Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

World News
See other World News Articles

Title: Lavrov Calls Out USA/NATO’s Role in Afghanistan Drug Trafficking
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://engforum.pravda.ru/index.php ... -afghanistan-drug-trafficking/
Published: Mar 28, 2017
Author: Started by Mario Milano
Post Date: 2017-03-28 00:26:25 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 34

PMF... Russia’s Foreign Minister says that NATO tolerates drug trafficking in Afghanistan — which continues to fund extremism in the region

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov always finds the most diplomatic ways to point out Washington’s innumerable international crimes.

During a discussion with Russian military officers last week in Moscow, Lavrov pointed to Afghanistan as an example of Washington’s longstanding policy of “managed chaos” in the Middle East. In the process, he also blew the whistle on NATO’s extremely high tolerance for drug trafficking:

The US operation against the Taliban and al-Qaeda was supported by all countries. It’s another matter that after receiving the international approval, the United States and its NATO allies, which took over in Afghanistan, started acting rather inconsistently, to put it mildly. During their operation in Afghanistan, the terrorist threat has not been rooted out, while the drug threat has increased many times over.

The drug industry prospered. There is factual evidence that some of the NATO contingents in Afghanistan turned a blind eye to the illegal drug trafficking, even if they were not directly involved in these criminal schemes. Afghanistan is a separate case, although the current developments there, which are a result of the NATO operation’s failure, despite the carte blanche the bloc received from the international community, can be considered an unintended cause of managed chaos. In Iraq, Syria and Libya, this chaos was created intentionally.

Lavrov is being too gentle.

As Wired magazine reported back in 2013, current U.S. policy in Afghanistan is to allow poppy fields to grow — and prevent Afghan forces from destroying them. You can’t make this stuff up:

[U.S. soldiers are] not allowed to actually step foot in [the Afghan farmer’s] many acres of poppy fields or damage the fields in any way.

They can’t even threaten to destroy the fields or send in Afghan troops to burn, plow under or poison the delicate, pastel-colored flowers.

Nor can they discourage poppy farmers, however gently, from growing their illicit crop, which is hardier and commands a higher price than alternatives such as wheat. Poppy cultivation has been illegal in Afghanistan since 2001 but still represents a full quarter of the country’s gross domestic product and a major source of revenue for the Taliban, to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars a year. Many of the middlemen who buy up raw poppy paste for onward sale to heroin-producers hail from the insurgent group.

Watch Lavrov “diplomatically” blow the whistle on this insane racket

uprootedpale...ug-trafficking/

Edited by Mario Milano

Worlds biggest heroin dealer the Zionist controlled US Gov, Pentagram and CIA want their heroin to keep flooding the world indefinitely


U.S. General: 5,000 More Troops Needed For Afghanistan

Posted by Aaron Nelson | Mar 27, 2017 |

U.S. General: 5,000 More Troops Needed For Afghanistan Insists Troops Needed to ‘Break Stalemate’

Article via Antiwar

It’s been reported for over a month that Gen. John Nicholson, the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan, wants more troops for the 16 year war. Over the weekend, however, he’s offered more details about the size he envisions for this new force.

Gen. Nicholson now says he wants another 5,000 US and NATO troops, saying he believes the US needs that many to “break the stalemate” in the war. Nicholson has repeatedly labeled the conflict a “stalemate” in recent weeks, which appears to be an overestimation of the situation, with the Taliban continuing to gain ground against Afghan security forces.

The US has repeatedly run into this problem in Afghanistan, with the government’s forces unable to stand up to the Taliban by themselves, and NATO growing weary of continuing to prop them up. This has led to escalations and deescalation for years, constantly trying to save the Afghan government from outright defeat.

Nicholson argued that because 9/11 involved Afghanistan, a loss in the country would embolden terrorists globally. At the same time, throwing an addition 5,000 “US and NATO troops,” which would likely end up being almost exclusively US troops, at the war 16 years later doesn’t seem like it’s going to resolve the conflict, but rather just extend it once again.

wearechange....(We Are Change)

Edited by Mario Milano


Poster Comment:

Nicholson argued that because 9/11 involved Afghanistan...

9/11 involved Israel, not Afghanistan. 9/11 false flag was organized by Israeli agents to get US to attack Afghanistan where Arabs were allowed to train in house-to-house combat to evict Israeli thieves from Palestine (which is only practical way to end Zionist warmongering).

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread