Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Business/Finance
See other Business/Finance Articles
Title: Supreme Court throws out Apple’s $399M win in Samsung patent fight
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.mercurynews.com/2016/12/ ... m-win-in-samsung-patent-fight/
Published: Dec 8, 2016
Author: UPDATED: December 7, 2016 at 3:21 am
Post Date: 2016-12-08 16:01:50 by HAPPY2BME-4UM
Keywords: None
Views: 40
mercurynews.com
UPDATED: December 7, 2016 at 3:21 am
CUPERTINO — In a unanimous decision Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court threw out a lower court’s $399 million judgment against Samsung for violating patents involving Apple’s iPhone.
The decision overturns a victory that Apple had won in the Washington, D.C.-based U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. The case will now go back to that court for any further proceedings, including determining what, if any, lower penalties Samsung may have to pay Apple.
Tech giants such as Google, Facebook and Hewlett Packard Enterprise had urged the Supreme Court to take up Samsung’s appeal of its patent loss to Apple, warning that the outcome against Samsung “will lead to absurd results and have a devastating impact on companies” because of the implications of how patent law is applied to technology products such as smartphones.
It was the first time the Supreme Court made a ruling on a product design since 1885, when it heard a case involving carpet designs. Case Collard, an intellectual property lawyer in Denver with the law firm Dorsey & Whitney, said the 8-0 court opinion, written by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, may end up being historical in its reach.
“The Supreme Court’s decision brings damages law for design patents into accord with the damages law for utility patents,” Collard said. “No longer can a patent holder get all of the profits from the sales of a product infringing a design patent. Instead, they may recover the profits attributable to the infringing feature.”
http://www.mercurynews.com/2016/12/06/supreme-court-throws-out-apples-399m-win-in-samsung-patent-fight/
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread