Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Why They Are After Trump…Revisited
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://lewrockwell.com/2017/06/bio ... uito/why-they-are-after-trump/
Published: Jun 20, 2017
Author: Bionic Mosquito
Post Date: 2017-06-20 10:26:58 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 459
Comments: 8

For several months, I have felt that the Trump=Russia witch hunt was a diversion. Sure, they want Trump out, but not for the stated reason – not for Russia. They want Trump out because what he represents is a voice for people who are tired of seeing every libertine, immoral, property rights and wealth destroying progressive platform agenda shoved down their throats. Trump ran against almost every plank of this life-destroying force.

I wrote on this topic in March; from the conclusion:

Russia is a diversion; it is useful as a means to an end. It isn’t the end. The end is the salvation of the many pillars of the progressive agenda; the end is the final destruction of western, classical liberal, civilization.

Don’t expect me to explain it as well as Judge Napolitano can and has; I have listened to and read several commentators on the topic of the special prosecutor, Comey’s testimony, etc. I can only offer a semi-ignorant layman’s summary.

A special prosecutor was appointed with no crime to prosecute; with no crime to prosecute, you have a dozen of the most aggressive, capable attorneys looking for something…anything. Show me the man and I will show you the crime.

The narrative is shifting, from collusion to obstruction. Without a crime for the special prosecutor to prosecute, why not?

They ignore the overwhelming evidence of the Clinton crimes, former Attorney General Lynch and her visit with Bill, even the leaking admitted to by Comey.

But the special prosecutor is looking for a Trump crime. And the collusion with Russia – after one year – is a narrative with no story.

They want Trump out because they want their progressive, cultural destroying agenda to crush us all.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0) (Edited)

For several months, I have felt that the Trump=Russia witch hunt was a diversion. Sure, they want Trump out, but not for the stated reason – not for Russia. They want Trump out because what he represents is a voice for people who are tired of seeing every libertine, immoral, property rights and wealth destroying progressive platform agenda shoved down their throats. Trump ran against almost every plank of this life-destroying force.

I wrote on this topic in March; from the conclusion:

Russia is a diversion; it is useful as a means to an end. It isn’t the end. The end is the salvation of the many pillars of the progressive agenda; the end is the final destruction of western, classical liberal, civilization.

Don’t expect me to explain it as well as Judge Napolitano can and has;


RUSH: We're Not That Far From A CIVIL WAR! - YouTube, 5 minutes

Published on Feb 10, 2017 by DailyRushbo


Founding Oathkeeper Says Civil War Is Imminent - YouTube, 4.25 minutes [Leftist-linguistics warning]

Published on Jun 10, 2017 by The Alex Jones Channel

One of the founding members of Oathkeepers claims that the way things are going that there will be civil war in America. Not if but when!

@ 2:55, Interviewer: "Alright, anything else you want to add?" Answer: "All your base are belong to us."

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2017-06-20   12:59:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: GreyLmist (#1)

It's almost as if these "opinion leaders" want a civil war. Hegelian dialectic at your service - thesis (problem, violent anti-speech leftists), antithesis (reaction, violent reactionary alt-right), transcendence (solution, civil war fears drive martial law crackdown).

Where has this been done before?... Hmmm...

spirit  posted on  2017-06-20   17:34:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: spirit (#2) (Edited)

It's almost as if these "opinion leaders" want a civil war. Hegelian dialectic at your service - thesis (problem, violent anti-speech leftists), antithesis (reaction, violent reactionary alt-right), transcendence (solution, civil war fears drive martial law crackdown).

Where has this been done before?... Hmmm...

Answer your own question for us, please. Your paragraph 1 assessment tells me nothing of who said what in either video posted that prompted it. Rush Limbaugh clearly stated that he wasn't speaking of armed conflict and asked at the end how the situation gets resolved. Answer that question also -- or do you fear martial law to the extent that you'd auto-refuse a fair hearing for any non-Leftist speakers on this subject? Do you see common ground somewhere and, if so, where exactly?

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2017-06-23   13:52:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: GreyLmist (#3)

Germany in the '30s.

A disclaimer has little effect on the perception created by the use of the term "Civil War".

spirit  posted on  2017-06-26   19:43:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: spirit (#2)

Hegelian dialectic at your service - thesis (problem, violent anti-speech leftists), antithesis (reaction, violent reactionary alt-right), transcendence (solution, civil war fears drive martial law crackdown).

In Germany between the wars, the Communists tried to overthrow the Weimar government.

Heinrich Mueller was a Bavarian policeman and he became familiar with the tactics of the Communists.

His experience in Bavaria caused him to be very precise in his dealings with the Communists during WW II. His specialty was Soviet Counter-espionage.

He escaped to Switzerland at the end of the war. I have the "Gestapo Chief" series of books here. Written by Gregory Douglas.

Mueller during his interview with the U.S. agent was asked about Hitler. His reply was, "Maybe the Russians can go to Barcelona and ask Franco about him. They might end up buried in an orange grove. And if you went there, you might end up in the next orange grove over."

Mueller was brought from Switzerland to the U.S. in 1946 and given a rank of Major in the U.S. Army. And he played the piano for Harry Truman.

If you want to know more, get copies of the books for yourself. There are three of them. And the cover photo of Vol. 3 shows Mueller as an old man on a hunting trip. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2017-06-26   21:54:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: spirit (#4) (Edited)

spirit: It's almost as if these "opinion leaders" want a civil war. Hegelian dialectic at your service - thesis (problem, violent anti-speech leftists), antithesis (reaction, violent reactionary alt-right), transcendence (solution, civil war fears drive martial law crackdown).

Where has this been done before?... Hmmm...


Me: Answer your own question for us, please. Your paragraph 1 assessment tells me nothing of who said what in either video posted that prompted it. Rush Limbaugh clearly stated that he wasn't speaking of armed conflict and asked at the end how the situation gets resolved. Answer that question also -- or do you fear martial law to the extent that you'd auto-refuse a fair hearing for any non-Leftist speakers on this subject? Do you see common ground somewhere and, if so, where exactly?


spirit: Germany in the '30s.

A disclaimer has little effect on the perception created by the use of the term "Civil War".


Not a good move, imo, to have gone from a somewhat Orwellian-sounding snowflake to Gestapo-esque. If you are that "triggered" by any use of the term "Civil War" in Conservative expressions of concern for America about it, your "alt-right" terminology is also baseless as nothing other than a derisive euphemism for Non-Leftists. Your avoidance of the questions asked tells me that you have no answers and, like the Commiecrats, aren't really oriented to reaching common ground with the Right for purposes of resolution -- just surrenderings of it by parties of the Right to parties of the Left. So, I'll tell you where the one common ground of all Americans really is -- right where it's been for centuries: our Constitution. And that's why the Commiecrats of our times almost never want to find a path of conversion to it except to obliterate it.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2017-06-27   14:58:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: GreyLmist (#6)

Alt-right is a well understood term among those who are keeping up with the political discourse.

I am a natural law constitutional republican.

You appear to be having a conversation inside your own head. I will leave you to it.

spirit  posted on  2017-06-27   15:53:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: spirit (#7) (Edited)

Alt-right is a well understood term among those who are keeping up with the political discourse.

Sounds like you're saying that you can't writely define it understandably because you haven't kept up with the political discourse about it but prefer to use it as an ad hominem innuendo, rather than to differentiate between Constitution-allegiant Republican Conservatives and the RINOs who are Republican In Name Only.

I am a natural law constitutional republican.

Sez lots of RINOs but their actions speak louder otherwise.

You appear to be having a conversation inside your own head. I will leave you to it.

Spoken like a RINO-DINO Swamp dweller but I'm not Dr. Dolittle or so conversational as St. Francis of Assisi either. No time left for your auotocraticness right now. On my way to better things, such as this Alt-Market.com 4um post.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2017-06-28   7:15:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest