Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Activism
See other Activism Articles

Title: Texas gun-owners action alert! Constitutional carry gun law at stake this session!!
Source: none
URL Source: http://none
Published: May 9, 2017
Author: X-15
Post Date: 2017-05-09 12:16:46 by X-15
Ping List: *Shooters*     Subscribe to *Shooters*
Keywords: Texas
Views: 683
Comments: 15

HB1911 (House Bill 1911) would put Texas in the group of 13 states that already have constitutional gun carry laws: Vermont, Montana, Alaska, Arizona, Wyoming, Arkansas, Kansas, West Virginia, Idaho, Mississippi, Missouri (2017), New Hampshire (2017), and North Dakota (2017).

Rep. Todd Hunter (NRA 'A' grade) heads the Calendars Committee where HB1911 is bottled-up today. His office: 512-463-0490

Today is the last day for the Calendars Committee to release the bill to be voted on this session. Remember, Texas legislature only meets every two years.

SB16 has already passed this session and is headed to Governor Abbott's desk to be signed into law. Concealed carry license will now only cost Texans $40 for 5 years and $40 for renewal.

Please call Rep. Todd Hunter: 512-463-0490Subscribe to *Shooters*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 12.

#1. To: X-15 (#0)

Texas / 2nd Amendment bump ..

HAPPY2BME-4UM  posted on  2017-05-09   12:19:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: HAPPY2BME-4UM, Lod (#1)

I made a few more phone calls - Rep. Schaefer from Tyler: his office in Austin told me that HB1911 was, sadly, virtually Dead On Arrival this session.

The talk from the rest of the legislature about it passing was pablum to pacify the masses. We've been CONNED by the RINO's who never wanted constitutional carry legislation. The shit flows downhill from kike House Speaker (((Straus))).

X-15  posted on  2017-05-12   10:59:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: X-15, Happ, shooters, 4 (#10)

good site re: unconstitutional "laws"

www.ourrepubliconline.com/Topic/27

Lod  posted on  2017-05-12   11:34:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Lod (#11)

Thank you, great wealth of knowledge right there:

“Clearly, a federal law which is contrary to the Constitution is no law at all; it is null, void, invalid. And a Supreme Court decision, which is not a ‘law,’ has no ‘supremacy’—even if it is faithfully interpreting the Constitution. So it is the height of absurdity to claim that a Supreme Court decision that manifestly violates the Constitution is the ‘supreme law of the land.’” (William Jasper)

X-15  posted on  2017-05-12   11:47:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 12.

        There are no replies to Comment # 12.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 12.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest