Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: Trump Aims To Cut The Neocon Deep State Off At The Knees
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017- ... ms-cut-neocon-deep-state-knees
Published: Jan 5, 2017
Author: Tyler Durden
Post Date: 2017-01-06 00:02:11 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 130
Comments: 6

The Neocon-Neoliberals must be fired and put out to pasture before they do any more harm.

I have long held that America's Deep State--the unelected National Security State often referred to as the Shadow Government--is not a unified monolith but a deeply divided ecosystem in which the dominant Neocon-Neoliberal Oligarchy is being challenged by elements which view the Neocon-Neoliberal agenda as a threat to national security and the interests of the United States.

I call these anti-Neocon-Neoliberal elements the progressive Deep State.

If you want a working definition of the Neocon-Neoliberal Deep State, Hillary Clinton's quip--we came, we saw, he died--is a good summary: a bullying, arrogance-soaked state-within-a-state pursuing an agenda of ceaseless intervention while operating a global Murder, Inc., supremely confident that no one in the elected government can touch them.

Until Trump unexpectedly wrenched the presidency from the Neocon's candidate. The Neocon Deep State's response was to manufacture a mass-media hysteria that Russia had wrongfully deprived the Neocon's candidate (Hillary Clinton) of what was rightfully hers: the presidency. (The Neocons operate their own version of the divine right of Political Nobility.)

The Neocon-Neoliberals' strategy was to delegitimize Trump's victory by ascribing it to "Russian Hacking," a claim that remains entirely unsubstantiated. Now that this grasping-at-straws Hail Mary coup attempt by a politicized C.I.A. and its corporate media mouthpiece has failed, the Neocon Deep State is about to find out the Progressive Deep State finally has a president who is willing and able to cut the Neocon-Neoliberals off at the knees.

Trump Is Working On A Plan To Restructure, Pare Back The CIA And America's Top Spy Agency.

If you want documented evidence of this split in the Deep State--sorry, it doesn't work that way. Nobody in the higher echelons of the Deep State is going to leak anything about the low-intensity war being waged because the one thing everyone agrees on is the Deep State's dirty laundry must be kept private.

As a result, the split is visible only by carefully reading between the lines, by examining who is being placed in positions of control in the Trump Administration, and reading the tea leaves of who is "retiring" (i.e. being fired) or quitting, which agencies are suddenly being reorganized, and the appearance of dissenting views in journals that serve as public conduits for Deep State narratives.

I have also long held that Wall Street's political dominance is part and parcel of the Neocon-Neoliberal ideology, and the progressive elements in the Deep State also want to (finally) limit the power of the big banks and the rest of the Wall Street crowd.

Is the Deep State Fracturing into Disunity? (March 14, 2014)

The split in the Deep State is a reflection of the profound political disunity that is occurring in the U.S. In other words, it isn't just disunity in the masses or the political elites--it's a division in all levels of our society.

The cause is not difficult to discern: the concentration of wealth and political power in the hands of the few is generating levels of inequality that threaten democracy, the social order and the vitality of the economy:

As someone who has studied the Deep State for 40 years, I find it ironic that so many self-identified "progressives" do not understand that the U.S. military is now the Progressive element and it's the civilian leadership--the Neocon- Neoliberals-- who are responsible for leading the nation into quagmires and handing the keys to the chicken coop to the wolves of Wall Street.

When military leaders such as Eric Shinseki questioned the Neocon's insane "strategy" in Iraq--essentially a civilian fantasy of magical-thinking--the Neocons quickly cashiered him (Shinseki was a wounded combat veteran of Vietnam who rose through the ranks--the exact opposite of the coddled never-get-my- hands-dirty Elites in the civilian Neocon-Neoliberal leadership.)

To the degree that the U.S. has become a Third World Oligarchy owned and controlled by a financial-political Elite, then the U.S. military is one of the few national institutions that hasn't been corrupted by top-down politicization and worship of Wall Street.

Shinseki et al. did not amass a fortune from Wall Street like Bill and Hillary Clinton. The simple dictum--follow the money--maps the lay of the land rather neatly.

The Neocon-Neoliberals have run the nation into the ground. They must be fired and put out to pasture before they do any more harm. That includes the Fake- "Progressives" and the fake-"Conservatives" alike who have enriched themselves within the Neocon-Neoliberal Oligarchy.

If you are surprised that the Democratic Party, the C.I.A. and Wall Street are all hugging each other in the same cozy Neocon-Neoliberal Oligarchic embrace, you shouldn't be. Open your eyes.

Could the Deep State Be Sabotaging Hillary? (August 8, 2016) (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Horse (#0) (Edited)

When military leaders such as Eric Shinseki questioned the Neocon's insane "strategy" in Iraq--essentially a civilian fantasy of magical-thinking--the Neocons quickly cashiered him (Shinseki was a wounded combat veteran of Vietnam who rose through the ranks--the exact opposite of the coddled never-get-my-hands-dirty Elites in the civilian Neocon-Neoliberal leadership.)

To the degree that the U.S. has become a Third World Oligarchy owned and controlled by a financial-political Elite, then the U.S. military is one of the few national institutions that hasn't been corrupted by top-down politicization and worship of Wall Street.

Shinseki et al. did not amass a fortune from Wall Street like Bill and Hillary Clinton. The simple dictum--follow the money--maps the lay of the land rather neatly.

The Neocon-Neoliberals have run the nation into the ground. They must be fired and put out to pasture before they do any more harm. That includes the Fake-"Progressives" and the fake-"Conservatives" alike who have enriched themselves within the Neocon- Neoliberal Oligarchy.

Yes, follow the money ... to China and Israel, etc. before presuming that Shinseki, the Clinton admins, et al didn't profit from our troops being blown up in Iraq and other "scorched earth" designs of a sort by that cadre on their way out the door before GWBush and fellow-Neocons took over the .gov helm from them. Shinseki was a Clinton sidekick who assisted him in de-armouring the Army. When sent to Iraq, our troops had to use sandbags and scavenged parts to "up-armour" their vehicles in attempts to shield themselves from IEDs. Israel was one of the war-profiteering contractor outlets for "up-armour kits". As an additional swipe at the Military by Clinton & Clique, the Rangers' black beret was taken from them and assigned to the regular Army. To fill the massive orders for refitting most of the Army with black berets, Clinton illegally outsourced the production to China in violation of Law. Shinseki wasn't questioning the Neocons' insane "strategy" in Iraq. He simply stated the obvious that more troops would be needed there. At most, he might have spoken up that much because he knew that he was largely responsible for needless endangerment they would face without enough properly armoured vehicles in that "theatre".

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2017-01-06   12:54:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: All (#1) (Edited)

Shinseki was a Clinton sidekick who assisted him in de-armouring the Army. When sent to Iraq, our troops had to use sandbags and scavenged parts to "up-armour" their vehicles in attempts to shield themselves from IEDs.

Cross-referencing 4um Title: OBAMA LEGACY: TANKS DEPLOYED TO COUNTER RUSSIA ARRIVE WITH DEAD BATTERIES, NO FUEL

"Gifts" for Poland and company. Archiving: [deleted to replace source]

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2017-01-27   8:03:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: All (#2) (Edited)

Shinseki was a Clinton sidekick who assisted him in de-armouring the Army. When sent to Iraq, our troops had to use sandbags and scavenged parts to "up-armour" their vehicles in attempts to shield themselves from IEDs.

Archiving: [deleted to replace source]

Found a different source for the deleted info, cited at a freerepublic.com topic [Stryker Strikes Out], but that one is unavailable.

3 comments from the [2003] Free Republic discussion:

"Shinseki is on record as saying that he would like to get rid of ALL the tracked vehicles that the Army has."

"When Shinseki first came on board (under Clinton) I think the prevailing 'wisdom' was that we'd only be involved in peacekeeping missions in the future. That 'meels-on-wheels' mentality eventually led to what I call the 'Shinseki' (IMO we should name the failed vehicle after it's failed champion)."

"My newest b---- about the Shinseki For Senate Limo (Stryker) has to do with the stop-gap approach they used to upgrading the protective armor. Once the armor is in place, the crew can no longer reach the self-recovery wench. It also requires two or more crew members to successfully muscle open the hatches once the weight of armor plating is added on. I'm thinking any armored Stryker that rolls over or that gets mired during a river crossing is an inescapable death trap."


Alternate reports on Shinseki's push to phase out tanks/tracked vehicles for lighter and faster, less protective wheeled vehicles:


Army mulls cutting tanks in favor of lighter, high-tech force - FCW magazine, The Business of Federal Technology

By Bob Brewin Oct 11, 1999

Gen. Eric Shinseki, chief of staff of the Army, today called for a "major transformation" of the Army within the next decade that could include an abandonment of all tracked vehicles in favor of a lean fighting force that relies heavily on command, control and communications technology.

Shinseki, speaking in Washington, D.C., at the annual Association of the U.S. Army conference, said the Army this year will set up a new experimental light brigade at Fort Lewis, Wash., that will test these new concepts using new mobile platforms available in the commercial marketplace. According to Shinseki, the Army must transform itself from a heavy force designed to fight the Cold War with megaton tanks and tracked fighting vehicles into a service with "agility and versatility [and] a vibrant capability for reach-back communications and intelligence."

Although the Army has relied on tracked vehicles to fight every major battle since World War II, Shinseki said "we can go to an all-wheeled [vehicle] fleet," to replace the tracked vehicles.


NOT YOUR FATHER'S ARMY - newsweek.com

BY JOHN BARRY ON 11/21/99

Gen. Eric Shinseki, chief of staff of the Army, looks and sounds like the future. ... he talks about the need to "transform" the Army into a leaner, quicker fighting force that can go anywhere in the world on short notice. ... He has even openly discussed replacing the Army's most sainted weapon, the tank, with lighter wheeled armored vehicles.


Army stakes its future on speed - govexec.com

By Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. June 5, 2000

No one denies that the Army's new medium brigade sacrifices something for the ability to move overseas rapidly. What it gives up is armor. Armor means weight,

In addition to the technological and organizational challenges of creating a lighter, faster force, the Army faces money problems.

Repairing and replacing the Army's aging heavy weapons was overburdening the budget

a 20-ton vehicle is just much more vulnerable than a heavier one. If a heavy tank cannon, like the 120 mm on the Abrams, for example, hit the new 20-ton vehicle, the impact would spin it like a top, confided a contractor who builds the light machines.

So what can a 20-ton vehicle survive? What most manufacturers offer, and the Army will require, is enough armor to stop 7.62 mm bullets from a light machine gun, the kind a single soldier can carry. Additional armor that can be bolted on after landing should be able to stop bullets from a 14.5 mm heavy machine gun (like the classic U.S. .50-caliber) and primitive rockets such as the Russian rocket-propelled grenades. Forget about stopping a missile or a tank cannon


Army Holds Its Ground in Battle With Rumsfeld - latimes.com

November 29, 2002 | John Hendren | Times Staff Writer

WASHINGTON — Gen. Eric Shinseki, the Army's chief of staff, is helping to direct a low-intensity war in Afghanistan and preparing for a possible invasion of Iraq.

Sources say Rumsfeld will spare from planned budget cuts a light-armor program that Shinseki says is critical for remaking the Army into the more high-tech, faster-moving strike force that the Defense secretary is demanding.

Shinseki came up with the idea for revamping six existing Army brigades as Stryker brigades ... [He] envisioned six brigades of 3,500 men each, outfitted with fast-moving wheeled troop carriers, heavy weaponry and high-tech communication equipment. They would deploy anywhere on the globe within four days and fight smart when they got there.

The plan was to turn out the first brigade by May 2003, then one a year through 2008.


Shinseki in the news more recently:


10 Things You Didn’t Know About Gen. Eric Shinseki - usnews.com

By Bobbie Kyle Sauer | Staff Writer Dec. 18, 2008

President-elect Barack Obama named Shinseki secretary of Veterans Affairs.


Top Republicans join call for Shinseki ouster - stripes.com

By CHRIS CARROLL | STARS AND STRIPES

Published: May 6, 2014

WASHINGTON — Some key Republican legislators are joining with two prominent veterans groups to call for the resignation of Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki.

On Tuesday, Texas Sen. John Cornyn, the No. 2 Republican in the Senate, and Sen. Jerry Moran, R-Kan., a member of the Veteran’s affairs committee, said Shinseki should leave the VA.

“He needs to step down,” Cornyn told reporters. “The president needs to find a new leader to lead this organization out of the wilderness, and back to providing the service our veterans deserve.”

In a Senate speech earlier in the day, Moran said Shinseki seemed unwilling or unable to fix the department’s problems.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2017-01-27   12:52:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Horse (#0)

DRAIN THE SWAMP

U.S. Constitution - Article IV, Section 4: NO BORDERS + NO LAWS = NO COUNTRY

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2017-01-27   13:04:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: All (#1) (Edited)

Shinseki was a Clinton sidekick who assisted him in de-armouring the Army. When sent to Iraq, our troops had to use sandbags and scavenged parts to "up-armour" their vehicles in attempts to shield themselves from IEDs. Israel was one of the war-profiteering contractor outlets for "up-armour kits".

More on those issues at Post #3 and at these 2 articles:

Army Approaches Decision on Interim Combat Vehicle - nationaldefensemagazine.org

September 2000

by Harold Kennedy

Shinseki's plan calls for the new brigades to trade in many of their 70-ton Abrams tanks for mobile gun systems that weigh perhaps as little as a third of that and can be loaded on to a C-130 Hercules air transport. The new brigades are intended to be models for the entire Army. It will take at least another decade, Shinseki estimates, to complete the service's transformation into what he calls "the Objective Force."

"We're talking about transforming the entire Army," [Maj. Gen. James M.] Dubik said. "You can't do that without problems. But they're the kinds of problems we want. Transformation is about creating our future."

Shinseki wants to have five of the new brigades by 2003.

many are concerned that the new vehicles-while lighter than the Abrams-lack sufficient armor to survive a battle with heavy tanks. [Maj. Gen. B.B. Bell, the Army's chief of armor] conceded that survivability is a concern, asking:

"How do you build a light platform that performs like an Abrams?" On this topic, he said, the Army needs to think like the Air Force. "The Air Force does not accept being hit." Bell said. "The reason is obvious: It's usually quite lethal."

Army tanks, on the other hand, "have always taken the hit and defeated it with armor," Bell said. With the IAVs [Interim Armored Vehicles/Strykers], he said, that strategy has to change.

Still, Bell is optimistic. "The scientists today are telling us there are some possibilities out there," he said.

It will be years, however, before any new technology is ready for use, Shinseki warned. "Between now and 2010, there will be no change," he said. "What you see is what we'll take to war."


U.S. GETS EXPLOSIVE ARMOR FROM ISRAEL - defensetech.org, TOPICS:Armor

POSTED BY: NOAHMAX MAY 19, 2004

The U.S. Army wants to protect its Bradley fighting vehicles — by strapping dozens of Israeli explosives to their skins.

The idea behind “reactive armor” is to blow up a roadside bomb or rocket propelled grenade just before it reaches the vehicle. The Israeli military pioneered the concept in the 1970’s. American tanks have had been outfitted with it for years. And now, Bradleys in Iraq are being rushed the armor, too, Defense News reports.

The add-on armor… consists of 105 tiles that attach to the sides, the turret and the front of each Bradley. Each tile has a small explosive charge that can destroy the warhead of an attacking missile or rocket.

THERE’S MORE: “I’d be leery of taking these into situations where large numbers of noncombatants might find themselves near [reactive armored] vehicles,” says Defense Tech reader JA. “An RPG hit that triggered one of these panels might not penetrate the vehicle but I suspect the potential for exacerbating collateral casualties might give one pause. Or it will after Al-Jazeera trumpets it from the minarets.”

Meanwhile, reader MS points us to this online primer on reactive armor [site unavailable].

AND MORE: “The story here,” says reader DP, “is that the cheapskate Army under [chief of staff Eric] Shinseki squandered billions on handfuls of Stryker truck deathtraps and didn’t even come close to buying enough reactive armor.”

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2017-01-27   14:03:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: GreyLmist (#2) (Edited)

Shinseki effectively sabotaged the Army and its ability to fight with armor. All one needs to do is study Patton and his strategy in WW II to see how it is done. History makes the difference. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2017-01-27   15:44:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest