Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: Color Revolutions
Source: youtube.com
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KWKw1WnziY
Published: Jul 12, 2009
Author: NXSchell
Post Date: 2017-01-24 15:55:02 by GreyLmist
Keywords: Color Revolution, Net-Centric Warfare, regime change, NGOs
Views: 556
Comments: 17

From the Description section:

The aim is regime change through non-violent strikes, mass street protests, and media agitation-propaganda.


[Some] Key NGOs active in regime change: [Refs. at 0:53 of the 4.5 min. video: The "Non-Governmental" Organizations (NGOs)]

http://www.ned.org/publications/05annual/toc.html [National Endowment for Democracy]

http://www.iri.org [International Republican Institute - AZ Sen. John McCain, Chairman]

http://www.freedomhouse.org

http://www.ndi.org/ [National Democratic Institute for International Affairs - Madeline Albright, Chairman and Fmr. Sec. of State (Clinton admin.)]

http://www.soros.org/about/foundations


Poster Comment:

Additional article ref.

COLOR REVOLUTIONS AS AN ELEMENT OF NET-CENTRIC WARFARE - southfront.org 25.02.2016. Excerpts:

The main content of all “net-centric wars” consists of “effects-based operations” (EBO). This is the most important concept in the entire net-centric warfare theory developed in the US. EBO are defined by US specialists as a “combination of actions aimed at forming a specific model of behavior among friends, neutral forces, and enemies during peace, crisis, and war.” (Edward A. Smith, Jr. "Effects based Operations. Applying Network centric Warfare in Peace, Crisis and War", Washington, DC: DoD CCRP, 2002.) EBO’s main result is the establishment of full and absolute control over all parties to the conflict (including armed conflict), and their complete manipulation under all circumstances. Including when the conflict is ongoing, when it is threatening, and when there is peace.

The essence of “net-centric warfare” is that it does not have a beginning or an end, it is being conducted on a permanent basis,

It’s a design for global manipulation and total control on a world scale. That is apparent from the EBO definition.

Today one of the characteristic manifestations of NCW [Net-Centric Warfare] in a globalizing world are “color revolutions”. A Color Revolution (CR) is a net-centric operation whose objective is the removal of existing political regimes in another country. It is based on “non-violent struggle” methods developed by George Sharp in the 1980s (a US product, one of net-centric technologies). The CR concept implies establishing full control over a country and its territory without the use of armed force, if possible. It can be achieved by applying “soft power” which US political scientist Joseph Nye Jr. defines as a state’s (or alliance’s or coalition’s) ability achieve desired international results through persuasion and not suppression, imposition, or compellence, which is characteristic of “hard power.” Soft power achieves its effect by inducing others to adhere to certain international norms of behavior, which leads to the desired outcome without applying compellence.

Color Revolution consequences.

For states and political systems, CRs contain aspects of colonialism. The interests of the target society are not taken into consideration, it is expendable ... The society itself is destabilized, social foundations are undermined, the respect for government disappears, dissatisfaction increases, and economy is in anything but a normal state. These are the ideal conditions to impose Western social models. US enters the country.

In the last 20 years, US and NATO transformed Ukraine into a country hostile to Russia also through the application of net-centric technologies. ... The outcome is the country’s territory passing under US control. ... Being a nuclear weapons state, Russia is considered by the US and NATO one of its main geopolitical adversaries.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 17.

#2. To: GreyLmist (#0)

Russia considered by the US and NATO to be one of its main geopolitical adversaries.

This is so primarily because George Soros is one of the movers and shakers behind the movement. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2017-01-24   17:21:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: BTP Holdings (#2)

Russia considered by the US and NATO to be one of its main geopolitical adversaries.

This is so primarily because George Soros is one of the movers and shakers behind the movement. ;)

SOROS ADMITS RESPONSIBILITY FOR COUP AND MASS MURDER IN UKRAINE

Kurt Nimmo | Infowars.com - MAY 27, 2014

Color revolution collaboration began soon after engineered fall of Soviet Union


George Soros, NATO, US Color Revolution Machine Behind Unrest In Macedonia

Brandon Turbeville | activistpost.com - MAY 21, 2015

George Soros, NATO, and the Western Color Revolution apparatus

GreyLmist  posted on  2017-01-25   6:23:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: GreyLmist (#8)

You hit the nail on the head. Sometimes we must realize that we have traitors in our midst. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2017-01-25   6:39:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: BTP Holdings (#9)

Sometimes we must realize that we have traitors in our midst. ;)

Yes indeed.

4um Title: Neutrality Act of 1794 [18 U.S.C. § 960] [Correction: 18 U.S.C. § 960]

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/960

GreyLmist  posted on  2017-11-17   10:05:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 17.

        There are no replies to Comment # 17.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 17.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest