Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

National News
See other National News Articles

Title: Naval Academy Offers ‘Transgender 101’ For Faculty, Cadets Photo of David Krayden David Krayden
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/08/c ... e-the-cut-for-thank-you-party/
Published: Dec 8, 2016
Author: aa
Post Date: 2016-12-08 14:47:49 by HAPPY2BME-4UM
Keywords: None
Views: 136
Comments: 24

The U.S. Naval Academy is offering a voluntary “Transgender 101” workshop for faculty, staff and cadets this Friday.

Annapolis will host two one-and-a-half-hour sessions conducted by “transgender trainers” Kevin Perry and Marnie Florin. Participants are invited to register online at the academy’s Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL) website. The first session is for faculty and staff and the second is reserved for midshipmen, or cadets. The CTL is paying for the training that is expected to attract over 120 students and staff in total.

The entrance to the U.S. Naval Academy in downtown Annapolis, Md. on October 21, 2012. The campus founded in 1845 is located on the former grounds of Fort Severn. (Photo: Shutterstock)   The entrance to the U.S. Naval Academy in downtown Annapolis, Md. on October 21, 2012. The campus founded in 1845 is located on the former grounds of Fort Severn. (Photo: Shutterstock)   

According to an email released from Annapolis last Friday and obtained by the Washington Free Beacon, those successfully completing the seminar will have the opportunity to publicly display their support for the “trans community.”

“On Friday, December 9, the Center for Teaching & Leaning welcomes Kevin Perry and Marnie Florin who will be presenting Transgender 101: Gender Identity in the Workplace,” the email said. “Marnie and Kevin have given this workshop at Google offices around the globe to more than 2,500 employees.”

“Kevin and Marnie teamed out to create the Trans 101 session with the hope that it would create more supportive and inclusive workplaces by helping people better understand the trans experience and what it means to be an ally to the trans community.”

“Attendees will receive door cards, which they may display if they wish, to indicate that they are allies,” the email promised.

According to Florin’s website, the diversity instructor “identifies as gender neutral and goes by the pronouns ‘ze’ or ‘they.'”

Florin’s first attempt at “LGBTQ training” occurred when she was a volunteer for the U.S. Peace Corps in West Africa. After working for the Los Angeles Gay & Lesbian Center, “ze organized and canvassed for gay marriage.”

googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1422917324169-1'); });

Florin created her Transgender 101 training “after coming out as gender neutral at Columbia Business School” and realizing that her “peers were a bit confused and had a lot of questions.” “Ze” told the New York Times, “I was really disappointed to find that the L.G.B.T. community at Columbia Business School consisted of so many white, cisgender men” (those comfortable in the sex assigned at birth). Few were transgender or lesbian.”

The training now occurs every year at Columbia, where Florin succeeded in creating “a gender neutral bathroom” and “an option other than male and female” for the admissions application form. While working for Google, she and colleague Kevin Perry developed “Transgender @Google,” which has also been presented to staff at YouTube and Twitter.

The United States Navy fully supports the transgender training. In a news release of Nov. 7, 2016, the chief of naval personnel public affairs announced: “To remain the finest seagoing fighting force the world has ever known, the Navy needs men and women who are the right fit for the right job regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, creed, or gender identity.”

Annapolis spokeswoman Dr. Karyn Sproles did not respond to queries from The Daily Caller for comment.


Poster Comment:

=========================================

Irreversible DAMAGE?(1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)

We must be political correct even if it's frells up the military.

Darkwing  posted on  2016-12-08   15:08:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)

Sick shit.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2016-12-08   15:12:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)

Will the men be required to attend class in drag?

All this gay stuff is nothing new for the navy..


"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination

FormerLurker  posted on  2016-12-08   15:59:20 ET  (2 images) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: FormerLurker (#3)

All this gay stuff is nothing new for the navy..

=============================================

You know this because?

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2016-12-08   16:03:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#4) (Edited)

Because I WASN'T in the navy, I was in the USMC... :)

But yep, just do a quick Google scan of "sailors in drag" and you'll see a LOT of bizarro stuff.

It's the reason I DIDN'T want to join the navy, as just a little thinking about what they do when they're at sea for months at a time quickly made me dismiss the idea.

As far as the image I posted, it's the cover of a book that describes the "secret" of gayness in the navy over the years.


"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination

FormerLurker  posted on  2016-12-08   16:07:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#4)

Hell, they didn't even try to hide it back during WWII. This image was from 1945..


"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination

FormerLurker  posted on  2016-12-08   16:10:32 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: FormerLurker (#5)

It's the reason I DIDN'T want to join the navy, as just a little thinking about what they do when they're at sea for months at a time quickly made me dismiss the idea.

==================================================

I wouldn't let a grandson of mine join the military in its current state of sodomy and Gomorrah.

LoL on not wanting to join the navy - imagine the degradation it is now in.

Plus, Obamination's FIRST military directive in '08 was for the USMC to PRIORITIZE recruiting GAYS AND LESBIANS.

FUBAR

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2016-12-08   16:17:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)

Truthfully,this is nothing new to the Navy. Some would even say it is traditional.

Who was it that said the "Royal Navy lives on rum and sodomy!"?

sneakypete  posted on  2016-12-08   17:38:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: FormerLurker (#5)

Because I WASN'T in the navy, I was in the USMC... :)

Reminds of of the old jokes:

"Why do sailors have so many tatoos?

Answer: "So the Marines would have something to read while having sex."

And:

Why does the Navy send Marines to sea with the Navy?"

answer: "So the sailors will have someone to dance with."

sneakypete  posted on  2016-12-08   17:43:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: sneakypete (#8)

Everybody attributes this phrase to Winston Churchill, but on checking, it seems that he denied ever uttering it but "wished he had," in his words.

Another 19th century phrase concerning the British navy: “Ashore it’s wine, women and song; aboard it’s rum, bum and concertina.”

evahthang go' be aw-rite

randge  posted on  2016-12-08   17:51:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: FormerLurker (#3)

attend class in drag

As a young man in Chicago, I was near Clark St an Diversey Avenue. This was the hood the fags hung around. I spotted a drag queen. I said, "I know what you are!" The response was very terse. LOL

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2016-12-08   19:20:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: sneakypete (#9)

I knew a guy in Chicago. His kid brother joined the Navy. Never heard what happened to him after that. Such is life. :-o

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2016-12-08   19:25:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: sneakypete (#9) (Edited)

Why does the Navy send Marines to sea with the Navy?"

answer: "So the sailors will have someone to dance with."

I take it you were a sailor boy, eh pete? :)

Actually, they don't need Marines for that. Sailors dancing with other sailors seems to be an old "tradition".

They don't call each other "mate" for nothing...


"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination

FormerLurker  posted on  2016-12-08   19:36:30 ET  (3 images) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: All (#13)

I bet sailors LUV this song...


"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination

FormerLurker  posted on  2016-12-08   19:40:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#7)

Plus, Obamination's FIRST military directive in '08 was for the USMC to PRIORITIZE recruiting GAYS AND LESBIANS.

Glad I left the Corps long before then.

Equally glad I never served on a ship.


"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination

FormerLurker  posted on  2016-12-08   19:47:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: FormerLurker (#13) (Edited)

I take it you were a sailor boy, eh pete? :)

Nope,career army NCO. We liked females.

I did get stuck with escorting a classified radio van back to Bragg from the DR in 1965,though. It was loaded on a LST pulled up to the beach,and it was also taking a bunch of regular army guys back to the US. There was vomit almost ankle deep in the bunk area where the hammocks were,and the bow was still on the beach.

No way in hell was I sleeping in the hammock area with all those sick hillbillies,so I slept in the cab of the truck that was chained down on deck,or in the radio van that was in the back of the truck.

We hit a tropical storm off of one of the island chains on the way back,and the damn LST was taking 40 degree rolls. I can't begin to imagine what a nightmare that must have been down in the bunk area. I got off the deck and went into the galley and drank coffee and talked with the cooks. No way in hell was I going to stay in that truck parked right next to the rail with the deck rolling like that.

I did work as a deckhand on a shrimp boat the summer I was 13,and then haul seine and set or long haul net fish the rest of the time until I got old enough to enlist in the army,though.

sneakypete  posted on  2016-12-08   21:05:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: sneakypete (#16)

Nope,career army NCO. We liked females.

=====================================

What year did you retire?

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2016-12-08   21:34:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: FormerLurker, sneakypete (#14)

Thanks for your distinguished service.

Fun to watch ancient prehistoric history ..

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2016-12-08   21:48:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#17)

What year did you retire?

I didn't retire. I got out after being medevaced from VN and taken off jump status. That resulted in me having to leave SF and go to a conventional army unit. I was used to working with people ready to help with anything at any time,and suddenly it was like being a babysitter for semi-adults. You had to watch the people under you every instant,or they would disappear,and even if they were there you had to watch them every minute to keep them from bleeping something up. A couple of the people under me had IQ's so low they were barely qualified to be drafted. IIRC,a couple of them had GT scores right at 70. Everybody in SF had a GT score of 120 or higher to give you a reference point.

Also,the regular army didn't seem to appreciate the way I handled malcontents that tried to give me grief,so I spent the last few months of my army career riding my Harley around the motor pool at night as a motor pool guard.

The promised me a promotion if I would re-enlist and even promised to get me orders back to VN,but I had all of the regular army I could stand by that time and all I wanted was out. Especially after I had already seen how the regular army had to live in VN. There were guys there that served their whole tours as road guards living in a cave carved out of a clay hill,and they mostly ate C-Rations. Looking back,I probably should have gone for the deal because once back in VN I could have contacted the 5th group SGM and got sent back to SF as some sort of HQ company geek,and worked in an air-conditioned office. My rucksack days were over,though.

Where I screwed up is I was offered medical retirement before leaving SF,and not having anyone to advise me,turned it down because I thought I could get out and then come back in a few months later after the vacation if I didn't like being a civilian. I was told that if I took a medical,there was no chance of that happening. Damn shame I didn't have anybody to advise me that getting out with a permanent profile meant I wouldn't be allowed to get back in anyhow.

I had 7 years of AD. A little over 5 of them with SF.

sneakypete  posted on  2016-12-08   21:57:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#18)

Thanks for your distinguished service.

ROFLMAO! I can't speak for Former Lurker,but as for me,I knew of a couple of SGM's that would laugh so hard hearing that said about me they would need oxygen.

I wasn't exactly a "wear red and march in a straight line" soldier. Not even by SF standards. I once even left VN illegally for a week and took a flight back to Okinawa to visit friends and ride the motorcycle I had left there. An "extra R&R" that I fabricated on my own. I technically made it legal by getting a clerk friend to type up orders making me a classified courier taking "safe hands" to Okie. That's also how I got the free round trip jet trip ticket.

In my defense,I DID call the recon company 1st sgt and tell him where I would be and told him who to call in 1st group if something came up and I was needed back right away,so I wasn't really AWOL. And I did carry "Safe Hands" back to 1st group hqs on Okie. I just wandered into the signal company area in VN,showed them my orders,and asked if they had anything going to Okie. I knew the Warrant Officer in charge of the com center and he knew me from Okie,so that was no problem.

And I used the same briefcase handcuffed to my wrist that I carried the safe hands to Okie in to smuggle a BUNCH of Seiko and Citizens watches back into VN,and stood outside the big PX in Nha Trang on pay day and sold every day one of them for twice what I had paid for them on Okie,and still sold them cheaper than the PX was selling them.

And "yes,I did get back to the camp before my team was alerted for another mission,so it was all good.

Not so sure how "distinguished" stuff like that make me,though.

sneakypete  posted on  2016-12-08   22:10:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#18)

There is no way to over-estimate the value of LST's when it comes to our victories in WW*2. They weren't heavily armed and they weren't sexy,but they contributed MUCH more to our victory than the battleships.

sneakypete  posted on  2016-12-08   22:22:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: sneakypete (#20)

Not so sure how "distinguished" stuff like that make me,though.

=========================================

Thanks for all that.

I would call you 'sir,' but you would just try to bitch slap me for it.

;>)

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2016-12-09   0:36:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: sneakypete (#21)

There is no way to over-estimate the value of LST's when it comes to our victories in WW*2. They weren't heavily armed and they weren't sexy,but they contributed MUCH more to our victory than the battleships.

===============================================

Yeah, after you brought up the LSTs, I researched it some more on their mission contributions in WW2, Korea (Inchon was big), and VN.

I didn't realize the major role those cheap tin boats played in winning WW2.

I was AF, but had a Navy prior service buddy who said the LSTs were the reason he got out of the Navy during Nam.

FWIW, my brother was USMC Air Recon (Yankee Pappa 13) out of Da Nang and served three consecutive tours in Nam '65-'68. Shot down three times flying Baby Huey recons, one in N. VN. and one in (either) Laos or Thailand. He turned down Purple Hearts to stay in Nam. Life magazine did a big article on his unit in '67 (Yankee Pappa 13).

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2016-12-09   0:42:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#23) (Edited)

I was AF, but had a Navy prior service buddy who said the LSTs were the reason he got out of the Navy during Nam.

The major problem with them is they had flat bottoms so they could run right up to the beach in shallow water.

Which made them a nightmare to be on in deep water during heavy weather. They didn't "sail" so much as they "wallowed",and since they were made to be flexible so they could deal with hitting sandbars and by VN they were about 2 decades past their "best used by" date,they were scary as hell during a storm.

Sailing somewhere on one in the open sea once is an adventure. More that once could be a nightmare.

BTW,I had a cousin get out of the USAF in the early 60's and enlist in the Navy because it was almost impossible to get promoted in the USAF back then. He was a jet mechanic of some sort,and had been in 8 years and was still a E-4. So he switched to the Navy to make more rank. He had grown up around water and fishing,so going to sea wasn't a concern. He spent most of the next 10+ years on a destroyer,and seasick as a dog. He finally got assigned to shore duty at Rota (?),Spain the last few years before retirement,and ended up marrying a Spanish woman and opening a bar. I think he retired as a E-7,so in the long run the move to the Navy really worked out for him.

FWIW, my brother was USMC Air Recon (Yankee Pappa 13) out of Da Nang and served three consecutive tours in Nam '65-'68. Shot down three times flying Baby Huey recons, one in N. VN. and one in (either) Laos or Thailand. He turned down Purple Hearts to stay in Nam. Life magazine did a big article on his unit in '67 (Yankee Pappa 13).

Sounds like he must have been flying dust-off flights for the SOG guys out of FOB-1 (CCN) in Da Nang. They used a lot of USMC aerial support. I operated out of FOB-2 in Kontum,and all of our aerial support came from either the US Army,or the South Vietnamese Air Force.

BTW,the second incident had to have been in Laos because nobody was getting shot down in Thailand. In fact,the USAF had a huey squadron that operated out of Thailand that inserted SOG Teams in the areas nearer to Thailand than VN. It wasn't done often,but it was done. Or so I have been told,anyway.

sneakypete  posted on  2016-12-09   8:40:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest