4um: Michigan Recount Uncovers Too Many Votes in 37% of Detroit Precincts

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
National News
See other National News Articles
Title: Michigan Recount Uncovers Too Many Votes in 37% of Detroit Precincts
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201 ... ny-votes-37-detroit-precincts/
Published: Dec 13, 2016
Author: aa
Post Date: 2016-12-13 12:58:21 by HAPPY2BME-4UM
Keywords: None
Views: 57
Comments: 7

Green Party candidate Jill Stein’s Michigan recount unintentionally exposed major voter fraud in Detroit.
Election officials in Michigan found that 37% of precincts in Detroit tabulated more ballots than the number of voters tallied by workers in the poll books.
Hillary Clinton won Wayne County over Donald Trump 67% to 30%.
State officials are planning to examine about 20 Detroit precincts where ballot discrepancies occurred.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)
Headline you won't see:
Green Party Recounts Uncover Widespread Democrat Vote Fraud
evahthang go' be aw-rite
randge posted on 2016-12-13 13:02:54 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#2. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#0)
Dead and other illegal votes matter.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
Lod posted on 2016-12-13 13:03:13 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#3. To: randge (#1)
==========================================
Focusing on the MARGIN that Hillary beat Trump in Detroit (where the largest vote density is in the entire state), one come up with the conclusion that Hillary did NOT win those votes (that did not exist).
Also, the (fake) counted votes were EXACTLY the number of votes require for Hillary to win Detroit and that county:

Hillary Clinton won Wayne County over Donald Trump 67% to 30%.

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
HAPPY2BME-4UM posted on 2016-12-13 13:14:26 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#4. To: Lod, randge (#2)
State officials are planning to examine about 20 Detroit precincts where ballot discrepancies occurred.
Detroit News reported:
Voting machines in more than one-third of all Detroit precincts registered more votes than they should have during last month’s presidential election, according to Wayne County records prepared at the request of The Detroit News.
Detailed reports from the office of Wayne County Clerk Cathy Garrett show optical scanners at 248 of the city’s 662 precincts, or 37 percent, tabulated more ballots than the number of voters tallied by workers in the poll books. Voting irregularities in Detroit have spurred plans for an audit by Michigan Secretary of State Ruth Johnson’s office, Elections Director Chris Thomas said Monday.
The Detroit precincts are among those that couldn’t be counted during a statewide presidential recount that began last week and ended Friday following a decision by the Michigan Supreme Court.
Democrat Hillary Clinton overwhelmingly prevailed in Detroit and Wayne County. But Republican President-elect Donald Trump won Michigan by 10,704 votes or 47.5 percent to 47.3 percent.
Overall, state records show 10.6 percent of the precincts in the 22 counties that began the retabulation process couldn’t be recounted because of state law that bars recounts for unbalanced precincts or ones with broken seals.
The problems were the worst in Detroit, where discrepancies meant officials couldn’t recount votes in 392 precincts, or nearly 60 percent. And two-thirds of those precincts had too many votes.
“There’s always going to be small problems to some degree, but we didn’t expect the degree of problem we saw in Detroit. This isn’t normal,” said Krista Haroutunian, chairwoman of the Wayne County Board of Canvassers.
State officials are planning to examine about 20 Detroit precincts where ballot boxes opened during the recount had fewer ballots than poll workers had recorded on Election Day.

Previously: Michigan Recount Uncovers Serious Voter Fraud in Detroit- VOTES COUNTED UP TO 6 TIMES
U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
HAPPY2BME-4UM posted on 2016-12-13 13:16:34 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#5. To: All (#4)
According To Detroit News, the voting audit revealed that over one-third of voting machines had registered more votes than they should have.
Detailed reports from the office of Wayne County Clerk Cathy Garrett show optical scanners at 248 of the city’s 662 precincts, or 37 percent, tabulated more ballots than the number of voters tallied by workers in the poll books. Voting irregularities in Detroit have spurred plans for an audit by Michigan Secretary of State Ruth Johnson’s office, Elections Director Chris Thomas said Monday.

Unfortunately, while the problem is the worst in Detroit, the law bars a recount in areas with “broken seals.”
It’s worth noting that Hillary Clinton won Detroit overwhelmingly, but in the end the Michigan electoral votes went to President-elect Donald Trump.
The Detroit News last week was first to report that more than half of Detroit would be ineligible for the recount because of the irregularities. The results were based on county reports obtained by The News.
The new report, compiled by Wayne County elections officials, sheds light on the extent of the problems and shows a systematic tendency toward counting more votes than the previous Wayne County report, which didn’t specify if precincts had over-counted or under-counted ballots.
Republican state senators last week called for an investigation in Wayne County, including one precinct where a Detroit ballot box contained only 50 of the 306 ballots listed in a poll book, according to an observer for Trump.

Is it worth another look into the election to see if there was any overwhelming vote fraud taking place in other areas? I personally think that would be a good use of taxpayer dollars.
U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY
HAPPY2BME-4UM posted on 2016-12-13 21:27:04 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#6. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM (#5) (Edited)
Is it worth another look into the election to see if there was any overwhelming vote fraud taking place in other areas? I personally think that would be a good use of taxpayer dollars.

VOTER FRAUD IS AN ACT OF TREASON!. ANY QUESTIONS?

Forgot being politically correct to avoid offending the vote riggers. The globalist do not care what they say or do will offend us or not. ... We must take it serious calling stealing the election a high crime against the will of the people. When I say high crime. I call it the high crime of TREASON. I say this scathing remark without any reservation. We must call voter fraud for what it is. That is stealing the elections is treason. So calling the vote riggers traitors when they are caught needs to be the mantra.
Election fraud is treason because it is an overthrow of the government consisting of the will of the people as outlined in the Declaration of Independence stating:
“All just powers derive from the consent of the governed”

Edit to add this Celebrate America historicity notation @ Constitutional Rights Foundation.

Important Ideas: consent of the governed
The Declaration of Independence says, “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” This means that government gets all its power from the people. The people set up the government.

-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
GreyLmist posted on 2016-12-14 2:10:53 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#7. To: All (#6) (Edited)
Forgot being politically correct to avoid offending the vote riggers. The globalist do not care what they say or do will offend us or not.

Ref. compliation from Voter ID laws in the United States - Wikipedia + image page with File:Map of US Voter ID Laws by State, Strict vs Non-Strict, Nov 2016.svg

Red = Photo ID required (Strict) -- 7 of 50 States
Strict photo ID required: Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin.
Orange = Photo ID requested (Non-strict) -- 8 of 50 States
Non-Strict photo ID required/requested: Alabama, Florida, Idaho, Louisiana, Michigan, Rhode Island, South Dakota and Texas.
Dark Blue = Non-photo ID required (Strict) -- 3 of 50 States
Strict non-photo ID required: Arizona, North Dakota and Ohio.
Light Blue = Non-photo ID requested (Non-strict) -- 14 of 50 States
Non-Strict non-photo ID required/requested: Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Kentucky, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, and Washington.
White = No ID required to vote -- 18 of 50 States + D.C. [38%]
No ID required to vote at ballot box: California, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont, West Virginia, Wyoming, and Washington, D.C.

Examples of Globalist/Commiecrat spinmeistering on the subject:

UFO Sightings Are More Common Than Voter Fraud - motherjones.com | JULY/AUGUST 2012 ISSUE

1. Map of Voter ID Laws Currently in Effect *Does not include laws awaiting DOJ clearance, blocked by courts, or not in effect until after 2012. Source: National Conference of State Legislatures
2. Map of State Efforts to Restrict Voting, 2011-12 *Sources: Brennan Center for Justice, NAACP

U.S. Vote Suppression/Voter ID Map of Shame - crewof42.com | JULY 14, 2011

Map of Shame: Vote Suppression Legislation by State *copyright 2011 Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
[IOW, States with so-called "Repressive" Election Legislation ... States with Proof of Citizenship Laws ...]

Catherine Engelbrecht: Voter Fraud Has Been ‘Institutionalized,’ Allowing Non-Citizen Voters to ‘Flood Our Rolls’ - breitbart.com | 2016/11/29
From a contemplative comment there:

The solution is equally two-pronged: Trump's Border Wall and what I call The National Voter Identification Act. ... Legal citizens must identify as such to vote; we must make it easy for a true citizen to ID prior to a vote, ... States that don't comply with the NVIA, after due process, should lose control of voting administration in their state. The Feds take it over for five years, then a court reviews whether the State will comply. It's best that individual State control their voting mechanics. If we don't remedy BOTH problems, we make it easy for our opponents to attempt to steal our future. National Voter Identification Act is just as important as building a border wall !

-------
"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
GreyLmist posted on 2016-12-14 4:52:49 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um