Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Ron Paul
See other Ron Paul Articles

Title: WikiLeaks: ‘Destabilization Campaign’ Responsible for Flynn Resignation Online publishing organization points finger at intelligence community, Democrats and media
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/wikileaks-d ... onsible-for-flynn-resignation/
Published: Feb 15, 2017
Author: Mikael Thalen
Post Date: 2017-02-15 14:00:39 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 35
Comments: 3

A “destabilization campaign” by opponents of President Donald Trump is responsible for National Security Adviser Michael T. Flynn’s resignation, WikiLeaks alleged Tuesday.

The online publishing organization specifically blamed the intelligence community, the Democratic Party and the media in a tweet surrounding the incident.

“Trump’s National Security Advisor Michael Flynn resigns after destabilization campaign by US spies, Democrats, press,” WikiLeaks stated.

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, called the back-and-forth between the Trump White House and U.S. intelligence Wednesday a “battle for dominance.”

“Amazing battle for dominance is playing out between the elected US govt & the IC who consider themselves to be the permanent government,” he said.

Flynn announced his resignation Monday after reports indicated he misled Vice President Mike Pence and other administration officials on the details of a December phone call with Sergey Kislyak, Russia’s ambassador to the United States. Flynn had originally denied discussing sanctions, imposed by the Obama administration over allegations of election-related hacking, but a spokesman for Flynn later stated that he “couldn’t be certain that the topic never came up.”

“Unfortunately, because of the fast pace of events, I inadvertently briefed the Vice President Elect and others with incomplete information regarding my phone calls with the Russian ambassador,” Flynn wrote in his resignation letter. “I have sincerely apologized to the President and the Vice President, and they have accepted my apology.”

Information on the phone call became available to journalists at the New York Times and the Washington Post due to leaks from former and current U.S. government officials.

The leaks included a description by intelligence officials of the conversation thanks to an FBI wiretap of Kislyak’s phone. Other leaks revealed F.B.I. agents interviewed Flynn about the call just days into Trump’s presidency and believed he was “not entirely forthcoming.”

In an interview with the Daily Caller released Tuesday, Flynn admitted to discussing the 35 expelled Russian diplomats during the call but denied more specific mention was made of sanctions.

“It was basically, ‘Look, I know this happened. We’ll review everything.,’” Flynn stated. “I never said anything such as, ‘We’re going to review sanctions,’ or anything like that.”

Flynn also expressed concern over the leaks themselves, labeling the actions a “criminal act.”

“You call them leaks. It’s a criminal act. This is a crime. It’s not just a wink and a nod,” Flynn said.

Trump similarly condemned the leaks Tuesday, asking why so many “illegal leaks” were emanating from Washington D.C.

Wikileaks later shared an article from the Intercept’s Glenn Greenwald that argued in favor of the leaks despite their illegality.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

I guess it's bad when Podesta's emails are leaked, but good when Flynn's phone conversations are leaked.

I remember Napolitano saying the NSA was behind the hacking and leaks of Podesta's emails, saying they didn't want Clinton in office, but I think he was mistaken as the NSA appears to not like Trump at all. But maybe the NSA has a lot of internal devisions going on.

Pinguinite  posted on  2017-02-15   15:42:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Pinguinite (#1)

I guess it's bad when Podesta's emails are leaked, but good when Flynn's phone conversations are leaked.

Yeah,it is. Podesta was committing federal crimes,and Flynn was doing nothing every other nominee before him in his position had done.

I am unsure if the intel pros that have been at it for decades can even be punished because they know so much under the table crap that they can threaten to talk if they don't get shot time in a club fed with a golf course.

The media,on the other hand,can be destroyed. All it takes is for a president to have the stones to bar the guilty reporters and the agencies they work for from getting passes to any and all official government briefings. Not having access will kill their market share because they will have nothing to report to attract more subscribers and keep the ones they already have. Which means advertisers will drop ad buys from the that media outlet.

I may be wrong,but I suspect Trump is entirely capable of leaving them sitting on the WH porch and hoping someone will tell them something as they leave a press conference or briefing.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-02-15   16:55:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Ada (#0)

Flynn announced his resignation Monday after reports indicated he misled Vice President [Elect?] Mike Pence and other administration officials [who were also not yet Trump admins and neither was Flynn?] on the details of a [unofficial?] December phone call [prior to the Inauguration] with Sergey Kislyak, Russia’s ambassador to the United States.

“Unfortunately, because of the fast pace of events, I inadvertently briefed the Vice President Elect and others with incomplete information regarding my phone calls with the Russian ambassador,” Flynn wrote in his resignation letter.

Information on the [non-government employee] phone call became available to journalists at the New York Times and the Washington Post due to leaks from former and current U.S. government officials.

The leaks included a description by intelligence officials of the conversation thanks to an FBI wiretap of Kislyak’s phone. Other leaks revealed F.B.I. agents interviewed Flynn about the call just days into Trump’s presidency and believed he was “not entirely forthcoming.” [About what in their transcription that they weren't in a rush to talk with him about sooner? And on what grounds was the F.B.I. wiretapping the Russian Ambassador?]

In an interview with the Daily Caller released Tuesday, Flynn admitted to discussing the 35 expelled Russian diplomats during the call but denied more specific mention was made of sanctions.

“It was basically, ‘Look, I know this happened. We’ll review everything.,’” Flynn stated. “I never said anything such as, ‘We’re going to review sanctions,’ or anything like that.”

Cui Bono? Dem and RINO Discordians? No, not really -- unless maybe they're working for George Soros and company. Intel looks erratic, the dishonest media more unreliable, Pence nearly hyperbolic or worse: sly. America sure doesn't benefit from this non-sensical fracas about a dismissive reply from a civilian citizen, politely deferring an inquiry of concern until the next administration could review it.

Obama Secretly DESTROYS Trump's Top General - YouTube, 6.5 mins.

Published on Feb 15, 2017 by Insurgency Broadcast Network

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2017-02-17   11:17:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest