Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Why They Are After Trump…Revisited
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://lewrockwell.com/2017/06/bio ... uito/why-they-are-after-trump/
Published: Jun 20, 2017
Author: Bionic Mosquito
Post Date: 2017-06-20 10:26:58 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 466
Comments: 8

For several months, I have felt that the Trump=Russia witch hunt was a diversion. Sure, they want Trump out, but not for the stated reason – not for Russia. They want Trump out because what he represents is a voice for people who are tired of seeing every libertine, immoral, property rights and wealth destroying progressive platform agenda shoved down their throats. Trump ran against almost every plank of this life-destroying force.

I wrote on this topic in March; from the conclusion:

Russia is a diversion; it is useful as a means to an end. It isn’t the end. The end is the salvation of the many pillars of the progressive agenda; the end is the final destruction of western, classical liberal, civilization.

Don’t expect me to explain it as well as Judge Napolitano can and has; I have listened to and read several commentators on the topic of the special prosecutor, Comey’s testimony, etc. I can only offer a semi-ignorant layman’s summary.

A special prosecutor was appointed with no crime to prosecute; with no crime to prosecute, you have a dozen of the most aggressive, capable attorneys looking for something…anything. Show me the man and I will show you the crime.

The narrative is shifting, from collusion to obstruction. Without a crime for the special prosecutor to prosecute, why not?

They ignore the overwhelming evidence of the Clinton crimes, former Attorney General Lynch and her visit with Bill, even the leaking admitted to by Comey.

But the special prosecutor is looking for a Trump crime. And the collusion with Russia – after one year – is a narrative with no story.

They want Trump out because they want their progressive, cultural destroying agenda to crush us all.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.

#1. To: Ada (#0) (Edited)

For several months, I have felt that the Trump=Russia witch hunt was a diversion. Sure, they want Trump out, but not for the stated reason – not for Russia. They want Trump out because what he represents is a voice for people who are tired of seeing every libertine, immoral, property rights and wealth destroying progressive platform agenda shoved down their throats. Trump ran against almost every plank of this life-destroying force.

I wrote on this topic in March; from the conclusion:

Russia is a diversion; it is useful as a means to an end. It isn’t the end. The end is the salvation of the many pillars of the progressive agenda; the end is the final destruction of western, classical liberal, civilization.

Don’t expect me to explain it as well as Judge Napolitano can and has;


RUSH: We're Not That Far From A CIVIL WAR! - YouTube, 5 minutes

Published on Feb 10, 2017 by DailyRushbo


Founding Oathkeeper Says Civil War Is Imminent - YouTube, 4.25 minutes [Leftist-linguistics warning]

Published on Jun 10, 2017 by The Alex Jones Channel

One of the founding members of Oathkeepers claims that the way things are going that there will be civil war in America. Not if but when!

@ 2:55, Interviewer: "Alright, anything else you want to add?" Answer: "All your base are belong to us."

GreyLmist  posted on  2017-06-20   12:59:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: GreyLmist (#1)

It's almost as if these "opinion leaders" want a civil war. Hegelian dialectic at your service - thesis (problem, violent anti-speech leftists), antithesis (reaction, violent reactionary alt-right), transcendence (solution, civil war fears drive martial law crackdown).

Where has this been done before?... Hmmm...

spirit  posted on  2017-06-20   17:34:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: spirit (#2) (Edited)

It's almost as if these "opinion leaders" want a civil war. Hegelian dialectic at your service - thesis (problem, violent anti-speech leftists), antithesis (reaction, violent reactionary alt-right), transcendence (solution, civil war fears drive martial law crackdown).

Where has this been done before?... Hmmm...

Answer your own question for us, please. Your paragraph 1 assessment tells me nothing of who said what in either video posted that prompted it. Rush Limbaugh clearly stated that he wasn't speaking of armed conflict and asked at the end how the situation gets resolved. Answer that question also -- or do you fear martial law to the extent that you'd auto-refuse a fair hearing for any non-Leftist speakers on this subject? Do you see common ground somewhere and, if so, where exactly?

GreyLmist  posted on  2017-06-23   13:52:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: GreyLmist (#3)

Germany in the '30s.

A disclaimer has little effect on the perception created by the use of the term "Civil War".

spirit  posted on  2017-06-26   19:43:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 4.

#6. To: spirit (#4) (Edited)

spirit: It's almost as if these "opinion leaders" want a civil war. Hegelian dialectic at your service - thesis (problem, violent anti-speech leftists), antithesis (reaction, violent reactionary alt-right), transcendence (solution, civil war fears drive martial law crackdown).

Where has this been done before?... Hmmm...


Me: Answer your own question for us, please. Your paragraph 1 assessment tells me nothing of who said what in either video posted that prompted it. Rush Limbaugh clearly stated that he wasn't speaking of armed conflict and asked at the end how the situation gets resolved. Answer that question also -- or do you fear martial law to the extent that you'd auto-refuse a fair hearing for any non-Leftist speakers on this subject? Do you see common ground somewhere and, if so, where exactly?


spirit: Germany in the '30s.

A disclaimer has little effect on the perception created by the use of the term "Civil War".


Not a good move, imo, to have gone from a somewhat Orwellian-sounding snowflake to Gestapo-esque. If you are that "triggered" by any use of the term "Civil War" in Conservative expressions of concern for America about it, your "alt-right" terminology is also baseless as nothing other than a derisive euphemism for Non-Leftists. Your avoidance of the questions asked tells me that you have no answers and, like the Commiecrats, aren't really oriented to reaching common ground with the Right for purposes of resolution -- just surrenderings of it by parties of the Right to parties of the Left. So, I'll tell you where the one common ground of all Americans really is -- right where it's been for centuries: our Constitution. And that's why the Commiecrats of our times almost never want to find a path of conversion to it except to obliterate it.

GreyLmist  posted on  2017-06-27 14:58:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest