal” forbids surprise inspections. Instead, Iran can schedule whenever is convenient for them, so that they can hide any incriminating evidence before inspectors see it.

This new deal FORBIDS surprise inspections!

In March, Yukiya Amato, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) tried to inspect a number of suspect sites in Iran. He’s the Principal International Inspector for verification that countries are honoring the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. In a report he published on March 23rd, he blew the whistle on Iran’s real intentions: Iran REFUSED to let him inspect their nuclear facilities. If that’s not a BIG RED WARNING about Iran’s evil intentions, I don’t know what is.

2015-11-18_0948

It looks to me like the President has sold us out to our enemies, to his friends fighting to establish…

Islamic Sharia Law all over the world (it’s called the Islamic Republic of Iran for a reason!).

hqdefault

Soon, they’ll easily be able to attack us with nuclear weapons at their convenience, most likely fused to create a high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) because, then, they can take us out with one good hit. When that happens, it will be the biggest TSHTF of our modern times, putting our country back 100s of years, essentially destroying our civilization completely.

It’s personally important to me that this message gets out, so that we stop this threat in its beginnings. That’s why my story, which I’ll share with you over the next few minutes, becomes very relevant.

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

They talk about the coming EMP that will wipe out everything electronic in the country except those in hardened military facilities. Do you have plans to make your own Faraday Cage to protect your electronics?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

#6. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

Suzanne Maloney drags Samuels and his Ben Rhodes profile over the coals one more time:

Samuels writes that the underlying intent of the Iran nuclear deal was to “create the space for America to disentangle itself from its established system of alliances with countries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Israel and Turkey” and “effectively begin the process of a large-scale disengagement from the Middle East.”

The problem with this assertion is that Rhodes never says any such thing. Nor do any of the other U.S. officials quoted in the story, or anyone else for that matter. And nowhere does the article assemble actual evidence to corroborate this provocative description of the Obama administration’s grand strategy in the Middle East [bold mine-DL]. This proposition was first and most fully articulated by my former colleague Michael Doran, now a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, in a 2015 article for an obscure internet magazine that went viral. Its thesis clearly animates many of the deal’s opponents. But absent evidence, the premise that Obama harbors a “secret plan” to jettison America’s deep security partnership with Israel and the Gulf states constitutes pure conjecture, not fact.

The profile’s serious errors are not surprising when we remember that the modus operandi of almost all Iran hawks in the debate over the nuclear deal was to misrepresent everything about the deal and the diplomacy related to it. If the deal blocked Iran’s ability to build a nuclear weapon, opponents of the deal said that it “paved the way” to an Iranian nuke. If it imposed restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program, opponents insisted that the deal “legitimized” Iranian nuclear ambitions. Deal opponents took each detail, turned it on its head, and deliberately spread falsehoods to undermine the deal’s chances of being accepted in the U.S. Similarly, opponents of the deal didn’t attack the agreement as a prelude to rapprochement with Iran because there was any proof that this was the administration’s ultimate goal, but because they knew that if they presented the deal this way it would make it a harder sell at home. “Obama abandons allies” is the story these people have been trying to push for years, and despite the fact that there is no evidence to back it up it persists because it is a useful line of attack.

The profile’s most controversial claim that the administration deceived the public on the nuclear deal is without merit, as Maloney shows once again, but it is consistent with the way that Iran hawks took unremarkable and even positive aspects of diplomacy with Iran and tried to turn them into proof of betrayal and appeasement. There has been a massive campaign of deception perpetrated by one side in this debate, and there has been an attempt to actively mislead the American public about the nuclear deal with Iran, but it wasn’t directed from the White House. It was the concerted effort of the deal’s opponents to sabotage and undermine it, to which this profile makes a belated addition.

www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/the-iran-hawks-campaign-of-deception/

bush_is_a_moonie  posted on  2016-10-23   1:46:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 6.

        There are no replies to Comment # 6.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest