Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Civilian Inmate Labor Program
Source: USAPA Army
URL Source: http://www.usapa.army.mil/pdffiles/r210_35.pdf
Published: Jan 14, 2005
Author: USAPA Army
Post Date: 2006-02-22 20:51:16 by Zipporah
Keywords: Civilian, Program, Inmate
Views: 689
Comments: 10

Civilian Inmate Labor Program 36 pages PDF

*Army Regulation 210–35

AR 210–35 Civilian Inmate Labor Program This rapid action revision dated 14 January 2005-- o Assigns responsibilities to Headquarters, Installation Management Agency (para 1-4j).

o Makes administrative and editorial changes (throughout). This new regulation dated 9 December 1997

o Provides Army policy and guidance for establishing civilian inmate labor programs and civilian prison camps on Army installations.

o Discusses sources of Federal and State civilian inmate labor.

Contents (Listed by paragraph and page number)

Chapter 1

Introduction, page 1

Purpose • 1–1, page 1

References • 1–2, page 1

Explanation of abbreviations and terms • 1–3, page 1

Responsibilities • 1–4, page 1

Civilian inmate labor programs • 1–5, page 2

The process • 1–6, page 2 Chapter 2

Establishing Installation Civilian Inmate Labor Programs, page 4

Policy statement • 2–1, page 4

Chapter 3 Establishing Civilian Inmate Prison Camps on Army Installations, page 8 Policy statement • 3–1, page 8

Negotiating with correctional systems representatives to establish prison camps • 3–2, page 8

Governing criteria civilian inmate prison camps • 3–3, page 8 Governing provisions for operating civilian inmate prison camps on Army installations • 3–4, page 9

Procedures for establishing a civilian inmate prison camp on Army installations • 3–5, page 9

Interservice, interagency, or interdepartmental support agreements • 3–6, page 10

Chapter 4

Reporting and Recordkeeping, page 10

Incident reports • 4–1, page 10

Media coverage • 4–2, page 10

Recordkeeping • 4–3, page 11

Chapter 1 Introduction 1–1. Purpose This regulation provides Army policy and guidance for establishing civilian inmate labor programs and civilian prison camps on Army installations. Sources of civilian inmate labor are limited to on– and off–post Federal corrections facilities, State and/or local corrections facilities operating from on–post prison camps pursuant to leases under Section 2667, Title 10, United States Code (10 USC 2667), and off–post State corrections facilities participating in the demonstration project authorized under Section 1065, Public Law (PL) 103–337. Otherwise, State and/or local inmate labor from off–post corrections facilities is currently excluded from this program.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Zipporah, All (#0)

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Diana  posted on  2006-02-22   20:57:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Zipporah, david irving (#0)

I am sure they will need Zkron B gas chambers to de-louse the inmates, and creamatoriums to hygeneicaly dispose of the dead.

tom007  posted on  2006-02-22   21:04:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Diana (#1)

I know Diana.. this confirms the rumors about the camps.

Zipporah  posted on  2006-02-22   21:06:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Zipporah, diana, red jones, zipporah, christine, brian s (#3)

Ya'll up for a ranchero in Paraguay??, 1000 acres or so? Remote muddy, lots of wildlife and satellite Internet access, learn Queche, live simple, do without elk steaks, get friendly with the local cops, anyone have a cessna 182 and a pilots license?

Looks like WW4 is comming, sponsored by the greedist of the international rulers of the nations.

Might be a party we will want to miss?

I am joking?? 250 acres in Paraguay can make for a a good life, maybe. It would be a little "out of the way", for WW4, that is the point.

Vote with your feet.

tom007  posted on  2006-02-22   21:20:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: tom007 (#4)

Vote with your feet.

I think they're counting on a lot of dissenters just leaving.

"War is a way of shattering to pieces...materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses... too intelligent." ~George Orwell

robin  posted on  2006-02-22   21:24:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: tom007 (#4)

Ya'll up for a ranchero in Paraguay??, 1000 acres or so? Remote muddy, lots of wildlife and satellite Internet access, learn Queche, live simple, do without elk steaks, get friendly with the local cops, anyone have a cessna 182 and a pilots license?

Looks like WW4 is comming, sponsored by the greedist of the international rulers of the nations.

Might be a party we will want to miss?

I am joking?? 250 acres in Paraguay can make for a a good life, maybe. It would be a little "out of the way", for WW4, that is the point.

Vote with your feet.

Seriously.. being out of the way is a great idea.. Beautiful country

Zipporah  posted on  2006-02-22   21:25:58 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Zipporah (#6)

Seriously.. being out of the way is a great idea.. Beautiful country

Fiftyfive million people would have liked to have "been out the way" during WW11.

Prolly comperable to the US in 1890.

I do remember seeing an FULL PAGE ad in the WSJ 25 yo, sponserd by the Paraguaian Gov, offering 10,000 acres plots of land for a song, the song I didn't have at the time,(IIRC $100,000). In the Matto Grasso area, undeveloped, still was the best land grab around.

tom007  posted on  2006-02-22   21:40:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: tom007 (#7)

Fiftyfive million people would have liked to have "been out the way" during WW11.

Prolly comperable to the US in 1890.

I do remember seeing an FULL PAGE ad in the WSJ 25 yo, sponserd by the Paraguaian Gov, offering 10,000 acres plots of land for a song, the song I didn't have at the time,(IIRC $100,000). In the Matto Grasso area, undeveloped, still was the best land grab around.

Not to mention Russia in 1917..

No I dont recall it.. property in Argentina not in the capital and in Paraguay is still very reasonable.

Zipporah  posted on  2006-02-22   21:43:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Zipporah, Indrid cold, diana, red jones (#8)

property in Argentina not in the capital and in Paraguay is still very reasonable.

Three YO when Arg had their currency colapse, Actually said to my DW, we should go down there with a briefcase packed full of $100,000. and buy a ranchero. Or two. It could have happened. Really.

Dicey situation - desperate times, could be a great deal, or could get your throat slit.

We did not do it. Wish we did, tho. If you had dollars you could keepthe Arg gov, from approprationing all the wealth of the landholders, due to the currency collapse.

It is a specialized situations, only for the brave. Three years later we could have very well had a 20,000 acre rancho for song. Or we could be dead.

And then we would have had to try to run an 20,000 Ranchero in Argentia from Colorado Springs.

I have serious trouble running my lawn mower over a quater of an acre.

Still, I do wish we would have risked it. I can easily get kiled tomorrow from many sources. And it would a much less glamorous death than from a SA ranchero Patron.

tom007  posted on  2006-02-22   22:08:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: tom007, Zipporah, All (#4)

When Stalin ruled the Soviet Union and was putting people in camps like crazy, many Russians managed to escape to other countries.

However Stalin had some guys working for him whose job it was to track these escapees down wherever they were, and bring them back to Russia, which they did, then off to the camps these caught escapees went.

And that was almost a century ago when there was much less technology.

I don't think there's any running away for anyone. We're all screwed.

Diana  posted on  2006-02-22   22:13:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest