4um: Stringent PA Laws That Protect Democrat Voter Fraud May Stop Hillary from Stealing US Election

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: Stringent PA Laws That Protect Democrat Voter Fraud May Stop Hillary from Stealing US Election
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201 ... nia-from-stealing-us-election/
Published: Nov 29, 2016
Author: Jim Hoft Nov 29th, 2016 6:55 am
Post Date: 2016-11-29 09:13:11 by HAPPY2BME-4UM
Keywords: None
Views: 807
Comments: 7

Jim Hoft Nov 29th, 2016 6:55 am

Stringent PA Laws That Protect Democrat Voter Fraud May Stop Hillary from Stealing US Election

The problem with Pennsylvania’s recount process though for Stein and Clinton is that according to state law three voters in each precinct or election district in Pennsylvania must submit a notarized affidavit to the clerk in their individual election districts in order to initiate a recount. There are 9,163 precincts in Pennsylvania. As of noon Monday,

"the Philadelphia city Board of Elections had received petitions for 35 of the 1,686 voting divisions in Philadelphia, according to City Commissioner Al Schmidt. By 5:30 p.m., that number was 74— about 4 percent of the city’s total divisions."

Stein needed more than 5,000 people in Philadelphia alone to sign petitions to file for a recount and would have had to mobilize about 30,000 people statewide to get a full recount going in Pennsylvania.

The laws in Pennsylvania are so stringent that it makes it nearly impossible to have a recount in the state. Unfortunately for Republicans there have been numerous mentions of fraud over the years in the city of Philadelphia alone. For example in 2012, in 59 voting divisions in the city, Mitt Romney received not one vote.

The Pennsylvania laws prevent a recount in areas like Philadelphia where there is good reason to suspect Democrat fraud. This year these same stringent laws may prevent Hillary from stealing the US election.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/stringent-laws-may-prevent-hillary-recount-in-pennsylvania-from-stealing-us-election/
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
#1. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)
She's not going to steal the election, recount or no recount, barring something so egregious it would start a civil war.
Hillary would need all 3 of the states of PA, WI, & MI to take the win. Even if she got any 2 of these 3, without the third, Trump still wins, and the number of vote gains in a recount has never resulted in a change big enough to change any of these states, much less PA where Trump got 70,000 more votes than Hillary.
Certainly voter fraud exists, but I'd sooner believe (as I'm sure about all 4um'ers would), that Trump won in spite of vote fraud, not because of it.
I do think Stein, just like all US citizens, has a right to petition for a recount if she wants. Elections are not about the candidates, but about the voters. But her motives and objectives here are not clear. Why only these 3 states that Trump won and not Minnesota & Maine that Hillary won but which were also close?
Is she trying to win respect from democrat voters or publicity to aid the green party for the next election? Is/was she secretly advocating for Hillary the whole election? Is she looking to enrich herself fraudulently?
Stein did seem relatively neutral between Hillary and Trump during the campaign. She was critical of both.
But Trump has won the election and no recount effort will change that. That PA's laws are what they are -- whether they should be or not -- are simply a lock on an otherwise unopenable door.

Pinguinite posted on 2016-11-29 10:25:37 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#2. To: Pinguinite (#1)
Is she trying to win respect from democrat voters or publicity to aid the green party for the next election? Is/was she secretly advocating for Hillary the whole election? Is she looking to enrich herself fraudulently?

=================================================
Did you see the liberal/socialist 'YoungTurks' coverage of the election night?
I think those bastards unintentionally answer most of your questions in how bad Hillary lost, how bad she really, really sucks, and how completely irrelevant she is and will forever be - even for socialist liberal racists like the YTurds.
FF to 21:15. These socialists are calling the bitch 'the worst candidate in history.'
What do you think?

HAPPY2BME-4UM posted on 2016-11-29 13:17:12 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#7. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#2)
Seems they were mad at Hillary for losing, hence the name calling. But prez candidates have lost far worse than Hillary. Mondale in 84 and Carter in 80 both being lopsided for Reagan.
But who cares what others think.

Pinguinite posted on 2016-11-29 23:21:46 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Replies to Comment # 7.
There are no replies to Comment # 7.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um